Mariah Milano Talks about Drug Use in Porn

Op/Ed by Mariah Milano

Ok what an story title right? It’s like opening a book you’re writing about cooking with "turn on the oven…"

But I’m writing about the other side of the issue on this one, not about the girls using. I’m writing about the directors and companies who continue to shoot girls who are notoriously fucked up strung out and drunks on set and off. Isn’t it actually illegal to shoot a video of someone if they are under the influence at the time that they signed their release? If it isn’t illegal it certainly voids that release. When you shoot for most companies now they not only have written releases they video you signing the release as well as have you make a statement verifying that you are not under the influence of any drugs including alcohol at the time of the recording and the signing.

Once again I bounce a big portion of the blame here on the agents who keep sending these girls to jobs when they know they are showing up to set really fucked up and putting other at risk if there are needles being used or whatever else high risk activity goes along with their addictions.

I know one girl who is my friend and whom I really like as a person but she is a total fucking wreck. Her life was pretty much destroyed at an early age by sexual abuse and she had a child as a result of a rape when she was 15. That child is now all fucked up at 15 years old and living on the streets. This girl has a lot to justify being fucked up all the time so she doesn’t have to deal with her tragedy of a life. She has breakdowns on sets and more often than not shows up totally fucked up yet she has one of the biggest names in the business. This one I know personally and know it to be a fact.

There are many other girls who are known drunks who are in the top 5 in the business. They show up slurring their words because they drank and took xanax which is as common in porn stars purse as condoms and lipstick. I am one who takes an occasional drink on set because I am terrified by dialogue. I can be naked in front of anyone but when it comes to dialogue I have absolutely no confidence at all. A few glasses of wine really helps me with that. You won’t see a video of me drunk though or incoherent ever.
My cam shows used to be a drunken exhibition because I was so insecure about the talking part. I’m being honest here and I think a lot of girls do the exact same thing. They get the jitters over the whole process and take a drink or 2 to calm down. I have no issue with it as long as you don’t get drunk and it shows on camera.

I would love for their to be intravenous drug testing with the AIM testing but it’ll never happen. I would love however for these companies to stand up for the quality of their product and refuse to shoot a girl who is too fucked up. Many of them do but I’m afraid not enough of them. And I honestly doubt that most would turn away a top name girl and send her home for being fucked up. I think they would just roll with it because they would be afraid to piss the girl off or maybe they can even get her to do some extras without paying for them.

I had a drug problem during the 7 years I took of from shooting movies. I own up to it and I don’t use meth any more and haven’t since 2003. It’s a vicious evil drug and I can honestly say it would have killed me if I wouldn’t have stopped using.    

I ran into a lot of porn people during my days as a tweaker and some are still active in the business and still tweakers which disgusts me that anyone would hire someone as tweaked out as these people are.

As fans what are your opinions on this? Do you care of girls are fucked up during scenes? Do you even notice? Which stars do you notice to be fucked up regularly? Inquiring minds want to know! 🙂

MariahXXX.net

115 thoughts on “Mariah Milano Talks about Drug Use in Porn

  1. I agree Mariah it’s not right. I’ve seen a couple of scenes like that. Don’t know names because I’m still trying to figure half of them out usually. But like you said it’s not right and to be honest just not that exciting to watch if a girl is fucked up and lolling around while some dude pounds away at her. If something like that occurs shouldn’t that technically be considered rape. I mean the girls probably not even really aware of it. Like you said though AIM needs to find a way to test for stuff like that. Pot is one thing other drugs are a whole bag of tricks worse. Alcohol wise though there should be a set limit on the set like 2 glasses of wine to 1 bottle of beer to 1 1/2 shots. Something to take the edge off without making a slosh out and slur words. Maybe it’s time for a change in whats been done and what will be done in comparison. I don’t know but your right it’s not sexy to watch someone who’s completely messed up. Maybe this idea will spread who knows. Thank you Mariah for the article.

  2. If someone has to take Alcohol and Benzos to do something, not only do they not want to do it, but they want to have as little memory of it as possible.

    I agree with Prae to extent, overly fucked up females are annoying in whatever setting, however product is product and I don’t really care. If I go to a restaurant and the cook was high on crack but the steak came out lovely I don’t care. Everyone lives their own lives and makes their own decisions.

    I don’t know what the point of drug testing would be. It’s not like they’re going to fly a commercial plane afterwards. I feel everyone in the U.S. has the right to fuck themselves up as much as they want, it’s part of their pursuit of happiness.

  3. jeremiahsteele says:

    “I can be naked in front of anyone but when it comes to dialogue I have absolutely no confidence at all. A few glasses of wine really helps me with that. You won’t see a video of me drunk though or incoherent ever.”

    Legally, a person is drunk if they consume 3 glasses of wine within an hour.

  4. praetorianknigh says:

    I agree Mariah it’s not right. I’ve seen a couple of scenes like that. Don’t know names because I’m still trying to figure half of them out usually. But like you said it’s not right and to be honest just not that exciting to watch if a girl is fucked up and lolling around while some dude pounds away at her. If something like that occurs shouldn’t technically be considered rape. I mean the girls probably not even really aware of it. Like you said though AIM needs to find a way to test for stuff like that. Pot is one thing other drugs are a whole bag of tricks worse. Alcohol wise though there should be a set limit on the set like 2 glasses of wine to 1 bottle of beer to 1 1/2 shots. Something to take the edge off without making a slosh out and slur words. Maybe it’s time for a change in whats been done and what will be done in comparison. I don’t know but your right it’s not sexy to watch someone who’s completely messed up. Maybe this idea will spread who knows. Thank you Mariah for the article.

  5. jeremiahsteele says:

    I guess the moral of the story is “Do what I say, not what I do”.

  6. joe truth says:

    Wow what a revelation. NOT… Firsts of all Prae you came up with
    “Alcohol wise though there should be a set limit on the set like 2 glasses of wine to 1 bottle of beer to 1 1/2 shots. Something to take the edge off without making a slosh out and slur words.”
    Who the fuck are you to decide this? Directors and producers are not responsible for what other adults do. Mariah what law school did you not graduate from? Yeah that’s what I thought. Please… The product we turn out here in jizz valley is watched for approx. 8 – 15 minutes till the viewer shoots his load. Then it is put away and not watched or thought about untill the next jerk off session. As far as your comment on you doing dialog… well that speaks for it self.

  7. sammyglick says:

    If Porn Valley ever did manage to totally take ‘drug use’ out of the industry, would there be anyone left to actually be in the thousands of releases made in a year?

    Likewise, as a few have already taken you to task for over your own drug abuse problems Mariah…wouldn’t you have made a handful of movies while still under the influence (but not yet struggling with a full on addiction problem)?

    Therefore, are you advocating you’d wished producers/agents back when you were a tweaker had pulled you aside before a shoot (which I’m betting you were really happy to have, so you could later score, unless the timeline is that you first quit porn…then got hooked on meth…then got off and decided to return to porn) and politely set you straight?

    If that’s the case, then are we not all adults and therefore can take care of ourselves. Likewise, if we agree we’re all adults and I’m NOT my brothers/sisters keeper, if a girl shows up on a set wasted…and they’re not sent home…then the adults on set all made a decision to just go on with life (living with the consequences of their decisions — as say, Devon and those producers did on the set of Devon Does Baja)?

  8. wait a minute guys…I never said I got drunk or fucked up to shoot a scene. I said I have had a couple glasses of wine throughout a shoot. There’s a big difference between that and being so fucked up you can’t stand up. Or so fucked up you start curing at everyone on set and spitting at the camera which I’ve seen. Or how about the set i was on waiting for another scene to finish and the girl was so fucked up that while she was fucking vaginally that she shit all over herself and the male talent?

    Also I quit shooting in December of 2000 and didn’t return to shooting until 2007. I tried meth for the first time in 2003 and for the last time in 2003 after an 8 month binge. I own my own mistakes and I also am the one who took the steps to stop using. I never used any drug other than alcohol on a set and can honestly say have never been drunk on set before. I admitted that there was a time when I was doing cam shows every day when I first started my site where I was drinking way too much. I don’t do that any more. I will have a glass or 2 of wine during a 1 or 2 hour cam show so Jeremiah your 3 glasses per hour comment isn’t relevant to me, but thanks.

    But one of the points I made here that hasn’t been addressed is the legality of a girl not in her right mind being permitted to sign legal documents and perform an act of sex which is something that is cleary stated in most written releases and all video taped releases.

  9. hey Joe Truth I never claimed to be an attorney or to even understand the law in any capacity. Furthermore, I post here and write these articles using the name that I am known for in this business. You can look me up and email me any time you wish.

    Can you say that about yourself? I don’t know anyone named Joe truth, so why don’t you post in the name you use in “Jizz Valley” and also since your infinite wisdom says who gives a fuck and it’s not on the director or producer to whether a girl is too fucked up to shoot or not. I think otherwise. I think that the more that girls are allowed to show up fucked up and shoot fucked up it continues the cycle and nothing will ever change. it’s like that old saying about the sins of the father…it continues through the generations until someone has the courage to step up and break the cycle. Joe, do you have that courage? lol

  10. sammyglick says:

    So now that Mariah’s Meth Timeline has been established — can you also answer the question, do you want MORE state/federal regulation in the adult industry as you’re proposing that producers/agents/directors and even fellow talent, report on each other’s activities (before, during and I suppose even after they leave the set). I’m no legal scholar either, but it seems you’re proposing wading into some serious issues regarding the right to privacy.

    Porn Valley isn’t your typical white/blue collar job that has actual legal ramifications when employees are intoxicated and/or the workplace is deemed to be unsafe because employers allow people to be intoxicated while on the clock. Again, I go back to the example of Devon Does Baja, in which it was widely alleged by the title star that she was sexually attacked on set (likewise, the producers flatly denied the charge). One can also go back to the ‘Classic Era’ in adult (the 70s) when there was untold tons of drug use, and who knows what else going on, and yet — there wasn’t a flood of people turning in their fellow performers for being morons wasted on coke/heroin/pills/alcohol et cetera.

    So unless someone is going to actually file charges (with OSHA or the local cops) the next time they see open drug use/extreme intoxication, then nothing related to such issues will ever be settled in this industry (as how will anyone else in Porn Valley be put on notice that such behavior and activities will not go unanswered in a court of law).

  11. brittanyblaze says:

    MY 2 CENTS,Everybody has a vice, whatever turns up the heat in a scene is their bizwax. Some girls i met here, that i looked at as a little bit of an addict, did some amazing shit while intoxicated that should never go unfilmed! So……legal,smeegal,hump like a beagle:)

  12. What I think Mariah wants addressed, and I don’t mean to put words in her mouth if I’ve misunderstood her, and no one seems to want to talk about, is the legality surrounding consent for intercourse. Can an intoxicated person legally give consent? (Not only consent for sex, but for said sex to be filmed.)

