Wednesday, September 8th, 1999
The Prey’s The Thing
Luke F-rd Wire Services, Ltd.:
Another bull's-eye for heat-seeking gettingit.com: The Cape Town journo known only as Schwann’s “Hunting Whores in the Veldt” investigates the intrepid trollops who role-play as “prey in the African bushveldt”... a high-octane, low-serotonin, dust-and-lust-choked rite of venery commingled with every psychopath’s wet dream: “Chase a gorgeous, half-naked blonde through the wilderness on your motorbike and pelt your human quarry with paintballs... It's a new game being played in South Africa, where prostitutes willingly take on the role of the hunted... Dressed only in loin clothes, the prostitutes would run through the veldt amidst herds of eland, kudu, and zebra. The human "game" was to be paid $50 an hour, whether they were 'caught' or just shot up with paint...”
Noted one waggish devotee of back-country prosti-popping: “Women are slower than impalas, but they're likely to be tricky. I reckon their natural survival instincts will come back to them.” This is the safest sex to come across Luke’s desk all week--so check it out at www.gettingit.com
Eden Rae Responds
Porn star Eden Rae replies on RAME to charges by her ex boyfriend Jeremy Steele:
Jeremy is a bitter man, who is lying through his teeth. He is also forgetting to mention his KKK paraphrenalia catalogs, which he has had for years, while saying i am racist. Very funny. There is a difference between calling an INDIVIDUAL a derogatorry name, and calling an entire race it. Evidently he has no clue that there is a difference.
For the record..I have done an interracial scene. I DID NOT mention it in the newsgroups because I thought it totally irrelevant to the accusations of racism I have endured. I personally felt that stating 'well I did an interracial scene so stop calling me racist' would have turned doing said scene into a 'proving myself NOT racist' thing, which it wasn't. I was referred the work by Tina Tyler, who's opinion I trust. She said the guy I'd be working with, and the guy directing, were very cool and would treat me right. I even emailed her to THANK her afterward.
I didnt even know about what he had said until two days ago [LF: Not true. Eden and I have corresponded about Jeremy's charges for ten days]. After as much money as I spent putting myself through school, I really feel no need to 'prove' it, swince that would require exposing the name I had during college and put me at much risk.
Jeremy was the one who asked his father for the money for my surgery AGAINST MY WISHES. I specifically told him not to Since he was the one asking for the money, not I, and I did NOT want any part of it. I thoruoughly dispute his one sided version of the events.
HOWEVER, I had no innate problem sending his father the funds, provided it was between his father and I. I had no address or phone number by which to do it. Very simple. Beyond the above factors, I was again treated for a recurrance of cancer in April. I was unable to work from January through to mid-May. I have not been involved in adult productions as an occupation since. I have done two films this year. I have all but retired.
Veteran porner Gregory Dark, creator of the "Blue Monday" vid for the group Orgy, is an MTV Music Award nominee for "Best New Artist" in the "Director" category.
Nick Long writes on RAME: Yes, Kelly and Kalina are one in the same. She stopped using 'Kalina' as there are quite a few movies out there as Kalina when she was seriously underweight and yes, her teeth did need work. Since then she has had her teeth fixed, gained weight to a mere 115-120 (up from about 80-85) and has appeared in a few select videos as Kelly Giraffe (originally G'Raffe). One recent one is 'King of Cocks' with Mr. 18".
As to the cancer, she had successful surgery a little over a year ago and it has not returned, but that is a five year wait for a 'clear' report. Oh yes, and she has had the dreaded bolt-ons installed, but in her case it was not industry pressure. Along with the low weight, she also had extremely small tits, about a 32AAA. It has assisted her self-esteem tremendously. They were not done by an industry butcher, but by a respected surgeon in the mastectomy re-construction field, (unfortunately now retired). And to save the next question, yes, Kerri, Kelly and I are still together and working in industry related fields together. Kerri has been offered several 'come-back' - 'return of' vids and declined. She still 'squirts' in our personal life (as does Kelly), despite claims that the girls on film only do staged squirts for the camera. Kerri is webmaster for 7 websites and both girls now have their own small 'mainstream' companies (non-industry). I'm still just a suitcase pimp ;-)
Now See Here
Meet New York Magazine’s “It” girl-- reporter Vanessa Grigoriadias: “I am: long hair, dark skin, big eyes, big lips, big breasts. f---able.”
