About ten years ago, gonzo overtook features to rule the XXX roost. Companies such as Anabolic became powerful so people could watch 18-year old girls getting double-penetrated, double-analed, gangbanged, etc.
In the last three years, you’ve seen the rise of five companies — Naughty America, Brazzers, Icey Porn, Bang Bros, and Matrix Content. Each company has at least 15 websites. They are desperate for content because they want to update each site every week.
The business is great for male performers who are in their twenties, look good, and can act. None of these sites care about double-anal and destroying some young girl. They want to know if you can be a pool boy for My Friend’s Hot Mom. Can you do Sex Pro Adventures? Big Tit Patrol? There’s less demand for the Brandon Iron-type (degrading) porn.
The wave of the future for male performers is less John Strong and more Jack Venice. It’s not Mark Wood as much as Charles Dera, James Deen, Johnny Sinn and Alan Stafford.
Four years ago, LA Direct Models had 90 girls. Spiegler had about 30. World Modeling had about 50. And then there were a bunch of small agencies.
With internet companies desperate for updates and not wanting to shoot the same girl over and over, the agencies are taking on more girls (because they’ll make about $200 per girl per scene).
There’s a massive infusion of new girls. LA Direct has 121 girls now. Gold Star has 102. Foxxx has 50. Exotic Star has 40. Lisa Ann has 40. Spiegler has 30. You’ve tripled the number of girls in the business. As porn becomes more accepted, more girls will get in. MySpace has revolutionzed porn because it is so easy to get girls off MySpace.
If you’ve been in porn longer than a year, the Vanessa Lanes, Brooke Havens, Trina Michaels, Tyler Wynns have two options — do more extreme porn or escort.
Well I guess there is something to be said for that? What I never understood was why “anal” was so much in demand and why the industry had to revolve around degrading and humiliating women so much? sure I know Luke reckons that degradation is part of our sexuality and I don’t know that there is not some truth to this. However seeing people in pain or causing undue distress or humiliation hardly seems natural or good.
I do not see all sex as degrading, I disagree with Luke on that. The issue is that most people who are not full time porn fans want to see fun sex, not sexual snuff films. And the market goes into that direction. But even Bang Bros have some degrading content.
Oh about Myspace, I believe sometime Rupert Murdoch pressured by his evangelical friends will take action on the porn Myspace pimping issue. He and Rick Warren (his supposed pastor) has taken a lot of heat for News Corp role in porn.
..is it true that Rev. Warren was caught blowing a tranny in parked car?
Big Lee
more girls, less quality,
Its all about Buster Good.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, of course, but I don’t agree that the stuff I shoot is degrading. I shoot a variety of content for 3 websites: http://www.loadmymouth.com, http://www.covermyface.com, and http://www.spermcocktail.com. It may not be to everyone’s tastes but to generalize all the content as degrading is simply not true.
I do work for some sites such as http://www.fuckedandbound.com and http://www.sexandsubmission.com where being dominant is required. I’m fine with that. So are most of the women I am paired with.
There has never been as much production as there is today and there is room for everyone. Guys in their 20s will always be in demand just as girls 18-25 will be, too.
We should all be happy to have as many opportunities to there are today.
The only time I don’t like porn is when the woman doesn’t appear to enjoy it. I’ve seen S&S that were hot though it is a domination site because the woman is completely into it. On the other hand, I’ve seen simply B/G scenes where you can see the utter disgust and contempt on a woman face. Sluts enjoying what they do is my main criteria for good porn.
Brandon- admit it, your a big prick.
What you do most certainly does degrade women. I have seen you in some pretty awful shit. You are a danger to women in general but you know very well that if it was not for this porn gig you would have no place to hide.
Because of your insecurities and small stature you couldn’t handle a real woman.
So try your best to make money by degrading women. Your days of doing this are numbered
Thanks, Martin.
OK, I will admit it…you’re a big prick.
I might well be a big prick? But at least I am not degrading women and causing them all sorts of harm for money while daring to say it is ok.
No its not ok – its just legal and you are free to do this as long as there are vulnerable and disadvantaged women to exploit.
What you do has no finesse or nobility but thats ok too just dont try pretend its something that it is is clearly not.
Just look at the names of the websites you listed and yo can see its all about degrading women.
Another reason you would never be able to get big name pornstars/pornworkers like Lucy Lee Michelle Maylene or Slyvia Saint to work with you.
I seen your throat gaggers stuff and you were just mean and mysoginist like you were really gay or something [nothing wrong with that (being gay) if thats what makes your boat float.
Just it strikes me that you might as well be more honest about you being gay and loathing women the way you clearly do.
Martin, I don’t know you and you are entitled to your opinions, however misguided they may be. At least we both agree that what I do is legal. Unless and until you are appointed porn czar of the United States or the arbiter of good taste, I will just have to politely disagree with you and continue doing my best to create the kind of entertainment that many people enjoy.
I couldn’t agree with you more that what I do has no finesse nor nobility. I never claimed it did and I am certainly not alone in my succesful pursuit of mediocrity.
The names of my websites are no more or less offensive or degrading than the vast majority of what is available on the internet. While http://www.loadmymouth.com, http://www.spermcocktail.com, and http://www.covermyface.com may offend you, I suggest that you look elsewhere for something you would find more to your taste.
You listed the names of 3 beautiful women: Lucy Lee. Sorry, but I did work with her for Metro. Great performer. Michelle Maylene. Never worked with her. Sylvia Saint. I did a magazine layout with her. Great woman and it was nice to catch up with her last time I saw her in Barcelona in 2005.
As for your interpretation of the scenes in Throat Gaggers, I enjoy performing in those types of scenes and the title is pretty self-explanatory. I am not sure what you were expecting to see but, again, the content is not that much different than, say, Face Fucking Inc. by Joey Silvera. Your selective criticism kind of loses steam and the performers hired to work in those movies are well-aware of what they are doing.
If you are so convinced that I loathe women, I would invite you to watch the 238 scenes that are up at http://www.loadmymouth.com and find anything other than interviews, blowjobs, some sex, and a lot of swallowing. Compared to some content out there, it’s passe. Many girls have done their first scene for me for that site. If you would like to see Sarah Ryder, who just did her first scene 2 days ago, go to the blog at http://www.brandoniron.com. She — and I — had a great time.
Hope that helps clarify where we both stand. In the nearly 10 years I’ve spent in this industry, I have found that you can never completely explain yourself to many people. They don’t want to hear what you have to say…and that’s fine. Like you said in your earlier post, my “days are numbered” so this will all be a moot point before long.
As loathe as I am to admit it, I agree with Brandon. I also think Martin should stop stalking Lucy Lee and go kill himself to make our lives better.
Martin = Sports Swami?