    I’m no legal expert, and I don’t know about porn contracts people sign with regards to intoxication so I honestly don’t know. Here’s the thing though, nobody cares (especially outside the industry). I mean that generally speaking and specifically speaking. Girls aren’t going to report it because they’ll lose money and job opportunities; no one will want to work with them if they burn their bridges. The men certainly aren’t going to report it. The male talent are getting paid and laid. The directors and producers have a product to put out. Do you really think porn wants to open itself up any more than it has to the general public. We only see what they want us to see for the most part. If you don’t care enough about yourself to not sell yourself for money, to not abuse substances that will kill you, to be exposed to countless STDs that harm your health, why should anyone else care?

    For the most part these girls are still viewed as prostitutes. Nobody cares if a prostitute is raped, robbed, or beaten. Right or wrong, that’s social hierarchy. You’re only as respectable as what you do.

    Now morally speaking, I personally think it is completely wrong to take advantage of someone under the influence regardless of if they say it’s OK or not, but that’s just me. I try to separate any rational/moral/humanistic thought when I’m thinking about porn though, because if I didn’t I wouldn’t be able to enjoy it. It ruins porn for me if I start thinking about all the sex for money, drug use, STDs, unprotected sex, the hundreds of scenes some girls do, abortions, prostitution, children born to porn parents, young girls having sex with really old guys, hot girls having sex with really ugly guys, etc. Which is why I treat porn like one of the posters above alluded to…as “entertainment” and nothing more.

  13. jeremiahsteele says:

    My 2 cents, Brittany,

    Excessive drug and/or alcohol use can be dangerous to oneself and others, personally and professionally, and, more importantly, it weakens the immune system, which makes you and everyone else more susceptible to various sicknesses and infections.

    Every vice has it’s price! And if you’re not in good health or too doped up on the set, everyone pays the price, inevitably. Worst of all, we pay the price without getting the benefit of the high.

    Two independent studies, one about the average life span of porn stars (in the U.S.), and the other about the average life span of rock stars (in the U.S. and Europe) both amazingly calculated about 39 years to be the average life expectancy in both fields. I’m not precisely sure how they got the numbers but interestingly they’re both about the same.

    The flame that burns twice as hard dies twice as fast. A lot of porn stars age fast and, for various reasons, don’t last.

  14. I actually the industry would do some kind of random drug testing..

    if you need drugs to do porn, ur in the wrong business.

    as a porn star, and a co worker is doing drugs, your putting my ass at risk .. and thats not fair..

  15. BigDickDaddy says:

    Brittany Blaze is funny. She is one of these girls that does porn strictly to charge more escorting . .period. She has only done a few shoots and being older, heavy and with bad skin has little hope moving up in the business.

    Instead of doing $100 dates she wants $300 an hour. Just look at the archives for websites like Redbook for past and current pricing.

    Girls in porn just to charge higher rates is one of the main reasons this business is going downhill fast.

    Yes I know its tough to consider anything that Lynn Lemay shoots as porn.

    Hopefully Lynn pays well . . . LMAO . .sorry couldnt help laughing while saying that!

  16. “Two independent studies, one about the average life span of porn stars (in the U.S.), and the other about the average life span of rock stars (in the U.S. and Europe) both amazingly calculated about 39 years to be the average life expectancy in both fields. I’m not precisely sure how they got the numbers but interestingly they’re both about the same.”

    Another fine example of why statistics are bullshit.

    How the fuck can anyone work out a life expectancy for porn whores when most of them are still alive and kicking?

    Even whores who started in the ’70s are still within the US average life expectancy.

    Of course many of the ones who’ve died will have died young, from stuff like drugs and suicide, when most of the people who’ve done porn are still pretty young. The ‘study’ I’ve seen included all the AIDS deaths in gay porn too – no wonder it was so low.

    This is a study that can’t be done for another 50 years or so, when a generation of porn people have snuffed it, from natural causes or otherwise.

  17. yeah that life expectancy is a little crazy.

    Brittany I don’t know you so I don’t know your situation but thinking that it’s ok for someone to put someone else’ health at risk is retarded. What if said someone’s vice is heroine and they shoot it up and have shared a needle? That shit still happens to this day even with free needles being handed out and all the info on it. I was told by a meth head that he and his wife share needles every time they use together and that they’ve shared with others more than once.
    I have never used a needle and I stuck to snorting it and smoked it at the end.

    But again, this is absolutely no different than what I wrote about a few months ago regarding male talent shooting their dicks before scenes. It’s a health issue as well.

    But yes, I do question several aspects of this from the legality of the releases that is signed or video taped to the health risks and then there’s the ethical question of the responsibilities of the producers and directors to allow these girls to ruine themselves.

  18. Sammy
    I forgot to address your question I’m sorry. I think that anything that is being done that harms the talent should be reported to someone.
    If girls are being filmed while they are fucked up and their releases aren’t valid and later on after they sober up guess what? They can come back and sue those directors for publishing that content without a legal release. Its a fact and therefore it is affecting far more than just the talent.
    I don’t believe in violating someone’s privacy but when it can affect the health of other people there can be exceptions. How much different is it than publishing test results from HIV and STD results? If you test dirty guess what? everyone gets an email that you are dirty until you verify and test clean. what’s the difference?

  19. jeremiahsteele says:

    You’re probably right. Kendall, but there is some truth to the stats, most likely. Plus, you’ve seen some porn girls age amazingly fast within say 6 months, a year, two years (etc)…

  20. Despite RAME’s best efforts, we don’t know the living status of a majority of porn workers. A significant portion could be dead.

    Bravo, Mariah! This issue is important. Hell, its the Rosetta Stone to slowing porn’s decline. Institute a NO DRUGS rule and the talent pool will decline. Decreased talent slows production Industry-wide. Production slows but profit margins may increase in the long run as distributors raise prices. The supply of sex workers is always pretty inelastic (you gotta be desperate or kinky to want to do porn). Its only upon increased profits that performer wages rise.

    Wanna get rid of the fly-by-night producers that increase competition while lowering quality? Strengthen Industry practices and protocols. Drugs would be a good place to build right on top of AIM testing.

  21. JohnnieMontecito says:

    IN my 13 years of shooting I remember shooting several women over extended periods of time. it always amazed me how it was like a time line from start to end. Started with real boobs looking cute and fresh. About 6 months in came the bolt on’s and the look getting tired but not used up. At about a year or a bit more she was needing a real makeup artist to make her look fresh again. I am sure you get the picture. Usually a bit before the bolt on cam the drinking and or the drugs. If the girl lives in one of the agent house it seems that could start with in days of starting in the business. All these girls do is work, shop and party for months on end.

    I look back at my friend Alexandra Quinn and look at her progression and how sad it was. I felt helpless trying to help her. So many of these women I think feel trapped but at the same time don’t understand how to crawl out or to save themselves due to lack of self esteem and being just to wasted to manage it.

    It takes a special kind of person to enter adult and never become an addict on the talent side.I have known a few and those women are the ones that had brains and used them to.

    As for the legality of shooting fucked up girls. I asked my attorney once about it. This was right after a women had shot with me and asked for her footage back. I gave it back to her I did not want to feel guilty about it. I was basically told from that day forward to put on camera they where of sound mind and body and 100% sober. I also would tell the agents to never send me a fucked up girl cause I was sending her back. I got sick of losing time and money from girls locking themselves in the bathroom. Or sleeping of there troubles. or just being hard to deal with.

    Mariah is absolutely right that this industry needs to care about it’s people and work with in the industry to clean up it’s act. Especially in economic times like this where every shoot is so tight on budget. Not just that but we as people need to treat those that need help in a better light and get them the help they need.

    Aim really should step up to the plate but they never will. For everything they claim to be they are still just as bad as the rest of the industry.

  22. brittanyblaze says:

    Ok 1 more cent, No Mariah putting money and saftey at risk is never ok! As for intoxicants i was on your side if it with, its ok to have a FEW glasses of wine before a set IF thats what takes for you to give the director what their wanting from you. My vice is I drink Redbull, if i drank 6 then broke some furniture or had a stroke thats gonna be a problem just like anything else. If MODERATION & Personal responsibility seem to be in order then its not voiding the release of why you’re there that day. But any illegal drugs no matter what they are can be a problem even without needles.
    If our sets are at risk of being invaded by the LA Health dept,or Cal/OSHA some day then the illegal drugs make us all look bad on set.We cant control everything around us but we can try to understand it.

  23. jeremiahsteele says:

    Some good points, Johnnie. Success need not be a form of suicide. The tragedy of accererated aging amongst the hapless fast-lane youth of porn means lowered immune systems, which means a fertile bed for opportunistic infections that all of us have to deal with or be wary of.

    Regarding our modern day cosmetic Frankenstein creations, I’ve read of or have talked to dudes who actually prefer fake tits to real ones, and I will never understand that. Assuming they’re not deflated flap jacks, missing from cancer or deformed, leave them alone! I think that’s part of what wrecks women, having foreign objects in their bodies. I don’t think the body reacts or favors it, too well. They don’t look or feel real 99 percent of the time, at least, and women lose their natural good looks and delicate femininity.

    Any good photographers who work with natural light, natural surroundings and the like (as well as fans of) should understand how big fake knockers stand out like a turban wearing Taliban terrorist in a Christian church.

    And what is it about men/trannies trying to look like women AND women trying to look like trannies? They’re both meeting in the middle and it sucks! I suggested to one female talent once not to get a boob job; that she looked fine as she was. She expressed utter contempt and hatred to me for having said that, said she’s gonna do it, did in fact, and now she has a couple of hard halved coconuts inside her chest where her soft medium-sized titties used to be and she looks more like a tranny than a female. I think the world has definitely lost it’s fucking mind! I remember reading a female talent expressing the same lament about another female talent for having “wrecked” herself, so I’m definitely not alone here.

    Keep in mind, ladies, if you have self-esteem issues, cosmetics never gets to the root of it, and neither does drinking or drugs. And when you stand ruined on the side-line, that won’t do anything for your self-esteem, either.

    Jenna Jameson, in her book expressed regret for having her boob job. We should admire her honesty, and girls who always looked up to her should heed and remember this. She also admitted to doing meth and other things.

    And Brittany, here we go again. You said “its ok to have a FEW glasses of wine before a set IF thats what takes for you to give the director what their wanting from you…” Having 3 glasses of wine within an hour means you’re legally drunk. If you really NEED to drink or do drugs before working maybe this job is not for you. I can accept maybe one or 1/2 a wine glass to loosen you up a little, but how many drinks do you need?

  24. brittanyblaze says:

    None,I dont drink at all on set i said Redbull. But i cant tell you how many is too much for someone else. I can deliver what im asked to do, and enjoy my work sober.

  25. Relax Everyone,
    There’s nothing wrong with having a few glasses of wine with a homemade cannibus cookie before filming.
    Stars’ need to be in a conscious state of euphoria while on the set so they can give the best performance possible. Do I really need to argue that weed rocks the libido?
    As for the hard drugs thats always problematic. It’s really up to the discretion of the director of what he/she would allow on set. Personally I prefer the organics.

  26. jeremiahsteele says:

    What did I just read? lol.

    “There’s nothing wrong with being legally drunk and stoned before filming. In fact it’s necessary to give the best performance possible”.

    “Illegal drugs are problematic but it’s up to the director as to whether s/he’ll allow illegal hardcore drugs on the set”.

    Wow.

    I’m gonna go smoke some weed now. Maybe I won’t feel as much of a stranger in a strange land…

  27. This article has gotten some really good feedback. I don’t agree with all of it of course but it’s an interesting read no doubt!

    I can’t remember the last shoot house I walked into that didn’t smell like weed lol I don’t smoke weed other than maybe a few times a year but don’t have issues with others who do as long as they aren’t those stuck stoners who can’t complete a sentence. Otherwise blaze that shit up! 🙂

    There is a Japanese saying “Steel cuts bone, Steel cuts flesh, Steel doesn’t cut steel.”

    If we were to watch out for our industry from the inside it would be a much healthier and fun career to have. I admit I wouldn’t want my daughter to tell me she was gonna be a porn star, but I do know that now I am here I am going to make the most of it on my own terms. When I see these young girls all fucked up and slurring their words in the makeup chair because they took too many xanax at 8am it makes me sick.
    The industry itself needs a conscience and as far as I can see it doesn’t have one. The mainstream industry does and it’s called the media. You fuck up and boom you’re fuck up is plastered all over TMZ or People or whatever. We don’t have that. People expect us to be molested drug addicted girls with severe daddy issues and for many of us it’s true. But does it have to continue? Isn’t there something we can do about it? Can’t we see a girl on set who is fucked up and refuse to shoot with her? I do it. I did it 3 months ago. It was either me or her and they sent her home. Drunk at 9am and talking about needing more coke is unacceptable but guess what, they would have shot her anyway.

  28. to the haters of mariah, mariah ranked 110 out of thousands of porn stars, past and present. not to shabby! oh, and i’m not trying to sound like a fanboy.

  29. thats according to freeones.com. sorry

  30. jeremiahsteele Says:

    “Illegal drugs are problematic but it’s up to the director as to whether s/he’ll allow illegal hardcore drugs on the set”.

    I said “hard drugs” can be problematic. Weed & Alcohol(though alcohol can always be a problem, if abused) are okay when used responsibly. There’s a big difference between a drug user and a drug abuser. Weed & Booze is okay on the the set if used for it’s purpose: Getting your mind into that uninhibited sex zone!

  31. jeremiahsteele says:

    “Our Lord finds our desires, not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.” – C.S. Lewis

  32. I hate Hobbits lol!
    Seriously though–everything in moderation.

  33. jeremiahsteele says:

    Hobbits are from the land of J.R.R. Tolkien, not C.S. Lewis (“The Lion, Witch and Wardrobe”, first book of what was later called the “Chronicles of Narnia”), although Tolkien and Lewis were close friends.

    Another piece of trivia: Lewis, Aldous Huxley and JFK all died on the same day: 11/22/63

    I’m going to return now to middle earth and continue my studies…

  34. Mariah’s # 1 in my book. Look at that photo–unbelievable! If I sound like a fanboy, I don’t care.

  35. thanks Kraven lol

    I think this discussion has run it’s course as the rep0lies seem to be dwindling and all that’s left are quotes from fairy tale books and my own contribution of a Japanese sword saying. lol

  36. Thank you. I’m new to this site and I enjoyed your post.

  37. jeremiahsteele says:

    I don’t know what fairy tale books you’ve been reading that reference sex and booze, Mariah. The above quote is from one of Lewis’ theologian essays. Maybe you mean “fairy tail”, as in gay guy wearing a tutu?

  38. sammyglick says:

    “The industry itself needs a conscience and as far as I can see it doesn’t have one.”

    Mariah, Isn’t that what LIB and other porn related message boards are for?

    “The mainstream industry does and it’s called the media.”

    Mariah, The Media is journalism no matter who/what they are reporting on.

    “You fuck up and boom you’re fuck up is plastered all over TMZ or People or whatever. We don’t have that.”

    Again, it’s called LIB and other porn industry message boards…it’s no rocket science as to who in porn are major fuckups (as you yourself said as much). It’s just that no one has the guts to out them.

    The problem lies in how there are few, if any, real consequences to the talent’s actions be it mainstream or porn. Case in point, Britney Spears and Lindsay Lohan didn’t exactly get kicked out of Hollywood for their drug-related nonsense (and Paris Hilton has made a CAREER out of being a coke-head idiot in both mainstream and porn). Sure, Lindsay might lose a few acting jobs and Britney is laughed at for a year or so — but when you get paid MILLIONS, it’s not exactly the same economic impact to your life than Chasey Lain having yet another meltdown on set (and losing a day’s worth of pay).

    Tanner Mayes has a notorious reputation. Does it lead to her being BANNED from all and any porn sets? Nope. Heck, I’m sure that some producers and directors hire her just for shits and giggles (and any free BJs she might be giving out that day). So someone like her will simply burn through the usual Porn Girl Career Timeline a little quicker than say Kayden Kross. BFD.

    Was Tanner going to be the next Jenna? She doesn’t care, the fans don’t care. Where’s the next slutty PYT for the Porn Valley Fresh Meat Grinder….?

    Ironically, Mariah and others have made and will keep making excuses and exceptions for drug use; oh I ONLY have two drinks three hours before I have to shoot a G/G, I ONLY smoke a little marijuana the morning of my shoot if its a B/B/G, I ONLY have 3 beers after 2PM never before noon on the day of my shoot if its on a Wednesday or Thursday, I’m OKAY with others being stoned just as long as they don’t slur their words and its just a BJ shoot with stills, yadda yadda yadda.

    So until there’s basically a ‘zero tolerance’ policy toward drugs and alcohol that everyone abides by, I don’t see this issue getting any better (because one persons ‘natural herb’ is another’s ‘legally prescribed’ medicine).

  39. I don’t make excuses Sammy. Nowhere did I make an excuse. Having a couple glasses of wine throughout a 5 hour shoot isn’t being fucked up. I don’t smoke weed and stoners fucking annoy me but they aren’t infecting people.

    Sammy you have to realize that a tiny percentage of porn viewers ever even visit a porn forum once much less repeatedly to keep up to date on happenings and gossip and news. they love it but deny it. they pretend not to know the names of girls but they search for scenes with them. they are closet people and don’t want to know because then it would make the whole thing real. does that make sense?

  40. No, that doesn’t make sense. Most people don’t go to the forum cause they simply don’t give a shit about the gossip, about the actual goings on, any of it. It’s just not at all interesting to the vast majority of people.

  41. sammyglick says:

    “I am one who takes an occasional drink on set because I am terrified by dialogue.”

    Yea, it’s really tough memorizing all of those lines for scenes in the latest Beyond The Call of Booty and Brazzers’ Dr. Adventures.

    “I never said I got drunk or fucked up to shoot a scene. I said I have had a couple glasses of wine throughout a shoot.”

    “I will have a glass or 2 of wine during a 1 or 2 hour cam show so Jeremiah your 3 glasses per hour comment isn’t relevant to me, but thanks.”

    Yea, Steele — Mariah gets a PASS because she can hold her liquor (unlike the other lightweights in Porn Valley). Or as you so brilliantly put it…

    jeremiahsteele Says:
    I guess the moral of the story is “Do what I say, not what I do”.

    “stoners fucking annoy me but they aren’t infecting people.”

    I guess your buddy Priya Rai also gets a MARIAH MILANO PASS.

    “I can’t remember the last shoot house I walked into that didn’t smell like weed…Can’t we see a girl on set who is fucked up and refuse to shoot with her? I do it. I did it 3 months ago.”

    Yea…you took a STAND FOR ONCE. Are you going to keep doing it, as obviously it wasn’t just a random event. You purport to have plenty of F-you $, so how about the next shoot you go to and you smell weed and there’s people who are wasted, you just turn around and leave.

  42. sammyglick says:

    Mariah @ comment #29 – “I don’t smoke weed other than maybe a few times a year but don’t have issues with others who do as long as they aren’t those stuck stoners who can’t complete a sentence. Otherwise blaze that shit up!”

    Mariah @comment #42 “I don’t smoke weed”

    One minute she’s Bill Maher and the next, she’s Mother Teresa.

    At the end of the day, I don’t care what your (or anyone else for that matter) vices are. Doubly so when it comes to Porn Valley — as last I checked, you’re all adults (legally, if not always mentally…but that’s life). Having made the choice to work in adult film, you have to take the good and the bad. Otherwise, you’re about two steps from becoming the next General or Shelly Lubben (as they’re constantly calling for the porn industry to be policed as heavily as your average steel mill or coal mine).

    When your throwing stones at your fellow performers, you probably shouldn’t be in a glass house.

  43. I think Bill Maher smokes a few times a day not a year.

  44. jeremiahsteele says:

    Supposedly the greatest job in the world and people need to get fucked up to do it!

    This reminds me of what was said about the Studio 54 days. They said if you remember any of it you weren’t really there (meaning they were all too fucked up to have any memory).

    Dominatrixs on the other hand, demand their slaves be absolutely sober! They’re all about pain as pleasure and don’t want to miss a fucking thing!

  45. you know what Sammy I have tried since day one to understand your animosity towards me but I have come to the conclusion that you’re just a fucking asshole. What other explanation could there be? You take things completely out of context and you embellish things said only a few paragraphs earlier on the same fucking page! You say it’s just that you refuse to kiss my ass because I’m a porn star, well does that mean you are required to lie and twist what I say and turn things to the negative every time I write something even when being honest and forthright about myself and adversities in my life?

    I just want to get this straight:
    Because I can have 1 or 2 glasses of wine and not be fucked up means I can hold my liquor? I smoked weed maybe three times in 2009 yet you compare me to Bill Maher??? And then say I’m pretending to be Mother Teresa? I would love for you to show me where i said that! I am not a drug addict. I was honest enough to discuss my own past with drugs and also stated clearly that I have not done them in years and you took that and turned it around a few days ago. You stand corrected again.

    I took a stand for once??? You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about first of all. I have walked off of more than 20 sets because things were not right with me. I have turned down jobs that I felt were degrading to me and to women and were a scar on the industry. I also was just offered a scene for Elegant Angel which I accepted and it’s an interracial scene. LT is the director and when he offered me the job he said he would pay $100 over my rate and I told him it wasn’t necessary. I’m not going to charge someone more because of the color of their skin. To me that is wrong and to me that is taking a big fucking stand. Don’t you agree?

