Home

Back to Essays

 

Your Ad Here


"Ford exposes drug use, mob connections and murder plots..." Evan Wright, Rolling Stone

"There's a kind of low-key genius..." Jeffrey Wells, Hollywood-Elsewhere.com

"Serious history of the dirty-movie business." Booklist



Monday, January 1st, 2001

Email Luke Gene Ross Porn Star Escorts Nicis Girls vs CoverGirls Krista Leigh vs Roy Karch Dec 31 Nice Jewish Girl Update

Celebrate The New Year With A Porn Star Whore

The following porn starlets are listed by www.nvbrothels.com as whoring in Nevada in January. Moonlight Bunny Ranch (1-800-BUN-NYRA): Ruby, Mila, Annie Ander-Sinn, Bridget "The Midget" Powerz, Mel and Lee Anne. Madam Kitty's Fantasy Ranch (1-800-MS-KITTY): Jeannie Rivers and Tiana Rose. Remember whore mongers: If she's good enough for Ron Jeremy then she's good enough for you! Click here: NV Brothels

2001 - A Porn Odyssey

Don Barzini predicts: The new administration will begin their "American Values Jihad" by attacking the internet. Sure, everyone's already figured this out, but my take on it is they'll prioritize companies that produce their own net content. These won't be "obscenity" attacks per se, but what they deem as obscene is the force behind it. Any company f---ing with people's credit card #'s should be on Defcon4 alert...you know who you are. Look for some of the good ole boys rolling on each other and some jail terms resulting.

Any adult company shipping by US Mail, regardless of what that US Postal Employee/Marketing person told you, is in for a bad time. Barzini predicts these companies to be high on the government's hit list. Re-read the Mann Act, it will be the gov's tool for these prosecutions.

Any company producing content that has a religious theme (Extreme stands out as an example) will be high on the hit list.

HBO will launch an adult channel, others will follow, it will mark the beginning of the end for the existing channels.

More porn talent, i.e., high-end girls, will recognize that "they" are the valuable commodity, and will form their own companies, keeping their content exclusive to themselves, e.g., Jill Kelly's company.

Luke F-rd will finally springboard his time in the sewer into a mainstream gig, but one foot will remain stuck in adult.

Rumdar writes: A Mutual Fund salesperson with a huge collection of "donkey porn"? or answering phones for "Madam Nici"?

Andy writes: Lukey, I am tired of the shrill hysteria from these idiots who are conjuring up near-gulag images for the porno industry and its fans. Bush has bigger fish to fry. The economy is slowing and many issues have been neglected by Clinton for years, such as the sorry state of our schools, military and Federal judiciary. He has a LOT more to worry about. Remember, the Meese Commission didn't come until year five of Reagan's reign. Plus, the Congress is really tight, so Bush doesn't have the room to move when it comes to stomping on people's rights. And given the mysogeny and horrendous treatment of women by Max, Extreme, and other gonzos, well hell, I've been saying for years these guys are inviting legal crackdown. If and when it DOES happen, then you should report on it. Until then, spare us the hysteria from these fools who think if my paranoid mind can conjure it up, it will happen.

Gauge vs Mojo

Erotic Shooter writes: Hey Luke, long time reader....first time writer.

Just wanted to drop you a line about the latest Gauge and Mojo saga. I just had a photoshoot with Gauge about a week before Christmas and her story about Mojo was a little different. According to her.... he's the one who emptied "their" bank account and split.

When I saw her she had absolutly no money and couldn't even afford to feed herself. I worked with her for a few days and she seemed as sane to me as anyone could expect from a porn queen whose been f---ed over. She's trying desperatly to distance herself from that "thing" she used to call a boyfriend (MOJO). She left town to get some much needed rest and to clear her head.

You know as well as anyone that there is always two sides to a story. Just wanted to tell you the side that I heard...it sounds a lot different from the one that Mojo is telling. Without Gauge...Mojo is nothing and bound to end up back in Memphis where he belongs.

Riley Rambles Again

Critic Pat Riley writes on the newsgroup rec.arts.movies.erotica (RAME) : First up is a non-porn movie, Road Trip. You can see the entry at the imdb at: http://us.imdb.com/Title?0215129

and I recommend the review at: http://www.screenit.com/movies/2000/road_trip.html which gives you blow-by-blow details of the sex and nudity. They presumably saw the theatrical version and mention "glimpses" of nudity in the shower scene but I saw the unrated videotape version and the shower scene is quite long with lots of tits and some full back-view nudity.

Speaking of the shower scene, take a look at the feminist type who advises Amy about the pig-like nature of men. Ignoring her frizzy/curly hair which is how I know she's a feminist--the anti-male stance just confirms it--she has a very nice little body. Take special note of the gentle uplift of her tits and the near puffy areola. Oh, how nice it would be to squeeze them! But the real quality is in Amy Smart who also has a fantastic little body with nice probably B cups which you do see in some detail--more squeezing; drool drool--and an adorable tight waist, good skin, and good dentition. Oh, and a really pretty face. If you follow the link above to her filmography there are several photos of her (clothed) and the statement that she was born in 1976 making her probably 23 when the movie was shot and thereby proving that there's actually life after the teenage years. Not much but sufficient.

Facially Amy looks similar to Buffy Van Norton who's credited as Cameron in Barely Legal #6 and over whom various people have been drooling recently. Buffy (credited as just Buffy) is also in Barely Legal on Vacation which I'll mention briefly later. The problem with Buffy is that she has boy-like tits; a boy-like butt is great but boy-like tits are a little on the small side. Amy's B cups cure this defect. Naturally, Amy can also act which also puts her a smidgen ahead of Buffy.

