Judge Upholds Stripper’s Rights to Get Paid

From http://www.boston.com/news/local/

Judge upholds strippers’ pay suit
Scores of dancers claiming thousands; Chelsea club may appeal, lawyer says

By Jonathan Saltzman
Globe Staff / August 11, 2009

About 70 strippers who worked at a Chelsea club are each entitled to recover thousands of dollars in damages in a class-action lawsuit because their employer misclassified them as “independent contractors,’’ depriving them of wages and tips, a judge has ruled.

The suit, which a lawyer for one of the strippers described as the first of its kind in Massachusetts, seeks to recover money they should have received at King Arthur’s Lounge in Chelsea since 2004.

King Arthur’s Lounge, a club that has been the scene of more than one notorious crime, did not pay the strippers any salaries, required each to pony up $35 to perform each night, and kept $10 of every $30 that each made for “private dancing’’ in secluded booths, according to a state judge who granted a stripper’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

The club had argued that selling alcohol is its main business, not putting on strip shows, and that the performers were independent contractors who provided extra entertainment akin to televisions and pool tables at a sports bar.

Suffolk Superior Judge Frances A. McIntyre dismissed that argument.

“A court would need to be blind to human instinct to decide that live nude entertainment was equivalent to the wallpaper of routinely-televised matches, games, tournaments, and sports talk in such a place,’’ she wrote. “The dancing is an integral part of King Arthur’s business.’’

McIntyre certified the suit brought by Lucienne Chaves, a 32-year-old former stripper at the club, as a class action on behalf of her and other dancers who were misclassified as independent contractors, said Shannon Liss-Riordan, a Boston lawyer for the strippers. About 70 other strippers who worked at the club are part of the class proceeding to trial on damages.

Liss-Riordan said the strippers at King Arthur’s were like indentured servants, given the $35 fee they had to pay management.

“In this case, we have an employer who was charging its employees to work,’’ she said. “They weren’t making minimum wage. They weren’t making any wage. Imagine a restaurant where a waiter has to pay to come to work’’ and hand over a portion of his tips.

She estimated that some of the strippers will be entitled to tens of thousands of dollars in damages.

Under the Massachusetts tips law, waiters, bartenders, skycaps, and other service employees must earn a minimum wage of $2.63 an hour. Employers are prohibited from taking a portion of their tips, although a number of restaurants, bars, hotels, and other businesses have violated that provision.

The strippers at King Arthur’s were allowed to keep all the tips they received when they performed in an open area, but had to turn over a third of what they made in the private shows, Liss-Riordan said.

Chaves, who worked at the club from 2005 to 2007, declined to comment through her lawyers.

Robert R. Berluti, a Boston lawyer for King Arthur’s, said that some of the strippers made hundreds of dollars a shift. That raises questions about whether they suffered financially, he said, although the judge rejected a similar argument in her July 30 ruling.

Berluti said McIntyre’s ruling reflected the fact that Massachusetts has one of the strictest laws in the country concerning misclassification of workers as independent contractors.

“This was a case where the judge was saddled with a Massachusetts law that makes it an outlier with respect to the rest of the country,’’ he said, adding that his client is considering appealing.

In arguing that the strippers were independent contractors, King Arthur’s said that Chaves got to pick her own music, costumes, partners, and routines. The club also said it never gave her written rules to follow or documentation that she was an employee.

McIntyre rejected that argument, pointing out that the club hired and fired strippers, determined what hours they worked, and “apparently hired its dancers based solely on whether they ‘look good’ rather than individual performance experience or talent.’’

On Jan. 25, 2008, a man opened fire during a fight inside King Arthur’s, killing one man, wounding two others, and causing patrons and employees to scramble for safety. The alleged assailant, Jesse Camacho, who was 19 at the time, was arrested nine months later in Mexico City.

The bar was also the scene of a brawl on July 23, 1982, that began with an argument between Alfred J. Mattuchio and Everett police Officer John McLeod, who was off duty.

The officer left the lounge, then returned with several other police officers, armed with nightsticks, baseball bats, and tire irons, according to news reports. They attacked a dozen patrons and employees, and Vincent J. Bordonaro was beaten to death. Four Everett officers were indicted in the death, and three were convicted. The city was found liable in a civil case.

13 thoughts on “Judge Upholds Stripper’s Rights to Get Paid

  1. thorn7025 says:

    I don’t think these girls thought about what they are doing.

    So if they are now paid “employees”, doesn’t the club get to keep all of money made in private dances? It is now a service provided by the club, kind of like McDonalds. The fry guy at McDonalds is a paid employee, like a stripper is now in Mass. Even though the fry guy is the one frying the fries, like a stripper would be the one giving private dances, he does not get to keep any portion of the money made from his fries.

    Strippers are independant contractors, not employees. This helps them make more money. Now with this ruling, they can make a whole $3 an hour plus tips from their stage performances, which might total $100 for the night. All the money from their private dances will go straight to the club. So now the $20 made from every dance (dancers can do more than 30 dances a night) is replaced by $3 bucks an hour. Smart girls.

  2. Might not look too bad to girls who aren’t even making enough to pay the house fee…

    Perhaps being an independent contractor isn’t so attractive when the money stops coming in consistently.

  3. this board sucks without the colonel!!

  4. The Colonel says:

    Thank you for the complement, Jerry, but lately there hasn’t been anything going on in this board that interests me, and I’ve been busy and didn’t have time to write an article and discuss whatever I’d like to discuss. Hopefully I’ll do that sometimes soon. Have a good weekend, my man.

  5. your welcome colonel! come back soon! like i said this place sucks without you.

  6. MissBiatch2U says:

    Pornfan, Are you a really gay kiss ass bottom who wants to DO the Colonel? or an ALT of the Colonel’s? It’s a little too obvious that you are one or the other.

  7. The Colonel says:

    Biatch, it’s sweet how you see a little piece of me in every man and think every male organism on the planet is either my reflection or my alt ID. That shows how much you love me, but me and Jerry are not the same person, you buffoon, and you need to get laid and eat some more fucking donuts.

  8. jeremysteeleofpoontalk.com says:

    eating donuts and getting laid might not be conducive to one another

    still, i like how that started off all sweet and nice colonel, and then… wallop!

  9. The Colonel says:

    Jeremy Steele says:

    ‘Eating donuts and getting laid might not be conducive to one another.’

    Maybe not, but since Biatch can’t get laid, at least she can eat all the fucking donuts she wants without being worried about how her ass would look like.

  10. jeremysteeleofpoontalk.com says:

    is this true Biatch? is no one fucking your donut hole? i hate nasty rumors…

  11. Lostbutterfly says:

    Yep, charging house fee’s and part of the dances is a way for GREEDY strip club owners to take all of their so called entertainers money. Strip club owners are GREEDY MF’s and the inslavement of women nation wide needs to come to an end… The independent-contractor B.S, is a way for greedy S.O.B’s to make millions while making women work for hours for free in their strip clubs. And ussually today more then not these places have no customers because of the recession. So I believe, if your going to make any person work for you for 8 hours 5 to 6 to 7 days a week with no hourly is B.S. I hope this judgement will happen in every state. Because if women are going to have to deal with being almost molested by every dirt bag that walks into the place, the least these gready low down strip club owners could do is pay their girls, because its just not right and it is a form of slavery.

  12. Hey biatch, where did that come from! hopefully your’re playing around, like you usually do. i’ve got no beef with you! the colonel happens to be entertaining, and i enjoy his statements. as for you, go fuck yourself(wink,wink)

  13. MissBiatch2U says:

    Fucking MYSELF isn’t half as much fun as fucking other people pornfan!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic