Home

Back to Essays



Sunday, January 14th, 2001

Keri Starr Straightens Things Out

Porn star Keri Starr writes: Hello Luke I just wanted to write to you and straighten a few things out.

First of all, I did invite Ashley to go to the Extreme party, and she told me that she was warned by a friend, not AVN, not to go. We talked to Zupko, and told him the we had invited her and he said that it would be cool for her to come to the party.

As far as Mike South, The only thing I told him when I talked to him was that I would tell Gene Ross, that he was not there with AVN. But he was wearing an AVN badge, when he basically told me that I should chose my friends wiser. He told me if I wanted to hang out with Extreme, that AVN could Make or Break me in this business. I never said that I would say that he did not say these things to me, nor do I think that he should wear an AVN Badge and tell me this stuff and expect me not to think that it is coming from AVN. Why should it matter if I work for Extreme or any other company, If I do a scene and it is good, then it is good. If it is Bad, then it's bad. I believe that I should be judged, by the scenes I do not the company I work for. However, I like working for Extreme, and will continue to work for them as long as they ask me to.

Thank you for letting me express my points and I want to once again say I am sorry to Ashley for the misunderstanding.

Mike South writes: Well Luke by Ms. Star's logic because I driive a Ford truck I must work for Ford, and I sometimes wear a No Fear T Shirt so I guess I work for them too, This chick needs to use her head every now and then for something other than sucking cock.

Britney Spears Dumps Greg Dark

Mike Paul writes on RAME: http://us.imdb.com/PeopleNews/ for 12th January 2001 says Britney Spears did *not* know Gregory Dark directed porn, and will not use him as a director anymore. How amazingly stupid did she, and the record label, have to be for this to be true, that she didn't know?...

Jason writes: I think it should be duly noted that in the article, Greg mentions it was the "company" that stopped him from doing the videos, not Britney herself. I seriously doubt she and the record label were ignorant to the information, but once it was exposed to the masses by Juli Ashton in "Porn to Rock" on VH-1, the "company" would naturally have to protect her image. What label wants to sort through thousands of letters from irate parents?

Thom Burr writes on the newsgroup rec.arts.movies.erotica (RAME): We (all those who read RAME) are a porn-obsessed subculture, with the dubious distinctions of being more literate and technically savvy than the the average porn hounds. USENET is even more problematic-- except on a few platforms (like, bizarrely enough, WebTv), it tends to be more difficult to use than stand-alone forums and boards.

I suspect this tends to both narrow the pool of readers while at the same time *slightly* elevating to level of conversation. Obviously, moderation further encourages those trends. End result: we are hardly representative of the nation, or even of internet users, as a whole.

So I very much doubt that even 1 out of a thousand random citizens would know who Greg Dark was, much less his connection with Britney. In the real world, information like this is amazingly obscure... As others have pointed out, obviously SOME people in the recording industry would have known...My guess is that those who knew simply didn't care, and didn't bother to inform those whom might be more concerned.

Dark must have done a decent job of interpreting the obviously twisted virgin/whore message Britney had been designed to project, and who better to hire for such a mission, anyway, than a skilled porn veteran. For all practical purposes, Dark was working out well: effectively no one in states found out about his past, and those who did didn't care.

The question remains: why did they so publically fire/dump him at this late date? It doesn't quite make sense, unless someone really didn't know about Dark, say someone near enough the to the star to have veto power, but slightly out of the loop...like one of her parents, say. Actually coming out and annoucing that a porn director has been directing her videos but that he's been axed wasn't all that bright either...

Victor writes on RAME: Quite by accident I picked up Chemical People's 1991 Cruz Records CD "Soundtracks" today. Here's an excerpt from the liner notes:

These recordings are jams we did over three separate nights for two Dark Bros. works in progress (at the time) "Between the Cheeks II" and "New Wave Hookers II". For BTC II, we just blindly jammed, for NWH II, we jammed along with the rough cut, like they do for regular films. Sadly, the music was often not utilized for maximum effect not due to the film makers, but due to censorship from within the industry itself. Another last bastion of taboo breaking and freedom of speech (as well as choice) had turned on itself.

Librarian writes: Not sure why everyone's freaking on this Britney-dumps-Dark business...total non-story. He directed one (1) Britney video - "From The Bottom of My Broken Heart" - from her first album. That was over a year ago! I have no doubt that, at one time, someone at her record company freaked on the connection (or more likely, that someone else would discover it), but any panic has had plenty of time to recede. Ironically, the hullabaloo stems from this month's Esquire article on Greg and he tells the story on himself. However, it seems that the press can't resist the porn + Britney catnip because it has been picked up everywhere as if it had just happened.

Thoughts On Lori Michaels

Fred writes: Fairly interesting. On the one hand, one could simply sit back and smuggly say, "gee-it's only porn. How could anyone take a career like this seriously?" On the othe hand, I imagine that the girls take their careers very seriously. It's how they earn their livings, taking whatever resources thay have and trying to parlay that into as much as they can. (I am not a racing fan, but it's sort of interesting that a car sponsor would use a porn actress to do promotion. I guess porn really is inching its way close to main stream.)

And I suppose along the way, they run into a ton of jerks who try to use different ruses to screw with them (figuratively or literally). It would be interesting to find out from Lori (or Asia for that matter) what sort of e-mails that they get grab their attention, and cause them to strike up a correspondence, and what sort of e-mails cause them to simply recoil in horror. It would also be interesting to post the "10 wierdest or creepiest e-mails" they received.

Tell me, Luke--do you get a bunch of e-mails from folks who are obviously 4-star crackpots? On second thought, I'm not sure I want to hear the answer to that. By the way--Lori is, in fact, a cutie.

I speculate that some fans get out of line because they become infatuated with her. There may be a few who are just plain nuts.

Actually, it's probably that many think that by going through her, they can get stories about themselves published on l-keford.com, and this is just their circuitous route for achieving that laudable goal of fame. It's perfectly understandable.

What's With The Bestiality Obsession?

YeahRight writes on Netpond: Obscenity is not as easy to prosecute now as it was in the good ol' Meese days. The porn explosion of the last 10 years or so will surely be a target if Ashcroft makes it into office, but it is not going to kill this monster we call internet porn. Its global. Sure, if your running the world largest Fisting site out of your home in Georgia... you may have a problem. Just like in the old days, content providers and movie folks will get hit first (if it comes).

The internet creates a whole new set of issues regarding boundaries. And seriously, I want to know what the obsession is with beast content. It is not illegal, why does everybody piss their pants and equate it with KP? The act of beastiality is illegal, but image wise it falls under the same obscenity guidelines as every other piece of smut on the web. If it is not illegal, you cannot tell me it is a moral issue. Your a pornographer.

Rob Black's Favorite Amusements

XXX writes: Dear Luke, Accordind to industry gossip, director Rob Black's favorite amusement during a long, tedious porno-shoot is to break wind loudly, while immediately looking askance at the nearest bare female ass, while pulling a look of disgust on his face.Black then very carefully and ostentatiously makes a great show of wafting the air in front of his nose away, while cowering away from the said female ass. He then exclaims the words "Kentucky...Fried!" and "Dirty cow!" several times while laughing manicly to himself. This takes the form of highly choreographed ritualistic behavior, with always the same number of set-piece steps and set words in the same place of the display, rather symptomatic of obsessive-compulsive disorder. In fact crew members have termed this little ritual "the Black guff dance".

Black is also fond of dropping his pants over trestles bedecked with food, from the caterers, exposing his bare ass, breaking wind loudly, while shouting out "Mexican spice!", and then giggling away like a maniac for at least 20 minutes.

Vivid Girl Raylene Does Not Escort

Stripperfan writes on BigDoggie.net: I seen Raylene dance twice. Both times I talked with her after her stage show. One time I got a Polaroid and once I got a lap dance. I asked about private shows and she told me both times that she does not escort.

Asia Carrera Leaves Simon Wolf Productions

Asia Carrera writes: "Simon Wolf Productions and I have dissolved our contract and amicably parted ways. I am now a free agent again, and available for freelance work in high-budget adult movies. I will still be shooting the third installment of the Simon Wolf "Tail" Trilogy ("A Witch's Tail", "A Wolf's Tail", and "A Maiden's Tail"). Shooting for "A Maiden's Tail" is tentatively scheduled to start in late February."

Fred writes: I note that Asia is leaving Simon Wolf productions. It's not on her web page, so I assume she sent an e-mail to you. Are you now in her good graces? Hey, instead of chasing Yiddishe maidels, you should start going out with her.

I sorta sensed that she was thinking ahead about the time when she could no longer do porn, and her tenure at Simol Wolfe was her way of putting her foot in the water about a post-porn future, i.e. what to do when there's a need for gainful employment. What do you think--not ready to do 9-5 employment yet?