With these sterling credentials, Grigoriadis, writing for nerve.com, plunges into the lubricious banality that is Voyeur Dorm: “... the latest advancement in web civilization, VoyeurDorm.com, a website that rigs a so-called dorm with forty cameras and then films the supposed co-eds who live there twenty-four hours a day.”
Nerve.com’s “I’m Seen, Therefore I Am: Twenty-Four Hours At Voyeur Dorm” is an exhaustive chronicle of the winsome scribe’s sojourn in “this nondescript ranch house a couple blocks off the freeway in a middle-class Tampa suburb.”
The “coeds” are washed-out mall-bunnies, community-college students and an ex-stripper--as contradistinct to big-city journa Grigoriadis, whose perceptions hover somewhere between bemused and amused. “I'll go pretty far to get the story”--which will come as a surprise for anyone who’s read V.G.’s snoggy puff pieces in New York--” but I draw the line at getting naked for the masses.”
Has Grigoriadis ever known anything resembling the kind of need or neediness that drives these women to such shameless depths of banality? Says one Voyeur Dorm leisurette, “What I really hate is that every guy demands that you take your top off, all the time...It's like, I will take my top off when and if I want to..."
If Tamra thinks there's something empowering about deciding when and when not to take her top off on camera, it's because she's been schooled in the Voyeur Dorm party line. The site [its operator] maintains earnestly, is not a porn site, but a celebration of freedom of expression and sexual pride, a zone that merely records these young women in their natural and unashamed state. Excessive nudity, like lounging around buck-naked, is not encouraged .... and there are no bonuses for it. The girls spend most of their waking hours in baby-Ts and miniskirts, typical mall-going regalia, or maybe the occasional sports bra.
That said, they don't shy from exhibitionism: when they swim, it's usually topless, and often on chat they'll strip down at the insistence of the hundreds of rabid men on the other end of the modem, who then duly offer praise about the girls' beauty. Also, whether it speaks to their boredom, their "Gen Y" bi-curiousness, a sense of showmanship or a genuine desire for female affection-- the girls do fool around with each other on camera in ever-shifting pairs.
"Each of us stays at our own comfort level...I showed my crotchonce and someone printed out an image of it and mailed it to me. So now I don't do that anymore."
Last year, [Voyeur Dorm.com’s originator] sold 50 percent of the company to Internet Entertainment Group's Seth Warshawsky, the 25-year-old cybersex mogul responsible for distributing the Pamela Andersen-Tommy Lee video and nude images of Dr. Laura Schlessinger. The dorm's net hit $250,000 per month, and it's only going up.... In August, the dorm was on Howard Stern twice. "Howard made me bob for tampons in an aquarium with red dye in it...[and] was yelling at us on the phone that he'd hang up if we didn't...The whole thing was pretty degrading."
Welcome to the future!
Will Luke Print Anything?
Amalek writes: Luke, in recent days you have been accused of printing (sans ink!) every damn thing that is emailed to you, no matter how devoid of informational content. Here is your chance to disprove your critics by not publishing the following strings of random five digit numbers:
08358 89578 46789 22713 38001 91757 68107 23768 71602 00781 42672 05533 64039 11161 89342 30692 (Source: "A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Natural Deviates" The Rand Corporation.)
