Sunday,
July 15th, 2001
Sin City Director Michael Raven Arrives On RAME
Michael Raven writes to the newsgroup rec.arts.movies.erotica (for the full thread go to the newsgroup, available through rame.net): I am always looking for new ideas and welcome any suggestions. Over the past year, Ms Steele has appeared in only three of my features and Lex has appeared in none. Ms Steele will appear in even less as she is now exlusive to Wicked Pictures. I agree that I probably used them to excess in the early years, but sometimes one gets comfortable and chooses to book "familiar and reliable" talent. Try some of my more recent titles, UNDERWORLD, BEAST or ADRENALINE. Preferably on DVD.
As to soft focus, I have eliminated most of it in recent works as I have switched to shooting primarily on film and very little video. I also tend to gravitate to noirish lighting schemes which unfortunately tend to go "muddy" when duplicated on VHS. This is probably why some of my works suffer technically. By the time they are duped down to VHS en mass, the resolution, thus the overall picture quality is nowhere near what you would see on the broadcast master. I don't recall ever using a fisheye lens or adapter. I usually try to film female subjects with as long a lens as possible. Somewhere between 120mm to 200mm. As to the aspect ratio, my films are shot on super 16mm with an aspect ratio of 1:66 and most of our current video titles are shot and masterd in 1:69.
I agree with your disdain for what we refer to as "Air Pops". I personally think it's pathetic however, you usually don't know whether you will get a copious amount or not until it's too late and I refuse to fake them. Again I agree that watching a guy jerking off is not "quite" as erotic as having the girl finish him herself, but again we are sometimes dealing with the performance limitations of the male talent. Many of them have difficulties while under hot stage lights and a crew of fifteen or more. Sometimes, this is the only expedient way to get the shot. I appreciate your comments and always welcome them.
While I agree that there are MANY Directors that capture much nastier sex on screen (I for one am a HUGE fan of Rocco, John Leslie and most Evil Angel products), please bear in mind that the products I create are for 2 major markets. German television and Domestic Cable. Each of these markets supply us with their requirements and casting input . It is a difficult task at best in satisfying these two broadcasters.
Torris writes on RAME: I'm not a lawyer and I recently read Luke F-rd's unusually lucid account of the pre-trial motions (in spite of his having to point out every Jew in the court vicinity. That is so distracting from your writing Luke. And boring. Give it a rest wannabe. 99% of the world doesn't care who's a jew and who's not).
Now Seymore's big complaint is that he's being hung out to dry for 5 fingers (fisting) where "eight" finger scenes are okay. (two hand insertions into a pussy minus the thumbs. Riley's American fister times two). But that really wouldn't sway me. Since fisting is being equated to kiddie porn and forced rape, I would take the defense that the prosecution is practicing sanctioned hate crimes and blatant discimination against homosexual lifestyles.
If I were Seymore's attorney I would keep the porn stars on the sidelines and bring in one lesbian expert after another to comment on how fisting is a normal part of sexual "love making". I'd parade lesbian librarians or home makers who talk about fisting being a reciprocal part of giving and receiving orgasms that are necessary b/c they don't need a male penis but some women do require penetration to climax.
I'd read chapters of books published by non-X publishers, like Doubleday, that discuss fisting as a part of the plot line, in a non-prurient manner like Heather Lewis' Road Rules and Mary Gaitskill's Because They Wanted To. I would really make this an issue of government discimination against a lifestyle choice and really get the gay and lesbian community involved in the defense.
If I were a lesbian and engaged in fisting as part of my sexual routine I would absolutely f---ing outraged that what lesbians do as a normal accepted part of their sexual gratification is being lumped in with rape, child pornography and defecation. By the way. What is FSC doing to help Seymore in his defense. Tal??? Tal??? Anybody home?
Luke Gets Mail
Gracie writes: Hey Luke, what's up? I was reading the website for that internet series the Money Shot when I saw that Gene Ross was a consultant on the show. Say wwwwhat? Wasnt this f---in guy ranting and ravin for months about what a bunch of wackos this same group of people were? I went back to your archives and its all there, so I know >>I'm<< not crazy. Is he full of s--- or what? http://www.moneyshottheseries.com/crew/gene.html
Al writes: Hey Luke, I saw Lexington Steele on an Interview during a Playboy TV special. He mentioned something about an herb he takes that helps penis size. I was wondering if you had his contact info or a home page he has so I can ask him.
Jason Sechrest writes: I was interviewing Rob and Jim on camera for both my web show and my cable show on The Erotic Networks. They had no idea who I was so I was explaining. They asked if I knew you, I said yes, and the next thing I knew Rob was dialing your number! It was very surreal. Just hope we didn't interrupt you from working or anything. What a weird ass convention that show is anyway! haha... but it's always fun to get a room full of your friends together (my friends at least) and to see Tera Patrick with a longer line of fans than the rest of the adult community combined.
Robert Lombard writes: Dear Luke....Hope all is well. Haven't communicated with you lately...just been ABSORBING all the information being posted. FASCINATING to say the least. And busy with the next go around of the R rated "Voyeur" series. Working around the schedules of some of the girls, who my clients want in the show, from Chloe, Shayla LaVeaux, Ava Vincent, Gina Ryder, TJ Hart etc is time consuming. The mainstream executives are really pleased with being able to utilize this awesome group of girls.
John writes: Luke: I think you do some valid, insightful reporting on the industry but in plain english, you are a hypocrite because you continue to accept advertizing dollars on your website from porn companies like Vivid and video dealers while at the same time you are trashing pornographers like Max Mardcore and Rob Black in your text. If your website wasn't such a contradiction, and wasn't so bogged down by pseudo-intellectual theological mumbo-jumbo, it might actually be profound. Sure, you need cash to keep this website running but it's a big contradiction, kind of like the exotic female dancer who takes dollar bills in her g-string to raise and feed her daughter in an upstanding Christian home.- Get with it, Luke.
Rick writes: I can't believe a woman like Chloe's lonely. She's smart, funny, politically active, beautiful, lithe - and from the looks of things, she's got a good soul and a great heart. So are the men in California just morons or what? Why is this woman looking for someone? Jesus! Send her my way...and I don't mean that in a pervy way. The girl's a rare find - a true original - and anyone who doesn't see that is a dolt.
Witrack writes: Yo, Luke! Could you PLEASE add an April Rayne AKA Andrea Naschak bio to you listing of adult stars??? Please? Ya know excaliburfilms.com has a bio of her listed as dead from a drug overdose. But I read in Ian Glitter's Porn Star that she is alive and well in the Bay Area and happily married with one young son! Give us one of yer expert bios of her on your stars list, will ya? It's the Christian thing to do! Or in your case the Judiasm thing to do! That's not proper English I guess but so what, anh? Ciao!