On another note, the other interesting Asian porn personality, Annabel Chong (Grace Quek), appears to have disappeared from the face of the earth. (Although her web site still exists, I don't think it has been updated in about a year.) What's her story in life? Does she have an e-mail address?

I did see the documentatry on her. I don't think she's the most beautiful porn star in the world, but she's fairly interesting--a wierd mix of a) being academically inclined; b) having a few sexual kinks to work out; c) probably being fairly bright; d) being generally messed up; e) having (I assume) a rather strong sex drive; and f) being utterly fixated on bringing notoriety to herself. I suppose if she can disappear from porn without a trace, anybody can. (There's hope for Brandy.) Quek falls into the category of being the sort of person with whom it would be a hoot to sit down over a beer or two, and have an interesting conversation (even without any sex).

I didn't get the impression that there were any particular traumas in her past that caused her to be the way she is. (I doubt the rape in London made her the way she is.) Nope--something else is at work here.

Why Luke Memorized To His Coy Mistress

Saturday night I recited the Andrew Marvel poem 'To His Coy Mistress' to Vancouver Kendra over the phone.

Vancouver Kendra writes: My take on why Luke has memorized "To His Coy Mistress." It is a great poem for Don Juan types. He tells the woman of all of the loving romantic things he wants to do with her if time were on their side. Then tells her that time is against them, and soon she will be old and ugly, and then what will her virtue and innocence have done for her? Finally, he makes his case for having sex right then and there, for that way they will cheat time. She agrees because of the sweet things he said earlier, and because of the image of her old wringly virginal body... She is left confused and de-flowered, asking herself once the 5" is through, "Is that all there is?"

Luke replies: You are exactly right! I said it to this girl in 1989 and she was most impressed. Chicks usually are. Soon after she took my virginity. I had this poem written out in my very own handwriting hanging above my dorm bed at UCLA.

Jane writes: Hello Luke, Just finished a long conversation with your darling Kendra, you really should marry her, she's adorable. Anyhow, we were detailing a plan that involves readers of LF.com taking up a collection to pay for our tickets to Los Angeles, where we will kidnap you and whisk you away for a day of fun and sun at Disneyland! Forcing you to wear your black leather gimp mask, we will take many photos with you, Minnie, Mickey and the whole gang! The finale will be the teacup ride, which we will buy a pass for you to ride continually until you are dazed and disoriented, then we will take you back to your home, tie you up, and together, Kendra and I will take over ALL operations l-keford.COM, finally giving your readership what it really desires and deserves!

Kendra plans on joining me here at my home tuesday night, and we would like to be guests on your radio show where we will discuss the above plans with you on air, then join the chat room where we will field any questions and take additional suggestions. Trust us Luke, this is better than talking about blow jobs ;-)

Internet Gossip

Dumb writes on Webmasters.org: My last experience w/ one of sharpies shows was that is sucked. 10 japanese tourists wandering aimlessly looking for a porn star. A 100x50 foot room with 20 booths. 10 escort boots, 5 dvd booths, 2 dildo booths. Ccbill, freshphotos & netdialer. I know that she'll justify by saying "this isn't a webmaster show"... but the fact is that she tried & the reason she failed is b/c she always chooses low class dwellings & makes it difficult for webmasters to figure out when the show actually starts. Truly the most worthless tradeshow in existence.

Concerned writes on Webmasters.org: Suppliers are crying the blues on content, down...way down. How much was 1000 pics 5 years ago...around $5000... 3 years ago $3000....1 year $1500 and today ..hell $500-$1000. Take the $1000 figure and we're looking at a 80% drop on retail in 5 years...thats over 90% drop in profit margins. Now for those f---heads saying those figures are bull...these are approx figures for above average quality. Today...any of us can go buy 10,000 low quality pics for under $500 from several sources.I predict 65% of North American content suppliers won't be around next year. You have to wonder about the posts "We Now Do Content"... f--- me!

Haha writes: If one studies the writings on NetPond, it becomes apparent that those with power or support from a clique can do or say anything they wish. They threaten to put people out of business and cause their friends to join them in this effort. It is a real study in threats and intemindation. It is a myth that people post using their NAMES, they use handles...it is their IP numbers that identify them.

Anyone who subjects themselves to this stressful practice of posting under those circumstances has to be a fool. Many people are trying to earn a living for their families and some idiot who happens to weild a lot of power can get his income witheld and stopped. I have seen groups of powerful sponsors join together to bring down entire companies who refused to bend to their will. It's time for this bulls--- to cease!

Jenna Jameson Hosts AVN Awards

Jenna Jameson writes: Well you would think since Paul [Fishbein] cleaned up and nixed some of the fanciness of the [AVN] awards, he could afford to pay the host…

John writes: Jenna, get screwed. Big deal, you have to wait one or two days, or a week for your check. You make so much money, what difference could it possibly make? You act like you don't know where your next meal is coming from.

FearZeus writes: Luke, who is this John character counting Jenna's money? Who f---ing cares how much money she makes?? Where I come from (New York) you pay what you owe!!! 2 days becomes 5 days.....then 5 days becomes 2 weeks....and then before you know it, you have to go chasing the person for your money!! It's not whether you need the money to eat, it's the principle of paying for the services that you received. John if you knew that Paul was charging $200 a head in advance way BEFORE the day of the show.....and he obviously had a low expense bill, why should you need to wait a week for your money? If Jenna had the attitude of, "Oh, well....I guess I'll get my money eventually..." for every business transaction she made...then she wouldn't have ANY money at all.

Jenna writes: Luke, it’s not that I’m waiting for my check… He isn’t paying me at all. Maybe I’ll get a gift basket… LOL

Gag Factor 2

Pat Riley writes on RAME: GAG FACTOR #2 2000--JM Productions Producer/Director: Jeff Steward, Jim Powers Featuring: Sophie Evans, Mandy Mystery, Tina Cheri, Jill, Regina Sharp, Dolly Golden, Billie Britt, Dyn-A-Mite, Gia Regency, Adrianna, Tony Ribas

No males are credited and are mainly unseen except for Sophie's SO.

What can one say? They've organized themselves a little better in this volume with the girls being throat-raped more competently so if your bent is to imagine yourself making some girl choke and gag on your dick you might want to watch this one and then see a psychiatrist. Not that psychiatrists are likely to be of any help but the other solutions--your mother staying at home and taking care of you when you were young and impressionable, your father giving you the hiding you deserved at a similar age, or the guys at the bar beating the s--- out of you when they find out about your treatment of their sister or their wife's girlfriend--all seem to be out of fashion these days.

Mandy Mystery is probably the girl from {Wang Dang That Sweet Poontang} with her red hair dyed white blonde.

Jill has short brown hair and a passable face.

Regina has shoulder length brown hair, marginal face, and a thick body.

Billie sounds English and has short blonde hair.

And Adrianna is not Adriana Sage (Alana Moreno) but a girl with shoulder length blonde hair and a marginal face.

As usual with these BJ tapes take the descriptions with a grain of salt. Ten scenes of the usual nausea. Dates of production: 9/6/00, 9/1/00.

For those girls who are seen regularly, I expect you to know them, however just to be helpful: Sophie Evans: Hungarian, shoulder length blonde hair, marginal face, medium tits, flabby belly.

Mandy Mystery (from Wang Dang That Sweet Poontang) Mandy is a German girl with shocking dyed short red hair, small tits, marginal face, poor dentition, clit ring, and a large tattoo on her right shoulder back.

Tina Cheri: Older blonde with large cantaloupes, shoulder length straight hair, marginal face, tight waist, belly button jewel. 25 years old, 5'2" tall, 107lbs, and 32DD-24-28 in 1998.

Dolly Golden: Supposedly French. Older woman with a not too pretty face, shoulder length blonde hair, large cantaloupes, and a womanly body.

Dyn-A-Mite: Shoulder length red hair, medium tits, tattoo on her right hip, belly button jewel, white skin characteristic of redheads, and a marginal face. In her appearances in 1999 she seemed to be pregnant based on her swollen belly. Nudie bar dancer originally from MI. 20 years old in 2000.

Gia Regency: Gia has short blonde hair, marginal face, small tits, nose pin, lithe tall body, and a furry fringed pussy. She sounds retarded but in {More Dirty Debutantes #114} she says that she's a virgin. Ed gets her anal cherry and in other movies she seems have dropped the pretence.

Comment: That's the equivalent to the line-up at the East Maplewood Amateur Musical Society's rendition of Oklahoma instead of the Broadway cast. Or put another way, watching the Kennedy High School football team play the Lincoln High School team, instead of the Super Bowl. (Not that even a cast of Alyssa Milano look-a-likes could do anything worthwhile with this crap.)

Club Humorgasm

XXX writes: I heard "humorgasm" by brad shaw & john ip et al. in vegas was an abortion. less than 200 attended!

Meni writes: Luke, I spoke to a few people who attended Humorgasm. One said, "200 people? there was atleast that in line at 9:30 and the comedy started at 11" and another said, "more like 1000" so you do the math.

