Monday,
January 29th, 2001
'House of Mirrors' trial of porn star pal
( Sunday Mercury ) ; 01-07-2001
KAY Franklin became friends with Christine Terry after the former porn star began divorce proceedings against her millionaire husband John. The couple owned the 44-bed National Centre for Aesthetic Surgery in Bromsgrove - the world's largest plastic surgery clinic complete with a helipad - despite their marriage difficulties.
But in 1995, Mr Terry appeared in court charged with threatening to kill his wife and the owner of a rival clinic Stephen McNerlin.
At the time, Mrs Terry said she had been accused by her husband of having a string of affairs during their stormy eight-year marriage.
'I think John would like everyone to think I was a sex-crazed nymphomaniac who had slept with every plastic surgeon, anaesthetist and handyman who ever walked into the hospital,' she said.
As a 19-year-old, Mrs Terry, now 48, was also one of ten people involved in one of Britain's longest pornography trials.
The six-week 'House of Mirrors' trial at St Albans Crown Court heard of a plan to swamp Britain with 17,000 hardcore films with names like Carry on Sheikh and House of Mirrors.
Mrs Terry, who was named Christine Street at the time, was convicted of possessing obscene material and sentenced to a year in prison suspended for two years.
Wahl's Porn Show Should Leave Town
John Sonderegger writes in the 01-22-2001 St. Louis Post-Dispatch:
So Tom Wahl writes this long response to a recent Talk of Charleytown column, explaining why he and his wife, Suzi, like living here in conservative St. Charles County. Again, he signs his letter as chaplain of the Systematic Volunteer Group in Lake Saint Louis. "When you call us exhibitionists who would be happier in a sleazier locale, you imply that we aren't happy here in St. Charles County. But we are happy here - we have an important mission in challenging territory, and we have the means and the will to pursue it."
Oops! Got that one wrong, Tom. We meant to say that everyone else in St. Charles County would be happier if you and Suzi left and took your lifestyle to a locale better suited for people who like to invite the media to watch them have sex. We did get a response to your letter, from Pat McCourt of St. Peters: "My response to Tom Wahl's letter 'Why live in the area?' is the following: "Just shut up!"
Charleytown response: Apparently, we're not the only ones who have grown weary of Wahl's boring behavior and self-serving ego. Yes, Tom, you are doing a great service to St. Charles County by producing and distributing sex videos, charging police officers a fee so they can watch you and Suzi do it in a hotel room, and standing up for the rights of others who want to rent porn at places like Family Video. Frankly, we used to be a lot like you - in the eighth grade.
Another HIV Positive
Sharon Mitchell of AIM says that a black performer named Tori Coca Flame [her stage name] tested positive via PCR-DNA on January 25 with results reported the 27th. Mitchell said she wanted to get Coca Flame back for a confirmatory test but believes she's homeless. "If anyone has seen her please gives us a call," said Mitchell. "I'm worried that there might have been some people who shot her over the weekend." (Gene Ross)
Mark writes: Luke, The scum of the earth Regan Senter is pictured with Ms Coca Flame. http://beautifulmodels.com/bm265.htm
Luke says: I just talked to Regan and broke the news to him about Coca Flame's HIV status. He hasn't communicated with for over a year.
Listen to my talk with Regan.
Regan: "What? No? One of my girls and Jim's girls and Reb's girls. Oh God. When? No I didn't hear that. You're the first person that's told me this.
"I have't seen her...[for about two years]... I haven't heard from her...
Click here to view Regan's girls.
At first, I could not find Tori Coca Flame on Regan's list of available talent. Ari writes: "Tori Coco Flame *IS* on Regan's list of models. If you look at the first "models" page, then "more beautiful models"...then "even more beautiful models"...eventually you will get to a three-column listing of all of his talent, and Tori Coco Flame is on the left hand side."
Mark writes: Luke, You should post an open question to all female talent who for whatever reason was stupid enough to perform in a Regan Senter “compliance” video, what was going thru their mind at the time. And if they regret it, and what would they do to Regan next time they saw him.
I met a girl named Tease Nightly whom Regan dealt with at the VSDA show last year. When I mentioned Senter, she politely told me she would like to take a baseball bat to his knees. Also, Ms. Nightly found her way to Senter shortly after arriving to LA, she DID NOT have an AIDS test but Regan Senter didn’t mind, he still did an infamous non-condom compliance video with her.
Now that Los Angeles has a new DA, Bush is in office and everyone is running around scared of Ashcroft how long will be before idiots like Regan Senter who don’t even have a business license are thrown in the big house? I think Senter would do every well at twin towers. The Aryan nation would love that big soft cushy ass of his.
From Luke's April 1, 1999 archive (this was no April Fool's joke):
Luke talked to five foot black girl Tori Coca Flame (now registered with Regan Senter, 310-207-2534) at 2:45 PM. I heard that Reb [Sawitz] had made her suck his dick a couple of times and then never got her work.
Tori: "I was in World Luckiest Man, the 101 girl gangbang by Mr. Marcus for Vivid.
"The first time I went [several months ago to Reb Sawitz's talent agency Pretty Girl International], I had my photos taken and we did the whole thing [gave Reb oral sex], I called back the next day and he said that he had lost my pictures. So I had to come back and do the whole thing all over again.
"So I did Mr. Marcus' 101... And I called him a month later and asked him if there was anything going on. And he said, 'who are you?'
"I said, 'Coca.' He said, 'Oh, I don't recall. Let me look through my files.' He gets his secretary to go through his files but I am nowhere to be found. So he wants me to come back down there again to take pictures, and give him another blow job. Three strikes and you're out!"
Tori, 32 yo, entered porn in April of 1998. She's appeared in 23 videos.
Luke: "What do you think is your best work?"
Tori: "I don't know. I don't even watch the things. I don't even own a VCR. But, I'd say Anal Pool Party 2 for Jim Powers at Notorious. Kira, Obsession, Champagne, Byron Long, Weed..."
Flame stands 5'1", weighs 110 pounds with small breasts. She measures 32A-23-36. "I work a lot for Jim Lane, as well as Jim Malibu, Zane, Samurai, Metro, Extreme... I was a fluff girl for the Houston 500. It's been up and down for me. Right now it's down. I wish it was up because I need some money.
"The Houston 500 was interesting. It was weird meeting people in reverse. You're sucking their dick and then you look up and there's a face attached. Hi, how are you doing? It was weird.
"Yeah, I did the normal [sex] with Regan [Senter].
"I can't understand how some people can get into the adult entertainment business and act like they're an angel. Oh, I don't do this. Oh, I don't do that. Oh, no, I don't want to do him. Get off your high horse. You know what it is all about, so come in with a good attitude, do your job and all will be well. If you go into this, you have to set aside your hangups before you take the oath of valor..."
Luke listens to a baby in the background playing a toy that repeats the tune "Oh Susannah, won't you wait for me."
Tori: "The other thing is, you can never say 'I'm going to have X amount of dollars this month because it is always up and down. Some people work constantly. I'm busting my ass and I can't even get a job. It sucks to sit around the house waiting for a call.
"These people tell you to call them on Tuesday. You call them and they say call me Wednesday. Then you call them Wednesday and they say call me Thursday... It irks the s--- out of me. I'm from the East Coast. I'm cut and dry. f--- yeah, I'm going to use you or no, I'm not. Don't keep me on a string and keep tugging me like a dog.
"My daughter is back there cracking up, now that she's got some attention. She's jumping up and down. I have six kids. It makes you think that I like to f---, huh? On camera, off camera, what the hell. I lost my virginity at age 17 and had my first kid at 21. Throughout my 20s, I had the same toenail polish on because I was always too f---ing pregnant to bend over... The father of my first three died in a car accident. They live with my mother in New Jersey and they're coming out for summer vacation. One is with his dad and the other two are here.
"When I was getting ready to come out here [from New Jersey], my mother said, 'please, keep the kids here.' I'm an only child. My mother is an only child. And her mother is an only child. I was the first one in four generations to have a boy who survived. So I had to be the one to spit out the children. I've had all my kids now. I'm not having anymore. I don't give a damn if the dick is gold with a diamond tip.
"Now I can just enjoy life and do what I want to do. This is something that I've always wanted to do. I remember when I was younger, my mother had this book called "Sex in Marriage." A black book with white letters. They had some cool color photos of people having sex. Whooh, it was cool. Ever since then I've had this thing about doing it. She never knew that I saw it. In fact, she still has it."
Luke: "How many guys have you f---ed?"
Tori: "f--- man, I can't count that many. I remember when I worked phone sex for USID at 6565 Sunset Bl.. And I was writing down everybody I had screwed. And at that time I was up to 125. Now I'm sure it has 250-300."
Luke: "You've made a lot of guys happy."
Tori: "That's my job. Everybody needs to have a smile on their face. At the Houston 500, I said 'My motto is that every dick will be sucked. Hold on to your nuts, here I come.'"
A porn veteran tells Luke: "I told her [little black girl named Tori Coca Flame] about Jim South and all those pictures I saw under his blotter of him [Jim South] getting head [from porn stars]. She asked me, 'Do I have to suck everyone's dick to get work?' Hell no, I said. 'Well, I'm kinda naive.' Then she said, 'Well, Reb made me suck his dick and then he didn't give me no work.'
"I disguised my voice and left a message on Reb's service, saying, 'I thought you didn't like models sucking your dick? Is that what you've got to do to get them work.'
"I've told you about Jim South's blotter. I'd walk into his office, and he'd say, 'XXX, come have a look at this.' And he'd lift up his blotter and show me pictures of girls sucking dick. And I'd say, 'Who's dick is that?' And he'd chortle and say, 'Well, XXX, that's my dick.'"
