I have a feeling that the twenty articles ( in the last two days) on Kayden Kross’ arrest is just the beginning. Since I think it is being covered very well on several sites at this point I don’t see myself jumping into the fray unless I get news that no one else has. So here is the legal report written by Ryan from LukeFord.com. If you go to his site, he has a link to click to read the original charges, which contain Kayden’s real name. Since her real name isn’t out all over the place (yet) I’m going to stay away from that and let Ryan take the blame for releasing it, lol.He also has a couple other stories on it that will catch you up.
UPDATE- Scott Fayner of ScottFayner.com says Kayden is not in jail and that he will have interviews with her mortgage broker and the victims up on his site soon. ScottFayner.com
UPDATE- Ryan e-mails me-Also wanted to let you know that Williams chick that document refers to isn’t Kayden Kross or anything to do with her, that I know of at least. That document refers to one of the victims but it may or may not be related to Kayden Kross.
Ryan writes-
Apparently she was originally charged with three counts of something however the #2 count seems to have been dropped. As of now she has just the two charges remaining. The first is listed as a Criminal felony charge – PC 487(A) (this is grand theft). The second is also a criminal felony charge – CCC1695.3. This is the charge relating to real estate fraud. This charge stems from the Home Equity Sales Contract Act Section 1695. Specifically the part where “by a deed from a trustee acting under the power of sale contained in a deed of trust or mortgage at a foreclosure sale conducted”.
In addition to Kayden Kross, another man by the name of William Henley was also charged on the same date. He has two charges pending. The first was the same as Kayden’s which was the criminal felony, grand theft – PC 487(A).
The second charge for Mr. Henley was the criminal felony charge of CCC2945.4(D) . This is a law that is meant t0 safeguard against deceit. In short it is meant to protect the homeowners in foreclosures that are subject to unfair dealings by “foreclosure consultants“.
Both Kayden Kross and William Henley are scheduled to be arraigned in this matter on October 14th at 10:30 am at the downtown Sacramento courthouse.
Although it may not be the same person, but there was a William Scott Henley court case or two with a William Scott Henley also out of Sacramento (same name and location as the defendant in the Kayden Kross case) involved in a company called Liquidation Properties, Inc. One of them shows 11 causes of action again him … 1st for Breach of Contract; the 2nd for Intentional Misrepresentation of Fact/Fraud; the 3rd for Negligent Misrepresentation of Fact; the 4th for Violation of the Federal Truth in Lending Act; the 5th for Predatory Lending in Violation of Financial Code §4970 et seq.; the 6th for Unfair Business Practices in Violation of Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code §17200, the 7th for Fraudulent, Deceptive, and Unfair Dealing by Home Equity Purchasers in Violation of Cal. Civil Code §1695 et seq.; the 8th for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; the 9th for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; the 10th for Declaratory Relief; and the 11th for Accounting.