Tony Morgan writes: Luke, You and I have never been formally introduced so allow me.... Hi, I'm Tony Morgan, some people call me SweetT on the boards and such. I own NationalNet (http://www.national-net.com) and a few other companies and have my hands into several things in the adult internet including being one of the sponsors of Club Humorgasm at InterNext this month along with John Epp from InsiteAdult (http://www.insiteadult.com) and Brad Shaw from ShawInternet (http://www.shawinternet.com).

Apparently someone that was not at our party took it upon themselves to send you an email and tell you that it was not a success and that only 200 people showed up. Let me assure you, sir, that our door personnel and that of the C2K kept a counter on the door and we had more than 1200 people in attendance for the comedy portion of our show. The C2K's maximum capacity is exactly 1557 and they absolutely refuse to allow more than that in the door due to some problems they have previously had with the Fire Marshall...thats why they keep such close tabs on the number of people.

With all of that said, however, I will admit that I was a little shocked at the number of people that left immediately following the Comedians. We paid an extra $40,000 to rent the entire club for the whole night (closed to the public) so that our friends could dance and party all night long but according to everyone that I spoke to after the show they were so tired from laughing at the Comedians most people just wanted to relax at one of the Hospitality Suites or turn in for the night. Feel free to ask around and I think you will find that the people who actually attended Club Humorgasm had a blast and are looking forward to the announcements of the Comedians for our June 27th show!

In the coming weeks we will be posting pics and videos from the show and we will be announcing the Comedians that we have scheduled for June 27th. The site is at http://www.humorgasm.com. I will trust that this sets the record straight.

Seven Degrees Of David Lace

XXX writes: My next article for you will most likely be called the 7 degrees of David Lace. I will attempt to show that most people in the porn business can be connected to David Lace. Here a few examples:

Derrick King – A wanna be talent agent who runs “Royal King Entertainment” as a way to girls to f--- him, he used to live at Lace Studios in Culver City. Derrick is known to shoot scenes and promise to pay but then keeps misplacing the checks.

Skylar Knight - A beautiful upcoming pornstar(’98 – 99) who was first flown to LA by Lace Productions. Later “Royal King Entertainment” represented her.

Ed Powers - Since Lace Productions is a still photography studio a lot of new girls that David brings in find their way to Ed. Cross reference the girls in Ed’s movies with the davidlace website.

Brandon Irons - Brandon now works on some projects with Derrick King. While Derrick was living at Lace Studios Brandon was hired for a virtual sex CD-ROM. Halfway into the project Brandon abruptly leaves. Since the footage couldn’t be completed, the entire project was scrapped with a loss of about $7,000. Brandon and David are arch enemies.

Roy Garcia - The plump talent agent constantly competes with Lace Productions on recruiting new models from Las Vegas. David installed an agent to work full time in Vegas.

Sunset Thomas Available In South Florida

Sunset Thomas posts on BigDoggie.net: First time posting. Thank you, Bianca Trump, for showing how to post here. I will be coming to Florida 1/21-1/28/01 and look forward to seeing alot of my fans down there. Please contact me to set up an appt. I will be available for private shows and/or escort services by myself or for the first time with my best friend Bianca Trump. If you see us both, wear your seatbelt, to prepare yourself for the ride of your life. If you feel safer, you can also book me though ASF, I think they accept credit cards. I do not. Check out my link escort page. Related link: http://www.geocities.com/sunsetisa10/MyEscortPage.html?979435274780

Hi Guys! My name is Sunset Thomas, Erotic film star and Penthouse Pet. Now available for intimate encounters for generous discriminating gentlemen. I am in the Las Vegas, Los Angeles area anytime. I also can travel to you with advanced notice. I have been seen in over 200 XXX Erotic Films to include #1 Hits "Sex", "Latex",and numerous others. I have been in Penthouse 20 times.To include Penthouse Pet March 1996, Penthouse Pet of the Year Nom. 1997. With my private escort service.....what you see in my movies is the service you get. All services are all inclusive unless you feel so inclined to tip. Rates are as follows : $1500. Per Hour $5000. All Evening (7pm-12mid) $6000. Over Night (11pm-5am) $10000. All Day (12 Hours) $15000. 24 Hours $25000. 2 Day Weekend Travel to you must include all expenses. 1-702-301-7829. sunset_thomas@hotmail.com

JRob writes: I checked out Sunset Thomas' ad through the link you provided. She is attractive and I think I may have even seen a movie she was in.

However, anyone who would pay $25,000 for two whole days with her is operating under the probable misconception that an orgasm in her presence is substantially better than an orgasm with another woman, and that she is somehow staggeringly fascinating to be with between orgasms.

For $25,000, I would (literally, not figuratively) require an orgasm that began the moment I met her and continued non-stop until the moment we parted ways. Otherwise, the orgasms my girlfriend causes me to have are more than sufficient.

Flashman calls

Flashman says: One of the top female adult stars was stopped at the bar of a major Las Vegas strip hotel and thrown out of the casino for soliciting an undercover security agent. It really did happen. It was quite a mess.

By the way, there's a new [porn] film coming out in March. It will be shot at the end of January. Porn Star Temptation Island.

Dennis Hoff was running around the convention talking to all the girls about doing what Sunset Thomas and other girls had been doing up there in Carson City. They even stopped Paige and Mirage, two of the girls I was with, and said, 'You girls are so good looking. You'll make $60,000 in your purse every 30 days if you come to the Ranch.

By the way, 323-549-5387, if any girls do want to do that Bunny Ranch. It will be fantastic up there. No felony charges currently against you and a clean bill of Jim South type health [are required]. A health card and a sheriff's card and they are right in the money.

Amia More called me and said Flashman, the reason I didn't make the convention was that I was covering my hair and I got the wrong stuff and it came out bright pink. And I was very embarrassed.

Johnathan Morgan, the terrific actor, says one of the prettiest girls in the business is his best friend from Denver, Colorado. Leena.

Kylie Ireland announces on the radio now in Denver, Colorado.

Rebecca Lord was wheeling and dealing at the convetion. She was a former Miss France contestant and now she's a porn star.

A lot of the girls tell me that they love Tom Byron but they prefer screwing him when his hair was even blonder.

Lexington Steele was running around the convention. The girls love him. A tall black fellow. Wearing a $1000 Averech leather jacket.

I've been in touch with George Plimpton from Harpers magazine. He's doing a big story on the adult business.

Nikki Dial To Host TV Style Show

Nikki Dial is one of the biggest adult-oriented personalities in the entertainment industry. She will soon begin production of her own television show, "Nikki Dial's Midnight Madness", at www.NikkiDialsMadness.com, which will air on Friday and Saturday nights. The show, which is a late-night adult-oriented variety show, is best described as a combination of Leno, Lettertman, Stern, and the Happy Hour. Midnite Madness will feature top musical entertainers, celebrities, sports personalities, and the Nikki Dial dancers. The show will be performed in front of a live studio audience and will promote audience and interactive participation. Some on its crazy features include Spin The Madness Wheel, in which a member of the audience is invited up to spin the wheel and can win prizes ranging from a weekend trip for two to an exotic location to a shopping spree for lingerie. The prizes will continuously change. At the end of every show, Nikki will have an hour long, on-line live chat where audience members can chat directly with Ms. Dial.

Where Were The Blacks At The AVN Awards?

Mr Marcus writes: Oh yeah add this to my earlier post. In regard to the racism in the business. Case in point, the f---in AVN Awards, it is definitely not a black thang over at "business as usual" AVN. Where the f--- are we represented at? What the f--- we got to do? hasn't the song and dance s--- been done already? Were just as good if not better than some of the other performers in our industry. Midori you deserved it, I watched you when you delivered your performance and I said to myself, dam! Good job. Lex should have been nominated for Performer of the Year, even on the merit he won the award last year. I'm not a bandwagon type of person all the criticism towards the AVN Awards is in some cases warranted, I think the system needs an overhaul. Bring in the mechanics.

Wetlands.net Subpoenaed

Jon David Messner of Wetlands.net was subpoenaed by US District Attorney Lynne Battaglia on December 21, 2000.

Battaglia is part of a "national action commitee" working twords the goal of "keeping children safe and helping them be all that they can be". (http://www.cyberangels.org/about/unesco.html)

Bill writes: Luke, Why was Jon David subpoenaed? Enquirng minds want to know. This was on Netpond [from JonBoy from Wetlands.com]:

I am soooooooooooooooooooo happy. For the past three months, myself and my company has been the target of a Federal Grand Jury criminal investigation initiated by the Internal Revenue Service. Today I am pleased to say that my Accountant was just informed by the IRS that they have now DROPPED the investigation because they can find no irregularities in our business practice.

