Home

Back to Essays



Sunday, September 12th, 1999

Kid Vegas Party

Kid Vegas held his party Friday night, but not at John Bowen's studio on Hartland as originally scheduled. KV moved his party to a home on Bronson in Hollywood.

From : Given an extended deadline of 2:30 Friday afternoon to have the movie Cocksucking Skank Whores in his hands, John T. Bone as of 3:14 PM, said there woould be no Kid Vegas party Friday night. Vegas has apparently been sent to his room without supper. Bone said he wants his movie, no ands, ifs, or buts. The communications breakdown between Bone and Vegas, prompted Vegas to call Gene Ross to talk to Bone on Vegas' behalf. Master Dominic who edited the feature is in the middle of the controversy. Up until Thursday, Dominc was in jail squaring a community services beef. But no movie has been forthcoming. Bone had a scheduled release date coming up this week.

Luke: Kid Vegas phoned Sunday.

KV: "John Bone is blaming for this... We still have not found the movie. We sent about 50 carloads of people over to Hollywood... There were lots of girls. I had about 12 with me... The only thing that sucked was that none of the bands got to play... My ribs still hurt from my accident.

"I'm done with John Bone. I'm washing my hands of him. I'm looking at working with Extreme... John cancelled my party which I had promoted for two weeks. He has no trust. He wants to f---ing disrespect me in front of all these people. f--- him. And I think he stole one of my handguns.

Porner: The whole Strange Brothers editing (thats who did vegas' movie)..started 6 months ago with Devin, the bald and gotee wearing dude who was Chuck's right hand guy, and a man named 'Ken' who is an outsider investor who happens to own a PLUSH editing bay( media 100) and a ton of cool gear. When Chuck started sliding down, Devon saw the opportunity to scoop more directorial work..... Porner: so he brought in Dominic, master dom, from zane legend etc.... Porner: he was now handling 'operations", while a third guy, Chris, did the cutting.

Porner: I am not sure how the monies were handled BUT...... I have been told that the one who got dicked on the money was ken Porner: Now, ken has cleared out the whole building, which he owns. Thats Dom's Apt upstairs( center for many Kid vegas stories) and the bay down stairs is now gone. Porner: Ken has told me that he moved the equipment for security reasons, and he is soliciting business for himself, and he kept the cutter from before. Porner: Im no high paid LAPD detective but I would add up the clues and say that Ken has the tape in Lieu of payment. Porner: I dont know if Vegas or Bowen has paid for the edit, but I would guess that Ken has not been paid. Comprende? Porner: So, unless that tape popped up on Friday, I would say that Ken has it. If Vegas reads this, he should no where to find Ken.

Reckless Endangerment 90210

By Krash

Slightly more than 35 years ago, in a case that was widely interpreted as the dawn of a new urban amorality, a young woman named Catherine (Kitty) Genovese was stabbed repeatedly and ultimately fatally outside her Queens, NY, apartment...as dozens of her neighbors watched. It was a half-hour before police received the first report--and by this time Kitty Genovese’s attacker had returned to the scene not once but twice to finish the wounded woman off.

Three decades and eight months later, in a structurally similar scenario, a 19-year-old ingenue named Leigh Zurmuhlen was spirited out of Manhattan’s trendiest nightspot, Bowery Bar, by Gotham’s celebrity-of-the-moment, Darren Star--who then plied her with narcotics in a Central Park West hotel room until she died.

A dozen or more New York City newspaper writers played blind, deaf and dumb as Darren Star made his getaway to Hawaii. It would be more than two weeks after Leigh Zermuhlen’s body was found alone in Room 1610 of The Mayflower Hotel before any of the reporters known here for brevity’s sake as “The Gang That Couldn’t Write Straight” even mentioned it--although the death was noted immediately in The Staten Island Advance....and the toxicology report followed on the AP wire a week later.

And in contradistinction to the Kitty Genovese case--in which the killer was apprehended and imprisoned--Leigh Zurmuhlen’s intimate assailant remains at large.

Also in the compare-and-contrast modality: “Two men accused of allowing a friend to die of a drug overdose,” reported the New York Times last month, "have been charged with manslaughter.” Equal justice under the law? Not on Central Park West. “Sex in the City”? Not for Leigh Zurmulen--at least not any more.