    I have refused to work with people that I felt were unsafe and unhealthy and said it right to their faces. I have taken more stands than you know so you need to shut your fucking mouth until you have FACTS, which you don’t.

    I never claimed to have fuck you money. Again, where and when did I say that? I just have enough money to refuse to do something that I feel crosses a boundary or to do something on camera I wouldn’t do off camera. I just got paid $2500 to host a party in south beach. I just had to show up and drink in the VIP for 3 hours and allow them to use my name and photo on the fliers. Not too bad huh? I made $10k to fly to Spain last week to be in 1 sex scene and 1 music video plus round trip first class airfare on Air France and a room at Hotel Me in Barcelona. Look it up Sammy.

    I think you need a woman so you don’t have to sit here and spew your inner conflicts toward people that your insecure loser ass wouldn’t never have the confidence to approach in person…isn’t there a name for that like a keyboard warrior or something?

  46. jeremiahsteele says:

    “What Makes Sammy Run” is a rags to riches story chronicling the rise and fall of Sammy Glick, a a young, UNEDUCATED Jewish boy born in New York’s Lower East Side who rises from copy boy to the top of the screenwriting profession in 1930s Hollywood by backstabbing others; avaricious, ruthless, tireless, principle-less.

    In fact he’s such a disgraceful Jew that even the Anti-defamation Leaque won’t defend him. And that’s saying something, because, I thought according to the ADL there was no such thing as a bad Jew.

    Urban Dictionary of “Sammy Glick”:

    “Sammy Glick is a heartless go-getter who will stop at nothing to pursue his ambitions, regardless of the consequences to others”

    Apparently his ambitions at LIB is being a human fart machine in reverse: just a lot of bad hot air.

    Listen to Jeremiah (Jeremiah is a hebe name, btw), Mariah. Like I said before, pay no attention to anyone who would actually name themselves after such scum.

    Besides that, the name just sounds plain aweful!

    Also, I’m the one who coined the phrase “Keyboard Warrior”. Thanks.

  47. Mariah–
    I was on a trip some years back from France to Spain and the Air France food was awesome. Not to mention more ice cold boozy beverages than I could drink. It was the best plane ride ever.

    As for sammyglick–he sounds like some angry slob with a sad case of Computer Balls.

  48. jeremiahsteele says:

    What the hell are “computer balls”? Just tell me.
    No need to show me.

  49. well said Jeremiah lol

    yeah Kraven, the food was unreal. They served us croque monsieur for breakfast that was made on the plane! dinner was amazing as well with a 3 course meal that served this watermelon sorbet with whipped coconut milk on top…unreal for a restaurant much less and airplane meal these days.

  50. Computer Balls is when someone talks tough but only via messages from their computer. Not in real life. You see it all the time.

  51. jeremiahsteele says:

    Usually once an internet assailant’s identity is unmasked their swollen balls shrink down to sub-normal levels (like stepping out of a cold ocean).

  52. hmmm I wonder who that applies to most around here?

  53. I can believe the 2,500 for the party, the Jersey Shore douchebags get 10K for the same shit, however to net 10K + all expenses paid in what you describe as posh arrangements for the work you describe is definitely dubious.

  54. sammyglick says:

    As if Kraven, I’d say the same to Mariah’s face. She’s not the Queen of England. Now far be it for me to suggest how Mariah should police Porn Valley, yet it wouldn’t have come off as so all over the place, if she wasn’t excusing some actions while going full force after others.

    Who couldn’t have guessed at the end of the day, it all comes down to one’s personal decisions. As she remarks in comment #48 (which she should have said from the get-go), several times she’s left a porn set for various reasons. Good for her. Other female performers might not have the same reaction in similar situations. Whatever — they’re living their life the way they want to in a free society.

    Likewise, some people are seriously affected by one or two drinks — others can drink a whole bottle and not feel all that drunk. Yet Mariah writes about her OWN DECISIONS as if Porn Valley should create new rules to suit her! My god, Mariah give us a break. If all you really wanted answered by the LIB group was…

    “As fans what are your opinions on this? Do you care of girls are fucked up during scenes? Do you even notice? Which stars do you notice to be fucked up regularly?”

    …then the short answer is a lot of fans, if not most, don’t give a damn if a girl in a porn film is visibly wasted. Period, end of story. They’re not going to call the FBI, OSHA, their local firestation if they see Female Talent X trashed in a porn movie. They’re not going to start a boycott, they’re not going to write angry letters to Jim Powers. If anything, they’re going to tell their buddy to see so and so totally fucked-up while getting fucked on camera.

    As for Steele, the reason many Jews don’t like the novel ‘What Makes Sammy Run?’ is because it paints an unflattering view of Jews in Hollywood. In that, it paints them as nothing more than, as you seemingly enjoyed pointing out, backstabbers who care more about getting ahead…then acknowledging where they’re from. Most Jews in Hollywood don’t regularly practice their religion and often only use their religion as a way to social network. Thusly, the tragedy of the story is no matter how far one goes in this world, no matter how much they achieve via the force of their own will, it adds up to nothing if you forget who you are and where you’re from.

    The novel’s title character is born Samuel Glickstein — but in his headlong pursuit for success, he becomes so ashamed of his birth name and knowing how anti-Semitic America is during the 1930s, he changes his name so he comes across as ‘less ethnic’ (and thus able to assimilate easier, and rise in his career faster, in a society dominated by Christianity).

    Anyhow, I find it amusing Steele feels the need to put in bold typeface that Sammy is an ‘uneducated’ person who manages to succeed (considering how many Americans celebrate any and all ‘rags to riches’ stories). Ironically, on the flipside, this once great nation has citizens who increasing embrace ignorance and stupidity (as their so-called political leaders attempt to make them fearful of anyone with a college degree).

    So you then have Steele, who often remarks how frustrated he is too many people in this world are apparently nothing more than clueless sheep who just take whatever the big bad media tells them. If only we were all ‘smart’ enough to figure out that 9/11 was an inside job and that there are plans afoot for a New World Order…or is it that a person who is ‘uneducated’ is not able to understand they’re a tool for the handful of elites who according to Steele and his likeminded conspiracy brethren, to grasp? Or is it that being educated clouds your mind? You can’t have it both ways…

    …which is it Mr. Steele? Are we too smart for our good, or too dumb to know the truth about the world?

  55. jeremiahsteele says:

    You truly are an amazing individual, Sammy. Few people can babble as much as with you without saying anything.

    Sammy Glick, the fictional character, is scum. That doesn’t mean all Jews are scum. In fact, such a conclusion is unbearably idiotic. I don’t know whether or not other Jews perceive a bad character who’s Jewish suggests that all Jews are bad. Again, the story was written by a Jew. God help us if it wasn’t, then the author would certainly be called an anti-semite. Anyway, I’m still clueless as to why you admire the character enough to name yourself after him.

    I took what was written about Sammy Glick and capitalized the word “uneducated” because that’s what you are. You’re like those asshole political hosts who have controversial guests on, but only allow them to speak literally 1/5th as much as the hosts themselves do during the “conversation”.

    You are plainly as insincere as those hosts, who, begin with the premise that certain guests are crazy, don’t listen with an open mind, don’t acknowledge any points whatsoever, and dominate the conversation.

    I can provide a video which literally has dozens of firefighter and civilians testifying bombs were going off at the WTC, before and during the “collapse” (obliteration). I can also provide video images of molton metal which glowed red and billowed smoke well after a month later. It’s scientifically impossible for a collapsing building to make molton metal. Only a powerful force can liquify metal!

    Too smart? Too dumb? Stop playing idiotic semantic games, and just look at the evidence I’ve provided, and think about the points I’ve made. If you don’t believe any specific point I can provide references.

    But you won’t do the research. You tell me, Sammy. Does that make you too smart or too dumb?

    I did a presentation in college years ago where I explained to the teacher and the class that the word “Education” comes from the word “educe”, which means to bring out. So education is not about programming, but bringing out the gifts of deduction that we have within, but, as you have exemplified, we’ve apparently lost.

    There’s a reason that t.v.’s call their buffet of telecasts “programming” because that’s exactly what they are doing. There’s a book called “Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television”, and it points out how t.v., with it’s breaking things down into soundbites has helped remove our ability to critically think. You stand as a proud example of that, Sammy.

    I’ve provided you with links, but you will not look at them. Is it because you’re too smart or too dumb?

  56. Third Axis says:

    Sorry to further jack this thread, but this is sort of along the lines of education (and drugs in porn is a really boring subject). Jeremy, have you ever heard of the Lookout Mountain Laboratory, located in upper Laurel Canyon and once a highly top-secret military facility? Here’s a bit of detail:

    “What would become known as Lookout Mountain Laboratory was originally envisioned as an air defense center. Built in 1941 and nestled in two-and-a-half secluded acres off what is now Wonderland Park Avenue, the installation was hidden from view and surrounded by an electrified fence. By 1947, the facility featured a fully operational movie studio. In fact, it is claimed that it was perhaps the world’s only completely self-contained movie studio. With 100,000 square feet of floor space, the covert studio included sound stages, screening rooms, film processing labs, editing facilities, an animation department, and seventeen climate-controlled film vaults. It also had underground parking, a helicopter pad and a bomb shelter.

    Over its lifetime, the studio produced some 19,000 classified motion pictures – more than all the Hollywood studios combined (which I guess makes Laurel Canyon the real ‘motion picture capital of the world’). Officially, the facility was run by the U.S. Air Force and did nothing more nefarious than process AEC footage of atomic and nuclear bomb tests. The studio, however, was clearly equipped to do far more than just process film. There are indications that Lookout Mountain Laboratory had an advanced research and development department that was on the cutting edge of new film technologies. Such technological advances as 3-D effects were apparently first developed at the Laurel Canyon site. And Hollywood luminaries like John Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Howard Hawks, Ronald Reagan, Bing Crosby, Walt Disney and Marilyn Monroe were given clearance to work at the facility on undisclosed projects. There is no indication that any of them ever spoke of their work at the clandestine studio.

    The facility retained as many as 250 producers, directors, technicians, editors, animators, etc., both civilian and military, all with top security clearances – and all reporting to work in a secluded corner of Laurel Canyon. Accounts vary as to when the facility ceased operations. Some claim it was in 1969, while others say the installation remained in operation longer. In any event, by all accounts the secret bunker had been up and running for more than twenty years before Laurel Canyon’s rebellious teen years, and it remained operational for the most turbulent of those years.

    The existence of the facility remained unknown to the general public until the early 1990s, though it had long been rumored that the CIA operated a secret movie studio somewhere in or near Hollywood. Filmmaker Peter Kuran was the first to learn of its existence, through classified documents he obtained while researching his 1995 documentary, “Trinity and Beyond.” And yet even today, some 15 years after its public disclosure, one would have trouble finding even a single mention of this secret military/intelligence facility anywhere in the ‘conspiracy’ literature.”