You'll notice that in Road Trip, a movie designed to appeal to the teenage and young crowd not dirty old men nostalgic for their youth, all persons are tattoo-, silicone- and piercing-free and there's no hint of BJ's, anal sex, or facial cum shots. Aw, gee, I guess when you get above the trailer park trash level of Jenny Jones, young people today are not as stupid as the raincoaters would have you believe. Further, the basis of the movie is a long-term relationship and jealousy figures highly in the plot line. I suppose the anachronisms that hang out here would argue that that's the result of society's pernicious influence. Yeah, right . More likely it's just the way most young people carry on normally. Many thanks to the producers of Road Trip for reinforcing the arguments of yours truly regarding these issues.

However there's a couple of things wrong with Road Trip (nitty-gritty to be sure): In her sex scene with Josh, Amy wears a pair of rust colored bikini panties which do not hug her butt well; they look like they're a couple of sizes too big. Rust colored is not a really flattering color, they should have been white lace, and they should have been tighter to avoid the misfit accusation. A thong would have been nice but even presuming that she wasn't willing to go this far, you can still get nice little hipster stretch type panties. You also have a sex scene with an ugly runt of a white guy and a big black beastie but this is played for laughs and is quite effective at what it sets out to do. We could have squeezed a couple more minor sex scenes in, notably a flashback to Josh and Tiffany (his long term g/f) especially at age 14.

Apart from the sex aspect, the movie is a laugh riot with little of the silliness one associates with teenage movies. Check out the scene where the pot-smoker asks the motel clerk for drugs. PC-ness is kept to a minimum. After a long dry spell in mainstream A movies, maybe this heralds a return to the proposition that R-rated always equals at least some tits. One can only hope.

I also saw The Virgin Suicides recently but despite a cast of drop dead gorgeous blondes, there's no nudity other than in the one sex scene which is extremely short but is actually better filmed than the one in Road Trip. The things that are better are that you have a side view of the girl's hip as she's screwing and that she's on her back all of the time. Other than that though, it's done with her just hiking up her dress so you don't see her tits. Pity. Also the movie is depressing. Such a waste!

Moving over to the porn area, I saw Barely Legal on Vacation the other day. While the quality of the pussy is high (Buffy Van Norton, Bunny Luv, Jezaree Robs, Mariah Kane) and it's well videoed, the sex scenes are flat. No passion, which is surprising seeing that Buffy, Bunny, and Jezaree are all with their respective SO's. Possibly this is a problem with the Clive McLean school of direction which may require raincoater/juvenile-friendly choreographed sex effectively killing any emotional content.

The scene with Mariah and Jay on the beach is particularly awkward and even her later four way with Buffy, Jay, and John E. Mak, is not an improvement. Mind you, both Mariah and Bunny are showing the effects of age. Mariah, after a long run, is now turning pear-shaped and her tits seem to be getting smaller by the movie. Probably the effects of putting on weight elsewhere. After the beach screw with Jay as she strolls with Jay away from the camera, you see positive proof that women should not be allowed to walk without high heels. It's not so much a walk as a waddle.

Similarly Bunny is putting on the pounds and her tits seem to be drooping more than before. She's still attractive, but her porn life is also coming to an end. Bad choice in males too. The guy she's with, Devan, is supposedly her husband.

In contrast, Ed has rebounded in MDD #172 and MDD #173 with a couple of worth-watching volumes. He went through a period of rolling in the uglies from the maternity wards of LosA, and then an assortment of just plain woof-woofs but in Deja Knight, Emanuelle, and Tyler Lane he seems regained his form. Note also for rare Ed watchers: in the last 20 or so volumes he's picked up some nasty raincoater habits, in particular rimming the girl's asshole and the facial. Fortunately he eschewed the facials in the case of Deja and Emanuelle but does the rimming for all three. The last thing I want to do is eat anyone's s--- so I wish he'd stop this. Let's face it, he's not going to attract the raincoater anyway, so why alienate the rest of the audience?

Deja says she's 18 years old but we don't delve into her ethnicity. I'd guess that there are some black genes in her past. She's pretty with a petite child-like although not a pre-pubertal body (i.e., she has a proper waist), prominent tan lines, hairy pussy, flat belly, tiny/small tits, and poor facial skin. Her teeth are OK however her diction is not. She's hard to understand.

As the scene opens she's in denim shorts and a thin-strapped camisole top with her front opening bra straps showing. Yikes! Someone teach these girls how to dress. She has little need for a bra anyway, but if she must wear one, use a strapless kind or wear a proper T-shirt top. After we establish that she doesn't masturbate and that she doesn't really care if Ed tries to masturbate her--it's not going to get her aroused--she crawls onto the bed and in stripping takes off her bra before her top. Yikes, again! The girl has perfectly fine little tits and we're going to see them anyway; why should she do this?

Well she gets naked and Ed rims her and then screws her including an anal ending in a body cum shot. He goes back in and screws her again with no anal ending also in a body cum shot. After the sex, he boasts that he came twice in around 20 minutes so presumably what you're seeing is approximately real time. At the end she says that it was not as bad as she expected which is about the extent of the compliments Ed is going to receive.

OTOH, this girl is very vulnerable, something that Ed senses and in the end you have the feeling that she's looking for approval and Ed is almost taking a fatherly interest in providing that self-esteem. (That's a fatherly interest where the father screws and anals his daughter, of course .) During the sex she's quiet and seems in pain for part of it although not during the anal. Ed must have prompted her to "talk it up" because she does become slightly more vocal at one stage but then lapses into silence. At the end, there's also some conversation about her allergies (she sniffs a lot) adding a nice concerned feel to the scene.