Skeeter Kerkove Says Thank You

Skeeter Kerkove writes: A big thank you to Ron Jeremy, for getting Bridgette 3 roles in the series Son of the beach. The casting agent saw the picture of Bridgette and Brianna Banks from the AVN awards show on the Luke F-rd website and it sealed the deal. Thanks to Genesis magazine who ranked Bridgette as the 9th most famous girl in porn. Based on Bridgettes first 120 movies. Bridgette is now in over 400 movie titles. Thanks to Jonathon Morgan from Wicked pictures for the nice comment he gave about Bridgette on stage at the AVN awards. Jonathon directed Bridgette in her best acting performance ever in his new movie that will be released in several months. It is Jonathons best work to date.

Thanks to Gene Ross for all the awesome support. Thank you to everybody who has contributed to Bridgettes career, by hiring her over 400 times in 2 years. Chris Carter gets a big thank you and Michael Zen of BABYLON, for the creation of Bridgettes Hellions, which will feature the hottest, wildest, nastiest sex ever done on full length features. Featuring all top talent. Keep your eye out for the continuing series Bridgettes Hellions. Bridgette is now in the process of producing her first feature with her own money and owning her own product at the ripe ol' age of 23. See Bridgette, Mr. Marcus, Tera and Luke on the Tera Patrick show live on Jan. the 16th.

Sex Survivor 2000

Robert Lombard of Creative Image Management writes: Luke, Enjoy your column. You must be a converted Jewish boy with one iron stomach but what I am about to reveal might have some interest.

GO and read Fridays post on Gene Ross and see WHAT IS ABOUT TO EXPLODE into a major scandal. The REAL TRUTH BASED ON GATHERED FACTS WITH BACK UP DOCUMENTATION REGARDING SEX SURVIVOR 2000.

Instead of people making fun of the talent and the proven individuals who provide us with some outstanding pornography. WE should go after the 'cum sockets' that think they can enter the industry because they are white collar business people who feel they are smarter then the people who have chosen this as a career and dupe them. From the talent to the working stiffs who make it happen.

WE are talking about a lot of people who have not been paid for their hard earned services or are holding NSF checks. I believe that is still a felony and also adding fraud and deceit to the equation. Prize money missing, Executive on mind altering substances and pressuring one of the adult stars to have sex....on and on and on and on. SO much still neatly filed with back up documentation ready to pop up from under the covers. Sort of like the hard on the younger males get in the morning..pitching that tent...ready to uncover.

I pride myself to have established a good working relationship with some of these awesome adult stars and to know what is going down is appalling to say the least.

Luke Hardcore

Luke writes: I am now available for consultation at just $100 an hour. I'll also write scripts for adult movies and do script consulting ..

Rumdar writes: Luke, I read with interest your offer to write original porno material or serve as a script doctor for the industry. I am curious, as perhaps your loyal readers are, as to what type of plots we can expect from you? Would a Luke script be romantic as porn movies frequently were during the so called "golden age?" Will you cater to what the industry seems to be churning out now, i.e., bukakke, triple anal, gang bang, etc. Could a Luke porno subplot contain some pro Torah scripture as your site does? Are you thinking humor, enlightenment, pathos, realism? Will you attempt to bring change to this sordid industry through your writing? In other words will Luke be a porno F. Scott Fitzgerald or another Max Hardcore. Come now, give us a hint of your intentions.....

Luke says: I would like to write porno scripts promoting ethical monotheism.

Helpful writes: There is tons of sex in the Old Testament... er ... I mean Hebrew Bible. Why not start with the story of Onan. His sin most appreciable with that of porn fans.

Rumdar replies: Onam WHO? It doesn't matter. I love "swords and sandals" flics. Like Gladiator. Can anyone fix me up with a non sex role?.....

Extreme Sets Luke Straight

Lee Jordan writes: As an authorized agent for Extreme, I am setting some things straight AS OF NOW.

I. RE: Extreme supporters harassing Paul Fishbein If this happened as reported, then we need to go on record as saying that this isnt encouraged, condoned, and from now on wont be tolerated by Extreme. Period. If it truly was *Pro* Extreme, then simply understand that this doesnt mean f--- AVN. If it was a case where someone else needed to wash their undies in our sink, then understand that laundromats are a lot safer. The goal at Extreme has always been the restoration of normal business on both sides. A relationship. Perhaps not what it was, or what it could have been, but a positive sustainable resolution that will finally put a close on fifteen years of negativity. By that we mean all the time, energy, resources spent on security over the years, which could have gone into production, not to mention...living.

And that goes both ways, Extreme was no more forthright than AVN regarding business. The effects have harmed both and it extends to the other affiliated companies and individuals...what is needed is a repair. The causual factors are obvious, so is the futility of repairing something by applying more of the same. As for the allegations that AVN broke faith with Extreme on an implied contract...bulls---. Thats why we have contracts, to define the parameters of an agreement, also why a contract was never drafted. Anyone who doesent understand...well thats probably because it was none of your f---ing business in the first place. (If understanding is crucial, beneficial and most importantly do we even know you...thats different.) Thats the Extreme position, anything else written or repeated is bulls---. What has been needed here from day one, is a healing process...it's really simple.

When you f--- life up through subterfuge, and manipulation, crossed agendas...there is zero chance of making it better with more of the same. Doesnt matter how much money, or anything else you throw at it. This needs to become a healing process...like now.

We would like to begin by asking Luke to please run spellchecker on Pauls name in the future. A royal pain in the ass...he is occasionaly. An idiot he is not. Ive always considered him a friend, and I would like nothing more than to see him back to I met. Im damned tired of watching him being manipulated in a game of 1000 personal agendas, and I am available at anytime to anyone who feels slighted by that remark. This would be a good point to compare these remarks, to those made during the character period, and anyone found with their fingers in the mixing bowl, better have WHITE frosting on them, or they will be in for an Extremely BLACK adventure.

And I am well versed and experienced when it comes to Producing on a shoestring budget. I am really hoping for the happy ending, but If not, it wont be a subtle ending and there are parameters long in place that I could not alter if I wanted to. I sincerely suggest that a lot of time and money, have already been spent, needlessly and with a guaranteed BLACK ending on both sides. All to avoid something effortless and safe.

Something which has a good chance to move all the companies involved in a permanent positive direction. Someone is so f---ing lost in the scripting, they never developed a workable storyline...because they never developed all of the characters. There is no safe way to manipulate this situation, It was over before it started, and it will go on of two ways. Good or bad, it will be extreme. I prefer extremely good, but Im fully reconciled to go down on this one...Ill be in good company. Extreme

P.S. I wanted to take this opportunity to clear up a misinterpretation of terms, which lead to *I shot the sheriff*, being heard around the world. Theyre not related to firearms...specifically. Trigger-A trigger is any action which initiates an event. A trigger can be anyhing...a car passing a specified point within a particular timeframe, anything. Deadman- A deadman is a trigger designed to initiate an event when the author is incapable of tripping it manuallly. Specifically- Death, Dissappearance, incarceration, or re-location are all events which trip the deadman.

Oh yeah...I wanted to sat that I agree that it was bulls--- for the FTC to come down on RBJ. Fortunaley everyone has agreed that there isnt a problem, but if there had been, RJB is on the small side.

You know pops, you would have ben proud, Ive actually been reading way past college level for a year and a half..and Im not such a bad guy. My only real vice is whacking porn clips. In De Tower of DeBabelizer is my favorite...

Mike South Replies To Extreme

Mike South writes: Well Luke it appears you get some kudos for semi honesty...at least you ran my response to Keri Starr, Gene did not. Oddly enough I confronted Keri about this last night who quickly stated that she never told Gene any of that, that the only thing she said was that I said she should choose her friends more carefully. Keri told me she would email gene today and straighten it out. So either she is lying or Gene is lying. Since Gene didn't run my response it makes me wonder about his credibility. I wonder if Valerie copied him on the response to Billy Goat Byron? Don't guess he'd have run that either....references to Byron with a dick in his mouth aren't all that popular at Extreme.

Official l-keford.com Masturbation Exercise

BJ writes: This masturbation exercise is for both the men and the ladies. It will bring clarity to fantasizing, and reveal the unconscious basis for those universal feelings of power/domination during impersonal/non-relationship sex and masturbation.

The unconscious feeling that I refer to, which belies all the sex and fantasies of the sex industry, is simply a deep-seated, satisfying feeling and need for revenge. Try this the next time you masturbate, sir or madam, and then compare notes with other l-keford readers.

Although the underlying feeling I refer to is unconscious through habit, an unmistakable vengeful feeling is immediately obvious if one merely attends to it. It is that satisfying feeling of power/domination that prevails in each and every masturbation fantasy, anonymous/impersonal encounter, etc.

The deep psychological basis for this powerful need for revenge is our childhood experience of betrayal, abandonment, etc. by our father (for the women, usually) or mother (for the men), and the unconsciously furious need to strike back at one's lover or sex object.