And Darren Star? With the Emmys only hours away--and his HBO “comedy” up for an award--these words from “Sex and the City” creator Candace Bushnell [in New York mag, dated February 10, 1997]--words filtered by Bushnell through her knowledge of Darren Star’s crime[s] 18 months previous--emit an eerie resonance: “...The people I write about, this certain slice of New York, I have this theory that everyone I know is becoming a Cyborg. That’s what I really want to write about, Cyborgs...superhuman man. Cyborgs are the next evolutionary step in Homo sapiens. We have Homo sapiens, and then we have Cyborgs. We have already replaced the heart, and Cyborgs are probably less emotionally needy. My theory is that they need to eat less food. And they can survive on drugs, which is the way of the future--eating vitamins and alcohol and drugs.”

Emmy or not--there’s more on Leigh Zurmuhlen’s terminator...when Reckless Endangerment 90210 continues. Only at l-keford.com.

Gossip

Duck DuMont has divorced his porn star wife Kym Wilde who's doing her first sex scenes in nine years.

Michael Raven is trying to talk Sin City contract girl Shay Sweet into doing a double penetration scene with two big black guys.

I hear that Todd Blatt of Antigua Productions, the company that sells VCA's international rights, owes porners thousands of dollars. Most porn companies have huge debts to their peers, except for VCA, Sin City and Vivid...

Transvestite Terri Hess owes porners over a million dollars, including about $150,000 to GVA West.

Regan Senter

Porner writes: When we talk about working in the adult entertainment business, a lot of people view us as lowly scum bags lining our pockets from the nations perverted desires. It seems that in EVERY business, there's always one individual who has to bend the rules and give everyone a bad name. In the case of adult video, that individual is Regan Senter. In my book, this self proclaimed "agent" is absolutely on the bottom of the food chain. From his dingy apartment, this parasite attempts to lure unsuspecting newcomers to the porn world into his bed for a two minute f--- that he proclaims is a necessary "demo" in order to get work.

It's safe to say that if he quit this practice, his two inch penises (seen on his web site) would forever be locked away inside dirty underwear. As I write this, behind me sleeps a former "Regan" model who spent most of the night filling me with horror stories of this leech's lowlife activities. He believes that he's doing no wrong because he's "up front" about his "demo." I find this incredibly repulsive.

His method is simple. He finds girls through a series of ads run in local papers. Not very original, but on occasion, effective. If they're not scared off by the appearance of the dump he lives in, these girls are given a standard "Regan Speech" on how the business works. HIS BUSINESS THAT IS!! He gives the girls what sleeping beauty refers to as a "penalty sheet." This is a list of rules depicting how they are to act while working for him.

Rule #1 There will be a one thousand dollar fine for spending the night at anyone's home involved in the industry. This includes everyone from directors on down to Pa's and tech's and their friends.

#2 $50.00 fine for talking to ANYONE on the set whom he didn't pre approve or have under his thumb.

#3 $500.00 fine for attending ANY industry event i.e.: award show, birthday party,etc.. or talking to anyone without his permission.

This list of "rules" goes on to #20(I should have a copy to submit early next week). He offers his s---ty apartment as a home base, place to stay while working because #1 he wants to pressure them into his two minute sex routine #2 because he charges them rent, and most of all because he doesn't trust the "new girls" to stay at all loyal. WHO WOULD.

He is so afraid that they'll find out about AVN (which I guarantee he doesn't have lying around his rat hole) or AIM that he instructs the few producers that on occasion get talent from him not to let them around other girls. He tries to screen who they (the girls) will be working with as to not let certain talent whom he deems traitorous, anywhere near his newbees. WHAT A PIECE OF s---!!!

We all know that in this business sexual favors are traded on occasion for better roles and box covers. But in order to just get work in the first place? Come on. On to how he works his deal with ANYONE who want's to get talent from him.

For starters, his web site is loaded with talent. Unfortunately, about 90% of them either don't work for him, are no longer in the business, or just hate his f---in' guts. When asked about these women, he say's that they're flakes and you wouldn't want them anyway. He charges a $350.00 "retainer before he'll give out phone numbers that he doesn't even represent. He likes to refer to Jill Kelly when offering numbers to prospective clients. Apparently that's his coupe de gras. Before he gets your money, he promises first shot at new girls, but once he cashes your check, he claims that said they would have to be in the biz for thirty days. He sends the newbees to the same producers and NO ONE else.