    Pretty curious, I’d say.

  57. jeremiahsteele says:

    Yeah, Third Axis,

    Located on Wonderland Avenue, site of the Johnny Wadd Wonderland murders. It’s amazing how many films they made. And I thought Hollywood made too many redundant movies.

    ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ are often dismissed with the quip that nothing can be kept secret, yet here is a facility producing more films than all of Hollywood combined, involving hundreds if not thousands of people over the years right in the middle of LA and there was no ‘evidence’ of it until the 1990’s.

    Similarly, The Manhatten Project, which developed and tested the first atomic bomb as well as other things (including underground facilities in NYC), had 1000’s of employees and was kept a secret from the public for years.

    It seems Lookout Mountain was “Manhatten West” and was mainly involved in the Hollywood filming and editing of the Manhatten projects.

    Also, regarding the Manhatten Project, Adolf Hitler supposedly did not die in Berlin in the last moments of the war. The “burned body of Hitler” that has been shown over and over again was not that of the Reich’s Furher but that of Gustav Weler one of Hitler’s body doubles who had recently died and was kept in a walk-in freezer for just such an occasion. To perpatrate the hoax the body was shot to mimic suicide.
    Just before the end of World War II Adolf Hitler contacted President Franklin D. Roosevelt and offered him a bargain. Hitler would give the United States all of the Nazi German atom bomb and rocket documents and the locations of the hiding places of his top scientists if the United States would give him political asylum. A deal was struck and Hitler was moved to the United States. He lived in hiding in the Manhattan Project underground, under Central Park until he died in 1956.

    After WWII many nazi top scientists were recruited into the FBI, CIA, NASA and other government agencies in what is known as “Operation Paperclip”. It’s no wonder the U.S. has such a fascist element to it.

  58. Third Axis says:

    Well, I think this facility was designed and equipped for much more than just the AEC imaging projects, of which, granted, there were many. There are some researchers who believe that the Lookout Mountain Lab had some involvement in the CIA’s MK-ULTRA projects as well, which involved, among its mind-control research, ritualistic pedophilia (of which several victims testified during the 1977 Senate hearings into the program’s covert operations). Of course, manipulating the media has always been a prime modus operandi of the U.S. intelligence/military/industrial complex, no?

    And “OP. Paperclip” gave complete immunity to some of the most despicable Nazi war criminals, and put them on our government payroll to help devise methods to subject American citizens—including children as young as three years of age—clandestinely and against their will, to radiation, toxins, drugs (LSD, MDMA, etc.), and hypnosis. This shit isn’t some made-up conspiracy crap either; it’s fully documented and admitted to by government officials.

    Our government is below contempt and unworthy of any shred of it’s citizens’ respect. Revolution is our only salvation.

  59. jeremiahsteele says:

    from:

    http://themurkynews.blogspot.com/2008/06/chapter-eleven-grand-tour-of-satans.html

    “Lookout Mountain Laboratory was built in 1941 (the history of Laurel Canyon goes back many years–you really need to read through McGowan’s stuff)…and functioned as a combination movie studio / CIA research & development / police state propaganda factory.

    The existence of this facility wasn’t even acknowledged until the early 90’s even though it had produced some 19,000 government propaganda films, and had the likes of John Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Howard Hawks, Ronald Reagan, Bing Crosby, Walt Disney and Marilyn Monroe working there on “undisclosed projects”. No Hollywood actor has ever admitted working at this place. To this very day, except for one rather creepy “disinfo” cul-de-sac website, a Google search for “Lookout Mountain Laboratory” produces zip/zilch.

    Apparently, much of the cutting edge movie technology (such as 3D effects) originated at Lookout Mountain, and spun off into the larger Hollywood movie industry. God only knows what else they’re cooking up at places like this.

    As an aside (a strictly speculative one)…I am sort of guessing these guys, at some point, are going to trot out spectacular holographic images, flashed across the night skies…with some sort of propaganda messages with which to ‘wow’ the populace. (There’ll be no “wows” from me.)”

  60. jeremiahsteele says:

    The more I’m reading up on the subject the more strange shit I’m coming across. Have you ever seen the moon landing hoax video with the light fixture from above falling into frame while Neil Armstrong is descending and saying “One small step for man”…? Well it turns out the hoax was perpetrated at Lookout Mountain!

    Also, “Located in Hollywood, California up in the hills is the intersection of Laurel Canyon Boulevard and Lookout Mountain Road. It has been known to be an area of many hauntings. People have reported seeing the same phenomena at the same spot as they reach the bottom of Lookout Mountain and then turn left onto Laurel Canyon Boulevard. It is here that people have seen an old fashioned carriage being pulled by two white horses. These horses are racing extremely fast down the road, but the hooves of the horses cannot be heard strangely.

    The apparition only lasts about two seconds before vanishing into thin air. This apparition has been known to cause accidents in the intersection by causing the people who see it to swerve and miss it.”

    Could this be the work of those high tech movie makers?

  61. Third Axis says:

    Yup, the “moon-landing hoax” (which, incidentally, I’m not signed-up on) is one film project that’s been theoretically assigned to the LML. What’s particularly interesting to me is, with so many people working there for more than two decades, including lots of A-list Hollywood directors and technicians, that so little of what was being done has been brought to light. As far as the claimed sightings of apparitions in the Laurel Canyon vicinity, it’s known that research was being done at the facility on 3D and early holographic technology. The spooks were at play, but they were all wearing suits.

    Send me an email addy through Cindi, and I’ll forward you my links on the LML. It’s a really fascinating subject, and I’ve been digging as deeply as possible into it.

  62. jeremiahsteele says:

    Cool, will do. Also, the hippie movement started at Laurel Canyon, and strangely there’s a lot of military ties to the rock stars’ fathers. Jim Morrison’s dad was involved in that scam Gulf of Tonken non-incident which began the Vietnam atrocity.

    I used to live up Laurel Canyon for 6 months in 1992, up the road from Jim Morrison’s old house next to the convenience store.

    Also, keep your eye out for a post with a link which is not up yet as Cindi hasn’t gotten around to approving it.

  63. Third Axis says:

    I came across the initial reference to the LML some time ago while reading a blog by researcher Dave McGowan. He wrote a very interesting and lengthy multi-part article on the entire LC/Sunset Strip scene of the ’60s and ’70s, including the oddly high percentage of major music industry and Hollywood figures who came from families with ties to the military intelligence community. Lots of death by suicide (and other unexplained causes) included in that period’s history also, as you know. Some of McGowan’s assertions are, imo, based on conjecture as well as uncredited sources, but he raises some strong points in connecting the dots that sould peak the interest of any thinking person.

    As a music journalist, I’ve had a longtime interest in the history of that era and it’s influence on popular culture. The more I dig, the more I discover that not all of the influences were so “groovy,” and the presence of the CIA at the top of Wonderland definitely casts a sinister shadow over the whole trip.

  64. jeremiahsteele says:

    I look forward to your email. My post here is still not approved and up yet. The truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

    It’s been proferred that Charles Manson was a CIA mind-controlled operative to help destroy the peace movement. Sounds crazy, on the periphery, of course. Still looking into that one…

  65. mattharcla says:

    Wow, this discussion thread moved along! But returning to the original spec point, I wholeheartedly endorse Mariah Milano’s position. As a film maker, I would not work with anyone who was intoxicated, and I will not produce work on that basis.

    Pornography actually makes the world a better place, as the 2005 publication The Porn Report details. Any people in the industry who maintain ethical, social and health related standards are to be applauded.

    There should be awards for these things. A Nobel Porn Prize.

  66. jeremiahsteele says:

    Hey Third, You gotta email Cindi your email to email to me, or I’ll never get it, got it?

  67. sammyglick says:

    You’re like those asshole political hosts who have controversial guests on, but only allow them to speak literally 1/5th as much as the hosts themselves do during the “conversation”.

    Please, as if YOU Mr. Steele were to ever get the chance to host your own ‘Coast to Coast’, you’d let any guest get a few words in edgewise during one of your lucid rants about the coming New World Order…

    I don’t even know why you’re in porn. You claim to have ALL THE SECRETS (well, at least the suppressed 9/11 video showing all of the evidence of an inside job) to this insanely random world we all live in. Does Gov. Ventura know about this tape? Have you sent it along to him so he can credit you with blowing the 9/11 Conspiracy wide open? I would of loved to have seen you standing next to him on his TruTV show — perhaps you’ll be featured in Season 2?

  68. jeremiahsteele says:

    Don’t tell me what I’d do, moron. It’s not the coming new world order, it’s already here. Bush Sr gave a speech to congress speaking of “a new world order”, on 9/11/91, exactly 10 years before 9/11/01.

    You’re a babbling, obnoxious windbag who still refuses to do the research and wants to ask idiotic questions without answering mine.

  69. sammyglick says:

    Dude, just go get your radio show already! That way you’ll at the very least, have the satisfaction of hanging up on callers like myself.

  70. jeremiahsteele says:

    This is my radio show, as much as it is yours. And I’m hanging up on you now. But before I do so let me just let you know you’re waving a middle finger at those who died that day and all the friends and family of. A lot of facts exist and research has been done which you don’t care to look at. At the very least, in the name of those who died that day, we deserve a thorough examination and open forum, not just retarded insults and snide remarks such as you’re offering. Because we won’t get to the bottom of things, they’ll keep shitting on us from the top. Enjoy!

  71. sammyglick says:

    Oh that’s right…thanks for reminding me that I’m a key member of the Federal Government and the New World Order.

    Later, when I’m going to the Skull & Bones restroom, specially reserved for us ‘in the know’, I’ll pass your complaints along to Cheney/Rove/Bush/Elvis/Neil Armstrong/Hitler/Dan Rather/Obama/Greenspan/Lou Dobbs/Tony Blair/Santa Clause and anyone else involved in the suppression of Free Humanity.

    As for giving the victims of 9/11 the Middle Finger, if you watched the state-controlled media program 60 Minutes this past weekend, you’ll see that I’m a little too late. As the ineffective city/state NY government (along with the Port Authority) can’t even get their act together long enough to build a fitting memorial. I’d save your anger over all of this for them, instead of a goofball like myself.

  72. jeremiahsteele says:

    I’m curious, do you think Oswald blew out Kennedy’s head out the back from a shot through the back of the head with a “magic bullet”? Probably, otherwise you’d have to believe elements of the corrupt gov’t kill people for money and power, just like Roman times, and that would mean, in your own words, you’d have to believe all them conspiracies, from Elvis is still alive to reptile aliens in the White House.

    You are a goofball. That’s about the most intelligent thing you’ve said.

    If you were in a debate class, like I was, you’d get an “F”. You’ve never researched in order to effectively refute the other side.