PS - Regarding that story you recently ran concerning some porn chick getting married and having a cat fight with some other porn chick over something else that included a transcript of some verbiage from her that so totally failed to make any sort of impression on my cerebrum that not even the insertion of high I.Q. mouse genes would enable me to recall or understand it, I have the following question: Doesn't that sort of thing LITERALLY rot your brain? I mean, when you are done keying in a story like that, don't you feel a bit, uh, lighter headed?
Why don't you try to turn this whole deal around by doing something else. How about taking a few screenwriting courses and writing a screenplay about a guy from New Zealand who comes to America, matriculates and then drops out of USC, converts from Catholicism to Mormonism, and then becomes ensnared in the wicked world of commercial sex and republican politics. He nearly loses his soul, until he meets a nice Scientologist girl (could be played by NJG) who shows him the wonders of the e-meter, and all ends well for him.
Fred responds: Those alleged 5 digit random numbers were not random! I've decoded the pattern! Luke, it's a secret message from a cabal of conspiring pedophiles, homosexuals and the Kennedy clan, setting forth details of their evil plan. We've got to stop them before it's too late!
Fever59@hotmail.com writes: Luke, I have been an avid reader of your site, even back to the days when the most controversial thing about your site was the impossibility of navigating it. And I have noticed that the content of the site, although still the best porn has to offer, has its pockets of something being squeezed from a rock. I couldn't help but notice a series of numbers printed on your site the other day, and don't get me wrong, they were fine numbers in their own right, but, well, see, I have always dreamed of being heard by those fabulous women of porn, who I know read your site, and seeing those numbers get their shot to be heard and read by the same eyes that I pretend are looking up at mine, I would be remiss if I didn't give it a shot to write you something as publishable as those fortunate numbers.
So to the fabulous ladies of porn, if I am being heard now, if this is my shot to maybe swoon one of you, or maybe two, or why limit this to any number of youse, if this is my only chance to capture the heart of a pornstar and make her so wet that she needs fins to finger herself, so swollen with desire that she would need a shoehorn to put her panties on, then I shall proceed with the necessary coth and romantic snares: If I had 15 minutes with you, baby, I'd do you like a 3rd grade word problem!!! I'd lick you until you smelled like my last meal!!! I'd make you OH like the national anthem of an Orioles game (if you are have ever been to a baltimore home game, you'll understand) (and you'll know that is a big mofo OH!!!)!!! I'd have you in the stars like a wish!!! I'd have more cum on your face than expression!!!! Why I could do it all and that which is then some!!!
All you have to do is email me and you'll have more pleasure than the tip of humanity's clit!!!! fever59@hotmail.com and the rest of your life will be spent peeling disbelief from your momma's momma's folds!!!! Fever59@hotmail.com for a monster truck of a ride on a beast of a man!!! Thank you, Luke, and, well, if you bump me for some more numbers, I'll understand. They, they have infinite potential and I... I have my fabulous women of porn and my email: fever59@hotmail.com
NiceJewishGirl writes: So along with Luke's so-called "moral" vision, you know, he hates porn, is against pornography and only believes in sex within marraige. As well as his excellent article about how porn is destructive to women. But he starts off the site with how he was "looking for Kendra"-- to f---. I hope Kendra has enough sense to see his game for what it is. Anyone who sleeps with Luke F-rd is an idiot and is sadly in need of serious therapy. I don't just mean the oppositional dichotomies within his soul. It's the fact that he does not respect any woman that sleeps with him or has any kind of sex with him. No matter what he says the truth is there plain as day.
I'm not sure he respects any woman ever, at all. Don't be fooled by that OZ charm. It is hiding a man who is a serious misogynist. Don't fall for his "poor me, mummy died" thing, don't fall for his "I'm just a writer trying to make a buck..." It's a BIG LIE. The fact is that Luke LOVES porn, he came to this business because he was ADDICTED, and loves the thrill of easy women, and pseudo-fame. The only reason that he goes to shul, well besides picking up jewish chix, is that he has no inner brakes, he needs it otherwise he would be trying to star in those flix that he deplores. But he would never make it in porn for a couple of reasons. Size being number one, and number two is that his ...um little problem lately...