Make a mental note to attend to the revenge that belies your own favorite power sex fantasies the next time you masturbate. Doing so may provide, perhaps for the first time, a liberating, even sobering conscious awareness. It may even provide a new feeling of choice with regard to whether to continue on a path of revenge-driven sexual behaviors.

Luke says: I have certainly found this to be true in my own masturbation exercises. So what should I do now?

Bj writes: Things you and other l-keford readers can do to become even more aware of revenge as the basis for all sex-industry sex.:

1. Pick up one of the new how-books on lesbian sex, and notice the universal, lopsided butch emphasis on S & M techniques. This proves lesbianism is also really about revenge--revenge on rejecting or intrusive parents,and also very decidedly on past male lovers .

2. Watch Temptation Island, and observe for yourself that non-relationship sex(and sex with" interchangeable partners") is motivated entirely by revenge.

3. Attend to the feeling of revenge while looking at women as sex objects, as in pornographic photos and videos. Recognize that the women in these portrayals, and women who have sex for pay, are similarly motivated by revenge on men, as well as on their own sex(for being female, which they reject in themselves as well).

4. Read any book on sexual perversion or sadomasochism, and you'll see how they all agree that revenge motivates all lover-as-object-driven sex, and all for-pay sex.

5. Find a new way of relating to your fellow men and women in a real-world comunity of people who know and need each other outside of strictly sexual needs(like swingers) Focus on learning relationship and intimacy, not sex or techniques...recognize sexual addiction as such and read any of the books on Sexhelp.com for recovering sex addicts.

6. Notice how satisfying oneself with revenge-driven sex in a relationship, as in " making love" to pornography, is just a way to avoid intimacy and other emotions, and difficult relationship issues.

7. Notice how even your relationships with other people of your same sex is entirely, one-dimensionally win/lose, and exclusively driven by selfishness and competitiveness, not by mutual reward and advancement of a larger, cooperative society. That's why male bonding, as in traditional human societies, is simply absent in the sex industry. Males don't congratulate each other on marriage, nor encourage each other to succeed and survive in a larger common society with children and families. They simply compete for sex, which is no basis for bonding. Power relationships are the only possible outcome, as in primate societies, where males strictly compete for sex on the basis of power.

Tom Tryon - Blast From The Past

Tom Tryon (1926-1991) made a string of B films in the 1950s, most notably I Married a Monster from Outer Space with Gloria Talbott. In the early 1960s, he made the leap to "A" pictures, but a bad experience with director Otto Preminger on the set of The Cardinal (1963) made Tryon decide to retire from acting, although he made a few more films and several appearances throughout the 1960s. He eventually turned his energies to writing and became highly successful with his science fiction works such as his 1971 novel The Other. Tryon was once involved in a long-time romance with 1970s gay porn star Casey Donovan, aka Calvin Culver. (Culver died of AIDS-related complications in August 1987.) Tryon died of cancer at the age of 65.

Luke Gets Mail

GoodyTwoShoes writes: If you want to know how much the entire AVN awards show cost, ask Mike South. Word is he has an itemized copy of the bill in his possession.

Leon writes: Luke -- I'm wondering if you happen to know the porn pseudonym of a lovely actress I just met. Her real name is Stacey Parker, and I could tell she's a porn actress. I'd love to know the name she works under! Thanks!

Meni writes: "Of course computer games don't affect kids' minds. I mean, if we'd been affected by PacMan, all we'd be doing now is running round in dark rooms eating little pills and listening to repetitive music."

Sasha writes: I recieved an email requesting I write with my thoughts about my experiences with TBD [BigDoggie.net] site. The site has not only treated me with kindness and respect, but once I was reviewed and posted on it, my business not only grew in quantity but also in quality. My experience with the owner of the site is one of great mutual respect..I think of him as a protector and mentor and I am very grateful his site exists.

Christina writes: Luke, Any info on Sky Taylor? I saw her in Vivids End of the World and Michael Zens Deep Pink but haven't seen her lately. Do you know anything about her of if shes contracted.

Owen writes: Quick question: Why can't I find information on your site on my two favorite female stars: Anita Blond and Toi (or "toy" as she is called in "Seymore Butts - Swings!") ? Have these two stars created bad blood with misbehavior or bad attitudes so that they merit being excluded from your site ? I can't find much on them anywhere on the internet for that matter...

Frank writes: Apparently Eyada.com has laid off half its staff (according to the NYC radio message board) which explains Berkowitz being shuffled around. These netcasters can't survive--nobody wants to go through the trouble of putting up with a jerky stream whose quality of discourse is dubious.

i know comedyworld.com is on an AM station in atlantic city--1450, perhaps? check their website. probably rather low power. i think there is a genuine need for syndicated stoopid talk--even if it hasn't been tapped into by stations. but again, i don't know anything about how the site's offerings have evolved into conventional form. IMHO: stern has exhausted the porn star novelty after about 3 straight years of milking houston, kendra jade, et al for perverse amusement. i think luke (and, y'know, us) transporting this fascination to a more provocative level (as the genX prager) would get some legitimate tongues-a-wagging, not to mention the raincoat crowd.

Fallen King

Knight writes: Seth Warshavsky once touted as the new king of porn can now be known as the crying little bitch of porn. On Dec 29, when he walked into a corner store an upset employee who had not been paid for several months confronted him. A confrontation ensued where Mr.Warshavsky was punched in the head, thrown against a refrigerator and then laid on the floor in a fetal position crying like a little girl. Mr.Warshavsky was then kicked in the head and left on floor in a puddle of his own urine. Mr.Warshavsky has been known in the indistry for non-or late payment of features to his site, as while as all employees and venders. He has taken monies out of for a 401K program and only a small portion was paid. Don't you find it strange that both R.J.B Telecom and Mirage Entertainment are under federal investigation for double billing it's customers while I.E.G and Seth Warshavsky are free and continue to do so. Mr.Warshavsky a powerful man in the boardroom, it would have been nice for all the people he has cheated to have seen him on floor sniveling, crying and showing his true self. It's too bad someone didn't get it on tape, I wonder if he would have been so quick to put it on his site?

Eric writes: Hello Luke, Regarding the incident that took place on the 29th. I was there, "Knight" most certainly was not. Seth was attacked by a former employee, who admitted at the time that he (the employee) was desperate, fresh out of jail, and on a binge of some sort. The man was twice Seth's size, yet he did remarkably little damage. Seth was not crying, nor did he "Piss" himself. Regarding the other malicious allegations, their absurdity is surpassed only by the knucklehead making them.

Statute Of Limitations On Libel?

Isn't there a one year statute of limitations on libel? Meaning that if I posted something defamatory or libelous about somebody more than a year ago, then they can't sue me.

XXX writes: According to CCP (Code of Civil Procedure) section 340(3), as printed in the 1997 edition of "Standard California Codes" (published by Matthew Bender), the answer is yes, there is a 1 year statute of limitations.

Query: Are these articles still accessible on your web site? I suppose if I were that lawyer, I might argue that the fact that the article is still accessible on your web site means that the client is continuously being libeled. I have no idea whether the law supports such a theory. This would require legal research.

Liberty writes: Hello King of Porn, THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS ONE YEAR FROM WHEN PUBLISHED. IF IT IS AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVE AND IS ACCESSED, THE ONE YEAR STARTS FROM THE DATE IT IS ACCESSED. WHEN THE MATERIAL IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE, THE STATUTE STARTS TO RUN. I love your archived material, but it may end up being your Achilles' Heel.

Bob Jones writes:

1. Continuous Publication. Only one court has considered this, and they decided that the libel from a website is not continuous, that the limitations period begins when the page first appears. However, that was not a California case. Each state may reach its own conclusion about whether its own law says that web pages are continuous publications or not, but usually unless the first court made a major error or the statutes are substantially different, the first court's decision is a good predictor.

2. California's one year statute of limitations. The person who wrote that to you is definitely _not_ a libel lawyer. This is a nasty little issue, and will take a few paragraphs to explain. Courts have stuggled with it for years, everyone agrees its a terrible situation, but no-one's done anything about it, so pardon the complexity of what I'm about to say.

The rule in tort (libel is a tort) is that suit may be brought under the law of any state in which damage occurs. The damage in libel is damage to reputation, and it occurs wherever the libelous statement is read. The basic rule in libel is that for a national publication, like yours, a libel case can be brought in any (or every) state in the US, under that state's law. So California's law (and its statute of limitations) might mean diddly squat. At one time, it was common for people to "forum shop" in libel, by picking some random state with law favorable to them (and no other relation to the case) in which to bring suit. There are famous cases we study in the first year of law school in which this happened, and the courts said "oh, how terrible" but let it happen.