Emanuelle is filipino with a passable face (pretty sometimes), long straight black hair, poor dentition (she wears braces), 5'9" tall, tiny/small droopy tits, large areola, paintbrush, and a lithe body. Despite the droopy nature of her tits, making her a suspect teenage mother, I couldn't find anything out of place with her belly which is as flat as can be, and she definitely has a tight waist. Let's give her the benefit of the doubt.

Oh, I nearly forgot. For voyager: she has a prominent clit which you really only see when she's in missionary and Ed is in her asshole. No particular attention to it during Ed's rug munching.

She says that she's 18 years old and was de-virginized at 14 and, after the usual Ed, "You should have waited," she points out that 14 was not that long ago. Their opening conversation is a little worrying at first as she seems a little aggressive and/or hooker-like. Ed puts this down to no one telling her about his mode of operation which is probably true as she calms down after the beginning of the interview. Ed can't resist trying to have her say that she likes older men and then as is becoming frequent, she says that she doesn't masturbate. Ed rims her and then screws her including an anal where he only inserts the head of his dick. It ends in a body cum shot.

Emanuelle is one of those rare girls who actually think that they should be enjoying the sex in porno movies, and in furtherance of that idea, she seems to really enjoy screwing. I can't say she has a convincing orgasm, nor does she attempt such, but the sex is a cut above the usual going-through-the-motions.

Special note for Torris: Also in #172 is Kno Malone who says that she's Moroccan and looks middle-eastern. The problem is that while her body is passable, she's ugly facially. Hey, really ugly, Rodney Moore ugly! And, she's clearly a feminist, having curly black hair . She gets on well with Ed though, mainly because she's an aspiring rap artist and does an impromptu song praising Ed. Unfortunately he returns the favor with a song of his own. Still, much as I think this is rubbish, it was amusing enough.

Moving on the #173 we have Tyler Lane. Tyler has short black hair, passable face, small firm tits, tight waist, splooge of pubic hair, flat belly, no obvious tattoos or piercings, and a lithe petite body. If you grow her hair a little, change the color to dirty blonde, add a large tattoo on her right calf outside, and add four or more ear piercings you have Elizabeth/Crystal from 18 And Nasty #18. I'm leaning towards these not being the same girl but if anyone has better information they should speak their piece.

Tyler says that she's 19 years old but we don't really delve too much into anything else about her. In addition to Ed on the camera, Jay Ashley is also in the room and seems, although it's not stated, to be part of Ed's drive to pass some sex over to a new stud, however here at the beginning he starts telling some hopeless jokes which Tyler doesn't get. (I only "got" one of them, hence the "hopeless" comment.)

At Ed's insistence she masturbates a little and then he rims her leading to Ed screwing her ending in a facial. She's not very responsive which I originally thought was her fault--just a girl going through the motions--but then...

It's Jay's turn and he starts off naked--she's also naked--and indulges in a passionate kissing session while standing beside the bed. This is quite long and she's very responsive with Jay getting visibly aroused, and leads to the usual rug munching on the bed. Again she seems much, much more responsive than with Ed who's videoing this and makes some comments. Effectively both Jay and Tyler tell him to shut up which happily he does until the end. They move into cowgirl and missionary with lots of kissing and almost normal position sex ending unfortunately in an urgent rush-around-to-the-head facial. Again, no earth-shattering orgasm (which would be seen as fake, anyway) but an understated passion that seems to be absent in most porn.

Also is #173 is Venetia Vixen who is not too pretty, has tattoos and a slob like pasty white body. If you like woof-woofs such as Tawni Lyons you might like her but normal people won't. The only condom in the mentioned movies is one in Road Trip with the black beastie but of course you don't see it applied or used.

Good Enough Actors

Director and journalist David Aaron Clark writes on RAME: These are the porn performers I've worked with who by my estimation have enough smarts and experience that I can get good performances out of them. They're not necessarily the most popular, or the flavor of the minute, but there you go. There's others, but these are the ones I would vouch for ... Just don't expect me to put you in touch with any of them.

p.s. anybody who wants to debate on the acting talents of any of the above, feel free, but if you think they can't act I insist you make that judgement based on their work in MY shows, or else I'm not interested in your opinion ... 90 percent of the circumstances porn actors work within, if there is even a script they don't see it until an hour before their scenes ...

Julie Meadows, Jack Hammer, Brian Shurewood, Suzi Suzuki, Jewel Valmont (or whatever the f--- she's calling herself now), Herschel Savage, Dave Hardman, Annabel Chong, Steve Austin, Joey Silvera, Ted Hunter, Justine Rome, Luciano, Jon Dough, Kitten, Ashyln Gere (she DOES do mainstream)

Ashlyn also appears as "Crystal Night," a neo-nazi personnel director at a corporation secretly funded by Brazilian Reich refugees in Morgan & Wong's two-part MILLENNIUM episode, the names of which escape me at the moment. You'll catch it every two months or so on FX at 1 a.m., which is when they show reruns of one of the best TV shows ever ...

Slap Happy's Brutal Porn

Matt writes on RAME: What "golden age porn" have you seen? There was stuff back then that was way more controversial then today's porn like full blown hardcore rape, incest with no "step" type insinuation, golden showers, pure underage themes, hardcore bondage, and s--- scenes.

FAQ@rame.net replies: True, but it was done in some sort of context of a plot and the like. And it was always "pretend." I have a hard time beliving the "pretend" part these days; and I don't think it's because Brandon Hidell is a better actor than his predecessors. I think it's because these performers are really getting brutalized. There's a question of intent that I have the real issue with. It's one thing to *pretend* to be hit; it's another thing to *actually* be hit. It's difficult as a spectator for me to watch real violence; it's easy for me to watch "movie" violence. I know Rambo didn't really punch that guy; but I'm pretty sure Mickey G did belt that chick... That "subtle" difference does certainly affect my enjoyment of the movie.

David Clark adds on RAME:

Anybody who doesn't see the difference between an actor playing a murderer/wife abuser/mafioso whose character brutalizes another character played by an actress in AN OBVIOUSLY FICTIONAL CONTEXT -- with no REAL slapping, hocking lugies, etc, etc -- and the truly jarring REAL violence being commited in some of today's smut by the likes of Brandon "Thank God I found my niche" Irons for the sake of a quick buck is either fatuous or seriously developmentally retarded.

I would say that that this s--- is heading toward snuff, but that would only give it a cachet it doesn't even deserve. Even Max, for christ's sake, presents it as fantasy -- "teenage girls" stopping by the Max home for help with their homework, etc. There's no imagination and nothing artistically redeeming about luring a down-on-her-luck whore into the back room of your warehouse so you can turn on a camera and start gagging her until she vomits, spanking her until the veins break in her ass, and smack her face and tits until they're all bruised up.

Though I wouldn't wish government intervention in the porn industry under almost any circumstance, if anybody deserves to go to jail and see what it's like to be sexually abused, it's the thoughtless, brutalizing cowardly asshole who makes his money like this. And everybody here knows how far to the edge -- and over -- I like my art, and my porn. But this sort of thing is bulls---.

The real pathetic scum who embarrass the rest of us for being of the same species aren't the unsightly, sad whores who submit to this s--- for a couple of hundred bucks, but the hate peddlers -- not smut peddlers, HATE peddlers -- who perpetrate it.

I say this knowing Brandon Irons, having enjoyed him as a performer and even somewhat liked him as a person in the past, but now being disgusted by his willingness to do anything to make a dime. Brandon, if this is all you're capable of doing to pay your rent, go back to Canada, and beat up the girls there.

Meni69: slap happy controversy? Meni69: its not controversial Meni69: i almost made a 19 yo puke last night Meni69: and she had plenty of spit flying Meni69: girls do this s--- in real life.

Lynne writes: As someone who also knew Brandon Iron, I have to reinforce David Clark: There's no reason to hurt women in the name of entertainment. Either someone's been giving you the wrong scoop, buddy, or you had us all fooled into thinking you were one of the good guys. Haven't you considered that you are exactly the kind of guy other prisoners will find, uh, exciting?

Brandy Alexandre Separated At Birth

Joe writes: Luke, I was browsing through some news groups the other day, and came upon an interesting thread. It mentioned Brandy, and had a link to a "Separated At Birth" collage she had posted to her website. She claims to look like Patrick Fugit from the movie Almost Famous (heard great things about that movie, but don't know if I wanna see it after this). Anywho the picture I found attatched to that thread in the NG was called "separated.jpg" I felt had more resemblance to the person in the picture than she claims to have with Patrick. I attatched the picture to this email so you can post it and let your readers decide. Here is the link to Brandy's "Separated At Birth" collage that she made. http://www.kamikaze.org/fugitalexandre.jpg

Blast From The Past

12/31/99

Friday morning, Luke interviewed by telephone leading porn webmaster Joe Elkind of the Cyber Entertainment Network (CEN).

Luke: "I hear you are suing rival net porner Brad Shaw?"

Joe: "Brad's got a big mouth. Bigger than mine. And he opened it. And he's got people bashing me and bashing us and I just don't put up with that bulls---. First, he started out with the thing Amateur Beaver. And we told him that we wouldn't let him buy it because we're developing a site amateurbeaver.com. It's trademarked, etc... He bought amateur-beaver.com which is stupid because I am going to wind up getting all the traffic from it anyway when people try to type it in. We told him that if he wants to use it [that domain name amateur-beaver.com], that's fine. But keep it quiet. But he opened his mouth about some s--- and I told people what his problem was. He was pissed because he did not want to spend $100,000 and buy the name amateurbeaver.com. And so he had to go out and dig up his own name and program which is fine. Except he's copying something we're doing.

"So JB [Joe's partner] told him that we were going to sue him... They ended up settling... I wasn't interested in suing him. It was JB who was pissed at him for opening his mouth. And then he has people posting this [negative] stuff [at www.condomproject.com]... If I'm a thief, how come I am still in business? I pay everybody. [Joe and his company CEN have a good reputation for honesty.]

"My partner and I had a meeting the other night and we decided not to sue him. We're just going to go about our business.

"What Brad's trying to do to get into the market is expose other people's weaknesses in their programs. Everybody is going to have a weakness in their program. It's not rocket science."

Luke Gets Mail

Bruce writes: Luke-was told about your site by a friend about a week ago. You got a great site. I've always wanted to know more about the business side of the porn industry-and you really give the details. I'm amazed at how the porn movies have changed in just the last 2 years. Randy west has volume 1 of a pissing video out. I never thought I'd see pissing videos in the adult section of MY LOCAL video store.

I think the best adult movies out there are from -New Sensations. They have a compilation called -The 4 Finger Club- which are great adult movies. The problem with Ed Powers or Randy West videos is-I dont want to watch a porn movie with the guy whose holding the camera -TALKING. If these 2 guys would let the actors do their thing and keep their mouths shut-I might actually rent 1 of their movies. Another problem with 90% of most pornos is the editing. I've seen pornos with so many f---in edits per minute that I almost get seasick. If these guys would keep the edits down to a bare minimum and just lets the cameras roll-that would be great.