Luke says: Jim South denies ever having a blotter let alone being stupid enough to keep pictures of girls sucking his penis.
Guess which agent is having sex with Tori? It's Regan Senter, from two years ago.
Paul Cambria's List
I've received requests to repost this.
Gene Ross writes: "Cambria's reasoning is that the boxcover is the first line of defense and porn crackdown artists don't bring VCR's with them on store raids. The list pretty much includes: no facial cum shots; check for facial expressions- don't use any shots that depict any unhappiness or pain; no shots with an appearance of pain or degradation, body shots are okay if the shot is not nasty; no bukkake; no spitting or saliva mouth-to-mouth; no food used as a sex object; no peeing unless in a natural setting such as a field or roadside; no coffins; no blindfolds, no wax drippings; no two dicks in or near one mouth; no shot of stretching pussies; no fisting; no squirting; no bondage or bondage-type toys or gear unless very light; no girls sharing the same dildo in mouth or pussy; toys are okay if shot is not nasty; no hands from two different people fingering the same girl; no male-male penetration; no she-males; no bi-sex; no degrading dialogue, e.g. "suck this cock, bitch" while slapping her face with a penis; no menstruation topics; no incest topics; no forced sex, rape themes, etc., no black men/white women themes. So far, among the companies that are going to adopt these guidelines are Vivid, Hustler, Video Team and VCA."
The Real Naturals 3
Patrick Riley writes on RAME: I was shocked when I went to the video store the other day and found the title movie from Ed Powers. How disloyal! To someone who has watched all (except one) of Ed's 175 volumes of MDD plus most of his other movies. Why didn't someone tell me about Ed starting a new series? Now I'll have to go back and try and find #1 and #2. Mind you, the release date on #3 is 1/19/01 so the others can't be too far in the past.
Based on the box, the concept is to have girls who have natural tits. Er, so what? Lots of girls in MDD series have natural tits. Unmarried mothers have priorities other than spending money on boob jobs. I think Ed must be scratching for some new gimmick but I don't think this is it. Inside it's just MDD; could be volume #176 (but isn't).
However, what Ed could do, and this is based only on #3, is call it "The Good Stuff" meaning that the trash he leaves back in the MDD series and the erotic scenes he puts in this series. Because this is one of the most erotic movies of 2000. An absolute MUST SEE. Even buy it! Disclaimer: hardened raincoaters who are uninterested in the emotional reaction between the participants won't like it.
Note to voyager: I think we may have a replacement for Ariel Lane and Shiloh in Sasha and Carlo in the last scene. Carlo is possibly more handsome than Shiloh--Italian type who reminds me of Marino Franchi (Super Mario) in the Ben Dover movies--and should be even more desirable as a candidate for "conversion" if you get my drift.
Cast: Brandi Lyons (8/31/00), Kno Malone (8/31/00), Luna (10/25/00), Sasha (9/9/00), Scott Lyons, Carlo, Ed Powers Date of release: 1/19/01 (note: it's a 2000 movie because the scenes were all shot in 2000)
Brandi and Scott can be seen Extreme Teen #11 where they do a perfunctory couples scene (couples in this context means a scene where the performers are a real-life couple (SO) not a scene directed towards the couples market) but here they go through the usual Ed interview and we find out something about them.
Call me naive but I was sure that the existence of these types was just anti-American propaganda. These aren't trailer park trash, they're backwoods trash...in 2000 no less. The story about the Hatfields and the McCoys is an urban legend...isn't it? Of course after you've seen Brigette and Skeeter Kerkove and Guage and Mojo this is the next logical step. BTW Scott comes from SC and Brandi from Kentucky.
She's not too bad looking with a passable face, very long straight brown hair, small tits, not much waist, and a shaven pussy. No obvious tattoos or piercings and she seems to have a nice placid disposition. You can imagine her in them thar' hills stirring the mash with half-a-dozen grubby rug--er, dirt rats playing at her feet.
However, she's Amazonian and towers over Scott. Of course he could be Vince Voyeur type runt. He seems to have a little trouble growing a beard but has that feral cunning one associates with such people. If you want a comparison, I think the producers of the Simpsons patterned the slack-jawed yokel after Scott.
Well, it seems that she's 21 and he's 26 and they've been married for six years...tick, tick, do the math. The penny dropped for Ed too and he reached for his heart medicine. Not only did Brandi lose her cherry at 15 (probably long before) but she actually got married at that age. Ed is speechless! But not Scott who tells us all the circumstances: She was living in a house with four other people and apparently was up to no good so he talked to her mother who agreed that it would be alright for Scott to take Brandi away from all that and marry her. And they say arranged marriages are dead!
In all that follows, Brandi placidly goes along with anything anyone tells her to do--she'd probably f--- a horse if she was told to--all the time with a non-irritating grin on her face. Sheesh, maybe in addition to the HIV test they should have an IQ test for the new performers--under 50 and you're out.
The idea is for Ed to screw Brandi and then for Scott to jump in and then Kno Malone to join the fray. Kno can be seen in MDD #172 and Extreme Teen #8 and is allegedly Moroccan with an ugly face, long black hair, tattoo of two Chinese characters between her shoulder blades in a vertical line, small tits, mole on the inside of her right tit, and a stubbly pussy. This is not exactly what one would call a handsome foursome. Kno says that this is her last movie because...bleep, bleep...(Ed bleeps out references to other companies but I presume that she's talking about problems with Extreme).
Brandi masturbates perfunctorily, Ed rims Brandi (yuk), Ed screws Brandi including an anal ending in a facial. Scott screws Brandi and then Kno joins in for a three way including an anal of Kno (Scott might be an ugly yokel but he enjoys his work and Brandi doesn't seem to mind) ending in a facial on Kno, and finally Ed gets back in again and screws Kno ending in a belly cum shot. None of this is particularly erotic but it was interesting.
The second girl is Luna who you can also see in Real Sex Magazine #37 where she only masturbates (same as here) but RSM #37 was done on 11/2/00 (note the date above). Luna is...how should I put this...too good for porn, at least in her own mind, and that may well be a correct determination. Her attitude reminds me of Jade (not the Canadian stripper/whore) in RSM #36, or Sara St. James, or Alexus Winston in L.A. Meat. It's a Playboy/Penthouse or similar model who has decided to get some easy bucks by doing some non-threatening mainly nude scenes or in this case masturbation but who despises what she's doing.
Gene Hackman's character in Under Suspicion (an excellent movie BTW) talks about women who have nothing to sell but their beauty and how they know it. Luna is in that category or at least thinks she is. The way in which she preens and shows the camera her pussy, her butt, etc indicates that she's used to being adored for her body, having the men flock around and drool over her no matter how cruel she is to them. In many respects her performance as the (undeniably true) gorgeous coy sex object is vast overkill and the viewer tires after a while. Of course beauty fades eventually and a new piece of prime pussy appears on the scene and when that happens, as they know it will, girls like this at the extreme take the Savannah way out.
Luna is very pretty with short straight brown hair, medium/large very firm tits (34C), elephant ears, flat belly, trimmed triangle of stubble, tight waist, and a lithe body. She meets Ed in the backyard of a house I haven't seen before and after lots of preening and showing him her pussy and butt they go inside to a bedroom which is not the normal Ed set. Maybe it's her house. She says that she's 18 and comes from LosA and talks about her first time--hard to tell when; she doesn't give a straight answer to anything but around 14--and the guy "opened me up" for the next one. Hmmm. Very strange view. It's like sex was a career and she had to get her body in working condition. She tells about how her best masturbation experience was in the bath with the water from the open faucet running on pussy--she tells the same story in RSM--and masturbates with various toys. Ed keeps hinting "Have you ever had sex with an old fat guy" but she's not buying Ed's line although she does tell the camera that you (the viewer) could learn some things from Ed.
The scene (a long scene) ends with Ed lying flat on his back and masturbating while she makes gestures with her mouth as though she were licking his dick and then sucking him off. Somehow I'm unconvinced that she hasn't done anything before this because to know why he's getting her to do this you have to understand the distance shortening properties of the camera lens (she's actually a foot or so away from his dick) which seems unlikely at her age without some actual experience.
Despite the negatives, Luna, more so here than in RSM, is just too good to pass up. Imagine tying her to the bed and exploring the inside of her elephant ears yourself.
And now the piece de resistance, Sasha. Initially Sasha appears on her own in Ed's lair made up like Heidi with her natural white blonde hair in two braids and seems quiet and shy. She says that she's 19 years old and comes from Russia but has been here for six years and is going to trade school but other than that Ed doesn't delve too deeply. English is reasonable. Facially she's pretty with small/medium tits, tight waist, trimmed but still hairy pussy (yes, the rug does match the drapes), slightly rounded belly, small blue tattoo in the small of her back, and a lithe body. She says that she masturbates but her masturbation performance doesn't bear out her assertion. Ed BTW is not allowed to touch and doesn't.
Later she reappears (without the braids) and now she's in the arms of Carlo who's obviously the boyfriend or SO. Oh, these two are in love. Every time he replies to Ed she looks into his eyes adoringly and after they're given the go ahead (Ed doesn't speak from this point on) he undresses her and there's lots of kissing and body fondling. The editing is not great with some jumps but it's as good as we're going to get. Carlo spends lots of time kissing her body with special attention to her tits and then plunges in. After a couple of changes of position, he rims her asshole (yuk!) and then anals her ending with her on her back (he's probably in her pussy at this point) and pulling out and giving her a facial (aw, gee, couldn't we have kept it as a non-raincoater scene) which he licks off her face and kisses her, passionately. The scene ends with her saying, "I love you, Carlo." Now ain't that cute!