Joe from Alabama writes: Luke: Interesting to read in Friday's report that Minneapolis/St. Paul area attorney Randall Teague was at Night of the Stars. The man Teague represented was (now-deceased?) Ferris Alexander...who cornered the Twin Cities porn market until he was busted.
I must to be a little amused at the anti-Bush ranting that goes on. If Ashcroft is going to "kill the porn industry," wouldn't it have happened by now? If anyone who votes Republican is EEEEEVILLLLL, wouldn't Lori Michaels have been blacklisted by the industry? I know, she'll get a pass as long as she's a babe who can put $$$ in Vivid's pocket. What the pro-sex people don't understand is that some people are frightened of a culture that says the genitalia must be engaged 24/7 AT A MINIMUM!
If you need to use yours with a person of the same sex, that's OK, but by God (insert appropriate deity here), use it. If you need to use yours with an 8-year-old, by all means, do it. For those of you who think I'm exaggerating, the Man/Boy Love Association crowd is pushing for mainstream acceptance.
Look, I think it's warped that people think kinky sex means "in the daytime or with the lights on." The porn industry needs to realize that discipline isn't a genre of movies found next to the all-girl and pissing videos. And sad to say, the biggest reason so many people think Bill Clinton is the second coming of Jesus is because they'd love to get away with as many lies as he has.
As you've noted, there's a lot of lying that goes on. From skimping on payoffs, to the woman (Sindee Coxx??) who hasn't seen her parents in years because she can't show off her new breasts since they still think she works in the printing business. ("Why'd you get those, honey?")
If you truly think Bush is going to ruin this country (bet you cash that rebate check rather than puke on it and send it back), leave. Or better yet, get California to secede from the Union. It would give Republicans control of the Senate again!
That disinfo story sounded great. Interesting that Temptress appears to have become one of the burned-out victims. And is Juli Ashton retired from making vids?
DunnDunnn@aol.com writes: Hi Luke- Read that Chloe is looking for Mr. Right. If you have the ability, pass my email to her and have her shoot me a mail. I am not offended by what she does in her business, and wouldnt mind talking to her and seeing what comes about. I have deep admiration for her and how she carries herself, and am secure enough that I could handle it. Of course she is gorgeous as well, so who wouldnt want to be friends, or her Mr. Right. Tell her you met me and I am not a crazy asshole too. Thanks man. =)
Ransom writes: Keisha never looked so good at Night of the Stars. I liked her bravery. Being free. Free of a bra. They were burned a long time go, righteously! No big tit lady should be made to wear a bra.
Free of underwear, that's making a statement. Free to show her bush, while Bush is President. Before he turns Ashcroft loose to shut the biz down. Free to make a spectacle of herself, drawing a crowd of photographers between her legs!
That's what freedom is all about. Give me a break! Can't porn women stay clothed just for a few hours! I noticed you got muscled out of the money shots. You didn't have the will to see between her legs and take a picture. Probably felt embarrassed and I wouldn't blame you. Like rapid dogs, were the others getting in there.
I disagree with Lizze Borden, the porn women aren't whores all the time. She can spread her legs for pictures, f--- in films, its okay. Free to do that. But when she spreads her legs in public veiw for many to see or works in a brothel and escorts for money with strangers, she's acting whorish.
Standing on a street corner, trading sex for money, she's a whore. Getting cornholed and an enema...Puking in that mess and drinking it, or doing a bukkake, she's beyond being a whore. Nasty f---ing slut, what it is to me.
Can one really have a conversation about Chaucer with a slut, that may not be possible. Keisha looked good acting like a whore. I wish she had more sense of decency than that. Being naked under that dress was enough. There is a time and place to be naked. There are times to act civilized too.
Of course my aggravation didn't stop me from collecting the pictures. I like porn women with clothes on and looking nice in a dress. They seem more real then. Real as can be with fake names, colored hair and extensions, boobs made of gelatin. That's why you walked away mind scrambled. Were you talking to actual people or replicants that look human.
Brandy Alexandre writes: In looking over your snippets from Night of the Stars, I wondered if when my Hall of Fame eligibility comes around (next year if the 10 year retirement rule still applies, per Bill Margold) if I will actually be "honored." If so, will they just do it in absentia, because no one lets me know about upcoming functions (interestingly enough I was getting my hair done last night). It's not like they can ignore the facts of my contributions to the industry. Hmm, well, Hollywood does it all the time. There was some other actor honored with having broken the black list when it was really Otto Preminger who did it. When this was brought up some time before the presentation (I forget where it was presented), it was said Preminger didn't get it because no one likes him. People can ignore history all they like, but they can't change it.
Roses in the Rain
Lynne writes Luke: I am so sad for you...not that you did something to upset me, but looking at the overall picture of where you are in life (which is a subject that consumes me for good or bad, but at least I am honest in admitting it) and how you go about making efforts to make changes.
As much as I want normalcy for you, I despair...you can never have a romantic involvement with anyone, let alone parent children. Who could understand you and tolerate the depth of your disturbance? Everyone has needs of their own, which you can't even comprehend. I have the maturity, the intelligence and the compassion to love you but it is not a romantic love...it's like my love for Tobi (the world's most obnoxious dog). My heart goes out to you in your inadequacy.
You are like roses in the rain. We leave them on the bush to enjoy the beauty, but one night it rains, and they are destroyed. Whereas if we had cut them and brought them indoors in time, we would still have their beauty and fragrance to enjoy for many days. Some intervention didn't happen properly and damaged you horribly. I see the results, and tears flow...
I doubt you have ever been honest with any therapist really, because I don't think you can be; your self-filter is too smudged up with your own fingerprints. And the therapists don't spend enough time with you, unless they read your site daily and your autobiography (unlike Goddess, I don't think those were written for effect, but more like journals to reflect your perceptions of things...) And unlike your male friends, who have so much invested in seeing you as a normal, good-lucking stud because they themselves are so whacko (and I can't feel sorry and make excuses for the whole world, especially its ruder members)...I try to absorb every moment, every subtle nuance (being that my IQ is apparently 133 BEFORE I have my first cup of coffee at 6 a.m.) and come up with sadness and tears.
Disinfo Nation - Porn
Friday afternoon I watched a copy of the British TV show Disinfo by Richard Metzger (Disinfo.com). I was impressed. I write Richard: "I was really impressed with that show on porn you sent, really impressed... I was sitting back expecting it to be another dull show on porn, but you blew me away...And I really like the quotes you took from me. Great editing."
Richard writes Luke: " A journo friend of mine in the UK told me that he thought an entire nation was traumatized by that episode (and another, earlier show about transsexuals). There were loads of complaints to Channel 4, apparently, but it was being discussed 'round the water cooler the next day so that's all that counts --that it made people *think*."
Roll the tape.
Richard Metzger: "The societal effects of pornography have to be seismic. But nobody wants to talk about them."
Anka Radakovich: "I've been writing about sex for ten years and I do not understand why guys would like to watch a gangbang video. Women would be horrified if they knew how depraved men's sexual fantasies were."
That's because Anka is a woman. Women writing on the sex industry are freaks and inherently biologically limited. The sex industry is overwhelmingly powered by the demand of men. Women count for little in the sale of sex. Anka and Susie Bright and co are freaky women for writing about porn and one should not expect much wisdom or insight from them.
Lynne L-patin: I have two thoughts...the first is that your own sexuality is so aberrant that you looking at porn is the twisted looking at the twisted, which is extremely interesting but also invalid...the second is that you are baiting me (someone) to provoke discussion...
Back to the tape.
Luke: "As porn has become more mainstream and more accepted over the past few years, it has to become more outrageous at the same time. Because pornography relies for its charge on breaking taboos. So just as the mainstream world becomes more accepting of pornography, so pornography must become increasingly wild."
Temptress: "When I first got in this business, I was in the business for sex. And that was it. I wanted to go on set, have sex and go home."
Juli Ashton: "I was the last generation of big stars. You had a girl on the cover and she sold the tape. Now you've got 17 girls on the cover with cocks in their mouths and who knows what their names are."
Bill Margold: "There are three reasons for coming into this business and two of them are wrong - money and sex. The sex is mechanical and if you are only doing it for the money, you are going to feel like a whore, even if it is legalized. The only reason for coming into this business is for the glory, the immortality."
Temptress: "I'm definitely in it for a career move and that's what the bigger companies are for. You can't really go anywhere with gonzo but it sells. It's the nastier part of the porno industry. It's more sleazy but that's what a lot of people like."
Juli: "I didn't like being a school teacher. I didn't want to go get my real estate license. It was the easiest way to make good money fast."
Luke: "The typical career trajectory for a female porn star is to enter the industry, do one video and then leave. One experience of sex on film is so shocking and appalling and revolting to their female nature, that they leave and never come back."
Inari Vachs: "Sometimes I like getting slapped, choked, having my hair pulled, called names... But if a girl is brought to tears during a scene, you're pushing things too far."
Luke: "Consumers most want rough hard nasty sex where the women are treated like dolls who are just schtupped into oblivion, given no mercy, just thoroughly degraded and pushed to their absolute physical limit."
Juli: "I think you have a different breed of talent. Girls that are younger, that are willing to do more and to get paid less. And directors that are expecting more for less money."
Temptress: "If you don't watch yourself, you can definitely get eaten and thrown back out on the street in this business. And gonzo directors will definitely do that. They just want you to come in, bend over, have sex and leave."
Extreme Associates director Lizzy Borden: "I've had girls get bloody noses on my sets because we hit them so hard.
"I don't care about exploiting anybody. If you don't want to work for me, then leave. There are a lot of other girls coming into the industry that will work for me."
Pictures of bukkake covers.
Houston: "A bunch of men stand around you and come on your face. They buried me in the sand and a bunch of man came all over my face."
Porn girl: "I thought I'd give it a try and I peed in his mouth."
Jessica Darlin: "I take it in the ass. I'm 5'5" and I've got real boobs."
Luke: "Pornography is a mirror to the human psyche, particularly the male psyche, as it is overwhelmingly men who spend money on this stuff. If pornographers don't make products that inherently to the male psyche, they don't make any money. And these guys are in it primarily to make money. They're just businessmen, they're sleazy ones, but businessmen."
Rob Black: "It's a bunch of f--cking degenerate people filming other degenerate people f--cking. Then we sell it for money. There it is. We're f--cking pimps and prostitutes and panderers. Everything. We are the filthiest of the filth."
Cut to a clip of Kristi Myst with a dog collar around her neck. She licks out a dog bowl of dog food.
Man: "Premium dog food. Such a good bitch."
Rob: "There's the drug dealer and we're a little above that."
Luke: "The most influential pornographer is Rob Black who's taken pornography to its logical conclusions - degradation. He's grown up in the pornography industry. His father owns stores in Rochester, New York. Rob's a smart guy and a savvy operator. He's started up his own wrestling league. He uses his contract porn girls to promote his wrestling league. They work as ring girls and coming to the attention of teenage boys who are big wrestling fans. Rob's skilled at gaining publicity and he produces the most repellant, vile disgusting, morally troublesome work of which I'm aware."
Rob: "They're basic f--k films. Rape angles, incest angles. But it's all fantasy. It's all bulls---."
Inari: "Stuff that Rob Black is doing is not fetish or foreplay, it's out and out degrading. They push the barriers only for shock value and I don't think that shock value is sexy."
Rob: "We don't do stuff because we can't do it in America. We can't take a video of a guy taking a big s--- on f--cking girl's head. Would I shoot that? Yeah, I'd shoot it."
Luke: "There is nothing that Extreme would not shoot and sell to the public."
Lizzy Borden: "They want to see assholes gaping. I want to take a flashlight and look down and see what a girl's insides look like. I hate all that lovey dovey bulls---. That's boring. I get hot girls who f--- like whores. That's what they are. They're whores."
Rob: "See, those are all the people that pretend that they don't do what they do. I'm not a porn star, I'm an adult actress. F--k you. If you f---, you're a porn star. If a guy still f---s your ass and blows a load on your face."
Bill Margold: "The biggest difference between a porn star and a prostitute, is that when you put your ass on the line in an X-rated movie, you lose your anonymity."
Rob: "The only difference between you and a f--king crack addict whore, is a f--cking camera and a f--king model release. That's it. What's the difference? I could have no f--cking film in that camera. There's no difference. You're a f--king piece of s---."
Inari: "As Rob Black says, we take money to do sexual acts. I'm very different from a crack whore on the street because I check tests for the people I work with. I know the people I work with. I'm generally friends with the people I work with. I'm very different from a crack whore on the street doing johns for ten dollars."
Rob: "If they f--cking suck dick for money..."
Juli: "We f--- for a living. That part, I agree with Rob. If you can't handle that, you're in the wrong business. To glamorize that or to think that you're better because you're a star, or to put yourself on a different level is asking for a crash and that almost always happens in this business."
