Home

Back to Essays

Adam & Eve

A Vietnam veteran, Harvey worked for CARE in India's school feeding program. "It became clear to me that family planning was important… Just transferring massive amounts of food wasn't helping."

Returning to America in 1969, he entered a Masters program at the University of North Carolina. Phil wrote his thesis about the effects of contraception on population growth. Then he tried selling condoms by mail order. They sold well as did other erotic items such as sex guides, lingerie, vibrators and oils.

Adam and Eve sends all questionable videos to two outside therapists for review. The therapists then sign a paper saying the material will help improve communication between couples. This reduces the threat of legal problems.

In the late 1980s, the US government launched prosecutions of all the big pornographers including Phil Harvey's Adam & Eve. But while companies like Vivid and VCA cut deals with the feds, A & E fought back and won.

"The government spent millions of dollars on the case: fifty federal attorneys worked full time for almost two years as well as state attorneys from Utah, Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina and other states. Adam & Eve spent $3 million in lawyers' fees and in return got a lot of free publicity while the government decimated their competition for them." (Hollywood Blue)

Throughout the '90s, A&E has helped produce some of porn's top films, such as Cameron Grant's Dinner Party, Wicked's Conquest, and Vivid's Bobby Sox and Borderline. But only in 1997 did A&E begin looking for publicity for their role in production.

Candida Royalle helped move Phil Harvey's company. "I basically set them up [in distribution]," Royalle told AVN. "When I knew that I needed to give up my distribution [company Femme], because the distribution was sapping all of my creative energies, I thought about the various companies that could take over…. I felt that Phil Harvey's political involvement was in tune with mine, and that we'd be a good match."

The deal whereby A&E bought the rights to distribute Femme films as well as funding new productions for Royalle, took a year to negotiate.

"People in the industry know us because we're a big customer," A&E's PR representative Bernie Oakley told the 12/97 AVN. "Now they're beginning to be aware of us because we're doing productions. Russ Hampshire [VCA] and Steve Hirsch [Vivid] knew us, but did Nina [Hartley] and Juli [Ashton], and Ruby and Missy? They do now."

A&E are on the internet at www.adameve.com.

7/6/01

Book Review: The Government vs Erotica

Steph@AdultDVDTalk.com writes on RAME: I know a book review may not exactly be appropriate, but in light of yesterday being Independence Day and the upcoming Seymore Butts trial.

The Government vs. Erotica: The Siege of Adam and Eve

I've been in the porn industry a little over two years now. Only one person has ever taken the time to let me know that I'm an evil pornographer paving my way to hell. Until recently, I didn't think much about obscenity prosecutions. Sure I've read the gossip site battles between Free Speech Coalition representatives and certain pornographers that don't think they're doing enough. When I was working for an online retailer we had a few meetings about where not to ship product, trying to put together the varying advice from studios and our own lawyers. And I've followed the Cambria List scare, Elyse Metcalf's trial, and the upcoming Seymore Butts trial. But I never put much thought into the power of individuals who work for "our" government to shut down businesses that they simply don't like. That is, until I read Philip Harvey's The Government vs. Erotica.

While I don't condone violence toward women, and I'm thoroughly disgusted by some adult productions, I recognize that those are a part of the price we pay for freedom of speech. Yes, some producers give porn a bad name, but the prosecution of Adam and Eve in the 80s makes clear that the religious right finds all depictions of sex obscene, even what some porn fans would call "vanilla" porn.

Harvey's book details the raid on Adam and Eve in 1986 and the ensuing prosecution, or should I say persecution. The individuals within the government responsible for the persecution clearly intended to shut down Adam and Eve, rather than simply get an obscenity conviction. Ironically, by shutting down other mail order companies (Adam and Eve's competition), these individuals helped Adam and Eve pay for their own defense.

The legal tactics, jury reactions, and reprehensible actions of government individuals provide for a fascinating read. It's a great story about an interesting historical moment that Harvey tells well. As the writer is the founder of Adam and Eve, the presentation of the company's virtuousness has to be taken with a grain of salt. Harvey emphasizes the notion that he began the mail order business as a means to fund nonprofit work in international family planning. While the good that Adam and Eve has achieved is admirable, the good hasn't come at the expense of company profit (there's clearly room for both.) Harvey does admit to making a good living while describing his anger at writing a check to the IRS, knowing that his money will be used to prosecute him.

Half of The Government vs. Erotica tells the tale of the Adam and Eve obscenity trials. The other half is dedicated to greater issues of freedom of speech, a "scientific" look at pornography, and the problems with organized religion. Harvey doesn't offer any profound insight, but he does bring together all the issues in a coherent, intriguing fashion. His chapter on "Big-Government Conservatives; Big-Government Liberals" provides some excellent examples of the contradictory nature of both the Republicans and Democrats:

"American 'conservatives,' daddy-like, want government intervention to prevent us from reading entertaining sex books, from engaging in homosexual relationships, to prevent women from having abortions, to forbid anyone from smoking marijuana (though not much more dangerous than ordinary tobacco). 'Liberals' want the government to interfere by taxing us strenuously, taking income from some to give it to others (who are by no means necessarily poor), regulating businesses in ways that drive up consumers' costs, and guiding our behavior through the tax code."

This statement, of course, leads into a discussion of libertarianism. Harvey says his libertarian convictions were shaped by the trials. I have to wonder why the porn industry as a whole does not support the Libertarian Party. Or maybe it does more than I know? For anyone interested in the history of obscenity prosecution, the origins of the porn industry's self-censorship, or simply a good legal tale, I recommend picking up a copy of The Government vs Erotica. The book has given me a better perspective on the battle between today's government and our first amendment rights as well as inspiring me to learn more about the issues involved. I commend Philip Harvey for writing his story, as it will reach a much greater audience outside of the porn industry. If you're at all concerned with your personal freedoms, you should read this book.