He claims that if someone from his stable works for you,and she brings a friend, you owe him another commission. YEAH, RIGHT!!! He pulled such a 360 on me since our relationship started that I've just written off ever getting any talent from him again. As a matter of fact, I'd have better luck cruising the supermarkets anyway. NEW TALENT BEWARE. STAY AWAY. IT WILL ONLY TURN YOU OFF TO THE BUSINESS.

Vern Bullough Responds to Charges of Pedophilia

CSUN sex professor Vern Bullough, who helped organize the 1998 World Pornography Conference, has been accused of pedophilia by antiporn activist Judith Reisman.

Here's a quote from an article in the August 30 edition of The New Statesman: "The founder of CSUN's Center for Sex Research and the sex guru emeritus at the conference was Dr. Vern L. Bullough, a self-admitted pedophile and an editor of the Journal of Pedophilia. Bullough wrote the introduction to the pedophile handbook Loving Boys: A Multidisciplinary Study in Two Volumes of Sexual Relations Between Adults and Minor Males, by the Dutch pedophile and former "jurist" Dr. Edward Brongersma."

Dr. Bullough (whose recommendation was crucial to Prometheus Books decision to publish Luke's first book) writes Luke: "Dear Luke: These are charges made by Judith Riesman and have appeared in the John Birch society publication. I am not a self admitted pedophile, and my four children and grandchildren are upset. So would my late wife be. My ideas on the subject were developed at an international meeting sponsored by the Catholic Brothers of the Paraclete back in the 80's to deal with pedophilia in the Catholic Church. The results were published in a book edited by the Psychiatrist Jay Feierman. Unfortunately, it turns out the 50 or so experts assembled from around the world had no real advice to give as far as causes. What was needed was more research.

"As a historian, I knew that the age of consent has changed over the course of the twentieth century, generally raised upwards and so some of the behavior now classed as pedophiliac was not earlier classified in this way. But how does one do research on the topic which is forbidden. I read extensively in the literature and felt that at least in some cases, we had to look upon it as sexual harassment, i.e. a behavior that was tolerated and acceptable a generation ago, but is not today. The vast public acceptance of this change in harassment from tolerated to making it illegal has really changed behavior but not yet eliminated it. Was there something more involved which puts the stigma more on the perpetrator. How do they think?

"When Paidika first began to be published, I was invited to be on the editorial board. I originally turned it down, but then accepted it since it gave me access to what passed for research on the topic. I was not the editor, but along with about 30 other mostly academics on the editorial advisory board. I was asked by the publisher of the English translation of Brongersma's book to write a preface to it, and I did so. If you read the preface, you will find I called it a lawyer's brief made by a believer in the subject, and for us to understand people like Brongersma we need to read what they believe. I believe Brongersma is wrong and erroneous but how does one deal with the topic without talking to such people or reading what they have to say. I still hold by that.

"I have initiated a lawsuit against Judith Riesman and asked for a retraction from the John Birch society. Riesman, however, is a slippery character. The Kinsey nstitute also sued her and won a $50,000 settlement against her, the amount of money they spent to win their suit. She declared bankruptcy and says she is unable to pay, and just goes on making her accusations. One begins to feel helpless in trying to deal with such charges. Any advice from you on how to do so would be much appreciated. I should add that one of the perils of doing sex research is in being charged with being what you have researched. I did a lot on homosexuality and a considerable number of people have come to believe that I was gay; I also did a lot on cross dressing, and many believe I am a cross dresser. I also did a lot of prostitution but interestingly no one so far has accused me of being a prostitute. I have also done some on s/m and similarly I have been identified as one. Personally I am a monogamous heterosexual. Married to my first wife for nearly fifty years before she died three years ago, and now married to my second wife, an old friend. I remain monogamous."

Danger Boy Video

Ramsey writes on RAME:

I really believe that Dangerboy Video will become one of the best companies in the industry simply because of their perfect attitude towards porn. These guys know what porn is all about and so does Mila, a perfect combination I would say. I havn't seen any movies from them YET but I did read a lot about them and about Brad and they sound like winners. Also the fact that Dave Cummings thinks highly of them is another reason why I think these guys can be a major player in the industry. I think it's only a matter of time before Dangerboy Video blows Extreme Associates away. Extreme can have this "Miss Extreme" thing but that's nothing compared to the "Queen of Nasty".