Luke: "If you look at the arc of someone like Teri Weigel. She started out in Playboy in the mid 1980s. And increasingly went downhill from there, from the perspective of the average guy on the street. She went to softcore to hardcore to bukkake and to working at the Bunny Ranch as a prostitute."
Lizzy: "They are a prostitute, and until they release that, they will be f---ed up in the head."
Anka: "The actors in adult videos are sexual gladiators. They go out and do the dirty work that we would never do. We want to watch somebody have sex with 500 people because we will never do that."
Luke: "The pornography industry inherently defiles people and this defilement usually makes its mark on their physical person quickly. You see people aging very quickly in this industry."
Bill: "What happens more is not so much to their body but to their mind. The body can probably take a lot of bludgeoning. The mind is much more fragile than the physical form and it can break down faster. And when you wake up one morning and realize that you've done things that the mind can not handle, then the mind shatters and the body follows suit."
Lizzy: "For Cocktails, I had Kristi [Myst] get f---ed in the ass. Then they put the enema in there and she s---s it out. She takes a cock all the way down her throat, makes herself throw up. She's spitting. There's puke. There's ass juice. When you do too much ass f---ing, the tissue gets real loose. The tissue comes out of her ass and gets real long and stringy. And she drinks it at the end."
Lizzy giggles. "I like shooting that."
Anka: "Women have made such progress in the workplace. Feminism has made such strides and our pornography almost seems retrogressive. A lot of this extreme porn shows women being humiliated. It shows five men ejaculating on their faces. Gangbangs. The fantasy seems to be to put women in their place and humiliate them."
Luke: "I agree with the feminists that pornography is all about the degradation of women. Where I disagree with them is that I think it is equally about the degradation of men. Pornography inherently degrades the user, the maker and the participant. Pornography does to the soul what tobacco does to the lungs.
"Fifteen year old boys will naturally look at females and objectify them as sexual objects and want to use them as sexual objects. Pornography then adds to that. Pornography exacerbates an unhealthy and destructive though inherent and natural male tendency to relate to women primarily as sexual objects."
Rob: "Pornography is entertainment. And reflects what is going on in the culture."
Luke: "In the movie Ass Clowns, you have a woman in the climactic scene who is despoiled and also receives a tub of earthworms flung on to her and she goes on having sex with these guys covered with filth."
Anka: "If he's a really young guy and this is the first pornography he's ever seen, and he hasn't had that much experience with women. I don't know that it is a totally positive thing for him to be watching a situation where women are having their faces sprayed. I don't think that the average girl that they'd go out with would want to do that in a million years."
Luke: "If an adult can buy Ass Clowns, inherently there will be 13 year old boys getting their hands on Ass Clowns. Ass Clowns is an extremely destructive form of pornography. All pornography corrupts, Ass Clowns corrupts more."
Anka: "The most extreme porn is something that men watch alone. I don't they call up someone they're considering having sex with and say, 'Would you like to come over and watch some vomit porn? Some midget porn? Some foot fetish porn? Some gangbang porn?' I don't think the new crop of gonzo extreme porn is bridging the gap between the sexes."
Juli: "What happens when you learn that the way to treat a woman is to slap her around and come on her face?"
Tabitha Stevens: "It will leave an impression on their mind. It will lead to women being treated like crap. Isn't there enough rape as there is? That's what they're putting out. Rape me, make me throw up and eat it. Let's do it again. Extreme push you to the limit and Gen X kids love it."
Anka: "A young guy watching that might actually think that that is something that a young woman might like. He doesn't even know how to give her an orgasm or find the clitoris yet he is totally versed on midget porn."
Bill: "It dulls society's image of sex rather than excites it. The inundation of what we've been putting out has deadened the nerve endings. And it is no longer exciting to watch adult material."
Luke: "The ability to take pleasure in simple natural non-destructive forms of human exchange such as holding hands with your girlfriend, kissing her and even fondling her is diminished when you get that huge charge from seeing Ginger Lynn taking loads on her face."
Juli: "There is no human sexuality taught in our society. So you go to whatever resources you have. And if your resource is Rob Black, you get a f--ked up education."
Inari: "There's nothing shocking anymore. People are so inundated by so much stimuli, that unless it is balls out freaky, they're not going to pay attention to it."
Anka: "When you watch a romantic movie, you feel romantic afterwards. When you watch a violent movie, I might feel a tendency to do something violent. If a guy watches this kind of porn, it has to give him ideas.
"Twelve year old imitate Austin Powers, so somewhere along the line, they're going to imitate one of these gangbangs. We don't know yet what kind of influence these kind of videos are going to have on 15-year olds."
[That's ludicrous. Of course we know what kind of influence these videos will have on 15-year olds and adults - a destructive influence. That's just common sense.]
Luke: "We all have different places where we draw the line. The industry is constantly pushing pushing pushing that line. It is constantly trying to break taboos and it is increasingly alienating itself from the mainstream middle of the country which is not pro pornography but is willing to accept it as long as it knows its place. Now with women stuffing pages of the Bible up their ass, as in the Extreme movie, that is going to appall a sizable portion of the American population."
Rob: "The Christian Right wants to ban Extreme and Vivid and all pornography because it is all disgusting filth."
Inari: "California makes too much money off of porn for it to ever go under."
Luke: "The moral and legal climate for the porn industry will change under this new Republican administration. And it won't only be reflected in obscenity busts. But the whole atmosphere of the country will change so that it will be increasingly less permissable for pornography to operate. That means that on the margins you might have fewer banks that are willing to do transactions for pornography companies. It means that it may be harder for pornography companies to go public on stock exchanges. It may become harder for pornography companies to do softcore deals. It may become more difficult for different cable outlets to accept adult programming."
Bill: "If the industry is bludgeoned by enough lawsuits and obscenity trials, then they will pull back."
Luke: "The presidency and its whole administration can help set a moral tone for a country. And if the Bush administration has any kind of moral tone whatsoever, then that is bad news for the pornography industry."
Rob: "We do pornography. In certain sectors of the States, they deem it obscene. All these companies now pulling back, we take a jump forward and give the fans even more stuff. So now we overtake more of the market."
Kendra Jade Sings
Kendra Jade writes: Wassup Yall, Wanted to give you all a heads up on this awesome all ages rap/rock show happening on June 27 at The Whiskey. The headliner is Stu Stone. He has a rockin voice and mad crazy lyrics. He wrote this song called "One Crazy Bitch" and Tommy of NA sings the chorus. I hear Tommy is gonna sing atleast that song with him. Yall know Stuart, he is the voice of Ralphy on the cartoon The Magic Tour Bus, he's acted in a bunch of other stuff. He is absolutely amazing and the funniest kid I've ever met in my life. He's got unlimited talents oozing out of every pore on his body. Oh and he's cute too. Lots of celebrities will be there as well to show their support for Stu such as Maverick recording artist No Authority (www.noauthority.com) and me, Kendra Jade. As a matter of fact, me and Tommy (of NA) may each perform a song with Stu for the first time ever live. All Kendra Jade fans in the Cali area must go to this show! You never know who may show up to support me, I know all kinds of peeps.
Who: Rapper Stu Stone plus special guest KENDRA JADE and others....
What: an all ages concert
When: July 27th at 8:00 p.m.
Where: Whiskey A Go Go 8901 W Sunset Blvd Los Angeles, CA (310) 652-4202
Why: Cause you wanna see how hott I am gonna look at this show!!!!
How: If you have questions or wish to purchase tickets email: thillgambino@aol.com,
or bruindx@yahoo.com You can also go to ebay.com and type in Stu Stone
to bid on tickets.
Costs: tickets are $10.00 if you buy them now. i dont know how much
they will be at the door so buy em now!!!
Is Human Flesh Kosher?
Chaim Amalek writes: Note the non-judgemental tone of the following movie review (NY Times, of course):
"An engaging and colorful tale -curious and intriguing" - New York Times
"In this true story, Tobias Schneebaum, a gay, Jewish writer and anthropologist, returns to the Amazon after his brief foray into cannibalism in the 1950's. A master storyteller, Schneebaum recalls his experiences of eating human flesh with the Amarakaire Indians and having sex with Asmat male tribal leaders."
What could be more life affirming than meeting with a bunch of primitive, third world savages to engage in anal sex and cannibalism? Luke, is Chaim Amalek being too judgemental?
PS When is that that nice lady who sells dildos to lesbians going to date me? All l-keford.comville is demanding that this date take place.
PPS A responsa is called for on the topic of cannibalism. If there is a prohibition, is it a blanket prohibition that reaches even unto vaginal secretions and semen? What does YOUR rav say about this? I am at this moment bccing this to that Rabbi who stole your teffilim while booting you from his temple.
Luke's Aryan Roots Show Through
Chaim Amalek writes: NOW we get to the root of why all the seriously jewish Juden in kehilot Hollywood have abandoned you. Courtesy of Pierce. (Note with particularity the section on feminism. Right on the money! What Pierce does not know though, but which Ygg does, is that this disease has afflicted jews more than gentiles.) Luke, with how much of this are you in agreement?
Luke says: I agree with about 66% of the following. I'm not concerned about race though, I'm concerned about values. Note that all the Jews that Dr. Pierce is going off on below are secular radical Jews. Torah Jews don't do things like invent feminism, communism and destructive Hollywood movies.
God gave Torah to the Jews to keep them busy so they wouldn't infect dumb Gentiles with pernicious notions like feminism, communism, and crappy entertainment like MTV etc.
I regard Dr. William Pierce as an evil dangerous man. I publish his views, like I publish many of the evil things said and done by some members of the porn industry, to draw attention to the threat of particular evils so we can more effectively combat them.
What most disappoints me when I publish Dr. Pierce is how few thoughtful critiques I receive of his writings which do not descent into personal attacks.
Dr. William Pierce, the leader of the most dangerous racist group in America according to the Anti-Defamation League, the National Alliance (Natvan.com), writes:
I've discussed various aspects of feminism in my broadcasts. But every time I've talked about feminism at any length I have pointed out that the principal promoters of this pathology have been Jews. Certainly the 1963 book by Jewess Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique, was the Das Kapital of the modern feminist movement, and a great many of the other feminist writers and publicists also were Jews. More important, the feminist movement would have remained on the fringes of our society, populated mostly by lesbians, if it had not been for the enthusiastic and continuing support of the Jewish mass media, which made feminism Politically Correct on college campuses.
And I have pointed out that the reason feminism is important is not that it has made many women neurotic and has made many men as well as many women very unhappy, but that it is race-threatening. Feminism is not important because of its effects on the economy by changing the composition of the work force. It is not important because it opens up new careers for women or because it relieves men of the need to be chivalrous or protective toward women. Feminism is important for just one reason, and that reason is racial. Feminism has drastically lowered the White birthrate: it is now well below the replacement rate, and the race will die out if the birthrate is not raised once again above the replacement level.
Even more immediately threatening, the White race, which is the race on which feminism has wreaked its havoc, will be swamped by the non-White races, where feminism has not taken hold. Feminism takes women out of the home and puts them in the workplace. Feminism leads women to choose careers other than motherhood. Feminism, all by itself, will destroy us unless we stamp it out the way we would an epidemic of hoof-and-mouth disease: ruthlessly and thoroughly. To recapitulate: feminism is a racial threat, and it has been made into a racial threat by the Jews, who have been and still are its principal promoters.
Communism is another example. There certainly are people who manage to talk about communism without mentioning either race or the Jews. Conservatives are pretty adept at that sort of thing: at dodging the real issues. The John Birch Society, for example, will tell you that communism has nothing to do with race or with the Jews; it has only to do with freedom and with private property. Many Christians will tell you that the bad thing about communism is that it is atheistic: "godless communism," they call it, and to them that's what is really important.
When I talk about communism, the Jews and race are central to the discussion. I talk about the Jews because they are the ones who designed and spread this plague. What would communism be without the Jew Karl Marx? How could it ever have gotten the Russian people by the throat without all the Jews who constituted the majority of Lenin's accomplices during the revolutionary period? Lenin himself was only a quarter Jewish, but most of the people who financed his revolutionary activities were full-blooded Jews, and so were the Bolshevik gangsters with whom he conspired: Radek, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Sverdlov, Uritsky, and the rest.
Every foreign observer who visited the Soviet Union in its early days was struck by the huge preponderance of Jews among the commissars and other Soviet leaders. Without these Jews to finance, lead, and staff the revolution, the communist movement would still be meeting in cellars and back rooms in St. Petersburg trying to figure out how to seize control of the Russian government. And without the Jewish apologists for communism in the media in the United States and elsewhere, the Soviet Union would have expired 50 years sooner than it did. It was Jewish media influence- -- concealing the true nature of communism, concealing communist atrocities and portraying the Soviets in the best possible light, as heroic pioneers for social justice -- that made it politically feasible for the United States and Britain to become allies of the Soviet Union in the Second World War in order to crush anti-communist Germany and then to turn half of Europe over to communist rule after the war.
