My Nom for the most Beautiful Non-Porn Girl in Porn

HOLLY RANDALL    HollyRandall.com

 

Photos by Mark Daughn

12 thoughts on “My Nom for the most Beautiful Non-Porn Girl in Porn

  1. Holly is very cute, but No longer a fave. She’s put on more than a few LB’s and may be destined for a desk job.

  2. I’ll say it because it has to be said.

    Holly has a chipmunk face.

    While 18 and 19 yr olds might be cute when they have a chipmunk face, after 25 it starts to look bad.

    Once a woman with a chipmunk face hits 32 years of age, its time to put a bag over her head.

  3. I got the feeling that Luke dodged the bullet with this one.
    I hope I’m wrong.

  4. I wonder how old are those pictures?

  5. Geesuz. Holly looks better than most of the porn girls and Hollywood celebrities out there. She’s not anorexic thin which makes you look twice your age. Look at Jenna Jameson as an example.

  6. elglorioso says:

    what BDD said…

    she is overrated

  7. I’m sorry but when you pose naked for porn sites, you are no longer a “non porn girl”. YOU ARE A PORN GIRL, even if it’s just softcore, you are still a porn chick. I mean what else do you call Hanna Hilton? She posed nude for porn sites. I mean sure now she does videos but ya it’s just a matter of time before they all do.

  8. Most beautiful?!

    I’m sure Holly is a great gal, but she is some 40+ pounds overweight, has NO chin, beady little eyes and chunky cheeks. And that’s AFTER some serious Photoshopping.

    Sorry. Porn chick or not (and I agree that she has chosen to become one by posing naked), she is a very plain Jane.

  9. formerindustrygal says:

    Just another fake blonde….no shortage of those

  10. Randy, 40 pounds overweight?? If she lost 40 pounds at her height, 5 ft 7, she would be anorexic and near death!

  11. Donkey Wrong says:

    She’s got a nice ass.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic