Home

Back to Essays



Monday, November 13th, 2000

Luke On Lovebytes

I will be a guest on the Bob Berkowitz show "Lovebytes" on Eyada.com at 8PM PST tonight. The topic of the discussion will be the following. What profound points should I make?

Rumdar writes: Luke.. I am listening to you on the Bob Berko Show. I see you stared out with your "I Am A Conservative Republican" shtick. It pains me to see you on the wrong side on the barricades with fellow hypocrites like Jim Baker, Swaggart, Bob Livingstone, Newt, that football player (whose name I can't remember) who refused to shake Clinton's hand and was indicted for raping his 17 year old baby-sitter. AND every other phony so called conservative who claimed one thing and was then caught in a motel with a hooker. Luke...it is not to late to save your soul. You and Bob were rather boring with the political talk. Smut would have been a more interesting topic...

Isabella writes: So Luke, How odd it is to listen to you speak, and to know what I knew all along...you are a rather brilliant boy. Your duplicitous nature is such a puzzle, and yet I would be lying if I said it didn't appeal to me. I just tuned into the radio program (yet another first for me at the hands of you). Ironic, as you mentioned our email conversation. I sit here and yearn for that level of intelligent conversation. I would love to discuss religion with you; I would love to pick your brain. However, I hear your voice, and I revert to teenage giggle mode. I guess it is the novelty of it all, or perhaps it is the fact that it goes against my own self perceptions.

In lieu of the last comment on the program, Trudeau said, and I am paraphrasing, that the state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation. He was I great man...I really hope that you have some knowledge of him. Does any of this make sense? I fear I am being loquacious yet again.

Luke replies: It all makes sense...except i do not have a high regard for trudeau... He was an immoral womanizer, though that is not why I diss him... Yes, it would be nice to have real in person interactions with you...we're missing the nuance and expressions and the physicality that make up genuine interaction.

Gore Carries The Porn Belt

Pete DuPont writes for OpinionJournal.com: But in the Oct. 23 New York Times appeared a shaded map of the United States that bore an eerie resemblance to Tuesday night's results. In an article headlined "Technology Sent Wall Street Into Market for Pornography," the map shows by region the percentage of sex movies in the home-video market. Mr. Gore carried the areas with the highest percentages (40% on the West Coast and 37% in New England and the Middle Atlantic states); Mr. Bush carried the area with the lowest percentage (14% in the South), and they split the rest of the country that had middling sex movie percentages.

It sounds ridiculous, but there's a grain of truth in those comparisons. Mr. Bush carried married voters 53% to 44%, led by a similar margin in homes with children under 18, and won the "religious right," 79% to 18%. He won the South 54% to 44% and lost the Northeast 37% to 56%. His was a culturally conservative vote. And character did matter: Among voters who said they wanted an honest and trustworthy president, Mr. Bush won 80% to 15%. People who attend church weekly backed Mr. Bush 57% to 40%.

Democracts & The Single Woman

Dennis Prager writes for the National Review. Here's an excerpt: One explanation is that the Democratic party offers itself — and the government — as the protector of, and provider for, millions of single women. The Democratic party offers its governance as a surrogate husband — and it is so regarded by many unmarried women. Most women have a primal desire to be protected, and, if they have children, to have their children protected.

To make this observation is neither insulting nor sexist, any more than it would be insulting or sexist to speak of men as being innately more physically aggressive or less naturally inclined to monogamous commitment. Whether because of evolution, socialization, nature , divine design, or an amalgam of all of these, women have a powerful need to feel secure (the shift of American priorities from liberty to security can be regarded as one example of the feminization of American society). For the vast majority of women in history this need was met through marriage. That is why almost no woman marries "down." Virtually every woman wants a man who meets her primal desire for a protector/provider. This is why it is often so difficult for a professionally successful woman to find a mate. There are few single men more successful than she is, and most of those men are quite happy (indeed often prefer) to marry women who are far less successful than they are.

