|
The Me Decade
Defiance
A Dirty Western
Kindergarten Teachers
Story of Joanna
Jamie Gillis
Waterpower
Chained, Whipped
Texas Hacksaw
My Pumpkin
No Mo' Hoes
Little Orphan
Dusty
The Taming of Rebecca
Forgive Me - I Have Sinned
Clarity
Dr Robert Stoller
Sin & Perversion
1970s - A Lack of Empathy
The spirit of the 1960s lasted into the first half of the next decade
when its idealism ran thin and left people preoccupied with themselves.
The 1970s was the "Me Decade" and this lack of empathy comes across in
the vicious films of the time, overflowing with violence, rape, drugs,
and sadism. Nasty flicks lasted until the start of the Reagan administration
in 1981 which helped build a new national mood.
Drug use soared during the 1970s and it became particularly hip to snort
cocaine. The secular most of all devoted themselves to pleasing themselves,
to getting ahead and to getting head. The desire to be a winner frequently
overwhelms concern for others, notes Dennis Prager. Solipsism reigned
- "the philosophical theory that the self is the only knowable, or the
only existent, thing." (The Oxford American Dictionary)
Defiance
Armand Weston directed 1975's Defiance - "a sexually more frightening
film (and much more explicit one) than Straw Dogs, or The Snake Pit or
even Behind The Green Door," writes Bob Rimmer. "Caught sniffing dope
by her religious mother, Kathy is first sent to the psychiatric ward of
a hospital where she is raped by the inmates and an attendant in a most
brutally believable rape scene. "Rescued" by a doctor who is a follower
of the Marquis de Sade, she is tortured until horrifyingly, in the Journey
of O tradition, she begins to enjoy her pain, debasement and degradation.
Worth owning to test your own reactions. Should the Marquis' writings
be censored or do we dare to expose the insanity of his theories by openly
showing tapes or movies like this? And whatever happened to Jean Jennings,
who is a good actress?" (Guide #1, p.77)
Bill Margold had a different reaction to Defiance. "A pubescent piece
currently attempting to expand zippers is blonde Jeane Jennings, star
and primary orifice of Defiance. She has that "my clit is sugar-coated
and if you lick it, you'll get cavities" look about her. "Defiance has
that "I've seen most of this before and better" look, and while Jean gives
an earnest performance, her writhings are wasted as the story sinks into
sublit sexual depravity with synched in sighs and slurps. There is also
a sextet-de-sucking scene as smiling Jean takes on a host of holes a la
Green Door.
"Defiance is only a painful experience to those viewers who have been
waiting to see some stylish flogging and stomping for the torture is minimal
at best."
A Dirty Western, directed by David Fleetwood, also appeared in 1975.
"This is the most believable sexvid, with perhaps the best acting and
cinematography you've seen in any of them. It is also the most frightening.
The time frame is the 1890s. After seven years in prison, three convicts
escape. Jim, a rancher near the prison, is leaving for a cattle drive,
and his wife, Sarah, is planning the wedding of one of her favorite daughters.
A tender love scene sets the prelude for the horror to come. "The film
raises an inevitable question: Why do violence, murder and rape make more
sexually exciting films than stories dealing with normal emotions?" (Guide
p.79)
UCLA Psychiatrist Michael Goldstein has a different perspective. "Average
males don't find real rape pornography exciting. They don't show a reaction
to it physiologically or psychologically. If there's real harm being done,
even in a simulated way - beating up, force, no excitement show [by the
woman] and so forth, it is not sexually exciting to the average person."
Story of Joanna (1975) "Recommended as the best film example for a walk
on the dark side of porn...an absolute must for those frustrated fetish
freaks who are never satisfied in their search for kinky sadomasochism
or bondage and discipline. Story of Joanna is one of only five films I
would recommend for kink fans. All of the others are either too silly,
too lame or contain too little of the kinky stuff.
"The only challenge to John Leslie as the best actor in the history of
porn is Jamie Gillis when he wants to be. Here, he wants to be in the
role of Jason, a possessive misogynist who first charms women, then lures
them to the depths of personal humiliation and abuse. It is perhaps the
best role in Jamie's long career.
"The leading lady, Terri Hall, formerly a dancer with the Stuttgart Ballet,
is one of the treasures of the X-industry. Her nude dance sequence is
the finest in the field. The 'face of the moon' scene with Zebedy Colt
is on the all-time classic sex scene list.
"Be advised that the theme is not something that everyone can deal with,
but be further advised that you will not find better treatment of it elsewhere.