Another thing that ruins a porno is a 35mm camera in the backround clicking while the sex scenes are going on with flashbulbs going off during the movie. That sucks. The absoulute worst thing in a porno movie is music. The music that plays in most porno movies sounds like music from the worst band in Croatia-being played backwards. The 4 finger club has fresh cute girls, no music, very few edits per scene and minimal talking from the cameraman. You're like a gossip columnist for the porn industry-but its great reading.

Passmaster writes: the f--- is up with all these pornstars trying to deny prostitution? being a prostitute is: f---ing men for cash being a pornstar is: f---ing men for cash and being filmed doing it for thousands to watch later

pornstars a just prostitutes that are so good that they are worth recording on tape for others to watch. eg high class hookers. DONT DENY YOUR HOOKER ROOTS!

btw luke wassup with that bitch kendra jane? bitch looks like shes just been dug up - how can you cream yourself over the s---?

Shane writes: I pretty much have to agree with Passmaster - Porn "stars" ARE nothing but prostitutes, and that goes for both male and female porn stars (I notice he didn't include men in the mix there other than as the consumer). At one time being involved in pornography was something for the participants to hide, as having sex for money on film with strangers was shameful and not acceptable to most, and prostitution in the truest sense as most seemed to be in it for only the money. Now we have elevated these prostitutes to STAR status and it's become something for a girl to aspire to career-wise! Stars in WHAT tiny galaxy? Calling them pornstars is only an attempt to separate their job descriptions from those of prostitutes, and ultimately to legitimize their choices.

I think the biggest difference between porn stars and hookers is that porn stars get on-site catering. But I'm not even sure that that's the case - maybe that's how the legendary "pizza delivery boy" made his first appearance!

Brandy Alexandre writes: Again, you're trying to pigeonhole porn into pre-defined parameters. Porn is porn and prostitution is prostitution. Ask any porn star who is also a prostitute, like Bianca Trump or Sunset Thomas, and they will tell you that each, though involving sex and cash, is different. Even the various governments acknowledge the difference. Otherwise they could not shoot porn in regions where prostitution is illegal. But it's shot virtually everywhere. Unadulterated prostitution (I'm so punny) is the exchange of pleasure for money--one gives the money to prostitute in order for her to provide him or her with sexual gratification. (In that regard, even if porn was prostitution, the guys would not be prostitutes.) In porn, while sex is involved, the purpose and intent is not for the participants to derive pleasure from each other, or even provide it, but to create the ILLUSION of pleasure for recording purposes.

Eventually this reaches a third party who does derive pleasure based on all the expenses involved, but that's really, really, playing with semantics. Harold Freeman won his pandering appeal on that basis. The people he paid to perform sex acts did not do so for his pleasure, but to perform a role in a movie in which explicit sex was integral. MAYBE porn is a subset or prostitution right next to women who marry for money, or date for free meals, but it certainly is not de facto prostitution. If you paint it all with the same brush then there is no reason why I would have been turning down money left and right to provide direct pleasure to some schmo just because he had the right amount of cash. Life is too short to f--- ugly men, shallow men, lazy men, or any man who would rather buy it than earn it. My co-workers were something else entirely.

Lynne writes: Lynne writes: It is very important for pornographers to differentiate between prostitutes and porn stars, though with the latter ever more synonymous with "women who do videos," stardom having become a poor description of the status of the participants. Though their actions (accepting money for sex) are similar, prostitutes and porn stars have different clientele.

Porn stars perform sex with a clientele of other porn stars (or at least people who have consented to performing sex for commercial exploitation), documented their transaction, offered formal identification and health records to one another, and are expected to report their earnings to tax authorities. Hal Freeman fought the good fight many years ago to ensure the courts respected the difference between illegal prostitution and legal media representations of sexual entertainment under the First Amendment. Physical participants in pornography are engaged in a legal occupation. They negotiate sex act and renumeration with third-party producers who pride themselves for not touching the "talent" rather than with their partners, though increasingly producer and talent are becoming one and the same.

On the other hand, prostitutes are not regularly tested for STD's and they make no effort to monitor the identification or health status of their clients. They do not report taxes on their earnings,almost invaribly receiving their income from their sex partner or a business intermediary rather than from business which intends to distribute the representation of their sex act for profit. Prostitutes sell the act; pornography sells the representation.

Ryan writes: "I see these porn stars with the ablility to cum in massive amounts. Why is that? I can only do it when I don't have sex or masturbate for a few days and I f--- for 25 minutes and pace myself then when it goes, it's in large amounts. Is there anything else that I can do to get the most massive amounts of cum possible?"

Stacey from CovergirlsInternational.com writes: Luke, Here's another one, trying to get off Nicis site

From: (Kelly O'Dell)
To: Cvglmodels@aol.com

I never asked to be on Nici's site....& have sent her numerous e mails asking to get off!

Short Fat Ugly Men Of The World Unite

Chaim Amalek writes: And regarding the hot cheerleader who talks of converting to Orthodoxy, does she have any idea what this entails? I mean, it is not like going to Kabbala classes in LA in the hope of meeting Madonna or suspected pedophile Michael Jackson. Jewish orthodoxy is a VERY demanding way of life. (And you Luke, are NOT orthodox.) How can a woman go from all the fun of being a cheerleader to wearing a sheitel? Let me set her straight. A weekend at the Chaim Amalek religious retreat on West End Avenue and she will be far more certain in recognizing her spiritual needs.

PS Someone wrote to you saying that "Life is too short to f--- ugly men, shallow men, lazy men ..." Luke, do we really need this sort of hate on the internet? Just because a man is short, fat, and ugly is no reason not to bestow sexual favors on him; its what's inside that counts.