This, obviously, was not a good situation. Many states now have statutes limiting when a libel case can be brought in state, but not all do. Many also have "borrowing statutes" that prevent people from trying to forum shop the statute of limitations, but by my reading of those statutes they would not, on their face, apply to libel. New York, for instance, has special rules for out of state libel that discourage forum shopping; this, however, is terrible for the press, because NY has very pro-press libel rules. Many states now also have new Conflict of Law rules that govern which state's law will apply to a multi-state tort like this one. Under many of those rules, California law would probably be applied, assuming that the plaintiff was also a California domiciliary (resident) when you published. But these rules are just as much of a mess as the libel rules; each state has its own idiosyncracies, and several still follow the old rule, under which they would apply their own local law to a multi-state libel claim.

In general, the law for the institutional press and libel in the US is mish mash of rules in different states, creating a terrible problem. The ALI (a presigious legal group) proposed a Uniform Retraction Act, which would protect publishers from libel if they retract (among other restrictions) and was to be adopted by every state in the U.S. So far, only North Dakota has adopted it, and I don't believe the others are expected to. So, its not safe to assume that the statute of limitations will protect you.

P.S.: I just want to point out, by the way, that this is like your fifth threatened libel suit in 2 months. This may be because giving in to them has made it appear that you will cave quickly under threat of suit. A lawyer who handled at least the negotiations with these folks might be a wise investment. I've noticed that you tend to retract more than you really have to.

Teller writes: As far as the California statue of limitations goes, there is a 1 year statute of limitations here. The tort of libel (defamation) occurs when a FALSE defamatory statement is communicated to a 3rd party, who understands it to be defamatory and tends toharm the defamed person in the community.

Therefore, each time someone reads defamatory material (ie: a website) another cause of action for defamation occurs. If the person defamed is a public figure, then this is a good defense, and actual malice is required to support a claim of defamation. Either way, if someone is defamed who is domiciled outside of california, They will normally sue in federal court. Then, the staute of limitations from the State that they bring the action in will apply. So a California statue of limitations may or may not apply. Be careful, Sir.

Chaim Amalek Defends Luke's Honor

Chaim Amalek writes: Well, someone has to do it, and who better than the man to whom Luke is, well, "closest" - Chaim Amalek. I have known Mr. Ford for as long as I have known anyone. He and I have gone out together with women he has dated, we have sought to impress many of the same jewish (and gentile) women, and he and I have much the same thoughts on the vital issues of the day. So I know my subject. Luke F-rd is NOT a fellatrix, no matter what others may choose to believe.

Of course, there have been interesting discussions as well concerning my influence over Mr. Ford, animated by jealousy, I think. Luke is his own man, and he is ALL man. Every single cell in his body has its own Y chromosome, that I can promise you. So stand tall and erect Luke, for you are all man, and lots of women love you. And that's the rub, the knowledge that you have your own groupies, women (not hookers!) who want to have sex with you on account of your fame. That you should have achieved such fame is what feeds the animosity against Luke F-rd, not any other shortcoming that you may have. That and the increasing awareness on the part of those in the know that you are known by these women as "the bar mitzvah boy" for your thirteen inch member. Well, too bad if others do not like me or what I have accomplished in life. I am Luke F-rd I am, and you are not. Deal with it.

The Wichita Massacre

Chaim Amalek writes: Luke, I've been to one world's fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and the current parshat shavout at www.natvan.com is the most effective bit of antisemiti propaganda I have ever seen. Effective because of its use of facts that jews, in fact, seek to suppress for unspoken and nefarious reasons. What do YOU make of it? PS Check out the big four hour special on "hate crimes" on MTV. Who runs this outfit?

Luke: Isn't owned by Viacom, which is principally owned and operated by secular Jews?

Dr. William Pierce, a white supremacist and the leader of the most dangerous hate organization (Natvan.com) in America according to the Anti Defamation League, writes:

Two weeks ago I told you about the atrocious murders of four young White men and women in Wichita, Kansas, last month by two Blacks. Two of my reasons for telling you about these murders were, first, the fact that the controlled news media in America had imposed a total blackout, outside the Wichita area, on the news of these atrocious crimes; and second, the fact that the Whites who were murdered didn't resist the Blacks who murdered them, and I wanted to draw a lesson from this failure to resist.

Well, another two weeks have passed, and the national Jewish news media have maintained their total blackout on the murders -- and during this time I have learned a few more details about the crimes which accentuate both points I made two weeks ago. What I told you in my earlier broadcast was that two Black brothers, 20-year-old Jonathan Carr and 23-year-old Reginald Carr, invaded a White home in Wichita on the evening of December 14, kidnapped the three White men and two White women in the home, all of them in their 20s, forced them to withdraw money from several ATM machines, then drove to a snow-covered soccer field on the outskirts of Wichita. There the Blacks raped the two White women, then told all five of the Whites to kneel in the snow and shot them in the back of the head, one at a time. After that the two Blacks returned to the Whites' home, burglarized it, and killed a pet dog they found there: a small, gray terrier.

One of the young White women they shot in the head didn't die however. She regained consciousness, ran naked and bleeding through the snow for a mile, and summoned police, who arrested the Blacks a few hours later. That's what the Jewish media bosses decided we didn't need to hear about, and they clamped a complete blackout on the story on December 15. In eager collaboration with the Jewish media, local authorities -- local politicians -- also imposed an embargo on all news about the affair. The local female district attorney, Nola Foulston, repeatedly asserted that race was not a factor, and that the rapes and murders would not be treated as "hate crimes."

What I have learned recently is that after the two Blacks drove the five Whites to the soccer field, they not only forced the White women to strip and then raped them, but they also forced all of the Whites to put on a sex show for the amusement of the Blacks. On that snowy soccer field they forced the White men to engage in homosexual acts; they forced the White women to have sex with each other; and they forced the White men to have sex with the White women before shooting all of them. After the Blacks forced the Whites to kneel naked in the snow and shot them in the back of the head, they deliberately ran over them with one of the vehicles they were driving. This additional information was leaked from the grand jury which heard the evidence in the case, despite the official news embargo. Furthermore, three days earlier the same two Blacks murdered another White woman, Ann Walenta, a cellist in the Wichita Symphony Orchestra, while she was sitting in her car outside her home. And four days before that, on December 7, they kidnapped, robbed, and pistol-whipped a White man, 23-year-old Andrew Schreiber, the manager of a Wichita convenience store.

Nothing racial about any of that, right? And certainly nothing that the White public should be told about, right? I mean, it's certainly not as newsworthy as the dragging death of a Black ex-convict in Jasper, Texas, in 1998 by three White ex-convicts, is it? I mean, the Jasper killing was given top billing by all of the controlled news media in America -- and in Europe as well -- for two years, and the racial angle was emphasized over and over and over again: hardened White racists drag innocent Black man to death. So obviously the murders and rapes of five White people in Wichita by a couple of underprivileged and misguided Black youths doesn't need any news coverage. Enough news already about interracial crime, right? No need to exacerbate racial tensions, right? Well, that's one of the points I wanted to accentuate.

The other point is the total lack of resistance of the White victims. It now seems that the two Blacks were armed only with a .380 caliber semiautomatic pistol. All of the killings were done with that same gun, and the police are still looking for it. Now, you certainly can be killed with a .380, especially if you're shot in the back of the head at close range, but it's not much of a man-stopper. It's a pretty anemic caliber, and it's only used because it's small and can be carried concealed easily. It's a ladies' gun. And yet three able-bodied White men let two Blacks armed only with a .380 pistol force them to stand and watch their women being raped and degraded and even to participate in the degradation themselves. And then they knelt obediently in the snow and let themselves and their women be slaughtered, one at a time.

That's really embarrassing. One expects more of a White man. This sort of sheep-like behavior reminds me of a scene in one of my novels, Hunter, in which a group of White office workers kneel obediently on the floor and let a Black with a straight razor go down the line and slit their throats, one at a time. In my novel the Whites submit because they have been conditioned by the Jewish mass media not to resist Blacks. They have been conditioned to regard any resistance to Blacks as "racist."

When I wrote Hunter 12 years ago, I was concerned that perhaps I was getting a bit ahead of myself, and that to portray Whites as so strongly conditioned by the Jewish media that they would meekly let themselves be butchered by Blacks would not be credible to my readers. I asked myself, will most Americans believe that Jewish media propaganda can have that strong an effect on people? Well, I worried about it at the time, but I left the scene in the book, and what happened in Wichita last month suggests that I really wasn't getting too far ahead of myself after all. That's a real shame.

Now let's talk about Jewish media propaganda for a while. Is it fair of me to describe it as deliberate, calculated psychological conditioning designed to demoralize White people -- and to emasculate White men in particular? Am I imagining things in believing that the mass media are slanted deliberately by the people who control them, with the aim of weakening White people and softening them up for the slaughter?