    You’ve been playing dodgeball the entire time, all the while thinking that proves you’re intelligent.

  73. Third Axis says:

    Glick’s not worth your effort, Jeremy. He’s just a contrarian, who likes to poke you with a stick. This country is filled with dupes, laughing it all off while being systematically enslaved. Someday, their screams will fall on deaf ears. Good riddance.

  74. jeremiahsteele says:

    I often wonder Third Axis what fucking planet I’m on. I mean, people are convicted in court based on one or two witnesses, yet with 911 there are countless numbers of witnesses on video and countless pieces of evidence which contradict the official story. And it seems as if no one gives a fuck!

    There is no such thing as being partially corrupt, no more than a woman being half-pregnant, and this country has been corrupted to the core. It’s politically incorrect to share anything which may disturb our illusive sense of security, even though our world’s on fire and we’re sleeping.

    If someone just ran up to you on the street all distraught saying “My God! I just saw a guy shoot a woman in the face point blank”, you would care, wouldn’t you? You’d call the cops, and testify as to what the person told you, right?

    Yet, we have something much more substantial, evidence, that collectively, is overwhelming, for a populace which by all appearances is absolutely underwhelmed. I saw videos of students at San Diego State being asked what year 9/11 happened and they didn’t even fucking know. I know SDSU is the party capital of all colleges but Jesus!

    We have treasonous indifference by the likes of Sammy pompously telling us “Don’t argue me with facts, my mind is made up!”

    There is no obscenity like that of a closed-mind in the face of overwhelming evidence.

    If 2012 IS the end of humanity as we know it, I can’t say I would blame “God” for cleaning the slate. Holy shit! What a disgrace!

    (end of rant)

  75. sammyglick says:

    “This country is filled with dupes, laughing it all off while being systematically enslaved. Someday, their screams will fall on deaf ear.”

    Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh…..heeeeelllllpppppp meeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!

    Oh that’s right, deaf ears can’t hear my pleas of help from the outright tyranny we all live in. Damn, I knew I should of brought a few of Glenn ‘The Socialist Progressive Nazi Communists Are HERE!!!’ Beck books so I’d get the secret password to the utopia his ideas will usher in if implemented.

  76. sammyglick says:

    As for the JFK Assassination, what am I five? Come on, we all know the Chicago mob in concert with Castro pulled the trigger! That’s hardly a ‘conspiracy’…

  77. sammyglick says:

    Oswald was OBVIOUSLY a patsy. Ruby used to cover-up the loose ends…please, don’t insult me.

  78. jeremiahsteele says:

    I think you’re admitting that JFK’s assassination was a conspiracy. Well, if you’re admitting to that then, in your own words you must believe ALL conspiracy theories. At the very least, you should be more open minded, shouldn’t you? Being open minded, doesn’t mean your brains are falling out, but do the homework. It’s fascinating stuff! Makes a B or even A level horror flick look rather stupid and dull in comparison (which it is).

  79. sammy himself is a conspiracy! he counters everything with some nonsense point of view just to be contrary to the subject being discussed. that way he can be a chapped cock about everything.

    I will bet that he believes that W was the one who planned and had 911 done. wait for it…wait for it…he and Rosie O’Donnell on the same page!

    and wtf happened to this thread???????

  80. jeremiahsteele says:

    “Conspiracy” requires more than one person, Mariah, and I don’t think Sammy has any friends.

    I do think you’re right about how he needs to counter everything you say. You should end your responses to him with “Talk to you later, Lonely Hater”, or “ttyllh” for short.

    W. made a speech about 911 truth advocates: “Never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories”. W and Sammy have about the same IQ, except W. doesn’t think he’s smart. Also, there’s a rare video I’ve seen of W. admitting that the way the WTC came down suggests it might have been detonated, which is more than Sammy can recognize. Rosie kept bringing the WTC scam up on that lady gab show (which is why they fired her), particularly building 7, which is smoking gun #1 for all hardcore denialists.

    If you have anything more to say about drug use in porn, feel free to add, Mariah, otherwise enjoy all the strange twisting branches that the original subject material takes. At least it keeps your article at the top of the subject bin for any readers who only check in once in a while.

  81. “W. made a speech about 911 truth advocates: “Never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories”. W and Sammy have about the same IQ, except W. doesn’t think he’s smart. Also, there’s a rare video I’ve seen of W. admitting that the way the WTC came down suggests it might have been detonated, which is more than Sammy can recognize. Rosie kept bringing the WTC scam up on that lady gab show (which is why they fired her), particularly building 7, which is smoking gun #1 for all hardcore denialists.”

    You really need to stick to what you’re good at. Like getting pissed on by fat black ladies. This paragraph contains such amount of concentrated stupidity that I feel like my IQ has decreased by 5 points just by reading it.

  82. jeremiahsteele says:

    Besides the Sammy and W. comparisons newklear I only stated facts.

    I’m glad you’re a big fan of what’s considered the favorite of all the reverse bukakke series.

    Fyi, I showed up that day, not booked as talent, but assisting the producer who was shooting a documentary. It turns out one of the three male talent hadn’t shown up, so they asked me to fill in, so, since I was there, had no time to think about (which helped), for “shits and giggles” and to further give the documentary more things to make me look ridiculous for your entertainment, I agreed.

    Since you spend so much time watching that kind of stuff I can’t expect you to be familiar with anything I’ve stated.

  83. Oh, so you expect me to believe that there is a tape with W basically admitting that 9/11 didn’t quite happen as we were told it did? Right, because the dems totally wouldn’t use it during the election campaign.

  84. jeremiahsteele says:

    I don’t expect you or anyone to believe anything! I’d hope, instead, you’d do the homework.

    Stop assuming that left and right aren’t arms of the same evil beast, newklear. Right arm is more dominant and Left arm is more supportive. Regardless, they’re both whores of the all mighty dollar, which matters more than you or me and anyone who is sacrificed so that they can improve their lot.

    When you go to work, who do you work for? The one who pays you, right? Think about who’s paying them. If you don’t know, then find out!

    Bush admitted that the collapse was suspicious. He and his clan have said and done countless stupid things. Rumsfeld admitted on video that the Pentagon was hit by a missle, and then stopped in mid sentence.

  85. Steel says..”There’s a rare vidoe I’ve seen of W, admitting that the way the WTC came down suggests it might have been detonated…….”

    Now that Ive stopped laughing I would like to say that Steele has officially jumped the shark. Please steele, as you so often demand of others, lets see one ounce of proof that this video exists. Or was it an undercove CIA agent who showed it to you and now he has disappeared.

    When and where did you see this alleged video? And just for the record, Osama Bin Laden lives next door to Elvis in Tampa Florida.(I saw a rare video of both of them body surfing at a Florida beach)

    Newklear, the same is true about the “moon landing” conspiracy theories. Ate hieght of the cold war, the Russians would have jumped all over any credible evidence of a hoax. Or, were the Russians a part of the conspiracy too?(lol)

    For 911 to have been a U.S. plot there would have to be hundreds if not thousand of people to take part, and if everything Steele believes is true that wouold mean G.W. is one of the smartest, most cunning people toever hold office. And I doubt that.

    Now, abou the drug use in porn. It is rampant. And it is unenforceable if any person was under the influence when they signed a contract.(thats a no brainer) AIM could do drug testing with the same urine sample they send for their worthless gonn/chlam test but they never will. They never will because the results would show exactly how much drug use their is, and as we all know, the truth is one thing that the industry fears more than anything.

  86. sammyglick says:

    Mariah “and wtf happened to this thread???????”

    It was made about a million times more interesting.

    As for Bush and 9/11, no I don’t buy the theory it was an inside job. Yes, on the one hand, the Neo-Cons placed in his administration (more than anything, to make sure he didn’t fuck anything up for Rove and the Republican Establishment’s fascist plans for Conservatives to dominate all of government for the next 100 years), did have a massive hard-on for Iraq (as they do Iran, North Korea, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and basically the entire Middle East and parts of Central Asia).

    Yet my own opinion is that after the fact, they figured it was their last best shot at going back to Iraq to ‘fix’ whatever perceived mistake they felt over Bush’s father so-called ‘act of mercy’ when he stopped the ground campaign short of marching into Bagdad during the first Persian War.

    As for JFK, that’s nothing more than a Cold Case the public has picked over for close to 40 years. Sure, it has it’s interesting gaps of logic, but again, it’s foolish to think public figures are automatically ‘safe’ — but when they’re murdered, a Conspiracy is afoot. What U.S. President WASN’T a target of some angry citizen? Saying that Oswald was set-up isn’t all that big a leap, or that Ruby was involved (for there are just as many people who knew him and swear he was just a ‘big talker’ and had zero mob connections).

    JFK was assassinated because of a serious slip-up with his personal security detail. No wonder, the government slipped a few things under the rug; or else, you’d probably eventually end up with nutjobs like Sarah Palin or Zsa Zsa Gabor’s husband (Prince von Anhalt) running for elective office!

    The Zodiac case is in the same category — yet at least those people don’t think the Big Bad Government had a hand in it. No matter who is found to be the ‘shooter’ in either case, is it going to fundamentally alter the course of the world? Doubt it, as did much of anything change when Mark Felt came forth and admitted he was the one who helped bring down Nixon?

    At the end of the day Steele, it’s all as simple as the opening sequence in 2001. From the dawn of humanity, we’ve all been killing each other over resources. That’s it. There’s no grand conspiracy to the world. It doesn’t matter if aliens came to earth and gave us somekind of ‘evolutionary jumpstart’. For as Kubrick so brilliantly dramatized, humans were selfish from the start. Instead of recognizing that humans are all the same, and that we’d probably have a much better shot at survival if we pool our resources and shared the common land. We didn’t and flash-forward to today were, again despite the fact we can see for ourselves that there’s no other competing intelligence species (as last I checked, dolphins were not developing the next iGadget), we’re STILL killing each other over…what exactly?

    Resources, land, resources, land, resources and land!

    The rich and elites keep to themselves, much in the way that the poor do, or immigrants or geeky video-game fans. Unless you’re hanging out with Trump and Carl Ichan this weekend, they don’t care much about your concerns, thoughts or film work. So again, is there some grand conspiracy to meetings between extremely rich and influential people?

    Not in the least, because I can assure you that Steve Jobs, Bob Iger, Les Moonves, Warren Buffet, Carlos Slim, Mort Zuckerman and their ilk are not sitting around right now wondering, “…what is that dude Jeremy Steele up to? That amazingly insightful male porn talent better hit me up later for a round of one dollar beers at the Rustic Inn or he’s going to get a major atomic wedgie when we catch up to him!!!”

  87. sammyglick says:

    Joe Know…Steele, let me take a second so you BOTH don’t have to respond with the boilerplate answers…

    Steel says..”There’s a rare vidoe I’ve seen of W, admitting that the way the WTC came down suggests it might have been detonated…….”