No condoms were used.
Tales of Perversity 8 - Lost Angeles
Patrick Riley writes on RAME: No the title is not the normal porno illiteracy but a play on "Los Angeles", the city and the people who inhabit it, the Lost Angels. Tricky, eh?
This is a ho-hum movie except for one (or one and a half) scene(s) which you have to put on your MUST SEE list. It has everything bad going for it:
Ginger Paige: porn fodder with an OK face, small tits, lithe but not particularly good body, long dark brown hair, and a tattoo on her left belly. In other movies she's too tall and too pushy.
Sky Taylor: pretty, elegant face, sun-damaged skin, looks old but that may be the skin, cantaloupes that she keeps covered almost all the time in this movie, flat belly, lithe body, tailbone tattoo, near shaven pussy, and shoulder length dark blonde hair. Lousy perfunctory performance in White Panty Chronicles #15. Think Brooke Campbell with cantaloupes.
Nacho Viadal: could be bad or good. Like TT he has times when he's romantic and passionate and others when he acts like Rocco.
Condoms in the main part for Ginger only.
And now the good stuff: It starts with Ginger sketching Sky in an apartment and then after a while Ginger aggressively starts a g/g with Sky to which she responds. This includes some hot wax on her belly and pussy which added nothing in my view. They move to the bedroom but before this goes too far, Nacho, looking like a wild man, bursts into the room. Sky tries to tell him to just watch and pushes him away but he won't have any of that and together with Ginger, he holds her down.
She acquiesces quickly and they do a three way which is very passionate between Sky and Nacho with there being a definite cooling when he's screwing Ginger. As an example, the camera returns after an obvious cut and we see Nacho screwing Sky missionary with her with her legs in the air and her head up near the headboard of the bed while Ginger is dressed in what looks like an old fifties-style house coat and is sitting on the end of the bed smoking a cigarette. The impression is that Ginger took a break but Nacho and Sky continued to screw. There's some further B&D with Ginger choking Nacho with an electrical wire but the purpose of this was lost on me.
Sky seems to draw out the cum shot from Nacho orally while he's on his back with Ginger choking him. Lots of eye contact and almost a "You're a bad boy and you'll have to cum now whether you want to or not" attitude. He cums on his own belly.
After the movie is finished, we watch a male, presumably the director Robert Madison, videoing himself Rodney Moore style getting a freebie from Sky but this in not just any old freebie. It starts with the same sort of high eye contact BJ and then she's begging him to put it in. He teases her just inserting the head of his dick in her pussy and then withdrawing. She's pushing back trying to make him go all the way. And then...the screen goes blank. Presumably he decided a full hands-on approach was more beneficial to him than doing something for us to watch. I can't say I blame him.
In some respects Sky's attitude and eye contact reminds me of an early Tiffany Minx say in the movie Tight Spot with a similar dedication to the job. Hopefully Sky recognizes what Tiffany doesn't and retires after half a dozen movies or so but until then I'll be looking for another equally good performance from her.
Teen Angel 2000
Patrick Riley writes on RAME: This is a hopeless movie in general. How Patrick Collins, who looks old and haggard BTW, thinks that he can take a Euro-whore and make her out to be a teenager or an angel which would seem to imply someone angelic--innocent--I don't know. Brittany, the title girl, is done up Max Hardcore-like with her hair in two pigtails and tries to look like she wasn't whoring it out at the age of 15...but fails. The rest of the women in the movie, with one exception, are the usual European versions of the Jenny Jones guests. One of them nearly reaches plumper status, or at least the fat women in those Big Top movies. (Just the movie for Gemini999--you like pig-like trash, don't you?)
Come on. You cross the tracks to screw some trailer park trash but she had better be a genetic aberration, i.e., good looking. We don't need to fantasize about them after they've started their downhill slide, say around 19.
Contrary to popular belief--or at least the reasonable man's belief based on Private and Evil Angel movies--European girls are not necessarily Amazons with bad teeth and big butts and a case in point in the girl in the second scene here who's quite pretty with short reddish-brown hair, small/ medium tits, shaven pussy, and a lithe body. She looks like she took a wrong turn at Zoltan Southeski's office and probably won't be in the business after this movie. Fortunately she only allows some rug munching by Brittany and avoids the dick of the diseased-looking Euro-stud who tries to do a three way with them.
If by any chance (e.g., the video store pays you to rent this one) you watch this excuse for Patrick Collins to get a BJ, and you know this girl, please advise. My guess is that she's Martina Benetti but I don't know why I'd guess this--I suppose the other names sound like they belong to ignorant whores.