Joanna shows up a nonexplicit effort like The Story of O for the watered
down, nonerotic crap it is.
"One brief moment that should interest the female viewers is the oral
sex scene between Colt and Gillis. Zebedy goes down on his master for
nearly a minute for the turnabout-is-fair-play people. "For a period piece
with costumes and kink, I don't think you will find a better sex film."
(Holliday in AVN 12/92)
Bill Margold: "The plot can be summed up by saying that the Marquis de
Sade has met his match. The film features the humiliations of a beautiful
woman (Terri Hall) by a mysterious man (Jamie Gillis) and an even more
mysterious butler (Zebedy Colt).
"Terri Hall cries out, "Every hole I have has been used," and, thanks
to Damiano's direction, the viewer will feel as if he's violated each
of Hall's orifices."
Bisexual Jamie Gillis excelled in nasty roles such as that of the enema
bandit in Gerard Damiano's 1975 Waterpower. "He'll scare you to death
in this one, in which he plays a sex pervert - an enema bandit who accosts
women in their apartments, ties them up and before he rapes them gives
them an enema (supposedly based on a true incident). Thinking about his
first victim, an airline stewardess whom he has watched screwing through
a telescope in his apartment, he says: "She's dirty. Just a toilet. If
I cleaned her out she would be clean again. She'd thank me. She'd be glad
I cleaned her out." Damiano gives this sexvid a long, scary buildup with
Jamie discovering that he is orgasmic when he watches an enema being given
to a woman in a sex palace called Garden of Eden, which specializes in
B&D, S&M, infantilism, cross dressing, French and Greek cultures and high
colonic irrigations. Suspected by a policewoman, C.J. Laing, he captures
her and tortures her in a long frightening sequence. The agony of the
enemas is written on his victims' faces. Whatever your shock feeling may
be, you'll watch this from beginning to end, and you'll have to admit
that both the acting and cinematography are great. Worth owning - if only
to initiate discussions on whether a film like this should ever be made."
(Bob Rimmer, X-Rated VideotapeGuide, p. 237)
Little Orphan Dusty appeared in 1976. Bob Chinn directed John Holmes
and Rhonda Jo Petty who won Best Actress at the 1977 Erotic Film Awards.
Orphan won Best Film and also placed in Screw's 1977 top ten list. "If
you are male and wish to test your sexual arousal to rape scenes, this
sexvid provides you with three separate sequences - one with a motorcycle
gang that takes on Rhonda Jo Petty. They later try again with her and
two other women. John Holmes finally tells Rhonda he loves her even though
she's pregnant by the rapists." (Guide p.101)
The Taming of Rebecca, 1981, features kidnapping, rape and Sharon Mitchell.
The 1986 Meese Commission Report describes the film in detail:
After her father beats her and forces her to have sex with him, Rebecca
goes to a school for sexually abused children. She tells Ms. Zorda what
happened: Masturbating himself while sitting on the toilet, Rebecca's
father called for Rebecca and told her to perform fellatio on him. When
Rebecca did as she was asked, he said, "That's it, bitch, suck on it hard.
That's why your mommy and I made you - to make daddy feel good." He makes
her sit on his penis while her play with her nipples. Rebecca complains
that he's hurting her, but he won't stop.
He says: "All right, bitch, I want to taste a little bit of your cunt."
When he finishes going down on her, he commands her to bend over the tub.
He spanks her and screws her from the rear. He makes her suck him off
again and then do what he likes best - urinate on his penis. Ms. Zorda
advises Rebecca to stay at the school, and she introduces her to the other
students and staff members, including Mr. Minindao, the "Dean of Discipline"
and his secretary Linda. Later in their office, Minidao and Linda discuss
what a difficult job they have, and Linda sucks his cock. Minindao goes
down on her and then they have intercourse. He asks her, "You want my
cum? Say 'Please, Daddy,' beg me to cum in your face."
Meanwhile, various students are talking about "the cave." The last girl
who had been taken there and talked to the police had disappeared afterward.
One boy says he wants some "serious action" and students begin to strip
and masturbate, perform fellatio and cunnilingus, and have intercourse.
One boy puts his fist in a girl's vagina.
The dean calls Rebecca into his office and scolds her for participating
in an orgy; he orders her to raise her skirt and bend over. When Rebecca
refuses, he tells her that he beat one girl until she threw up and then
made her eat her vomit. He beats Rebecca and has intercourse with her
from the rear. He makes her suck his cock.