Extreme IS blown away by The Evil Empire/Apocalypse. Cornhole Armageddon is proof of that. As for Dangerboy Video well they got Mila and so they have access to the nastiest girl in porn, what else do you need to know? Ofcourse you Americans can't handle movies that are too hardcore, Max Hardcore is proof, you Americans are always attacking him. That's why Vivid and VCA are big companies in the US while in Europe they don't mean s---, Max Hardcore does!

FBI's Howard Stern File

XXX writes with another l-keford.com exclusive!

The FBI file of Howard Stern: A Sex Addict and Closet Transvestite who pretends women hunger for him.

In several respects, Mr Stern can be likened to those who have sexual problems, such as those individuals who have extramarital affairs, participate in sado masochistic origies, or engage in various forms of sexual molestation.

Mr Stern has severe problems dealing with his sexual identity. He has to cope with a great deal of anxiety and guilt, and he is essentially lonely and depressed. However, as we analyzed Mr Stern we were very struck by his almost complete absence of overt anxiety and seeming lack of guilt. Here was a man sexually acting out and taking almost no responsibility for himself. In fact, he presented himself as a passive victim: women cannot resist him and yet he is so altruistic, so he did not want to deprive them! His extramarital behaviors were experienced by him the same way--he is a "sex object" to hungry women.

Furthermore, Mr Stern seemed to have rationalized away his fear of being found out by his wife and merely wanted to "protect her" from feeling hurt and uncomfortable. He seems to have no insight into the fact that he fears sexual contact with his wife. We never encountered a subject who seemed so full of superego lacunae or lacked so many ego controls, even though we have analyzed thousands of federal prisoners and mental patients who were labelled "sociopathic" or "psychopathic." However, his weak object relations, low frustration tolerance, and extreme grandiosity made him appear like a unique baby: no anxiety, no guilt, and little ability to introspect.

He is a psychopath who is peculiarly intolerant of frustration, inclined to sexual excess, selfish and egotistical, and an immediately ineffective reality sense, incapable of deep attachments due to the fact that he was emotionally neglected and abandoned.

Similar to most subjects diagnosed as sociopathic or psychopathic, Mr Stern experienced his parents as brutal, and rather than actively oppose them, he introjected their punitive voices into his superego. The more hatred he felt toward them, the more retaliation he expected, and the more he became subject to a punitive, primitive and sadistic superego.

Mr Stern may be described as an individual who is at war with a strong, sadistic, primitive superego that constantly dominates him. He is similar to the child who feels overpowered by aggressively demanding parents and wants to rebel against their strict and punitive controls. His asocial, callous, and impulsive behavior may be viewed as a defensive operation, that is, a rebellion against his punitive superego, which he projects onto spouse, family, colleagues, and society in general.

Since as a psychopath he has an unloving superego, he feels that he must be punished for his antisocial activity and that is why HE INEVITABLY LEAVES TRACES OF HIS MISDEEDS FOR OTHERS TO SEE (caps, ours). Both parents used Howard as a substitute little girl, and his father also used him as a whipping boy. He made an identification with his parental aggressors and violators, and consequently wants to make others suffer the way he suffered.

His sexual contacts primarily consisted of a great deal of kissing, hugging, and fellatio and anal sex, but almost no instances of coitus. When inside a woman, she appears so big to him and he feels so small. He is afraid she'll eat him up or castrate him. That's why he stay's out.

Mr Stern's fear of the vagina and his "staying out" of it also explain his having only short-term, brief and intermittent contacts with women. He learned he had to protect himself from being enveloped by a woman and the best way was to have only limited contact.

In analyzing Mr Stern's sexual contacts, what becomes increasing clear is how much hatred he was expressing---toward his parents, wife, and women. The hatred toward his parents was overdetermined. Not only did he hate them because they appeared to be "big mamas" who could weaken and castrate him, but he also projected his own weak self-image onto them and would be rather contempuous of them than confront his self-loathing. It was as if he were saying to women, "You are the weak, despicable woman, not I!"