Casualties Of The Sexual Revolution
Nick Adams writes:
The sexual revolution is over and those few scarred veterans who survive and refuse to surrender are marked forever with a digitalized scarlet letter.
At least that seems to be the message from the family values camp.
Mike Greene, head of the Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, fired the most recent anti-sex salve. Upon learning porn star Jenna Jameson was to appear at the Grammy Awards with recording artist Kid Rock, Greene banned the blonde actress from the show. He reasoned that a woman who earned her living by having sex on camera would be bad for the show's image.
Oddly enough, he didn't seem to mind when Raylene, a lesser-known porn star, replace Jameson onstage.
Another bit of irony is that Jameson appeared as a guest star on the CBS series "Nash Bridges" the same week. She's also appeared frequently on E! and Howard Stern, but always as the jiggling blonde bimbo.
Greene's message to her could not be more clear--Jameson is nothing but a sex object and should stick to behaving as one in places where it's permissible for men to ogle women of loose morals. The Grammy Awards are not such a place. Read On
Why Don't Porn Stars Get Any Respect?
Beavis writes on RAME: Hi, I recently read on Luke F-rd's site a list of around 12 ways pornstars can get out of the industry and each of the items on the list were very derogatory to pornstars...disrespectful. Now, I ask you...why do we all look down upon pornstars as if we're so much better? Seriously. We are all consumers of porn and watch it frequently if not avidly. And recently in society, the watching of porn has become much more acceptable and not so taboo. So, why is it that people just don't show much respect to pornstars? There's no...,"How many movies did you make this month? 33? Damn. I'm a big fan of yours', but that almost seems like too many movies." Instead, there is, "God, you looked so hot in 'Assbangers 15'. I couldn't believe how wet you got." Pornstars present themselves as objects for our use, but they are not just objects of affection. I'm not trying to say something as corny as "Pornstars are people too, you know." I'm just saying, we should start respecting these people more and appreciating how much hard work can in fact go into the filming of a porn movie, especially the big lavish productions.
John writes: About what Beavis said: I think porn stars work harder than mainstream celebrity movie stars, who are so overpaid for doing almost nothing. Porn stars are at least taking their clothes off and doing nasty things for our enjoyment, so they do earn their paychecks. Can you imagine if a mainstream movie star was asked to be spit at and slapped around, or have her head dunked in a toilet ? (as some porn girls have). She would totally freak out, or charge millions of dollars to do it.
Devoto writes: Luke, Beavis writes on your site a touching post that seems to agrue that PORN STARS ARE PEOPLE TOO!! Awww (*wipes tear from eye*) isnt that sweet! Perhaps Beavis should listen to what he is saying though, and he will be able to find the answer as to WHY Porn Stars do not get any "respect" (Who let Rodney Dangerfield into porn??). Beavis says "Pornstars present themselves as objects for our use". BOY, that kind of sounds as if they are MAYBE demeaning or degrading themselves? I am going to go out on a limb and argue that MAYBE it is the FACT that they present themselves as OBJECTS that allows them to be TREATED by society as objects? But, what do I know, I am just a small town boy with a big ego.
Luke Gets Mail
Asia Carrera writes: In response to Fred's comment of 'was she a flake or...', re:my leaving Simon Wolf, I should clarify one thing - part of my contractual agreement stated that I would dedicate 3 days a week to working for Simon Wolf, whether in the office, on the set, or at public appearances, and I would have 3 days a week for working on my site and one day for errands, chores, or just relaxing. After spending 5 days travelling to, from, and signing at the CES show, I felt I had done more than my duty for Simon Wolf that week, and of course I had a huge backlog of emails, website orders, updates and other work to do on my website when I got back home. So for Simon Wolf to DEMAND my return to the office immediately after CES ended was unfair in my opinion, and violated the terms of our contract. The added indignity of being suspended without pay made me decide once and for all that there should only be one dictator in my life... me! :)
Lynne writes Luke: Let them slap you around, you gorgeous bitch: it will only feel better when you come to me for tenderness and adoration...
LT writes: Luke, if you insist on having Flashman push fake tits all the time, and publicizing some schlock site that steers strippers towards implants, it's only fair that you mention the following: http://nav.webring.yahoo.com/hub?ring=implantring&list
This is a web ring listing sites that report the truth about breast implants. Anyone thinking of getting a boob job, it's worth a look. It's what they DON'T tell you about them. BTW, does Flashman push fake tits on his "girls"?
Luke, Skeeter Kerkove wrote that his wife Bridgette did NOT go to the Harline Clinic and that it was Dr. Sonntag who operated on her. (http://harlineclinic.hypermart.net/pub/docs/sonntag.htm)
The only thing I was wrong about was the website still being down. They simply changed the web address. I ask you Luke, what does that sound like? What I was getting at is confirmed there, the "doctor" that operated on Bridgette Kerkove IS the one doing the operations FOR the Harline Clinic. He took over when the old quack surrendered his license. Harline still operates the "clinic". What I was getting at is what caliber of ethics are involved in a guy that would work for someone so ethically challenged?