Sexaddict writes: Okay, Luke, put up or shut up. If pornography is so destructive, then take your photos and cheesy starlet frames offline. Called your bluff!!! Ahhhh, I understand why you won't- you are money addicted.
Luke: Good points, I would like to take the starlet frames off, and many of the pics...but the operators of my site insist on them.
Amalek@nypress.net writes: Damn, one of your other correspondents has stolen a bit of my thunder. You see Luke, I too, would like you to use your connections with the underworld of pornographic cinema to pimp for me. I want YOU to do this, because well, you understand the rationale of my needs.
To begin with, I am what is known as a mysophobe: I have an intense fear of contagion, and an appreciation that the engineered females that form the core of our erotic cinema are virtual fermentaria of disease. I therefore ask that you begin by considering all known porn actresses (and women who, in their own minds as least, qualify).
First, eliminate those who have been surgically altered in any way (but those who have had tonsillectomies and other similar surgical procedures should not be disqualified). Then eliminate from further considerations all women with tattoos, piercings, drug problems, a history of psychological disturbances, husbands, a history of sex with animals, or poor hygiene.
Now comes the really tough part. I want you to eliminate from consideration any women who is known to have or whom you think may have any of the following diseases: I. Venereal: Bacterial Vaginosis, Chancroid, Chlamydia infection, Cytomegalovirus, Donovanosis, Fungal infections, Genital warts, Hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, or non(A,B,C,D,E), Herpes, HIV, Lymphogranuloma Venereum, Molluscum Contagiousum, Mucopurulent Cervicitis, Nongonococcal Urethritis, Pelvic Inflamitory Disease, Proctocolitis, Proctitis or Enteritis, Pubic Lice, Scabies, Syphilis, or Trichomoniasis. (See "Sexually Transmitted Diseases - A Physician Tells You What You Need to Know" by Lisa Maarr, M.D. for more info.)
II.Non-Venereal, But Could Become So if Porn People Ever Contracted a Case: Anthrax, tularemia, brucellosis, glanders, anthrax, melioidosis, SMALLPOX, monkey pox, Bolivian hemorrhagic fever, Marburg, Ebola, Lassa fever, Q Fever, Rift Valley fever, encephalitis, or Bigmakdadiosis.
I promise that I will be a perfect gentleman to whoever survives the vetting process outlined above, whether or not she and I actually go to bed. Dinner, good conversation (if you fix me up with one of those Jewish Marxists who seem to be the real brains behind it all, I promise to discuss the Venona intercepts and the proof they offer of treason), and whatever else the lucky gal may be up for. I know I am asking for a lot, but if you do this for me as requested, you will be doing a great mitzvah (good deed), and everyone can use an extra good deed or two to his name! Who know, maybe this would turn out to be the one Mitzvah that assures that your name is inscribed in the book of life!
PS: For the benefit of those who asked: 91499 45266 85487 93054 35462 17767 29170 09732 88579 20344 I leave it to you, Luke, to determine whether such potent information should be distributed to the masses.
Luke responds: "I LUV U AND WANT TO HAVE UR BABY"
Amalek: Uh, while this was not exactly the response I was looking for, and is suggestive of behavior strictly forbidden by both torah and natural law, best wishes for the new year nonetheless.
Papilloma, Mon Amour
Luke F-rd Wire Services, Ltd.:
Attention porners: many of you may die from a condom-resistant virus lurking in your cloacae. What’s more--many of you have already conferred a death sentence on your most intimate associates and friends.
This week’s New Yorker offers compelling evidence that the cancer-causing type-16 papilloma virus--a close relative of the common wart with an ever-mutating brood of disfiguring cousins--is already rampant in countless sexually active humans. Writes the New Yorker’s medical correspondent Jerome Groopman, M.D.: “...[anal and vaginal ] intercourse can be unsafe even with a condom...because the papilloma virus lives in the interior cells lining the vagina, cervix, anus, and urethra. Condoms do not cover the entire shaft of the penis and do not block contact with pubic skin. So during the petting and frottage of foreplay, or during intercourse with a condom, papilloma-laden skin cells ...come in contact with...vulva and vagina, enabling the virus to track up [the] cervix....Even dead skin cells can contain the virus and remains infectious for days.”