Luke's Vancouver Kendra writes: Luka, Ok, I checked out the site. You will have to limit your activities with the other kendra once we are married. You always say you need someone to help you make the pain go away! No more blow jobs. Talking dirty is alright I guess, as long as it is for entertainment on the site and not for you.

Lynne L-patin: women should be easy, men should be hard, right?
Lynne L-patin: my site looks awful, dear
Lynne L-patin: the whole thing seems to be a movie review...where are the porn stars' New Years Resolutions, where is the dirt about CES?
Lynne L-patin: Anyone who wants spiritual meaning in their lives should stay far, far away from porn.
Lynne L-patin: It corrodes the soul.
Lynne L-patin: If you have a lot of women in your life, why not ENJOY it!
Lynne L-patin: You are so lucky!
Lynne L-patin: I think you should bag as many as possible
Lynne L-patin: even if that is only one or two...
Lynne L-patin: And put your soul in storage...listening to you talk dirty is astounding!
Lynne L-patin: I didn't know you could do it!

KendraJXXX: youve been so naughty on your site lately
KendraJXXX: whats up with you ?
Luzdedos1: I have not been in shul for a week, because I've been sick.
Luzdedos1: So I'm getting out my aggressions on whores.
KendraJXXX: so you are being poseesed by your inner demons?
Luzdedos1: Yes, or simply giving in to my slovenly desires.
KendraJXXX: luke, dont say whore...thats bad..you sound like the rest of the idiots you despise
Luzdedos1: You're right, but it feels really good to say it.
KendraJXXX: call yourself a whore then
Luzdedos1: Just rolls off the tongue and lets me feel all derogatory and superior. No, I prefer calling others whores. KendraJXXX: you whore yourself out every day writing about a business you hate
Luzdedos1: Sorry, I will try to clean up my language.
KendraJXXX: simply for profit , or to make yourself " a name"
Luzdedos1: I didn't mean to offend.
KendraJXXX: you didnt offend me
KendraJXXX: im just saying, you sound terrible saying that
Luzdedos1: Interviewing those madams whipped me into an evil frenzy.
KendraJXXX: lol!!! i bet!!!
Luzdedos1: I'm going to dinner with Nici. I hear she's hot looking.
KendraJXXX: NOOOOO
KendraJXXX: are you really??!!
Luzdedos1: yes
KendraJXXX: when??
KendraJXXX: dont call her a whore ...
Luzdedos1: I won't. We haven't set a date yet.
KendraJXXX: ok :O) be on your best behavior , lukey
KendraJXXX: are you gonna date stacey too?
KendraJXXX: you little boytoy you
Luzdedos1: I'm too monogamous by nature to date two madams.

Amused writes: Kendra hit the nail on the head when she called you a "whore" for voluntarily toiling in an industry that you profess to hate so much. One normally would not expect such wisdom from a woman who sticks pages of the Holy Bible up her anus.

Nice Jewish Girl Update

This partial transcript courtesy of Lynne L-patin:

NJG: So, who are you dating?
LUKE: Ohhh…who am I not dating?
NJG: Who's the latest crop?
LUKE: (Laughter) Oh, I've met some women through my appearances on TV in the last few months.
NJG: Oh, you've been on telly?
LUKE: Yeah, on telly.
NJG: Where?
LUKE: On the E Channel.
NJG: You were on E?
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: In what regards?
LUKE: "True Hollywood Story" on Linda Lovelace. That showed about twenty times so I got a lot of exposure from that.
NJG: Really?
LUKE: Then there's this big documentary that played in Canada called "Give Me Your Soul."
NJG: Yeah.
LUKE: And so I was prominent in that.
NJG: Yeah.
LUKE: Umm, let me see. (Yawns) So I've gone out with XXX a few more times…um…
NJG: Oh yeah, you're still dating XXX?
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: That doesn't really like you, that just considers you a friend, right?
LUKE: Right.
NJG: That isn't going to sleep with you ever, right?
LUKE: Right.
NJG: Yeah.
LUKE: Hee hee hee…hmmm, I've met this non-Jewish woman. She's fun.
NJG: Oh, yeah.
LUKE: And I've met different Jewish women at synagogue. Gone out once or twice.
NJG: Yeah.
LUKE: Talked to on the phone. Oh, I met a former Los Angeles Raider cheerleader.
NJG: Is she Jewish?
LUKE: She's converting to Orthodox Judaism.
NJG: Oh, she is?
LUKE: Yeah. Tall and blonde and hot looking.
NJG: Really? How come she's converting?
LUKE: Cause she's looking for spiritual meaning in her life.
NJG: How did you meet her?
LUKE: Umm... At a weekend orthodox Jewish conference.
NJG: Really?
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: And then those other women they found your website and they wrote to you?
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: Wow! Well, that's good. I know you're happy when you're like the dating monster.
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: You're happy. You're really, you know, most happy just dating.
LUKE: Maybe. Yeah, I got a lot of women in my life right now.
NJG: Yeah, yeah. You're really happy when you're just dating.
LUKE: Uh hmm…
NJG: And then you try to complain, "Oh I wish I were married..." everybody believes you so they'll sleep with you and then… LUKE: Hee hee hee.
NJG: And you just ha ha ha.
LUKE: Yeah, I've been back in the saddle again.
NJG: Yeah...
LUKE: Doin' the wild thing.
NJG: Yeah…
LUKE: On my floor.
NJG: Really?
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: See, I think you really should only, if you really love them, and you want to marry them.
LUKE: Yeah, yeah, yeah…hee hee hee.
NJG: See? I mean, I really think that, Luke, I think it's kinda, that's just what I think.
LUKE: I wonder if I can cop any action from any of these madams looking for favorable coverage? Hee hee hee…
NJG: God. But see...
LUKE: I'll plug their websites...hee hee hee...
NJG: You'll plug their websites.
LUKE: They'll let me plug some of their women.
NJG: You can plug their women. That's what you're really happy doing.
LUKE: Yeah, boffing hookers.
NJG: That's right. See, but I'm not into that.
LUKE: No. It's not very spiritual.
NJG: No.
LUKE: But it's a lot of fun. Hee, hee, hee.
NJG: See, like, I don't think that's fun.
LUKE: Yeah, well, that's cause you're a woman.
NJG: Yeah, I dunno, my boyfriend doesn't think that's funny.
LUKE: (laughter) That's what he tells you!
NJG: No, he doesn't! He's not like that, Luke!
LUKE: Hee hee hee, that's what he tells you or he wouldn't be able to get you into bed. Get you in the sack and start ridin' you. NJG: No, no, no…there are men that aren't like that, Luke!
LUKE: (snickers)
NJG: They're the only ones that really like me are those types, who like really think like that.
LUKE: I bet this one really likes your big breasts.
NJG: I dunno.
LUKE: Hee hee hee.
NJG: He just likes me.
LUKE: Yeah, I bet he does. Bet he really likes being with you, in a very intimate way.
NJG: He's really really smart.
LUKE: Yeah, he must be to get your clothes off.
NJG: (laughter) I happen to like smart guys.
LUKE: Hee, hee, hee.
NJG: I only like smart men, you know, and I don't like to sleep with people unless I really…
LUKE: Is he circumcised?
NJG: Well, he's British, what do you think?
LUKE: No, he's not!
NJG: You know what? And I told you I don't believe in circumcision anyway. I think it's wrong. Were you circumcised as a kid or as an adult?
LUKE: Uh hmm, as a kid.
NJG: A little kid?
LUKE: Yeah.
NJG: I wonder why. Do they circumcise in Australia?
LUKE: They did then, anyway.
NJG: They don't now. National Health Service, they don't. They shouldn't. That's how they got rid of it in all of Europe, because National Health Service won't do it.
LUKE: Right.
NJG: They consider it…But you know what, Luke? You have to go look at nocirc.com.
LUKE: I'm not interested in that.
NJG: I think it's wrong, though. Do you know? You think it's right?
LUKE: Yeah, it's the Jewish thing. I mean, for Jews. I don't care about the goyim. Hee hee hee.

Lynne L-patin: I enjoyed the repeated listening.
Luzdedos1: was it luke at his most empathic?
Lynne L-patin: I have to think...it was luke at his most scintillating radiance at some points
Lynne L-patin: you stayed right with her. as a journalist eliciting the right reactions
Lynne L-patin: empathy or pseudo empathy for the sake of a story?
Lynne L-patin: you were at your most of whatever it was

Lynne writes: I'm a woman, and I'm thrilled for you, Luke. It never occurred to me that you would enjoy promiscuity assuming you had the opportunity for it, but if you do, go for it! I've never regretted having done so. Even though He saw fit to make me only a woman, everything I've learned and enjoyed about sex only benefits my spirit in my old age.

Vancouver Kendra writes: Luke, What kind of spiritual girl is NJG? What kind of spiritual man are you? You hope the new government goes after the "fags?" What a thing to say. AIDS is not a gay disease, do people not realize this yet? I agree that perhaps it receives a little too much attention. For example, more people contract Hepatitis B...hell, more people die of cancer and heart attacks. I have never been so appalled to hear someone speak like that, when their history is one of prejudice and persecution. Do people not learn from history. What is your excuse?

Not to mention the fact that you are in fact whoring around yourself, and are hardly exalted!!!!! I bet I am more spiritual and caring than the two of you put together. Please tell me that this too is for entertainment purposes...please tell me you don't have a white hood in your closet....wait, you don't have a closet....on the floor then. If you really do believe this, then lie to me, and tell me you don't!

Ok, you are going against everything I have been reading [about Judaism], and reading for you, how's that for irony...ok, I'm actually doing it for me as well. And, what's this about all your dating and sex on the floor? I am not sleeping with you when you come here!!!!! It sounds as though you are more impressed with Cheerleaders.....oh GOD, cheerleaders!!! In Canada, we make fun of Americans for their preoccupation with cheerleaders. We didn't even have them at school, and certainly not at university....MEOW! Oh well, knock yourself out now, but just remember, that means I get to too!!!! Not that I will. Anyway, knock yourself out now because, after we meet you won't want to! How's that for confidence.

Don't say sorry, just explain. Is that what you think? Is that what she thinks? How come some of the most racist, homophobic people I have meet have been Jewish...if anything they should be the opposite. Shouldn't they?

Helpful writes: And this is why Gene Ross vastly superior marriage material. Run, Vancouver Kendra, Run!

Chaim Amalek writes: (Luke, I hope this helps you with her. Remember, I am always willing to help you out with your female troubles.)

OK, first of all, NJG, who I have crossed emails with in the past, is right on the money re aids research. Given that this disease is almost wholly preventable with a modicum of common sense (e.g., don't share needles, don't take a naked dick up your ass, use condoms and avoid sex with high risk groups), we are spending a wildly disproportionate share of our R&D dollar on it. Think about it - want to avoid HIV? Well, wearing a condom will greatly reduce the likelihood of its transmission. It does not pass through the air or strike seemingly at random. Would that it were only so easy to counsel parents on how to shield their children from cancer, or adult women from losing their breasts to that disease, or MS, and many other diseases whose sufferers lack the clout of our precious homosexuals. Hepatitis, cancer, and many other diseases are short-changed because the gay lobby wants to keep the world safe for bare-penis-in-the-ass sex. They simply cannot be bothered with wearing condoms, just as many of our junkies cannot be bothered with cleaning out their works before communally shooting up. In the meantime, people keep dying from diseases that they CANNOT avoid.