Of course, there were many non-Jewish activists, leaders, and propagandists involved in the spread and rise of communism -- Stalin is the most outstanding example -- and most of the Jews of the world never belonged to a communist party or made a pro-communist movie or wrote an editorial for the New York Times favoring communism. That is the smokescreen always raised by the Jews and their defenders when the issue of the Jewish involvement in communism comes up: there were many non-Jewish communists, and the majority of the Jews weren't participants in communism. The fact remains, however, that Jews not only formulated the essence of communism -- they made it what it is -- but they also played an absolutely essential role in its triumph. Without the Jews, communism, like feminism, never would have gotten off the ground. That is why any discussion of communism which avoids mentioning the Jews is meaningless and can only be misleading.
And why was communism such a terrible thing? Was it because it demanded a redistribution of wealth? Was it because it threatened the incomes and property of the capitalists? Was it because it was atheistic? Hardly. Communism was full of unworkable economic theories -- unworkable because they weren't in accord with human nature -- and it put forward some really nutty ideas about history and other things. But these were not what made communism such a disaster. The evil in communism was not that it took property away from those who had earned it or inherited it and gave it to those who had not; the evil was not that it discouraged individual initiative or that it eventually made an economic basket case out of every nation on which it was imposed. The evil in communism was that it preached egalitarianism. It denied the differences in human quality among individuals and among races.
Worse, it inverted the natural ranking of human beings. It appealed to the worst to bring down the best. It appealed to the resentful losers to destroy those who had been successful. It preached that the first shall be last, and the last shall be first. And it used these egalitarian teachings to justify destroying the best of our people wherever it gained the ability to do so. It was communist egalitarianism which justified the murder of 30 million Ukrainians and Russians -- the kulaks, the successful small farmers -- because they resisted being herded into collectives along with the ne'er-do-wells. It was communist egalitarianism which justified the mass murder of the Polish professional and military elites, in the Katyn forest and elsewhere, in order to "equalize" the Polish nation and also justified doing the same thing in Estonia and Latvia and Lithuania when those nations fell under Soviet rule.
Communism preached that the talented and successful people, the people with character and ability, were no better than anyone else: that anyone could become a successful composer or scientist or industrialist if he were given the same education and the same advantages as those who had been successful. So if the successful people resisted being "equalized," then nothing really was lost in killing them, because they were simply replaceable human units like everyone else. That was the evil in communism: it killed the best of our people in order to make more room for the worst. It did an enormous amount of genetic damage to our race.
And it is the same egalitarian teaching which is used today to justify every sort of racially destructive policy in America, from Affirmative Action to open borders. Since Blacks are essentially the same as Whites, except that they've been held back by White racism, it does no racial harm to give jobs and promotions to Blacks that otherwise would have gone to Whites, say the egalitarians. It does no racial harm to boost Blacks up the socioeconomic ladder so that they can be more easily integrated into White society -- and can more easily intermarry with Whites. Since European Americans are essentially the same as Mexican mestizos and Haitian Negroes, why should we exclude them from our country? Sharing our land and our wealth with them can't possibly degrade us as a nation or weaken us in any way. What difference does it make if they outbreed us and eventually replace us? Everything will be the same, because we're all equal. We all have the same creative potential, the same potential for building and maintaining civilization. Right?
And I hardly need to tell you that the people who're pushing the party line of racial egalitarianism in America today are the same people who covered for the communists while they were butchering the best of our people in Europe for the sake of individual and class egalitarianism. The same people are running Hollywood and television and the New York Times today who were running Hollywood and radio and the New York Times while the communists were "equalizing" Ukraine and Russia and Poland and the Baltic states before their media allies got us into the Second World War in order to keep the Germans from stamping out communism -- and the people responsible for communism.
I'll mention one other thing in this regard. A lot of people believe that the Jews pushing racial egalitarianism in America today are a kinder, gentler bunch than the Jews who were pushing communism in Europe 50, 60, or 70 years ago -- Jews such as Leon Trotsky or Lazar Kaganovich or Ilya Ehrenburg or the unnamed secret police or gulag commissars, with the blood of millions of our people on their hands. It isn't so. The Jews in America today cannot order the arrest of their enemies or potential enemies by the thousands, gloat over them while they are being tortured in the basements of police headquarters around the country, and then have them disposed of with a bullet in the back of the head the way they did in Europe. But they would like to.
Let me illustrate that. Timothy Blake Nelson is a Hollywood film director. One would never expect someone with the name Timothy Nelson to be a Jew, but in fact he is a Jew and has identified himself as such in various film-industry publications. He is the director of a new film -- O as in Othello -- due to be released next month by Lions Gate Films, although it actually was made by Miramax, a division of Disney. Disney is headed by the Jew Michael Eisner, and Miramax is headed by the Jewish Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey. The original production team at Miramax is all Jewish and is headed by executive producer Michael Levy. The point I am making is that everything about Nelson's new film is Jewish.
Although O is very loosely based on the Shakespeare play, Nelson's Othello character is not a Moor but a modern American Negro, who is incongruously named "Odin" -- and, believe me, the incongruity in naming a Negro after the chief god in the Germanic pantheon is deliberate. Everything in the film is deliberate. It is a calculated outpouring of hate against everything White, everything European, everything Aryan. O, like so many other films coming from Hollywood recently, is aimed at promoting sex between teenaged White girls and Black males. If you believe most of the pre-release reviews, it is not an anti-White film at all, but rather a film aimed at breaking down racial barriers. It is a film against White racism, a film which will help to promote racial brotherhood and racial togetherness and all the other things so beloved of liberals and Christians.
If you read what Nelson himself has to say about his film you will get a different picture, however. It is a film calculated to rub the noses of Whites -- especially Southern Whites, especially upper-class Whites, especially racially conscious Whites -- in their wickedness and their inferiority. The setting of the film is a high-class boarding school for wealthy White kids in Charleston, South Carolina. Nelson gloats over the way in which the school has been forced to change its policies in order to comply with the "civil rights" laws his fellow Jews have imposed on the country. He gloats even more over the way in which the White students at the school have changed. The White male characters in the film are inferior in every way to the Black hero, who takes possession of the most beautiful White girl in the school, Desi. Although Desi has surrendered herself willingly to him, the Black ultimately subjects her to a violent rape: a symbolic playing out of Jewish hatred against the White race.