    “Please steele, as you so often demand of others, lets see one ounce of proof that this video exists. Or was it an undercove CIA agent who showed it to you and now he has disappeared.”

    This is classic Coast-to-Coast logic. Super secret evidence of the government’s misdeeds is ALWAYS seen once by a small handful of regular citizens. Then it ALWAYS disappears for the rest of eternity. So you’ll just have to ‘believe’ what Steele ‘saw’.

    “Newklear, the same is true about the “moon landing” conspiracy theories. Ate hieght of the cold war, the Russians would have jumped all over any credible evidence of a hoax. Or, were the Russians a part of the conspiracy too?(lol)”

    Yes, the Russians were in on it, as were the Chinese, as was the rest of the Free and Un-Free worlds (it’s just that no one is going to believe Castro, bin Laden, or any other dictator if they say that it was a hoax that was produced in that secret LA film studio found I believe, under Griffith Park).

    “For 911 to have been a U.S. plot there would have to be hundreds if not thousand of people to take part, and if everything Steele believes is true that wouold mean G.W. is one of the smartest, most cunning people toever hold office. And I doubt that.”

    See, again…you’re not opening your mind to the TRUTH! Let me break it down for you — Bush was a puppet used by those who ARE actually super intelligent, ruthless and cunning. Furthermore, it wasn’t hundreds or thousands involved…it was a handful. Dedicated to their cause and loyal to a fault. They all took a blood oath that if any of them even thought of going on TV to spill their secrets, their entire family will be murdered and the secret 9/11 Cabal will revoke the million frequent flyer miles and free cable TV for the next thousand years the people behind 9/11 got as a bonus for their involvement.

  88. Justo for kicks, do you know how long it would take a team of demotlitin experts to wire all of the WTC buildings? And how could they do this without being detected by the THOUSANDS of people who work there every day. 9/11, the moon landing, JFK, etc….How many thousads of people would have to be involved in all of theIse conspiracies, yet to this day not on single person involved in any to these “conspiracies’ has come forward. I guess every single employee of NASA was in on the hoax? And all those dead people on that plane that crashed into the pentagon were also in on the conspiracy, and their families too. Steele, you accuse everyone who doesnt go along with this fantasy of being closed minded. Perhaps it is you who is being simple minded to buy into this crap. When you really consider the THOUSANDS of people who would have to be involved, the conspiracy theories fall apart faster than a mudhut in Haiti.(or was that caused by the New World Order too?)

  89. Sammy, thanks for the chuckles. Steele probably belives we are all a part of a conspiracy to humiliate him into keeping quiet about all of the governtment secrests that he knows the truth about. How difficult of a life for Steele to be one of the few who REALLY knows truth, but cant get anyone to listen.

    Steele, seriouslouly, if you reallly believe all that crap you need to see a therapist, soon.

  90. sammyglick says:

    Joe Knooooowwwwww!!!!!!!!

    Again, let me save Steele the bother of coming up with Dylan-esque lyrics to explain his worldview.

    “And how could they do this without being detected by the THOUSANDS of people who work there every day.”

    You’re using too much clouded logic! It was done over a long enough period of time to cover up their activities. No one said it was done in a weekend!!! Besides, they were all paid VERY WELL and anyone who stumbled across their evil activities was either PAID OFF or KILLED.

    “How many thousads of people would have to be involved in all of theIse conspiracies, yet to this day not on single person involved in any to these “conspiracies’ has come forward. ”

    Again, the state-controlled media has closed your eyes to the truth. It wasn’t thousands, it was a small group of dedicated people. Just look up the Bilderberg Group, Bohemian Grove, Defense Industry Security Command, (DISCO) and you’ll see what I’m talking about!!!!

    “I guess every single employee of NASA was in on the hoax?”

    Again, you’re thinking too literal!!! It was only the higher-ups…the lower level people simply brought the official line that we went to the moon. Likewise, the higher-ups involved were PAID OFF or their families threatened with MURDER if they spoke the truth.

    “And all those dead people on that plane that crashed into the pentagon were also in on the conspiracy, and their families too.”

    Again, you’re using too much logic Joe Know!!!! People were PAID OFF or threatened with MURDER if they spoke the truth. Just watch the videos online if you doubt Steele…

    “When you really consider the THOUSANDS of people who would have to be involved, the conspiracy theories fall apart faster than a mudhut in Haiti.(or was that caused by the New World Order too?)”

    Now you’re getting it Joe Know. Yes, the earthquake in Haiti is very suspicious. Especially in light of the ‘evidence’ there was a four star general on the island in the hours before — who is also part of the testing of secret sonic weapons created by DARPA. Likewise, Bill Clinton was there before the earthquake, showing ‘investors’ parts of the island.

    You put the two together, but clearly Haiti is slated to become the Las Vegas of the Caribbean and again, the rich have gotten richer because dopes like you are blinded to the truth of how the world works!

  91. sammyglick says:

    Joe Know “How difficult of a life for Steele to be one of the few who REALLY knows truth, but cant get anyone to listen.”

    Why do you think the government engineered it so that Steele would become a major porn star?! They’re crafty that way. The only thing separating Jeremy Steele and Glenn Beck is a gangbang with Ariana Jollee.

  92. jeremiahsteele says:

    Yawn, here we go again, speaking to the novice who yells about how “Elvis lives” and that the “there would have to be hundreds if not thousand of people to take part” comment again.

    Forget about what you believe or what you doubt and learn something!

    The Manhatten Project and the recently disclosed Lookout Mountain Base, which Third Axis has mentioned involved 1000s of people and had been kept secret for years.

    There are scores of witnesses and evidence regarding 911 that you don’t know about. They exist because they’re on video. I can send you video after video after fucking video if you like but if you won’t ever look at it what’s the point?

    Regarding Bush’s comment I mentioned,
    I’m still looking for the exact video I once saw, but here is the closest I’ve gotten so far:

    Bush says: “operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high — a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping”

    http :// www . youtube . com/watch?v=USnxe7hxP4I&feature=PlayList&p=D8978E3FC7D88581&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=56

    Cheney says “Terrorists Blew Up the WTC”

    http : //enduringamerica . com/2009/05/10/video-dick-cheney-on-face-the-nation-10-may/

    I’ll admit, strange as that is, none of that really proves anything. This does:

    http ://911docs . net/explosive_reality . php

    or

    http ://video .google . com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&ei=ZyCHS7WlMpe0rAOds5CfBw&q=improbable+collapse#

  93. sammyglick says:

    Interesting Bush video, but it seems taken out of context to prove an illusive point…that 9/11 was a massive inside job.

    Resources, land, resources, land, resources and land!

  94. jeremiahsteele says:

    “joe know Says:

    Justo for kicks, do you know how long it would take a team of demotlitin experts to wire all of the WTC buildings? And how could they do this without being detected by the THOUSANDS of people who work there every day.”

    You’ve just proven your ignorance again. Marvin P. Bush was one of the heads of Securacom for the WTC. There were teams of engineers going in there weeks before 9/11 “repairing” the WTC. The surveillance cameras and electronic locks of the doors were shut off to do these repairs. Floors were evacuated piecemeal to do this.

    You’re also ignorant of building 7, on video it was announced it was coming down by an FDNY. No building or plane hit it, it had two small suspicious internal fires and then collapesed in classic demolition fashion at 5:20Pm on 9/11. Look it up on youtube or video . google. com . Or do I have to spoon feed it to you?

    Regardless, you are ignorant of all the video testimony of bombs and of the laws of physics.

  95. Steeele, there are constantly wokres in high rise builings reparing eveything from electical wiring, air conditionaing systems, plumbers, telephone technicians, caarpen cleaner,window washers, etc. etc. etc. To say that exploseives were being put into place for months before hand is so truely idiotic it really doesnt deserve a reply.
    Steele, when you work on an elevator you have to turn the thing off. When you work with electrical systmes you have to turn them OFF so you dont get electrocuted. When you paint the floor of a building you remove the people wo they dont inhale th fumes.

    And of course all of these teams of engineers were in on thee conspiracy werent they. ANd under the best of circumstances it would take about 7 to 1o months to wire those building for demolition.

    In your best estimate Steele, how many people were involved in this conspiracy, including all of those engineeres, who according to you, are resposible for the deaths of thousands of people> Rely Steele, how many???

    Steele, are you familiar with the term “inner high rise superstucture.” It is quite obvious you have no idea what this term means. Looke it up and then come back and tell us how this applies to your theory of intentional demolition. Of course NOT ONE SINGLE demolition conspiracy theory advocate ever mentions this little tidbit about “inneer structure” because they know it would make them look like a fool.

    Please explain how you can know so much and not even know what this means you moron!!!!
    Steele, have you ever heard that term? How can you talk about intentional demolition and not even know about inner high rise supeerstructure.

    I used to think your ramblings were kind of funny. But now it is clearly obvious that you have some type of SERIOUS mental problem, and I am being totally serious.

  96. sammyglick says:

    The Shadow knows…and the guys who paid off the ‘workers’ who only made it looked like they were just changing the carpets and hooking up new fax machines.

    It’s all about land, resources, land, resources, land, resources…

  97. jeremiahsteele says:

    I meant to provide this link instead of the “explosive reality” one
    (there are much better documentaries on the site then that one)

    http ://911docs . net/everybodys_gotta_learn_sometime . php

    JOE, STFU ALREADY AND JUST WATCH THE DOC, YOU MORON!

    IT PROVES THE TOWERS WERE RIGGED.

  98. sammyglick says:

    Joe Know, you can skip the 9/11 uber-conspiracy videos and just watch the opening ten minutes of Kubrick’s 2001 — that’s ALL you need to know about how/why the world works the way it does.

    Land, resources, land, resources, land, resources!

  99. Steele,
    You need to learn not to believe everything you see on the internet. This MOCKUMENTORY you cite here is so full of total bullshit its not even funny.
    JFK, AIDS, 9/11, NASA, ….How is it that you, Jerry Steele, have all the answwers that have eluded all of us for so long? How is it that all of the people involved in these conspiracies have not done something to shut you up? If everything you say is true, and of course you can PROVE it, like this mockumentory, why havent you been silenced? How is it that youcame across all of this top secret information? OH YEAH, you read it on the internet!!!!(LOL)

    Why hasnt the government stopped you from exposing all of their lies? With all of this knowledge that you claim to have, that would make you one of the most powerful people on the planet. How could you know all this and still be a nothing, low budget, third rate porn mope?

    Seriously Steele, there are lots of good therapists out there. Or are they all part of the conspiracy too, you know, those physco drugs and all.LOL

  100. jeremiahsteele says:

    Joe, you and Sammy should go suck each’s other’s dicks.

    Anyway, I know you think I’m crazy, and certainly I must be to waste my time conversing with you.