The Democratic party regularly uses the rhetoric and offers the promises of a protecting husband: "I will take care of you"; "I will fight for you"; "I will fight for your children." We will provide your child's health care, we will provide day care, we will provide pre-school education. We will do most everything for you and your children that a husband would. This has long been viewed as one of the reasons for the absent husbands and fathers that plague the black inner city — the need for them has been reduced thanks to welfare and government.

Mr Ford - The World Praises Your Keen On-The-Spot Guidance

Modern chicken factory for poultry sex commissioned

Pyongyang, November 13 -- An ultra modern chicken factory was commissioned for the satisfaction of workers inclined towards fowl copulatory activities.

The factory called chicken factory no. 112 is located at the foot of a mountain on the east coast. Figures 112 mean Nov. 2. On Nov. 2 this year Pornographer Luke F-rd gave on-the-spot guidance to the completed factory and on the same day last year a ground breaking ceremony of the factory was held.

The factory covers an area of over 25,000 square meters. The factory looks picturesque as its buildings stand at the foot of a hill near a lake, tree-lined roads stretch in its compound and it has nice fences.

Celeste's Breasts

Lewis writes: Luke, I'm watching this video clip from a.b.m.e, and I must be witnessing part of the long, slow demise of Celeste. In this clip, she's f---ing Rocco. What I want to know is, what the hell happened to her tits!? Back when she was doing Felicia a million years ago, she had two of the best augmentations I'd ever seen. Now she's got worse scars than the horrid skank in "The Blue Fox". Each boob looks like a smiling cyclops, and everytime she gets a little athletic I expect one of her tits to rip open and dump a silicone load on Rocco's face. And to top it all off, she doesn't look any bigger in the chest than before. Is this all just built-up scar tissue, or did she visit some real butcher?

Luke: To the best of my knowlege, she retired years ago.

John writes: Luke, What has happened to Sindee Coxx? Is she still in the biz? Haven't heard much about her lately....

Luke: She married Barry, the English cameraman who used to be married to Trinity Loren. And she's still working in front of the camera.

Playboy & Brandy Alexandre

Brandy Alexandre writes: Luke, does this seem strange to you? I was applying to new merchants to add to my website (http://kamikaze.org/sponsors.html), focusing on merchants that would be relevant to the site or useful to surfers. I've gotten some really cool places that expressed some concern about the nature of the site, but could clearly see that it was "clean." After trying a few times I finally got Pets.com (which turned around and went out of business, I swear it's not my fault!), Sharper Image didn't even question it, and eNews worked with me about a linking problem. BUT... the Playboy Store turned me down flat! It doesn't make any sense. Their form letter said, "Thank you for your interest the Playboy Store Affiliate Program. Unfortunately, at this time we have determined that your site does not meet Playboy Online's criteria for membership...." It directed me to a link that described what they consider unacceptable and my site doesn't fall under any of it. PLUS, my website is a Playboy Pick-of-the-Day! Have they forgotten that as glossy as they paint themselves, they're pandering naked pictures just like the rest of them? I dunno. If you want to subscribe to Playboy, do it through eNews from my site. :) Other than that, after looking more closely at their store, I can't see much else that anyone would want to buy that they can't get from a less hypocritical merchant. Being addicted to the Playboy logo notwithstanding.

BrandyAlx1: Are you really going to discuss Viagra? Chime in that it creates a psychological dependence that can rival no other since it ties directly to once sexuality and related sense of masculinity and self-worth. No porn star who uses it is a true professional nor a porn star.

Viagra Causes Impotence?

The husband of actress Zsa Zsa Gabor filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, the makers of Viagra, saying the drug has left him impotent. Prince Frederic von Anhalt, 59, claims he can no longer become aroused without the drug, and it's driven 83-year-old Zsa Zsa to seek therapy.

Goddess writes: You should be "on top" of this story, Luke! How long before many of our "great" (cough, cough) porno actors are totally impotent because of Viagra?