Because of past deprivations and losses, Mr Stern expects to be abandoned or denied at the moment of closeness with a woman, when gratification finally seems within reach. Sexual acting out is likely to follow these moments of closeness, because of his intense excitement and strong expectations of renewed frustration. Multiple purposes and functions may be identified, but the primary motive usually is to get revenge against objects (i.e., others) for present and past disappointments.

When we consider Mr Stern's extreme and pervasive sexual acting out, it is evident that his childhood conflicts were so painful to him that he repressed them and did not want to talk about them. His acting out behavior emerges in the place of verbal recall and is a resistance to remembering childhood conflicts. Hence, acting out seems to be the only outlet for him. Thus, HE FEELS COMPELLED TO FIND AN OBJECT INTO WHICH FEELINGS CAN BE EVACUATED(caps ours).

By acting out sexually we believe he is also seeking reparation for past losses. Consequently, he projects his own limitations and vulnerabilities onto others instead of confronting himself, and Mr Stern acts out because HE CANNOT COPE WITH THE PAIN AND OTHER EMOTIONS THAT VERBALIZING WHAT IS ON THEIR MINDS ENTAILS(caps ours).

A destructive motive common to all his sexual acting out with others is revenge: he treats others in many ways the way he was sadistically treated by others. He also uses his sexual acting out to obscure his deficiences in relating to others.

Mr Stern's greed for acquiring or wanting celebrity and professional success at the expense of others demonstrates a wanton disregard for the feelings of others, which emerges from unresolved conflicts at all levels of psychosexual development. He is essentially an oral baby (read "bigmouth") who feels very deprived but very entitled. Mr Stern has an "insatiable craving" that exceeds what a person needs, and in addition, exceeds what the object(read "person") is willing to give. His aim is to extract all of the goodness that can be taken from the object, who is rarely recognized as a person with unique rights of his or her own.

Mr Stern rarely initiates sex with his wife. Although he rationalizes his sexual inhibitions with his wife by talking about her "lack of passion," our further exploration revealed that Mr Stern had unconsciously turned his wife into a mother figure and avoided her sexually. Again, as with his parents, in bed with his wife, he felt like a little boy being enveloped by a mother who would eventually castrate him.

Our analysis of Mr Stern's stated fantasies shows that at times he fantasized himself as a little girl--a fantasy he had nurtured all his life. What seems to predominate in Mr Stern's fantasies for loving contact were pregenital yearnings. Often, he fantasized himself as a baby at the breast, enjoying the sucking and pleasurably embibing good milk. From time to time in his fantasties he would also be AN INFANT WHO WOULD URINATE OR DEFECATE AT ANY TIME OR PLACE HE FELT LIKE DOING SO(caps ours).

Although he has frequent desires for anal intercourse, in which he would invariably be in the passive position, he has frequent fantasies in which he would be enveloped by his father's body and would eventually enjoy a blissful symbiosis. Our analysis of Mr Stern also brought out many fantasies of clinging to his father, sucking his father's fantasied breasts, sitting on his father's lap, and being anally penetrated by his father's penis and fingers. His sadomasochistic modus viendi means he cannot achieve realistic pleasure, but needs to abuse others or feel abused by his wife, his colleagues, or his superiors. Mr Stern shows a strong tendency to regress.

In many ways, he is a fixated baby, preoccupied with preoedipal and pregenital concerns. Consequently, when he is or feels frustrated, he longs to be taken care of and yearns for the perfect breast. He behaves like a hungry, helpless, demanding baby with frequent regressive displays. INFORMATION REGARDING MR STERN'S CONFIRMED CLOSET TRANSVESTISM IS STILL CLASSIFIED TO DATE. However, we can confirm that he is in fact a lifelong, closet transvestite.

No Bacon for Texas Schoolchildren?

Artist Francis Bacon is unhealthy for young minds--according to officals of the Forth Worth, Texas school district...which canceled field trips last week to the city’s world-renowned Fort Worth Modern Art Museum for its retrospective exhibit of the late English painter Francis Bacon.

Five school administrators deemed the exhibit “inappropriate for young students” after "reviewing" the paintings Wednesday in response to complaints from parents of fifth-graders who saw the show.

Teachers were notified that the field trips have been canceled.