Do I believe such things only because I don't like Jews and am therefore too ready to attribute bad motives to them? Some listeners think that is the case. Some people suggest to me that the attitudes portrayed by the Jews in the entertainment they produce for White people simply reflects their prejudices, but that there's no purpose behind it to corrupt or weaken us. Nearly all Jews are liberals, they tell me, and so it is natural that they produce films and television shows that portray liberal attitudes. And I suppose, following that line of reasoning, that the way in which they cover the news for us also is simply an unconscious reflection of Jewish likes and dislikes, with no ulterior motives behind it.

Other listeners suggest to me that I am putting the cart before the horse to blame Jewish media propaganda for changing public attitudes and opinions. What the Jews put into their Hollywood films and television programming is simply a reflection of life in America, they tell me. Americans have become more liberal, they tell me, and the Jews of Hollywood and Madison Avenue simply are following that trend, not leading it. After all, they say, the Jews are businessmen, and they're just giving the American people what they want. And the same thing applies to the news. If the American public really wanted to know what happened in Wichita last month, then the Jewish media bosses certainly would have told them. But Americans don't want to hear that kind of news, they tell me. That sort of news has a racist flavor to it, and it makes Americans uncomfortable. That's the only reason the Wichita story wasn't covered; Americans didn't want to hear about it.

On the other hand, they were interested in the Jasper, Texas, dragging story. Americans felt that sort of story needed to be told in order to help fight racism. That's why the Jewish media told it . . . and told it . . . and told it. Anyway, that's what some people tell me in order to explain why the Jewish media do what they do: why they suppress some news and exaggerate other news. Personally, I don't believe it.

I believe that the Jewish media lead the trends instead of following them. I believe that the Jewish media bosses have a propaganda agenda. I believe that they use their control of the news and entertainment media in a calculated way to shape public attitudes and influence public behavior in America deliberately in order to achieve goals of their own. And I believe that those Jewish goals are inimical to our people. But you know, you should decide that for yourself. You shouldn't just take my word for it. Yesterday a new Jewish film premiered. The name is Save the Last Dance.

The film was made jointly by Paramount Pictures and MTV Films, both of which are subsidiaries of the Viacom Corporation. The Viacom Corporation is run by -- and largely owned by -- Jewish media boss Sumner Redstone, who was known to his parents as Murray Rothstein. And Redstone also acquired CBS recently, making him one of the top three media bosses in America -- all three of them Jews, of course. Redstone has staffed his media empire with Jews from top to bottom. He has put in a Jewess, Sherry Lansing, as president of Paramount Pictures, for example. And Viacom's MTV division, which specializes in interracial entertainment for trendy young White people, is well represented by the executive there who has handled the Save the Last Dance project, David Gale. Gale, a Jew, is senior vice-president of MTV Films.

Save the Last Dance is a film aimed at 13- to 17-year-old White girls. Its message to these teenaged White girls is that sex with Black boys is "cool." Very briefly, the story line is this: Sara is a White high school girl who lives in a very White small town in Illinois with her mother. Sara loves to dance, and her ambition is to become a ballet dancer. Then Sara's mother is killed in an accident, and Sara moves to Chicago to live with her father. In Chicago she attends a mostly Black high school, meets a Black boy who is into hip hop, and the two of them are drawn together by their shared interest in dancing -- although their dance styles are as different as . . . black and white. And so, of course, they end up in bed together, despite the objections of Sara's "racist" father.

I might not have mentioned this film to you if it were simply another piece of the race-mixing filth the Jews of Hollywood have been churning out during the last few years. All of this filth has the same aim, but with most of it the people who don't want to see the truth about what the Jews are up to could argue that it is simply typically low-grade Hollywood entertainment which uses interracial sex for spice, for titillation, but that there's no evil motive behind it, no intent to encourage interracial sex. Well, they can't argue that about Save the Last Dance.

This is a film which is aimed squarely at teenaged White girls, by far the most impressionable and susceptible segment of the White population, and its intent is to make them more receptive to the idea of interracial sex. All sorts of advertising promotions have been launched for this film, and they're all aimed at teenaged White girls. If you want to know what's on the minds of the people who made this film, go to their very own web site, savethelastdance.com, and read what they say. Clearly, encouraging interracial sex was the thing most on their minds.

The film's Jewish producer, Robert Cort, discusses his motivation with his co-producer, David Madden. They say that they and others at Paramount wanted to produce a film about -- quote -- "interracial romance and the social impact created by such a subject. We felt a movie could explore what those obstacles were for people involved in such relationships, particularly young people in high school." -- end quote --

So the Jews at Paramount Pictures turned to a Black director who has a fixation on interracial sex, Thomas Carter. According to the movie's official web site, savethelastdance.com, Carter -- quote -- "had been looking for a story about interracial relationships that he could bring to the screen. Carter says the film positively reinforces the possibilities for people to love and understand each other, even when they are from different backgrounds and races." -- end quote --

Well, that's just a small sampling. Look at some of the film clips from Save the Last Dance that you can view free on the Internet. Look at some of the promotions that are so obviously intended to persuade teenaged White girls to see the film and to imitate Sara's behavior. The clear message of the film to these teenaged White viewers is, "Go thou now and do likewise." The last thing I want to do is put more money into Sumner Redstone's pockets, but I recommend that you see the film for yourself, so that it will stick in your mind and you still will remember it when the time for the cleansing of America comes. I don't want to give you the impression that there's something special about Redstone or the other Jews at Viacom.

Some Jewish media push interracial sex more blatantly than others, but they're all behind it: all of the Jewish newspapers and magazines from the New York Times and Newsweek magazine on down, all of the Jewish film and television producers, all of the Jewish advertising agencies. It's not just a Redstone thing or a Viacom thing or a Paramount Pictures thing; it's a Jewish thing.

I'll give you another example. The Miramax division of Disney also has a new film promoting sex between teenaged White girls and Black boys. The name of the Disney film is O. Although it hasn't been released yet, there's plenty of information available about it. It's been finished for more than a year, but the release has been postponed several times, reportedly because the Jewish bosses at Miramax, Bob and Harvey Weinstein, were nervous about some of the sex and violence in the film. There's a horrific scene in the film where the Black "hero" brutally rapes his pretty, blonde, teenaged girlfriend.

The Weinstein brothers are very close to both Al Gore and Hillary and Bill Clinton, and it has been rumored that they were concerned that controversy over the film might hurt Gore's chances in the recent presidential election. Perhaps Michael Eisner, the Jewish boss of Disney, Miramax's parent company, was worried too. And maybe the film's Jewish executive producer, Michael Levy, also expressed concern. Unless there's another postponement, however, O finally should be released sometime in the first half of this year. You should see that one too, in order to steel yourself for the hard and bloody things we will need to do in the future.

And really, that's what this is all about. As important as it is for White Americans to be informed about the criminality of Blacks and the hatred that Blacks have for us, as important as it is for us to be informed about atrocities such as those in Wichita last month, what is far more important is that we understand the systematic and deliberate distortion and suppression of the news by the Jewish bosses of the news media.

The Wichita rapes and murders are more important as evidence of Jewish intent than of Black criminality. And as important as it is for decent White Americans to be aware of the sort of destructive filth coming out of Hollywood which is targeting our children, what is far more important is for us to understand the systematic nature of this destructive filth, to understand that there is a purpose behind it, and to understand what that purpose is and whose purpose it is.

On these broadcasts I believe it's fair to say that I try harder than anything else to make myself clear. I try to state things as simply and unambiguously as I can. I try to find the most compelling evidence I can and to present it accurately and in a way that makes its meaning easy to grasp. Whenever I can, I use evidence that listeners can check for themselves if I tell them where to look. Certainly, that's true of the things of which I've spoken on this broadcast: both the Wichita rapes and murders and the Jewish films promoting miscegenation. And I try to draw my conclusions from the evidence in a way that makes those conclusions unavoidable for any reasonable listener.

The principal conclusion I have drawn in this broadcast is that the Jews who dominate our news and entertainment media are not simply businessmen trying to maximize their profits, like any other businessmen. They are men who also have a political, social, cultural, and racial agenda. They report the news selectively in order to advance their agenda, and they produce entertainment for the public designed to advance their agenda. Among other things on their agenda are the moral disarmament of the White public, the destruction of any sense of White identity or White pride, the inculcation of a sense of White guilt, and the paralysis of our will to resist the total Jewish domination of our society, the paralysis of our will to survive.

Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this broadcast. But I've presented corroborating evidence in more than two hundred other broadcasts. The selective reporting of the news in a way designed to make Whites feel guilty and the production of Hollywood films which attempt to persuade teenaged White girls that they should look favorably on sex with Blacks fit in perfectly with the Jews' support for open borders, the Jews' tireless work for "diversity" and multiculturalism, the Jews' advocacy of more and more "hate crime" legislation, the Jews' campaign against the Second Amendment, the Jews' efforts to censor the Internet and obtain legislation against "speech crime." Look at Jewish motives and activities in the light of history. Look at the way in which America has changed demographically, culturally, and morally during the past half-century under the impact of Jewish propaganda and Jewish policies.