The World's Most Important Website

Amused writes: Dear Mr. Ford, I invite you and your readers to peruse the most important web site in the short history of the internet! Finally, a web site that gives men meaningful insight into our favorite subject. The full potential of the internet to educate and enlighten has been fully realized today. Amen. Click here: All About My Vagina

Heather Barron On The Road Again

Heather Barron writes: i wont be back in LA til wed. how about next week lukey? ps. traveled 13 states in 8 days and decided after seeing jenna on hotel tubes, that i would much like to have wild hot sex with her. any leads on that pussy? :O)

Luke Gets Mail

John writes: A misinformed soul told you recently that Xpics no longer buys traffic. Xpics not buying traffic? ha! Luke, my man, here you go... http://www.puref---.com

Rumdar writes: OK, Then take my approach when I am feeling spiritual (very rarely). Don't say anything at all. You don't have to say anything in the beginning. If she brings up futuristic subjects like marriage, kids, condos, cars, money either grunt or shift the conversation to something else. Incidentally I was talking about Persian women with my Jewish buddy from Fla. (who knows Ron Levi) He indicated they are impossible to boff unless you are a fellow Persian. There is even a name. Can't remember. Something like NG or DT (don't touch) He told me they only give it up for shifty looking fellow Persians Jews who wear lots of gold jewelry.

Chaim writes Luke: Remember, all the gedolim of the jewish world from Moses to Spielberg have preferred the shiksa to the jewess. (Considering the women you have access to, don't you now feel pretty stupid for having pined after aging spinsters? Clearly you must not have been in a healthy frame of mind when coveting the attention of those jewesses. Again, you are far better off with a nice young gentile girl.)

Krome writes: To Luke I notice that alot of people feel a need to criticise you and your site. I find it informative. Your style of writing I find amusing and yet stimulating. You report information sourced from third parties and try to report an accurate description of the situation. The reason why you are probably criticised, in my opinion, is because some people probably went to their legal advisors maybe looking at court action and were then informed due to your writing style it would be highly costly to win as you report what other people usually say. Well f--- it if you weren't so popular no-one would give a f---, it is just that because everyone reads you it probably f---s with there egos knowing that the rest of the world now knows there business.

A Voice Crying In The Wilderness

Brent writes: Luke, You seem to be one who hangs on the fringes of this business and therefore one who could do some good for the world by pointing out and condemning the corruption and abominations. Instead, looks like you are being sucked into the same darkness with those actually producing and acting. Repent from you ways before it is too late. Stay true to your Jewish values. (I am Christian, not Jewish.) Make no mistake about it . . . there will come a day of accountability . . a day of judgment. I know that most in your industry, perhaps even yourself, will not want to hear what I have to say . . . but it is not too late to turn back. I dare you to put this on your page!

The porn industry is clearly DISHONEST at its heart. For "the love of money," evil men "lead captive silly women laden with with sins, led away with divers lusts." The great creator and author of life (known to some as God) must mourn and feel angry. These women have been given life itself in a beautiful world, beautiful bodies, the power to procreate children of their own and to raise and love them with a husband in a loving relationship. They have the opportunity to chose good or evil, or in other words, to chose happiness or sorrow, or ultimately life or death. They can grow in character and nobility by choosing the good.

[Michael Raven interjects: Luke, where do you find these guys? Are you suggesting that the only moral purpose for sex is procreation]

Instead, for money they go against their true natures and needs and chose to promote and fulfill the lascivious, perverse fantasies of evil men. An intimate relationship between a man and woman can compliment and bind a true love that is based on selfless sacrifice.

[Michael Raven: Same old, tired altruistic philosophies. Ahh, the endless carousel of self sacrifice where noone can ever satisfy themselves because they are too busy making others happy. When this type of "party" is over, the selfless one looks around and sees the mess left from everyone else and realizes than her/his "party" guest have just had a very good time at her/his expense. Gee, how fulfilling to be USED in such a manner.]