Now, as a general matter, are jews prejudiced? Sure we are! Only fools destined for the dustbin of history are not prejudiced. It is prejudice that keeps groups apart, and therefore racially distinct. We jews are among the most tribal folks on earth (racism is but one form of tribalism). Officially, we like to keep our bloodlines pure, which is why we erect such lofty barriers to outsiders as insisting that the men chop off a piece of their peckers before joining up. This helps preserve our intellectually superior genes, which is what gives the average jew his uncanny ability to make money and influence others. In short, Jews are racist because as the world's most intellectually gifted people (but certainly not gifted in most other ways), we know just how inferior the rest of the world is to us, and we want to retain our cognitive edge. We enjoy controlling the movies you watch, the newspapers you read, the porn your boyfriend jerks off to and the Federal Reserve System to boot, and we want to keep things that way.

Kendra, you seem very young and naive (which is why Luke likes you). You are not one of those white chicks who would have sex with an O.J. type, are you? Keep in mind that Luke is no less racist than his mentor, Dr. William Pierce, or Nobelists James Watson and William F. Shockley. You must be willing to deal with the entire package. There is more to Luke than mere fame and wealth; there is a very deep racialist thinker hidden in there as well. Deal with it. And maybe in the fullness of time, you will come around to the Luke F-rd view of the world. I know I have.

PS Do not accuse ME of being a bigot - I was one of the jews who marched alongside the negroes in Selma in the early 60's, and I donate money to the NAACP and the Democratic Party (Go Hillary!), so I am no bigot.

Vancouver Kendra replies: Yes Chaim, I suppose I am a bit naive.

I was born and raised in British Columbia. An only child of doting parents who did all that they could to shelter me from the "bad" things in the world. I suppose I have idealistic views on a vast number of issues. Having said this, I still can not truly believe that Luke is racist. I think he stirs the pot because, that is in fact the essence of what he does. Devil's Advocate if you will...or, perhaps I am just being idealistic about him. You mention that Luke is not about fame, and I must point out that that is not what drew me to him (and I assume that you are being facetious about the wealth part) I did not write Luke as a result of seeing him on television. In fact, as I have just told Luke, I did not remember his name from the documentary. I was actually vaguely interested in another aspect of the documentary. I was poking around the internet, and came upon Luke's site as a result. I wrote him more or less to ask him about his alternate life as the Ansel Adams of firearm self-portraits. It was odd, as I am not in the habit of writing strangers. At any rate, it went on from there. Not exactly unique I know, but there you have it.

So, am I in dire straights? Do you think that my naivety in this matter will result in personal future pain? I would be curious to hear more of your opinions. -oh, what did you mean by asking if I was one of those "chicks" who would like OJ type men? Do I have a fetish for African American men? (or) Do I have a fetish for twisted murderer types? In fact, I harbour no fetish for either group.....just men with mild Aussie accents who like to portray themselves as helpless, torn and conflicted souls.

I talked to John Douglas from TalkingBlue.com.

Ultraindy: Well we probably wont cover the awards show, but we will shoot the convention part.
Ultraindy: In addition to making sure all the tech stuff is prepared (cameras, film, batteries, etc.), I have to mentally prep myself for it.
Ultraindy: Plus, like yourself, I am not quite the Spring Chicken I once was.
Ultraindy: I have to prepare myself physically for all the walking about and carrying camera gear.
Ultraindy: So the two weeks before the show(s), I go out and walk each night.
Ultraindy: Carrying a bookbag full of heavy stuff.
Ultraindy: And doing a lot of stretching.
Ultraindy: As you know, there is a lot of me to stretch.
Ultraindy: So how are things in Luke Land these days?
Luzdedos1: i have enjoyed the avn bashing
Ultraindy: I am beginning to think that there will be peace in the Middle East before there is a cease fire between you and AVN. Luzdedos1: you sound contented and domestic
Ultraindy: Contented and domestic? You make it sound like I got my balls cut off...
Luzdedos1: you did, But it is good for you, you're nicer this way
Ultraindy: I also got a copy of a porn movie that I was asked to pass along to you. The latest Mila movie from DangerBoy Video. They feature Dave and I in it prominently. They whored us in their movie so that we will beat the promotional drum for them.
Ultraindy: All it took was Evelyn. It took multiple lawsuits to turn you into a softy.
Luzdedos1: Do you have a bestiality collection? I bet mine's bigger
Ultraindy: Nah, we have two dogs and two cats, so rather than the videos, we put on our own live animal sex shows.
Ultraindy: And with Ev being a vetenarian, we can always get the hot new talent.

I Love Saying The Word 'Whore'

I love saying the word "whore." It's been rolling off my tongue frequently lately. I love feeling superior to others and denigrating them. It's a huge psychological need for me, stemming from my insecurities, I suppose. I think the real reason that I write on pornography is that I fear and hate women, and thus love to see them degraded.

Excuse me a minute while I view ten black parolees gangbang a white wench.

Lynne writes: Yes, you've sexualized the loss of your mother. You didn't spend enough time on the breast. And you'll never move on as long as you receive attention for acting out your needs. Do you find "whore" more euphonious than "harlot" or "slut?"

Luke: Yes.