Skeeter, I can't commrny on her scars, because I avoid implants like the plague they are, but most women (and their men) who loudly proclaim I HAVE NO SCARS...have scars. Sometimes quite awful. I still have serious questions as to how Bridgette wound up with double D's and a nose job to boot, especially since she. Did she wake up with much larger boobs than she figured on before hand?...if so, she wouldn't be the first.
From your reaction (overreaction) to Rog's comment in his review, and your response to my comments, I think there's the possibility that the whole subject of the boob job hits a little too close to home for you. It's not a rumor, and it doesn't add to her fame...but bragging about it adds to your infamy...as does bragging about the "deal" you got on Bridgette's surgery and the thrown in nose job.
One last thing, Rog has made comments about other actresses and their implants. Granted, not as many as *I* would like him to (or for that matter other reviewers), and most aren't nearly strong enough, but he HAS done it. If it's a really badly done boob job, he'll say it.
Porn Ace writes: I know what I was thinking about last night,it was the hot fresh body of a barely legal Mariel Hemingway in the movie "Personal Best".I'd never seen the movie before and the sight of her in erotic lesbian scenes and other hot nubile athletic looking babes showing all in steamroom scenes had me spurting all over the place.I looked on some website where they reviewed the movie and some sissy had the nerve to complain about the "gratuitousness" of it all.Don't these reviewers know what makes a movie good?HA!I definitely recommend it.I give it one hard dick UP!
It sounds to me that you want to be a sort of "pimp" as well Jane,if you want to "direct"porn etc.Would you refuse to work with anyone who has kids?Or just refuse to use chopsticks in a sex scene?If it's a "greedy young wife" who is "manipulating" her husband to make more money would you see that as sick?Alot of wives play a supporting role in helping their husbands/partners in their careers,granted most aren't in porno but when the roles are reversed some people get all bent out of shape about it.Why the double standard against men?
But seriously it's big of you to admit that you have this "uneasy relationship" with porn.I admit being conflicted myself at times.I bet most all of porn watchers wouldn't want their daughter or mother sucking cock and taking it up the ass in a porno...myself included.I recognize this hypocrisy on my part and I think you do as well.But one thing I have a big problem with is those who get off on porn and then turn around and use derogatory put downs toward the ones who provide them the pleasure.I'll never understand this attitude.I appreciate the red hot babes like Jessica Drake who get me off time and again.Why would I then put them down??Some people might say I'm full of crap,but I also believe that the availability of porn makes for a better society.Look at countries that outlaw porn,Are they better off for it?Would you like to live in one?I say NO!Porn might be a dirty,complex job and those that enjoy it might be dirty,complex,conflicted people but damn it someone has to do it!!For all you do porn hotties,this next load is for you...
Devoto writes: The benefits of living in a society with porn is the creation of CREATURES like Ted Bundy, and, also, the immediate cure to anotherwise boring evening at home alone. OH, the humanity!!
Felix writes: Dear Luke, I came across VH1 last night and saw a porn star named Raylene. She said she was introduced to the adult movies by girl name "shane". They showed a quick picture of her and I think I've seen her before but don't know where.
Luke says: Check my bios on Raylene and on Shane.
Tom writes: Do Porn Stars charge their fans gawking fees to allow them to watch them have sex on the set???
Steve Neece writes: It has been a while since I have written,being once again employed.However,the level of lies and and subhuman intellect compels me to once again take up the cause of intelligence and truth. First off let me dispense with the cretin who made reference to Sunset Thomas' baby being born with bumps on its head from being poked while in her womb.Does he not realize that pregnant women have continued to have sex since time immemorial without damaging the fetus?! I hope this man never breeds.
Now for Jane.You are an arch hypocrite.Yes,I have my own reservations about Skeeter but that does not change the fact. Hopefully,Bridgettes children think of her first and foremost as a loving parent. Hopefully they will be raised to view sex in a positive way and their mothers activities will be looked on as just another form of recreation.A little wierd or gross,maybe, but no more than someone else being into any number of tacky things.As she has to my knowledge done any major gang bangs it is possible that her onscreen male lovers may number no more than a couple of dozen,as the same guys get used over and over again.You betray hysteria and or misinformation when you write of 'hundreds'.Yes,they will have to make them understand that many/most people are intolerant to what they do and it is perhaps wisest not to call unwanted attention to yourselves.That has often strengthened families and brought them closer together in cases of parents with unpopular/illegal political/social/religious beliefs.I look at the chopstick thing as being a daffy /tacky stunt,much like college students used to swallow goldfish or insects or rodents.Only chopsticks are not living,or dead.