Porn prostitutes this proper use to be nothing more than cheap, sensational merchandise. The purveyors of this entertainment promote big lies and outright sexual misinformation , such as:

Sex is a violent act where women enjoy being abused verbally and physically, and even degraded

[Michael Raven: Violence is by definition a NONCONSENSUAL act. If a woman prefers physically rough sex play, that is not violence. Degradation is contextual. It cannot be degrading is the parties consent. What you might personally find degrading isn't necessarily degrading to other. Keep in mind that adult films are for entertainment purposes. No different than any other film, except in content. The context is the same. No one is suggesting that behavior in adult films is something to be emulated. Exercise the same judgement you would while watching any other genre.]

Women prefer just about any abomination imaginable to vaginal intercourse

[MR says: The overwhelming majority of women in this country enjoy allot of sexual activities other than vaginal intercourse. Women love oral sex, toys , anal sex and even bondage and role-playing. If you consider these activities to be abominations, then it is you that has the problem.]

Women are ready for sexual action with little or no foreplay or even kind, loving words

[MR: Sometimes women are ready for sex with little or no foreplay, so what's the problem?]

Adult men who have been married for any time to wives that they care about will be able to see through the lies. But you perform a great disservice to those who may be confused about their sexuality and the nature and needs of women. This is particularly true for young men who are learning about relationships between men and women and what a relationship with a husband and wife can and should be. Many of your customers are young, single men in their teens and early twenties. Out of ignorance, deceit, greed, indifference, or all four, porn promotes these big lies to those who are most vulnerable. Come out of the darkness into the light. Wickedness never was and never can be happiness. It will bring only sorrow and despair. Repent now while in the days of your probation on this earth . . . before it is eternally too late. Luke, you can be an HONEST voice in a corrupt industry.

A voice of warning crying from the wilderness.

Michael Raven replies: I have been married to the same woman for 12 years. I love her deeply, but obviously do not share your views. You seem to think that you hold an exclusive monopoly on the truth regarding the nature of man/woman relationships. I can assure you that you do not. Your narrow minded views expose your ignorance. It is evident from your comments that you are envious of others who enjoy relationhips with a woman and can enjoy healthy, experimental sex, role-playing, fun sex games and other activities that every human should be given the opportunity to experience. Perhaps you secretly desire a woman that TRUSTS you enough to let her inhibitions go and explore the limitless sexual freedom that humans can share.

You cling to an antiquated value system. One that cannot hold up under the scrutiny of logic. Your bible is rife with contradictions and double standards. Consider King Soloman, a man considered by Christ himself to be the "Father of Wisdom". Soloman enjoyed the company of over 700 concubines. I can only imagine the sex drive of this man and I seriously doubt that pro-creation was on his mind.

p.s. Brent, if you despise this industry so much, why are you reading this sight?

Luke Helplessly In Grip Of Porno

Frankel writes: I'll bet you agree 100% with Brent's assessment of yourself and your behavior. You create confusion by failing to distinguish between ego syntonic and ego dystonic sexual behaviors. You have said repeatedly that porn makes you feel bad about who you are. The correct psychiatric term for behaviors incompatible with an acceptable concept of oneself is "ego dystonic". I suggest you clarify your future personal discussions on masturbation, porn, etc. by being honest and clear with us in stating whether these behaviors make you feel bad about who you are, admitting when you feel compelled to perform sexual behaviors which are in fact ego dystonic for you. I wonder if you are suggesting that you are out of control of your own sexual behaviors in relation to porn and helpless to stop? The chart at http://www.mhsource.com/pt/p960627table.html may help.

Luke says: I do think that any form of sexual expression outside of monogamous heterosexual marriage is a sin. Including masturbation. It does not live up to the ideals of any major Western religion.

Yes I do masturbate but I don't feel racked by guilt over this. I simply accept that I am not living up to the ideal.

When I whack my carrot to pornography, I am also deviating from Judaism's sexual ideal. Afterwards I sometimes feel sticky and slightly tawdry, particularly if the pornography in question was of a low moral level, such as Max Hardcore.

But I do not feel out of control of my own sexual behaviors. And I do not feel helpless.