These changes did not come about by accident. They are the result of design. The biggest and most important single factor in the Jewish campaign against White America is the Jewish control of the mass media of news and entertainment. Most Jews, of course, are not media bosses. Most Jews are not in a position to plan the selective reporting of the news or produce films designed to encourage interracial sex, the way Sumner Redstone and Michael Eisner and the Weinstein brothers are. But all of them -- or nearly all of them -- support the same things these Jewish leaders do. What is happening to America is not simply the consequence of having a small number of powerful and evil Jews in the media. It is happening as a consequence of having six million Jews in America. A small number of them control our mass media. The rest provide the Jewish tribal infrastructure which makes that control possible.

Luke says: Read my essay on Jews in porn and the Homo Mafia. Incidentally, Sumner Redstone's real name is Shlomo Rothstein.

Chaim Amalek writes: I suggest you forward that email to Sumner Redstone (or is it Murry Rothstein? Howd he get a monker like "Sumner Redstone" anyway? Perhaps I should call myself Prometheus Skyhope) along with a request that he provide you with the means with with to rebut Pierce. At the very least you should hear from his apoplectic lawyers. Now THAT should be interesting.

I always get a kick out of jews who try to hide their ancestry behind the most goyishe sounding names ("Ralf Lauren") their yiddishe kups can think of. Never mind that the goyim who want to know always figure the truth out, just so long as the masses don't know and won't learn the truth from watching the Larry King (or is it the Larry Ziegler?) show.

Luke, I just had a VERY inspired idea! Write a letter to Shlomo Rothstein, care of Sumner Redstone at Viacom, and let us know what happens!

PS You disappoint me in that it seems you never do stuff like this. Get your head out of the gutter of porn and do something interesting and useful with your life!

I notice that week after week, you publish the racist rants of Dr. Pierce with nary a rebuttal. And when you do publish a rebuttal, it is in defense of the jews, and never in defense of the African Americans who Pierce portrays as violent savages. Clearly this is further evidence that there is far less difference between you and Pierce on the issue of race than you care to admit to.

Tomorrow is Dr. Martin Luther King Junior's birthday, a time when even white americans are invited to sing the praises of Dr. King, and a time for you to do some teshuva. So let's hear it Luke, tell us why you think Pierce is DEAD WRONG in his characterization of black people as violent thugs, as niggaz out to beat the white man like a drum in the Congo.

Chaim writes Vancouver Kendra: Kendra, I note that Mr. Ford is publishing savagely antisemitic/anti-black propaganda obtained from the National Alliance's web site, and without rebuttal. How does this make you feel? (No irony-ladden answers please, just the truth. Do you agree or disagree with the essay he published?)

Kendra writes Chaim: I don't understand why Luke would post that. It is embarrassing. I like to think that those people do not exist here, and that it is typically an American problem. They do exist here, albeit usually not so overtly. It is usually in relation to our Asian-Canadians, and First Nations people. Why would he give it yet another forum? Why does he not explain himself? I will ask him.

Kendra writes Luke: So Luke, why? Please do not say it is to expose this sort of thing. You know as well as I do, that the majority of people who frequent your site probably eat it up. Probably concur.

Have you no time to answer the one who may bear your offspring? Yet you have time to post.

XXX writes: the most disturbing thing about pierce's rants is how he lumps all the jews together. there are plenty of torah-observant individuals who don't know nor care what film is topping the box office--yet will wax eloquent on a torah portion to make it sound more relevant, fresh and exciting than any over-marketed flick. and those are the same jews who are holding ideals that don't clash with what pierce is writing--you can hear them in shuls every saturday morning. so, pierce continues to shoot himself in the foot by persistently ramming down the idea that the culpable parties are nothing more than a bunch of "jews" ... dig?

Fred writes: Pierce is an obsessed failure. From Pierce's point of view, from the end of the 1950s (presumably the start of Pierce's career) to today, everything in the world has gone down hill. From Pierce's perspective, he can only view himself as a complete, total and utter failure--a looney voice in the wilderness, generally despised by the entirety of the human race, with the exception of some high-school drop-out skinheads.

He spends all of his time obsessing about blacks and jews as if these people had some sort of impact on his life out there at his home in West Virginia--sputtering out and selling tracts to others who can most charitably be called failures or white trash. There is some sort of wierd bitterness at the root of all of this. I think his entire psyche is directed toward an effort to explain away his own failures in life.

Do you know when he started drifting off into the ether of extreme politics? Was his father a Nazi? Was he denied tenure somewhere at the same time a Jewish prof was given tenure? It would be interesting to investigate.

Chaim replies: Unfortunately, none of this constitutes rebuttal; it instead is merely an ad hominem attack on a man rather than a logical rebuttal to his arguments. We are supposed to believe that because the man is presumed to be a personal failure in life that his arguments cannot have any worth. (Similarly, we are often told to pay extra close attention to what our celebrity class has to say about the issues of the day, and for corresponding reasons.) Fred, you can do better.

The specific question that I have for Fred is this: why has the mainstream press not covered the Wichita massacre? What makes one sort of crime (e.g., the murder of a homosexual man by two heterosexual white men) worthy of blanket coverage and another sort of crime (the sexual torture of a young white boy by two homosexuals, or the slaughter of a group of young white people by two African Americans) not worthy of any mention whatsoever? Can you concede that burried in the hate, Pierce may in fact have a valid point, or must antisemitic losers like Pierce be considered to be wrong on every point lest they be viewed as correct on the things you fear most?

Continuing on the Wichita story, do you know what Pierce's characterization of the ease with which these white people were tortured and slaughtered sounds like? Well, maybe you do not, and maybe Luke does not, but every born jew on the planet knows the answer to that one. Right Luke?

Fred writes: You know who Pierce reminds me of? General Jack Ripper from Dr. Strangelove. The same sort of obsessive nut. In one case, it's fear of what the communists are going to do with our precious bodily fluids. In another case, it's blacks and Jews.

O.K. So Chiam wants an actual rebuttal to Pierce's rant. Query--what part of Pierce's screed should be rebutted? First, I don't think Pierce is a credible reporter of facts.

But lets start out and say that a couple of Blacks committed the crime that is described in Pierces screed, and none of the media reported this incident. Query: How did Pierce find out? Does he have a parallel Associated Press/Reuters news service? Doubtless lots of Pierce's stuff has been inflated as it gets passed on from one right-wing goon to the next. Now Dr. Pierce seems to think that America's attitudes on race relations are the result of some small cabal of Jewish conspirators.

The truth of the matter is that America's attitude is the result of the efforts of numerous people, including:

a) the abolitionists, including lots of folks like John Brown who were intensely religious Protestants;

b) The electorate who put Lincoln in the White House, and a legislature in Congress that passed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment, the early Civil Rights Acts, and the Ku Klux Klan acts (designed to keep the likes of Dr. Pierce on a leash);

c) Truman, who integrated the military in the 1950s;

d) President Eisenhower, who sent in the army to desegregate schools in Arkansas (note that only one Supreme Court justice was Jewish when Brown v Board of Education was unanimously decided--I think it was Frankfurter);

e) LBJ and the Congress that enacted Civil Rights legislation;

f) African Americans, who have been steadily pushing and agitating first for an end to slavery, then for an end to segregation and other forms of racism.

Pierce would have you believe that the current American ethic agaisnt racism is the result of the small Jewish cabal. Blacks had nothing to do with it? Other religious groups had nothing to do with it? We Jewish people are so powerful that we did it all by ourselves? Isn't that just a tad bit silly?

Now Chiam wants to know why the press didn't cover this story. Do whites in general (or the media in general) bend over backward to bury stories about black-on-white crime? I doubt it. When I turn on the news, or buy a newspaper, there is no shortage of stories where it is made clear that the perpetrator or suspect was African American.

I don't know that there is a bias among newspaper editors against reporting Black-on-White crime. I am not in the newspaper business. Most newspapers are not run by Jewish people. Most newspaper editors are not Jewish. If you want to know why they report what they report, I suppose you'd have to ask them. My guess is that they simply try to do a good job. In any event, the evidentiary value of Pierce's allegations is zero.

Is there a finite, non-zero probability that such a bias might exist? I suppose. I've never polled the nation's newspaper editors. I don't think I've ever met a newspaper reporter or editor, or a television or radio reporter or editor. (I've lived a sheltered life.) Do I believe that such a bias exists? I have no reason to believe that such a bias exists.

Chiam, are you a newspaper editor? Do you work for CNN? Do you think a bias exists? What's your basis for believing that such a bias exists.

Finally, Chiam asks rhetorically, are we entitled to ignore all of Pierce's arguments just because he's anti-semetic? The answer is that Pierce has well-known and extreme biases. One should evaluate what he has to say in light of his well-known biases. There is nothing unfair or unreasonable about that. It's sort of like evaluating Goebbel's propaganda in light of who he was.