And there’s this statistical abstract to consider: “It has been estimated that about ten million American woman [not to mention the planeloads of Eastern European, Latin American and Asian sex-workers disgorged within U.S. borders each day] --most of them in their late teens and twenties--have active infections. A million of them have diseased, and perhaps precancerous, tissue as a result.”
For many this will mean--at the very least-hysterectomy, chemotherapy and radiation. And these will be the ‘lucky’ ones. Other than death, there is no known cure for papilloma and its many viral manifestations. There is no vaccine. Nor is there a surefire testing method.
Not even the Pap smear--the most widely used assay for papilloma--guarantees live-saving early detection: ‘The procedure is crude and inexact....Some technicians and pathologists joke that it’s like ‘Where’s Waldo?’ But with Waldo, the character has consistent features, and you know he’s around somewhere. With a Pap smear, someone has to inspect every cell on the slide....”
“...the greatest threat to accuracy is human error. The average slide contains anywhere from fifty thousand to three hundred thousand cells...”
“...To make matters worse, government inspectors have found widespread violations when they visit Pap-testing centers.”
Another sobering factoid: “...Extrapolating from a recent study in San Francisco, researchers estimate that thirty-five out of one hundred thousand H.I.V.-negative gay men have anal cancer. This is about the same rate of cervical cancer that was found in women before they began to receive routine Pap tests.”
Junk science? You bet your ass. So if you’re a porner of any sex--or merely a sexually sophisticated urbanite like Sarah Jessica Parker or Darren Star--take Luke’s advice and pick up this week’s New Yorker...because what you don’t know may be already killing you.
Sarah Jessica Parker
Blechhs and the City? In salon.com, journa Amy Reiter's wryly analytic “Cuddles in the City” takes a smear from the underbelly of HBO’s death-, drug-, and Darren Star-infused sitcom in this short take on the series’ Emmy nominee Sarah Jessica Parker: “... an upcoming Redbook interview, Parker says she's embarrassed by some of the frank talk in ‘Sex in the City,’ in which she plays... a newspaper columnist and ‘sexual anthropologist’ given to breezy commentary on such steamy topics as male-member size, sex-toy addiction and... coital flatulence. ‘Anyone who knows me knows I'm a prude,’ Parker tells Redbook. ‘I had to say the word 'pussy' in the pilot, and it took me weeks to prepare. I don't use the F-word. These are just not things that I say.’ ... You'd think a seven-year relationship with drug-addled bad boy [narcotics addict] Robert Downey Jr. [and a brief, amorous fling with bisexual joyboy JFK Jr.] ... would be enough to loosen anyone up.”
Return To Alpha Blue
Lou writes: I have a question about a particular porn movie and I hope that you can be the one to answer it for me. A number of years ago, around seven or so, I saw a movie called "Return to Alpha Blue." At least I'm fairly certain it was called that. The only actor I remember from it was Jerry Butler. The premise was that the world was now run by women and the only thing that men were good for was for sex. The women dialed some sort of control device and the men just appeared out of no-where ready to service them. About a third of the way, or even half way, into the movie there is a girl/girl scene. The girls finish up and they decide it's time "to get some meat in here" (or so to speak) and they call up two men. One of the men was Jerry Butler. Anyway, while the girls were at it with each other, there was a movie being shown on a screen behind them in the background. THAT IS THE MOVIE that made an impression on me and I have thought about it ever since.