The dean calls in two other students, a boy John and a girl. He commands
John to undress the girl and stick a pin in her brest. John says no, but
complies when the dean threatens to do it to him if he doesn't. John pushes
the point through her nipple as she struggles; blood runs down her breast;
the girl urinates. Feigning sympathy, the secretary takes her to the cave.
Once there, the secretary tells her that she will give her more "pain
and pleasure" and makes her perform cunnilingus. The secretary threatens
to turn the pin in her nipple if she refuses. The secretary turns the
pin, the girl screams. The dean comes in and makes the girl perform fellatio
on his "black rod" because she "pissed" on his floor. The secretary removes
the pin from her swollen breast. The dean says if she's good he'll put
his fist up her ass. He f---s her and the girls says, "I won't ever do
it again, Daddy D. Oh, please f--- me."
Rebecca tells Ms. Zorda what is going on, and they enter the cave. The
dean leaughs when he sees them, but Ms. Zorda points a gun at the dean.
He laughs again. The sound of a shot is heard.
The Meese Commission also described in detail Forgive Me - I Have Sinned:
The confessor mails letters to three person whom he summons for confession.
As they discuss their sins, he is enveloped by smoke behind a cross-stripped
screen. Ingrid, a young girl who, while sleeping on a camping trip, was
undressed and fondled by an oriental girl, Serena, in the sleeping bag
next to her. Ingrid woke and asked Serena what she was doing. Serena plays
with Ingrid's nipples, then performs cunnilingus. They kiss and perform
cunnilingus on each other. Ingrid, dressed in a school uniform, tells
the confessor that she couldn't help herself.
Curious about the size of his sister's tits, Brad peeks at her while
she undresses. Becoming excited, Brad masturbates. His sister Maria catches
him. She commands him to do as she says, then handcuffs him, hits him,
makes him crawl, forces him to perform cunnilingus and call her "mistress."
Brad tells the confessor that he's "an animal." Vicki Jones, from the
secretarial pool, goes to Jason Burke's office. Jason thinks that she's
a "primp-faced iceberg who needs a good f---ing." Burke threatens her
job and forces her to take dictation with his penis as the pen. He tells
her, "You girls are all the same. You act like you don't like it but you
really do. You want a good stiff dick right in your mouth. Oh, suck on
it, suck."
Jason pulls her by the hair and makes her suck his cock. She cries and
his cock falls out of her mouth. He orders her to open her mouth and then
shoves her mouth on his dick. He rips off her panties and penetrates her
vagina with his erection. She cries, "Let me go. Please, let me go." He
replies, "Say, 'I like it', say it, say it." She yells, "I like it. You're
hurting my pussy, ow. Don't, don't."
The confessor moves away from the screen, has her lie down, and straps
her wrists. "Now you must be touched and cleansed by me, your confessor.
Now you must taste the rod," he tells Vicki. He masturbates, and Vicki
licks his penis. "Be cleansed, sinner," the confessor says. Vicki sucks
his cock; the confessor masturbates; the confessor penetrates her but
withdraws to ejaculate on her buttocks. He tells her that she will be
forgiven.
After the confessor's separate encounters with Ingrid, Brad, and Vicki,
he assures them that they are not the guilty parties - that Serena, Maria,
and Jason are guilty - and that Ingrid, Brad and Vicki will get their
revenge by bringing the guilty ones with them Saturday night.
In preparation for Saturday's cleansing, the confessor fills six glasses
with wine, and puts a powder in the three intended for the guilty ones.
After the six people arrive, Serena, Maria, and Jason are given the wine
with power; they pass out. When they wake, Jason's hands are tied and
Vicki is over him; Maria is in a stock; the confessor holds Serena by
the neck while masturbating himself. Jason, Maria and Serena are in reverse
positions from their previous experiences with Vicki, Brad and Ingrid.
Vicki forces Jason to do her will; Brad forces Maria to do his will; the
confessor forces Serena to "suck the rod" while yelling, "You like sucking
on little young tits." As Vicki makes Jason perform cunnilingus on her
and Brad paddles Maria, the confessor commands Serena to perform fellatio.
Serena asks Ingrid to let her perform cunnilingus on her, but Ingrid says
she belongs to the confessor. The confessor has intercourse with Ingrid
from the rear and says to Serena, "My holy fluid from the rod that baptizes
you will cleanse thee."
The confessor masturbates and ejaculates on Serena's breast. Before the
film ends, Ingrid is performing cunnilingus with Serena, Vicki is performing
fellatio on Jason, and Brad is having intercourse from his sister's rear
while she is still in the stock.