"It's not age-appropriate,” the school district's art-program director, Beverly Fletcher, told the Fort Worth Star Telegram. “ It's an emotionally charged show. It has references to homosexuality ... and umpteen frontal-nudity views."

“... teachers were taken by surprise when they took students to the show...

“...[info-] packets that teachers received from the museum didn't reflect everything they saw...”

“...[One schoolchild] came home last week asking about homosexuality and violence and saying he was afraid to go to sleep...

“...Other parents had already complained...[Kvetched one:] "I've taken my child through the Kimbell Art Museumand it has nudity, but it wasn't like this...In descriptions, it says he is engaged in homosexual sex with his lover. I was really disturbed that my child was exposed to that without my knowledge."

[On the other hand...] “By addressing some parents' concerns, the district has raised the ire of other parents. "I'm upset. This smacks of censorship," said David Kay, whose eighth-grade daughter attends Daggett Middle School, whose trip today was canceled...

“...Kay said that he hadn't seen the show but that he knew Bacon was a homosexual and had heard his paintings contained nudity and often anguished subject matter.

“...He said his 13-year-old daughter and other students might feel compassion for depressed people after seeing the paintings."

Francis Bacon’s painterly signature was a distortive, agonized, erotocentric vision cast against non-Euclidean geometries and starkly enveloping color fields. Bacon, a homosexual on the grand scale, was 82 when he died in 1992.

Reported the Star-Telegram: “Daggett Middle School art teacher Amy Holkesvik said she was disappointed the field trip was canceled... "It is not pornography,” said Holkesvik. “My children would have snickered a little.” According to the Star-Telegram, “Advanced art students at four high schools who were scheduled to see the exhibit will now have to get parental permission to attend.”

WWW.ROCCOFUNCLUB.COM

Ron writes on RAME: Boring for those expecting Rocco values. Rocco's latest is boring. There are some interesting computer special effects and big production techniques. There is a story line and decent acting by the performers. The story line is there are problems with Rocco's web site and he has to figure out what is wrong. Needless to say, he is the hero and gets most of the women. He and Olga destroys the evil web female (Dina Jewel) and then he f---s Olga in the finale. Somewhere along the way, he does anal with the delectable Monic. I fast forwarded though most of the story. I don't watch porn for stories. There are devices called BOOKS, which provide much better story lines. The sex is tepid but with gorgeous looking babes. The sex is pussy and anal. Not a single dp, much less anything that smacks of Euro production. A few scenes get slightly rough (Rocco is Rocco and cannot completely control himself). I suspect that this video, with a bit of editing to remove the mild spankings (by Rocco's standard), will be aimed at the hotel and vivid market. In this video, Rocco ties to protray himself as a serious actor and director. I like Rocco the ole fashion Rocco way. Animal Trainer, Rocco's previous video, is a lot better and it has Kelly.

Gangbang Sluts 4

Ron writes on RAME: The video starts out with 6 guys sitting around and bs'ing. One guy comments on how his girlfriend is capable of doing the entire group and here comes Heaven Leigh. She has her hair dyed with gold highlights in front -- makes her look old. She looks pretty otherwise. The scenes are predictable and follow the Al Borda's standard, patented format (Nelson's patents). First, she sucks everybody off and at times has 2 dicks in her mouth. Her deepthroating skills seem to have improved. She can almost deepthroat a fairly large dick. Then it is virginal and everybody takes turns in her pussy. The position varies from upright mish to standing dog. Then is is anal and everybody takes turns in her ass. This is mostly standing dog. Then, it is dp in the cowgirl position with almost everybody ploughing her ass (except for the guy in the pussy -- he ain't got no ass but he got puss -- excuse the pun). Finally, we have a few guys doing the double pussy in the cowgirl position. Not all the guys did double pussy with Heaven. This is then followed by the money shot. Everybody comes on her face and into her mouth.

Bukkake Fun

DoneDone writes: Luke- By accident I stumbled on to the mecca of porn rental by my house yesteday. I quickly set up an account and of course I first selected "A Civil Action", just to make it seem like I wasnt only there for the porn. After that, I quickly headed for the porn section and marvelled at all the fantastic box covers. I settled on a few titles, one of them being American Bukkake #3 (the latest Bukkake #4 was rented out by some other pervert). Got home and popped it in, and I was fairly excited because my buddy JG is a big Bukkake fan, and I was new to the genre.