Will Jarvis aka Taliesin responds: Return to Alpha Blue was the second movie I did. (The first was the film Viva Vanessa.) The year was 1984, the director Gerry Damiano, and the movie was one of the first shot on video. It was a sequel to his classic Satisfiers of Alpha Blue staring Annie Sprinkle. Along with me the cast included (if memory serves) Taija Rae, Jillian Moorehead, Sharon Kane, Chelsea Blake, Johnny Nineteen, Jerry Butler and a few others. In the story, the women use some sort of control unit to summon male sex partners. The male appears in a Star Trek-like teleporter effect. I think, though I'm not sure, Sharon Kane and Chelsea Blake did a woman-to-woman scene and then were joined by Jerry Butler. I had two scenes. Jillian Moorehead sucks off three guys, of which I was one. Another actor had been hired for the role of one of the guys but couldn't get it up and was dismissed. I was asked to take his place, not stunt cock, but to be one of the actors in the scene. I did this, and then later in the day did the scene I had been hired for with Taija Rae. Taija was great to work with, I must say, and Jillian is an underrated talent. I hired her when I directed my first movie, Our Naked Eyes, a couple of years later. Gerry paid me very well for helping out with the extra scene, and that was nice too. The movie playing in the background during the scene Lou asks about was probably the original 'Satisfiers'; it certainly was something directed by Gerry Damiano. My best guess anyway.
Well that's my ramblings about Return To Alpha blue. The original 'Satisfiers'
with Annie Sprinkle is a better movie but 'Return' is a solid video
with some pretty good sex scenes.
Right Wing Rhetoric
Jocelyn writes: Hi Luke ! I reed your site most of the days and today's old tired blah blah from The moralityinmediawhataboutthechildrenquickimmustfindmybibleandlockmysenseofjudgmentsoiwontbeabletothinkorfeelanything really got on my nerves. You know it's funny because i don't specially own a lot of porn (3 vids ). I do like some movies where the girls are pretty and act like they enjoy it, so usually it's more erotic and intelligent than degrading right? Plus the lesbians stuff doesnt turn me on and i dont like the gangbang 2000+ kindda s---, to me it's not inspiring. Now you know why we only got 3 vids... And you know what, i'm a sexually healthy individual whith a steady girlfriend and from time to time we like to watch some blue movie for variety sake. Mind you we both agree the the quality and realism is quasi-inexistant. So i guess it's like circus...Althought i have to say that Geanna Fine does put on some great numbers even if i dont find her pretty. So back to our reactionaries, personnally i think their problem is that they're not only againt porn in general but they're againt freedom of : choice, orientation, religions etc... And to make my point perfectly clear here is this part of Metallica's And justice for all « you can do it your own way if it's done as how i said...» And remember these old-timers never dies... they just petrifies.
Speedom of Freech?
Luke F-rd Wire Services, Ltd.:
Longtime Screw illustrator Danny Hellman is being sued for $1.5 by globally syndicated cartoonist Ted Rall--for “libel and intentional infliction of emotional express.”
According to an affadavit filed August 19 by Rall’s attorney in Manhattan Supreme Court, Hellman impersonated Rall in “prank” emails to dozens of publishing-world personae. Reports today’s New York Observer: “...on Aug 5, posing as Mr. Rall, Mr. Hellman signed up about 30 people–a group that, he claims, included Mr. Rall and his friends–to an e-mail discussion group he called ‘TedRallsBalls.’
The welcome note to the group, signed with Mr. Rall’s name, said the list should be ‘a rowdy punk free-for-all where courageous cartoonists with balls can boldly tear down all those imperious golden idols of yesterday.’ What followed on the list were other fake e-mail messages from publishing people such as S.I. Newhouse Jr. [Vanity Fair, Vogue, Madamoiselle etc. etc.] begging to get off the e-mail list. Mr. Rall checked his e-mail shortly after Mr. Hellman sent the message. Then he went into a panic that the prank was making him look like an idiot in front of media heavies...
.... So far, Mr. Rall has identified just one real publishing professional who actually received the counterfeit message: Nicholas Blechman, art director for the New York Times Op-Ed page. Two days later, Mr. Hellman fessed up to the prank, after Mr. Rall and his attorney, Paul Levenson, sent him a letter to cease and desist.”
Backstory? According to the Observer: “Mr. Rall got Mr. Hellman angry with an article in the Aug. 3 edition of The Village Voice attacking Art Spiegelman, the author of Maus. Mr. Rall portrayed Mr. Spiegelman as the self-appointed lord of the cartooning world in the midst of an artistic decline. Mr. Hellman has until the end of September to file a response to the suit.”
While it is unlikely that Rall will collect anything resembling a mil when and if a jury finds against Hellman, even a modest cash award could prove a chilling experience for the freelance inkster--whose caricatures of celebrities high and low appear each week in the notoriously low-paying New York Press.
A longtime mainstay in the pages of the similarly downscale Screw--the venue for innumerable Danny Hellman illos, comix and two-color covers, as well as Screw’s 30th Anniversary party invite--Hellman is among the handful of Screw illustrators [others include Kaz, Steve Cerio, Paul Corio, James Romberger, Eric Drooker, Joe Coleman, Bob Fingerman, and the omnipresent Drew Friedman] who would ink their way out of the porno s---heap and onto the visual landscape of these times.
And of this illustrious crew, Danny Hellman--whose work has also appeared in Time, Entertainment Weekly, New York Magazine, Brill’s Content and The Wall Street Journal-- will likely be the first to appear on Court TV.
NJG: I got your book from the library today NJG: started reading it Luzdedos1: does it make you wet? NJG: I am wondering why you are OBSESSED with jews or identifying people based on their racial/sexual make up? NJG: luke r u horny or something? Luzdedos1: no, just teasing NJG: nvermind, just answer the question about why you insist on indentifying people based on their ethnicity Luzdedos1: I don't always, just at times, because it is moderately interesting NJG: why is it interesting? Luzdedos1: why does sex feel good? NJG: because it's all in the brain NJG: it's all about thoughts and your nerve endings Luzdedos1: oh Luzdedos1: i loved that letter you sent, thanks NJG: why is sex like pissing to men as you say
NJG: I think you make some good points in your book so far NJG: I think we should be in an indie movie together NJG: surely you know "directors" ...but most porn directors went to acting and directing school right? NJG: they just fell off the other side of the valley, my home town. But they really wanted to be in the studio system Luzdedos1: yes NJG: anyways we have the perfect relationship. No sex, but we looove each other. We both are writers and failed actors, too bizarre in a way, fast thinkers, love dish, controversial, conservative ....hmmm we need a director...... NJG: looking for love but it winds up in s--- constantly NJG: sounds like a great indie movie to me... I'd definitely go see it NJG: where are you? I have to go pee!! Luzdedos1: :) NJG: while waiting for you I went pee and was reading your book, I really think identifying people on race and religion is strange,..."the catholic xx", "the jewish xxx" ? Luzdedos1: i am strange
NJG: lol, yes dear you are, you are just different than others. NJG: but no more different than anyone I have known in my life NJG: one thing about hitler NJG: the same thing NJG: he seems like guys I have known my whole life, into art/opera, argumentative, getting thrown out by others, thinking he's an iconoclast, domineering views of women and extremely intelligent. You know as I read that I thought, jeez I could really be describing you luke NJG: ok now I'm on chapter 2 NJG: I don't see how understanding porn you understand life Luke Luzdedos1: hmm NJG: ok I read chapter 2 Luke NJG: and I think you don't quite understand what happened with Linda Lovelace. Here's my theory NJG: a lot of times when women are young they can be influenced by men, they will do things that they normally wouldn't do because they fall for some guy. She fell for Chuck Traynor. He brought her in to this stuff. She did it for him. For love. You know. NJG: Now she looks back and feels ashamed, it was another person, a person who now is older and wiser and wouldn't make that same mistake