I'll read a a few selections from Nelson's own pre-production notes for the film, in which he expresses the feelings that he wants the film to evoke. You can read the notes for yourself from the Internet at the Lions Gate Web site. And of course, you do have to read between the lines. The Jews are never straightforward in expressing themselves, but Nelson's hatred comes through clearly enough in these pre-production notes. I quote:
"First, a few words about why shooting in the South is important. Obviously, the story of Othello, and our modern version, deal with racial issues, and in no region in America is the history of racial oppression more apparent . . . . I'm actually speaking more of the historical backdrop this region offers. Without populating the film with an assortment of crackers, we can give this story a specific and pointed setting. Place Odin on a distinctly antebellum campus, in a crisp school uniform, among the similarly dressed scions of former slave-owning families, and the rhetorical value is immeasurable. . . . Like the actress who'll play her, Desi is not only beautiful, she's extremely bright. She's also got poise, wisdom, and depth, which means she's not vulnerable to fads, nor is she indifferent to her past. . . .
"Odin is that terrific paradox: the one whom all at some level despise, but whom all, at some level, want to be. In this elite Southern academy, hip-hop language and culture abound, as kids casually appropriate the argot of places they wouldn't be caught dead in day or night; of characters with whom they'd be terrified speaking. It is beautifully ironic that against the backdrop of antebellum architecture, and in a town in which the old slave market still stands . . . kids speak as they do in this film. These great grandchildren of plantation owners venerate the enraged great grandchildren of slaves, whose rhetoric, at close listening, is virulently anti-white. . . . Odin is born of the black underclass culture fetishised by his rich white classmates, while he simultaneously gets to mingle with those classmates as one of their own. The most beautiful girl in the school is his girlfriend. He'll get the same diploma his classmates will; he'll go to Duke. . . . Like the . . . classroom, the dining hall should feel as though students' grandparents once dined there. . . . We want old South, so that . . . it shouldn't be hard to contemplate Odin's forebears serving the grandparents mentioned above. . . . With very few exceptions, these kids should seem very white, and very rich." -- end of quote --
Well, what I quoted is just a small taste of what the Jewish director has to say about his latest anti-White propaganda film. What is clear is his obsession with race and his burning hatred for us and his contempt. And we let these people -- Jews like Nelson and Eisner and the Weinstein brothers and Redstone and all the rest, with their films and their television and their advertising agencies and the rest of their media -- shape the opinions and the fashions of young Whites. So paralyzed with fear of being called "anti-Semites" or "racists" are we that we let them do it. Perhaps we deserve the contempt they have for us.
Fred writes: 1. To the extent that Pierce can be interpreted as blasting communism for its murder of millions, Pierce is a hypocrite. He is a nazi, and murdering millions is something he finds morally acceptable.
2. It makes about as much sense to blame Marx for the behavior of Stalin than it does to blame Christ for the behavior of Torquemada. (I am certainly no fan of Marx. Basically, Marxism is bunk. But Marx was not Stalin.)
3. The real evil acts of communism were conducted by goyim like Stalin and Mao.
4. To blame folks like Betty Friedan for the declining white birth rate is silly. The fact of the matter is that in a non-agrarian economy where birth control is available, there is simply no incentive for the individual female to have lots of kids. As Chaim has pointed out, the Japanese, Spanish and Italian birth rates have dropped. This has occured without any Jewish influence. It has occured because it is in accordance with the interests of women in those countries. To put it slightly differently, having and raising 10 kids is no picnic.
5. Query: How many children has Dr. Pierce sired? I wager few if any (assuming there are any females willing to procreate with him). To the extend that he bemoans the falling white birth rate, he is a hypocrite.
6. Pierce bemoans communism as based on envy. Query: If we were to delve into Pierce's twisted psyche, do you not believe that he is largely driven by envy? I believe that he is envious of those who enjoy a station in life that Pierce has been denied, and that Pierce (wrongly) believes he is entitled to.
Who is the Greater Menace to Society - Luke F-rd, or the Hollywood Jew?
Chaim Amalek writes: "God gave Torah to the Jews to keep them busy so they wouldn't infect dumb Gentiles with pernicious notions like feminism, communism, and crappy entertainment like MTV etc."
Luke, this is a brilliant and original observation. It is a damn shame that you do not have your own pulpit in your own shul or your own television program from which to preach truth to the liars and whores of Hollywood who spend their lives suppressing truth and spreading the viruses of feminism, egalitarianism, and racial suicide. I know that this sort of analysis goes way over the heads of most porn people (especially the doomed Christian Girls in bondage to jews far more clever than they) but it needs to be said, often and loudly. As a jew, I want my fellow Juden to stop pretending to be what they are not and return to Torah. You can help them, Luke. Step one is to repeatedly identify the jews in command of our culture so that people can observe for themselves the correlation between cultural poison and being secularly jewish.
(Would that we followed the example of the National Socialists of Germany in the thirties and forties, and forced secular jews to wear a pink star! The confusion of the goyim would come to a quick end! I do not propose any form of discrimination against anyone, only that people be armed with the knowledge of who is who.)
Which brings me to your self-righteous Hollywood "friend." Unlike most of the Juden in Hollywood, he is NOT a secular jew, but a full-bodied Torah Jew. And yet even he is part of the Hollywood Racial Doomsday machine that works each and every day to mongrelize the White Race even as it suppresses or distorts the plight of the Palestinian so as to keep Israel a jewish preserve. Please, stop trying to suck up to him and call him out by name! He is no more a friend of yours than Yggdrasil is your enemy. I know that your feelings were hurt when the Jews expelled you from their temple, but know this - when one door closes, another door opens. We are waiting for you to join us, and assume your part in the Great Struggle.
Michael W. writes from Tennessee: Hello Mr. Ford. As an initial caveat I will state that I am blond and blue-eyed. Its unfortunate that someone who (30) was babtised at 9 years of age in a Babtist church has to reluctantly agree with much of what Dr. Pierce says. Luke, my God, Jesus Christ, was Jewish. God's covenant with Abraham ensured Jews would prosper and recieve Satan's everlasting sabotage towards them. I have been glad that Jews have been in America because of their scientific and medical presence in our country. God said that "I will bless those who bless you, and curse those who curse you" in regards to the Jewish people in the Old Testament. Jews also saved a million American lives by perfecting the Atomic bomb in WWII (Robert Oppenhiemer, Einstien).