Porn's Walk On The Wild Side
Porn’s walk on the wild side takes us into a thorny thicket. Certainly
movies like those detailed above do not elevate, but do they harm? And
what do they reveal about human nature?
First we need clarity. Point one. What people want to watch and what
they want to act out are frequently different. Many persons including
myself find pornos with vanilla sex boring and Max Hardcore arousing even
though our personal tastes are usually gentle.
Two, arousal is largely in the eye and the groin of the viewer. What
arouses one man may not arouse another, let alone a woman. In Psychiatrist
Robert Stoller's 1970 essay "Pornography and Perversion", he argues that
porn - the erotic daydream translated into words or pictures - is "the
highly condensed story of [the perverse subject's] perversion: it's historical
origins in reality, its elaborations in fantasy, its manifest content
which disguises and reveals the latent content."
What makes the use of pornography technically perverse for the Freudian
Stoller is that it indicates a persistent "preference for a genitally
stimulating exciting act [anal sex?] which is not heterosexual intercourse."
At the heart of all perversions, including pornography, is "a fantasied
act of revenge which condenses a life history - memory and fantasies,
traumas, frustrations and joys. The perversion of pornography, which provides
restitution for men, comes in different genres, each created for a specific
perverse need by exact attention to detail and each defining an area of
excitement that will have no effect on a different man."
According to Stoller, an essential quality of both perversion and pornography
is sadism, or revenge for a passively experienced trauma. Thus, for example,
the fantasy or act of "poisoning or humiliating one's partner with ejaculate"
or of causing physical damage to someone by one's phallic onslaught functions
to convert sexual trauma into triumph. Stoller speculates that the patterns
of sexual excitement of nonperverse people may contain mechanisms converting
sexual trauma to triumph not unlike those purportedly at work in perversions
such as transvestism. (Arthur J. Mielke, Christians, Feminists, And The
Culture Of Pornography.)
In his essay,"Transvestites' Women", Stoller examines the connection
between the erotic interests of many male transvestites in representations
of phallic or cruelly beautiful women and these men's perceptions that
the women in their lives who are sexually important possess all the power.
These women - the mothers, sisters, girl friends and wives - have in common
the "fear of and need to ruin masculinity."
The feminists are right, says Stoller, that male heterosexual porn insults
women. But it insults men too, showing their need to be cruel and marking
their failure to relate better to live females. Men abuse women because
they are uncertain, fearful, angry and envious. "Erotic daydreams in pornography
represent fantasies of revenge in which the consumer imagines he is degrading
women. Men fetishize - dehumanize - women to be erotically stimulated.
"Although sexual excitement is experienced as an automatic, uncomplicated,
natural (with implications both of biology and theology) phenomenon, it
is dense with meanings at all levels of awareness." (Dr. Robert Stoller)
Dr. Joseph Slade writes: "Like happiness, eroticism is at best measured
in moments. Buried deep, or carried near the surface of the psyche, our
particular fantasies are colored by respect for certain powerful taboos,
against which we calibrate those moments. While we ordinarily violate
these taboos mentally, in secret, as expressions of our personal sexuality,
some of these forbidden longings we share with others. Formulaic patterns
fix, compress, and intensify such fantasies: they become models for erotic
moments....People respond to certain patterns of behavior more readily
than to others.... Members of the raincoat brigade sit through hours of
trash in search for a formula that especially gratifies them. Behind the
hokum and hackwork, they may find moments of eroticism authentic for them,
some set that fits, or they may not; but hope would seem to spring eternal,
for they return again and again." (Joseph Slade, Movie Artifacts, 1982,
Nelson Hall Publishers, 111 N. Canal Street, Chicago, IIlinois, 60606.)
Dr. Robert Stoller agreed with feminists that in porn "there is always
a victim, no matter how disguised: no victim, no pornography." The scripts
of men's pornography as well as women's (which Stoller identifies as romance
novels) contain themes of hostility. "For most people most of the time,
a touch of cruelty may be a trace element in erotic fantasy." Women are
not exempt from his claim that "humans are not a very loving species and
this is especially so when they make love."
Porn creates an arena where someone dominates and someone submits. Authors
as diverse as Normal Mailer and Gael Greene, Henry Miller and Erica Jong,
remind us that this is the essence of eroticism. In a letter to Club magazine,
an avid viewer of pornos wrote: "It's reflected glory... When I see pictures
of John Holmes' superb 12" dick in full erection I feel proud of my sex;
it's like my team winning at football."