I will say this though:if the Kerkoves intend to raise their children to view sex as positive,loving and natural,I would advise against doing a lot of negative video's that make people look stupid and degraded .Video's in the Max Hardcore,Rob Black,Jim Powers tradition contradict any positive preachings you may impart and will cause them to raise awkward questions at a later date.Yes,I would hope that bridgette is remembered for something other than chopsticks but countless millions of children have parents remembered for truly awful things(murder,child abuse,drunkeness,addiction,general hatefulness,various criminal activities) that this would seem minor,if possibly embarrassing.By the way,what kind of porn would you make? Now,for the main topic.Luke,you are either woefully ignorant or a barefaced liar.Two thousand,max,you say??!! Torqemada had more victims than that in period of less than 20 years in Spain and his successors were even bloodier .By the way,Torquemada was a converso,or converted Jew.I find it interesting that you would be an apologist for the Inquisition ,whose activities included ferreting out and killing Jews.Their killings of witches and heretics number in the many millions but they tried to avoid responsibility for this by turning most of them over to secular courts for sentencing once they had tortured confessions out of them. You take the common stance of inferior mentalities when confronted with facts not to your liking ,you hysterically deny them. I posit this:Christianity has indeed killed more people than Nazi's and Communists combined.The fall of the Roman Empire,and its aftermath, is considered to be the single most catastrophic even in Western history.The population of Europe was reduced to a fraction of what it was in Roman Times.
As one of your posters,Alien, remarked,the church forbade the Greco Roman hydenic habit of bathing as a sinful indulgence of the flesh.That alone undoubtedly caused hundreds of millions of deaths over the milennia and a half it was in effect.I blame most of the depopulation of this period on church teachings,on hygeine and it's sapping of their will to defend themselves against dangers from within and without as this life was consididered unimportant.Lost knowledge in farming caused countless millions of deaths thru famines.Religious wars killed other countless millions.The Thirty Years War alone accounted for 7-14 million (1618-1648).The Church supported conquest of Latin America cost tens of millions of Indians their lives to enrich the Papal coffers.Did you know that the Taipeng rebellion in 19th century China was started by a crazed Christian convert who believed he was the half brother of Jesus Christ.Before he and his followers were finally suppressed 20,000,000 people had lost their lives.No wonder chairman Mao expelled all missionaries . I could go on ,but I'm sure you get the idea. As a Jew,how can you defend Christianity ? It sought to exterminate Jewry numerous times ,and over the period from 313 a.d to roughly 1800 may have been responsible for as Jewish deaths as Hitler.
As for the religious in America being more humane and law abiding...? More so than whom?Which religions.It has been documented many times that religious believers have higher crime rates,especially violent crime,than atheists who tend to be wealthier and better educated.as for humanity,you will find that those who consider themselves religious are far more likely to be in favor of the death penalty and far more tolerant,if not actually approving,of spousal and child abuse.Most are dead set against and childrens rights or child abuse legislation as they feel it interferes with parental rights to be as abusive as they see fit.They also tend to be less than active in environmental/quality of life issues.Altogether,a life hating,intelligence hatiing ,pleasure hating group.You can say that the more religious one is,the less educated and affluent they are.Are your beloved Orthodox Jews as wealthy and well educated as their secular brethern?I await your reply.Steve Neece
Devoto writes: Luke, I have read your page, and was amazed at the post submitted by Steve Neece. Apparently, on his crusade for intelligence and truth he has taken on the almost insurmountable task of attempting to remedy the level of "lies and and subhuman intellect" (typo left in to ILLUSTRATE Steve's own intellectual prowess) that appear on your site. As a contributor to your site, and therefore, a person with subhuman intellect, I feel the need to help Steve out. My parents have ALWAYS instilled in me the notion of helping those that are less fortunate than yourself. SO, Steve, it is your lucky day!!! YOU will be my charity work for the day (not too many elderly ladies to help across the street where I live). FIRST, I find it odd that an intellectual giant such as Steve would stoop to the level of using ad hominem attacks. BUT, I guess even Mark McGwire hits singles every now and then, so I can accept that.
Second, and what really makes no sense whatsoever, is that Steve argues that parents with "unpopular/illegal political/social/religious beliefs" often times have closer knit families due to the fact that they have to undergo outside scrutiny and that only reaffirms the closeness of the family unit. This, as itself, is open for debate. HOWEVER, he then continues in the very next paragraph to state : "countless millions of children have parents remembered for truly awful things(murder,child abuse,drunkeness,addiction,general hatefulness,various criminal activities) ". WELL, at least those countless millions (by the way Steve, if it is "countless" how can it ALSO be "millions"?) have close knit families to fall back on, if we accept Steve's earlier premise. In closing Steve, perhaps you ought to just stay at your new job and continue to flip burgers, and leave the logical argumentation to the those of us with subhuman intellect (gratuitous ad hominem argument, I know you like those Steve!). I sincerely hope you are grateful of my gift to you.