That being said, I agree that secular Jews blame ALL the European races for the Holocaust. The ACLU, People for the American Way, Sierra Club, Greenpeace, American Bar Association, CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, most newspaper syndicates (6 major ones), and last but not least, MTV are ran by Jews. Just look at the mastheads of many secular liberal magazines (TIme, Newsweek, Atlantic Monthly, Forturne, etc.), and you will see Jewish editor-in-chiefs or publishers. Why has this one race, comprising about 2% of America, so doggedly tried to run all our print and broadcast media? I honestly think I know the reason. The secular Jews, who dont believe in God, still long for a 'promised land.' They reject Israel, the real promised land given to them by the Lord, and covet America instead. Pierce is right when he states Jews promulgate feminism to young white women so we breed at below the replacement birthrate of 2.1 children per female. He is also right when he asserts the amoral media has secularized our people. Its imperitave that in order to really control America, whites must be made a minority here. What the Jews dont realize in my opinion is just how hospitable whites are to them in contrast to who the new American majority will be. They are making a huge mistake without realizing it. Arabs and blacks usually make no bones about detesting Jews. Whites (myself as one) have no bones with Jews except for the secular ones who insist on barbarizing our people. As capitalists, we dont resent anyone having wealth as long as they earned it honestly without fraud or theft. Thats why many of us so hate lawyers as they get rich using both... ......ha ha.
I fear the future of America and Europe (lowest birthrates on earth-1.15 in Spain, 1.18 in Italy) will be really ugly when many whites (about 20 more years) realize what is happening in their countries. People are tribal. Go to New York and see how the races stick together and observe the furtive, mistustful looks they give each other on the street. These two continents are being balkanized like Yugoslavia under General Tito. It took an iron rule to govern such a place with meager liberties. I think God seperated the races at Babel for a reason. He didnt want a One World Order and all people under one overweening ruler, yet we seem to be hurtling towards that very thing. Like Ayn Rand wrote in the novel Fountainhead, "divide and conquer, unite and rule." In short, aware American whites are heartbroken their country is being stolen from them and is becoming a place that breaks their hearts. We wanted to be an isolated shining city on a hill as an example to the world of what a religious society based in federalism and meretricious market economics, could achieve. Yet we are now getting, due to the Immigration act of 64, Democratic backed laws, secular (Jewish) media influence, an amoral nanny superstate with high taxes and lessening economic and religious freedoms. Its not the Jews as a race that is so upsetting some of us, but the secularist of whom many happen to be Jewish that are seeking to impose their worldview on this place that has us so discouraged. They had better be careful what they wish for however............look at what Russia has turned into.
Fred writes: Re: Jewish media domination. That's kinda like saying that blacks doggedly try to take over the NBA.
I certainly agree that America is a great country. My ancestors came here in 1904. It was a great choice. It beat the hell out of staying in Russia. Does that mean I "covet" America? America is the country of my birth. I believe it is, in fact, the best country in the world (from a number of perspectives, especially ideological). Is that coveting? I don't think so. I live here. I was born here. This is my country every bit as much as "Michael W".
As Chaim points out, Jews do not control the media in Japan, Italy or Spain. The birthrates are low there for the simple reason that economic and medical conditions reduce the desirability of having lots of kids. By the way--if the economic and medical conditions in Africa, South America and India were the same as here, their birth rates would be low here to. Women simply do not need to have 10 children.
Do you think it is some evil influence that inspires white American women to not have 5-10 children? Nope. The reason white American women do not generally have 5-10 children is a) they can now prevent it with birth control; b) they have no economic incentive to have 5-10 children, and c) they're sane. You'd have to be a 4-star idiot to think that women refuse to have 5-10 children merely because Betty Friedan tells them so.
It certainly is true that Arabs and blacks usually make no bones about detesting Jews. Whites have been more hospitable. However, historically, it has not been such a picnic for Jews in America. Up until the 1950s, Jews were excluded from numerous institutions in America, including the major New York law firms, places like Harvard, Princeton and Yale, country clubs, and various businesses. Institutions like the KKK has enormous influence in the first half of the 20th century, and it was no friend to Jews. The "political correctness" that the author appears to detest is part and parcel of breaking down these barriers.
The media sells what the rest of America wants. If America didn't want the stuff that the media sells, America wouldn't buy it, and the media wouldn't sell it. If this guy really thinks that there is some alternative product that the people of America really want that the media isn't supplying, he should go into the newspaper, magazine or TV business. If he's not willing to put his money where his mouth is, he's a hypocrite.
This guy is completely wrong. Yugoslavia and the rest of Europe is divided into ethnic groups. That is the way Europe and most of the entire planet is. America was probably the first nation put together (at least ideologically) along non-ethnic lines. The Puritan colony of Massachusetts, the Quaker colony of Pennsylvania, Catholic Maryland, etc. banded together. (I suppose one might argue that French, German and Italian cantons of Switzerland are sorta in the same category.) Switzerland certainly hasn't deteriorated into Balkan-like fighting. And America has not deteriorated into Balkan like fighting.
Deterioration into Balkan-like fighting is not some sort of inevitable result of race-mixing.
America has not been economically deteriorating due to immigration. If anything, it has become wealthier. If you tried to run Silicon Valley without Indians, Chinese and Koreans, it would grind to a halt. In many ways, immigration fuels the engines of wealth.
Second, the folks responsible for bringing America's largest racial and ethnic minorities into America was not the Jews. It was the WASPs who imported black slaves.
Third, Hispanic immigration is certainly not caused by the Jews. It
is caused by the following sources:
a) economic opportunity in the U.S. coupled with a complete unwillingness
of Agribusiness and the rest of America to forego cheap labor; and
b) in the case of Cuba, the WASP establishment to go along with anything
in the name of anticommunism.
The AMALEK Battle Plan For Keeping America Mostly White
Chaim Amalek writes: While I certainly agree that The Jew is to blame for many of our problems (e.g., mongrelization, pushy lawyers, even pushier SUV-driving publicists etc.) , I must point out that the low birthrates among white women in Spain and Italy are certainly not the fault of the jews, for the simple reason that the very tiny jewish communities in those lands most certainly do NOT control the mass-media there. Something else must be at work. Nor are Jews to blame for the infertility of Japanese women, as again, Jews do not control mass-media in Japan (no Juden there!). And as for the ruinous open immigration policy in the US, while stupid secular jews have supported it, it was voted into place by white Christian congressmen in the 1960's who failed to appreciate that they were sowing dragon's teeth.
The only way these deadly trends can be reversed is for the Juden to be recruited to the cause, and the best way of doing this is to use our obsession with Israel - a racially conscious state - to proper effect. Let's all urge our government to insist that as a condition of aid of every sort, Israel not treat the Palestinian immigrant any differently than the Brooklyn Jewish immigrant. This will force the jews to choose between the survival of Israel as a majority JEWISH state and the further mongrelization of America. I hope that the Jews choose life, and join the cause. This is the ONLY strategy that I am aware of (mainly because I thought of it up myself) that can work. But if any of you have other ideas, please pass them on to Luke and I will look at them further. Or will you content yourself to masturbate your race into oblivion while watching the flickering images of women you will never obtain?