"Fear is the other side of domination," writes Slade. "it sharpens the
tension which shapes the pornographic response.
"Female sexuality endangers male order. As with football, as with high-noon
showdowns in Laredo, as with primitive rites, there must be rules, formulas
and codes and cliches, to circumscribe and contain potential anarchy."
Dr. Robert Stoller believed in significant differences in the way men
and women become aroused. Men, heterosexual and gay, focus on body parts
and make them into fetishes while women, heterosexual and lesbian, look
more at personality. They are more psychic than anatomical. These dramatic
differences in male and female arousal appear to Stoller to be "insoluble.
Maybe if the need for orgasm, once excitement is instilled, were always
as driven in females as in males or as bearable in males as in females,
the two sexes would understand each other better."
No wonder then, that whenever society does not actively discourage homosexuality
and push men into heterosexual marriage, males tend to become bi-sexual.
(See Dennis Prager's essay on "Judaism, Homosexuality and Civilization".)
It doubles your chances of getting laid.
In Both Ways, 1975, a woman discovers her husband is in love with another
man. It's a rare mainstream porno to explicitly show homosexuality. Prentice
Hall published in 1980 a book called Barry and Alice about a true-life
situation similar to the theme of Both Ways. The themes outlined above
run against Judeo-Christian and Feminist notions that love be amongst
equals, and that one person's pleasure should not come at the expense
of another. No sex masters and no sex slaves.
Gloria Steinem claims that erotica, as distinct from pornography, "doesn't
require us to identify with a conqueror or a victim." The Kensington Ladies
Erotica Society insists that its members not portray women characters
as victims.
Perversion: The Erotic Form of Hatred, by Dr. Stoller, includes a chapter
entitled "Sex as Sin." The late psychiatrist suggests that "just as every
human group has its myth, perhaps for every person there is the sexual
fantasy (perversion?)." Pornography becomes "the communicated sexual fantasy
of a dynamically related group of people."
Defining sin as the desire to harm others, Stoller suggests that feeling
sinful about sex comes in part from the awareness "that some of sexual
excitement depends on the desire to harm others," and this awareness that
one is sinning often increases sexual excitement. All sins are not equal.
A rape fantasy is not an act of palpable violence, "and the transvestite's
unconscious fantasy of revenge leads to nothing more violent than his
masturbating into a lady's hat."
Stoller acknowledges that destroying the human in our sexual objects
diminishes our capacity to love and that "unchecked sexuality dehumanizes
erotic life and this thwarts love." If hostility plays a major part in
sexual arousal, this suggests that there is little sex, including heterosexual
marital sex, that does not have a touch of the perverse. This defines
perversion down - We're all perverts with our own perversions. All alike
are sinners, though not all are sinners alike. Like sex, comedy also relies
on hostility. Both mediums reveal that humans are not a loving species,
especially when they make love or laugh or are at their most human. The
most visceral entertainment - both amusing and erotic - frequently exhibits
hostility.
"Some humor is painful," writes Dr. Stoller, "some gentle, some malicious,
some warm, some mocking,some insightful. But there is no humor without
victims and victors, implied or manifest. One person's joke is another's
insult. Both people have been touched by the hostile theme, but the one
who has laughs has gained an insight the other had to reject. Hostility...is
a sine qua non [for humor and sex], whether it is scarcely there or thickly
larded in." (Observing the Erotic Imagination)
Author and porn critic Bob Rimmer writes: "After ten years, patrons of
adult theaters who have seen hundreds of pornos are either jaded or desensitized
to normal sexual experience on the screen. To compensate, many sexvids
offer bondage or discipline sequences or entire tapes in which the participants
get sexually aroused by tying each other up or whipping each other while
they wear leather clothing. There are sexvids that offer enemas, golden
showers and probably even Marquis deSade defecation and the eating thereof
(although I have never seen any that show coprophagia). Most adult film
reviewers rate the films on their ability to produce a hard-on. Continually
seeking after novelty, producers and directors of even the best sexvids
offer kinky sexual behavior that often borders on cruelty or sadism. These
sexvids degrade not only the participants, but human sexuality in general."
(Guide #1, p.34)
Arthur Lennig concludes his essay on censorship with the following thought:
"No one can prove that films with graphic sex or violence have a harmful
effect on viewers, but there seems to be little doubt that films do have
some effect on society and that all of us live with such effects... The
question of how society will function when all checks that a few thousand
years of civilization have imposed have disappeared...has yet to be answered."
 |