    There is nothing I could simply say or do to make you look at the evidence. Watch a video. No, you and Sammy gotta spout off instead like rabid retards.

    Later.

  101. Steele, I have seen every conspiracy theory video, read every lunatic blog, and seen all of dthe “evidence” that you and your ilk try to pass off as proof, and while I find it amusing, in a childrens fiction book kind of way, none of it stands up to close scutiny. You take everything these lunatics put on the internet as gospel truth, and then you clain that YOU have done the research. Reading lunatic posts on the internet is not research. Now please explain to me how the “Inner structure” relates to your claim of intentional demolition. You will also notice Steele, that not a single one oicf your conspiracy luntaics mentions this. I wonder why?LOL

  102. jeremiahsteele says:

    No you haven’t joe, you’re lying. If you did, you wouldn’t be ridiculing me. You’d know exactly where I’m coming from.

    “Now please explain to me how the “Inner structure” relates to your claim of intentional demolition.”

    I have no idea what you’re talking about nor do I care, you liar.

    You have not examined anything. Tell me how and why building 7 fell? Could you tell me at least what’s the official reason?

    Give me any of the basic arguments of any of the “nutty” theories you claim you’re familiar with and then I’ll answer your questions once you explain what they mean.

    How does a “collapsing” steel structure building blow up and outward into fine powder?

  103. Third Axis says:

    Now “joe know,” the sport troll, is an expert structural engineer too!

    Wow! This guy is a trifecta of expertise. What next, proctology?

    Look deep into my colon, “joe know.” Do you see your future?

  104. jeremiahsteele says:

    Thanks Third Axis.

    Fact: Never before or after September 11th, 2001, has a building ever collapsed as a result of fire.

    On 9/11, it happened 3 times, including WTC 7 which had small internal fires and was not hit by any falling tower debris or airplane.

    Fact: Mayor Giuliani said on tape he was warned the towers were going to come down and to evacuate the area.

    Who told him this and why were none of the firefighters told to get out of the building?

    Fact: It was announced on video by a firefighter that building 7 (which had long since been evacuated) was about to come down.

    Fact: In 2005, Madrid Spain had a 32 story towering inferno burning intense at 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit for over 24 hours and it did not collapse. It’s flames were red hot, whereas the black billowing smoke of the WTC indicates the fires were oxygen deprived.

    Fact: Dozens and dozens of videos of mainstream news reporters, firefighters, victims, rescue workers and other civilians testify that there were explosions before and after the planes hit, in the basement and the towers. The tesimonies and the explosions themselves ARE ON VIDEO! Can you assholes stop shitting and look at the videos first?

    Here’s just one short clip: I can provide many more.

    http ://www . youtube . com/watch?v=h7cvjBViV7g

  105. sammyglick says:

    Third Axis “Now “joe know,” the sport troll, is an expert structural engineer too!

    Wow! This guy is a trifecta of expertise. What next, proctology?”

    …and Jeremy Steele is an expert structural engineer????

  106. sammyglick says:

    So I looked at the video link provided and sure, it’s an interesting theory but this comment raises just as many questions (that are not so easily answered as the conspiratorial ones claim to do).

    frankthetank512 “when has a controlled demo ever been performed on a building of that height prior to 9/11. oh wait thats right it never has. they would need to wire massive amounts of explosives throughout the building. not just a couple poofs sporadicly throughout the building which were actually caused by buckling.”

    “Fact: Mayor Giuliani said on tape he was warned the towers were going to come down and to evacuate the area.”

    Okay, so Giuliani said something on tape…he’s said PLENTY on tape that was either wrong, knowingly false, or some combination of the two. In fact, The Daily Show pointed out a real whopper Giuliani was throwing out there in which he claimed Obama didn’t mention ‘war’ or ‘terrorism’ in his SOTU address (he was 1000% wrong of course, but again, did many in the media correct him? Not hardly…either in the moment he was making such a stupid claim, or afterwards).

    So again, Rudy says a LOT OF DUMB SHIT and so perhaps, this is simply another moment in which he might have simply been saying he’d been warned previously (as I’m sure Steele recalls the first ‘attack’ on the WTC during Clinton’s first term) that terrorists wanted to take down the WTC.

  107. sammyglick says:

    Also Steele, explain HOW there are no seismograph records from the WTC collapse that proves there were ANY type of control explosions that occurred.

    As for the whole debate about the ‘inner structure’ I believe this what it relates to;

    Nearly every large building has a redundant design that allows for loss of one primary structural member, such as a column. However, when multiple members fail, the shifting loads eventually overstress the adjacent members and the collapse occurs like a row of dominoes falling down.

    The perimeter tube design of the WTC was highly redundant. It survived the loss of several exterior columns due to aircraft impact, but the ensuing fire led to other steel failures. Many structural engineers believe that the weak points—the limiting factors on design allowables—were the angle clips that held the floor joists between the columns on the perimeter wall and the core structure (see Figure 5). With a 700 Pa floor design allowable, each floor should have been able to support approximately 1,300 t beyond its own weight. The total weight of each tower was about 500,000 t.

    As the joists on one or two of the most heavily burned floors gave way and the outer box columns began to bow outward, the floors above them also fell. The floor below (with its 1,300 t design capacity) could not support the roughly 45,000 t of ten floors (or more) above crashing down on these angle clips. This started the domino effect that caused the buildings to collapse within ten seconds, hitting bottom with an estimated speed of 200 km per hour. If it had been free fall, with no restraint, the collapse would have only taken eight seconds and would have impacted at 300 km/h.1 It has been suggested that it was fortunate that the WTC did not tip over onto other buildings surrounding the area. There are several points that should be made. First, the building is not solid; it is 95 percent air and, hence, can implode onto itself. Second, there is no lateral load, even the impact of a speeding aircraft, which is sufficient to move the center of gravity one hundred feet to the side such that it is not within the base footprint of the structure. Third, given the near free-fall collapse, there was insufficient time for portions to attain significant lateral velocity. To summarize all of these points, a 500,000 t structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down.

    A basic engineering assessment of the design of the World Trade Center dispels many of the myths about its collapse. First, the perimeter tube design of the towers protected them from failing upon impact. The outer columns were engineered to stiffen the towers in heavy wind, and they protected the inner core, which held the gravity load. Removal of some of the outer columns alone could not bring the building down. Furthermore, because of the stiffness of the perimeter design, it was impossible for the aircraft impact to topple the building.

    However, the building was not able to withstand the intense heat of the jet fuel fire. While it was impossible for the fuel-rich, diffuse-flame fire to burn at a temperature high enough to melt the steel, its quick ignition and intense heat caused the steel to lose at least half its strength and to deform, causing buckling or crippling. This weakening and deformation caused a few floors to fall, while the weight of the stories above them crushed the floors below, initiating a domino collapse.

    http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/eagar-0112.html

  108. jeremiahsteele says:

    yeah, yeah, Sammy,

    maybe it was elvis in a spaceship did it, i can play kindergarten maybes all night, not in the mood

    truth is always at two general stages:
    no way! and
    yeah, i knew that!

    not in the mood to play blah blah right now….

  109. jeremiahsteele says:

    yeah since the towers are shown to have blown up and out yeah i guess someone planted explosives

    the 1993 wtc was an inside job as well that got botched because the truck wasn’t parked in the right place
    http ://www . youtube . com/watch?v=7n76g57X4hM
    (as usual to watch this video connect the dots, and once you got enough facts and info, connect your own dots)

    the 9/11 case makes o.j. look like a reasonable doubter in comparison, talk about “denialism”

    ever hear of black boxes?, they’re housed in cases that withstand destruction. funny ‘coincidence’ all black box recordings were supposedly damaged

    i agree that lots of people say and do a lot of stupid things, but look at the totality of evidence (assuming you’re looking) and you get to the point you can’t talk yourself or anyone else of what is self-evident

    there are many stupid aspects of the 9/11 scam, there was an alleged hijacker’s passport found, clean, unsinged on top of the rubble. talk about stupid, somehow everyone and everything in the tower gets obliterated yet the terrorists passport survives

    if we had been diligent citizens back when the ok city bombing happened then 911 probably wouldn’t have happened, just like with 911 there are scores of original media reports live from the scene reporting how multiple bombs went off, also there’s no way it’s physically possible a truck with fertilizer could’ve blown up the murrah building like that, if we had done the homework then, then they probably would’n’t have tried to pull off the wtc scam, but as long as we’re a collectively comatoast population believing whatever stupid shit we’re told just because that’s the official verdict, then worse things may keep happening…

    the official story for both the wtc and ok city were both physically impossible… for the murrah building it’s like sticking a small fire cracker in cat’s ass, lighting it and claiming the firecracker blew up the whole cat,

    look at the wtc, it doesn’t just collapse, it blows up and outward, and supposedly because of fire? fire does not melt steel unless it’s 2,700 degrees and jet fuel can not reach such temperatures, also the wtc was overfortified stronger than it needed to be, first the steel structure around the bldg would absorb most of the energy of the plane, also the towers had 47 core columns in it’s center, up to 100 mm thick, how do you contradict countless numbers of people’s testimony plus the video evidence? how long can you be in denial?

    if terrorists wanted to kill millions they’ve could’ve easily with a suitcase nuke bomb, they could’ve also easily crashed one plane not four into a nuke around new york and (BOOM), so in the minds of those who carried this shit out they were merciful, it provided the justification for what was laid out in the p.n.a.c. documents and obama’s puppet master ziggy’s writings; an excuse to go into afghanistan and iraq, it’s the old game of conquest

  110. jeremiahsteele says:

    “Also Steele, explain HOW there are no seismograph records from the WTC collapse that proves there were ANY type of control explosions that occurred.”

    Wrong Sammy, why do you assume it doesn’t exist???

    There ARE seismograph records, in addition to video evidence that show there was a violent shake right before the collapse of the towers.

    “The laws of physics have not been shown to be wrong once”:
    http ://www . youtube . com/watch?v=CQBkLhHiGD4

    http : //www . scholarsfor911truth . org/Article911SeismicProof . html

    http : //www . journalof911studies . com/volume/200609/ExplosionInTowerBeforeJetHitByFurlongAndRoss . pdf

    http : //www . prisonplanet . com/analysis_lavello_050503_bombs . html

    http : //everything2 . com/title/9%252F11+Conspiracy+Theories

    http : //motherjones . com/politics/2007/09/homeland-insecurity-911-conspiracy-file-myths-and-facts

  111. jeremiahsteele says:

    I’m no Einstein but sometimes I feel like I’m talking to some attention starved non stop talking rug rat pre-schoolers. Sometimes, that describes me. But anyway,

    It’s been said to never battle with an unarmed opponent. I don’t want to argue my facts with your maybes. The statements you make and questions show you’re a novice and a’ guessin’. I don’t want to have to bitch slap you wih my well endowed thing-a-ling of knowledge, so step back!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic