Saturday, July 1st, 2000
Cheyenne Silver Update
Shaggy writes: Luke; Just a little information for about Cheyenne Silver and your sources last week. I know for a fact that shes been serious with a person also working in the industry for a few years now. I wont mention his name but we all know him. Last I heard they were living happily together in the Valley somewhere. I've worked with both of them and they seem happy and in love.
I did hear that she does had some friend who claims to be her boyfriend but he's nothing more than some chump who begs for money at the local malls and freeway offramps: the caring girl that she is simply feels sorry for him and gives him handouts and a few scraps of bread now and then. She's always been the rescuer who takes in stray and sick animals. She's a giver. Lets hope she doesn't catch rabies. Just a word to Cheyenne-time to let go of that bum! He reminds me of the homeless guys Howard Stern brings on his show. Im sure you can find a bed for him at the Mission downtown or better yet just take him to your local Veterinarian and have that old dog to sleep.
Lucky Smith?? Well, more power to him! Haha! Im sure Lucky was amused by that lil piece of (crap) gossip.......don't ya just love it? As they say, any gossip is good gossip. And yes, Lucky. you are a giver ............. if you could only get your nose out of those books for more than a few minutes!!
Exclusive First Photo Of Luke's Arrival in the Holy Land
Free of legal hassles and death threats, a jubilant Luke (with his Jewish singles group) celebrates arrival in the Holy Land!
I celebrated my Bar Mitzvah at the Wailing Wall then partied with friends afterwards in Jerusalem.
Porn Makeup
Eden Rae (Edenrae.com) writes on RAME: Yes there are a few such products out on the markey now. they are pricey and marketed mainly toward movie makeup artists/studios. i own the full airbrush system and its a breeze if you are at all artistically inclined. They have about 30 or 40 shades of foundation, plus some cool colors & metallics. You can custom blens from there. The makeup is light but covers naturally and opaquely. Its smooth and water resistant (holds up for about 25 to 30 minutes when immersed..splashing it with water doesnt bother it at all). It doesnt rub off either. Its applied with an airbrush, and so requires some skill. Whole set up ran me about $900, but for mainstream modeling gigs and such, its worth it. Much better than dermablend or any of that stuff. There is another company that from what I gather custom blends your shade in the store and then fills a can and pressurizes if for you so you can get the airbursh effect, sort of, without needing an airbrush.
White Aryans In Las Vegas
Arnold Potter writes: Just wanted to give you a heads up Luke we will be in vegas next month protesting the defaming of white woman. We have identified certain companies and we will picket them. This will be peaceful and lawful. We do have this right and we will get our message across. We look forward for the support of Many good White Aryans in our cause.
Mr Marcus Denies He's Jewish
Black porn star Mr Marcus writes on MrMarcus.com: "Jewish? hmmm all I did was eat a few bagels and cream. But on a porn set it's all they got."
Is He Or Isn't He? No! Not Gay, But Jewish?
Aghast writes: So Luke, is Mr. Marcus on your singles tour of the Holy Land or not? He should be as easy to spot as the proverbial "Hebrew in the wood pile." Just look on the tour bus for a big black guy with his yarmulke on backwards "Compton Style."
Luke: No, Mr Marcus is not gay, but yes, he is on my tour in the Holy Land.
Elsewhere on MrMarcus.com, Colorless writes: We all need to pity the DEEP ROOTED IGNORANCE that generates controversy about interracial love. But that is life, there are people who are condemned to remain in darkness permanently.
Porngal writes on MrMarcus.com: What do these gals have in common? Jenna j, Stacy Valentine, Jill Kelly, Serenity, Nikki Tyler, Jenteal, Asia. They are rich, classy, successful, have all gone mainstream (movies and e channel) and don't do interracial, they know with doing interracial the bottom line is you have everything to lose and nothing to gain...
Dick Clark: Jesus Christ! Anti-Black, Anti-Woman, Anti-Gay, Anti-Semetic! Where do you guys come from? Can't you access some skinhead website for like-minded ignorant bigots and leave us alone? What you say about others only tells us about you. Get some help. Projecting your self-hatred onto others will not help you to grow up. Do you know how to read? read a book. It would do you a world of good. Now....leave us to our pleasures and go back to your comic books.
John Rocker: Luke.. Dick Clark: Jesus Christ! who is this guy and what is he doing on your site? What a jerk. He probably hangs out with guys with purple hair, queers with aids, unmarried 20 year old chicks with four squalor kids and foreigners. f--- him....
Nowiggerz writes: To wigger dana and wigger dick anti-women?anti-black,etc?...none of the above...just a southern democrat, college-educated white male who's tired of politically correct bulls--- and misogynist wiggerz like yerselves...read a book, dick?...read your dictionary-it's spelled anti-semitic, you dolt...I heard of this website through my man Cool Hand Luke's site and decided to bop over and tweak you silly wiggerz and community-college computer lab using moolie-worshipping fools...
Doug: yo. every time i try to tap the bootie of some sexy dude after i've huffed down a spliff or sniffed some glue i can't seem to maintain erectibility.. dig it..? it's like i can't bring the sausage to the frying pan.. How do you get over this Mr.Marcus..
Lynne Gets Mail
Youtamer writes: Dearest Lynne, That was quite a courageous thing you did yesterday although most of Lukes readers more than likely missed it. I think Chaim would agree that, if spiritual peace were a persons goal, this would be a large step down the right path. Forgive me if this sounds presumptous, but I also believe that your husband, wherever he is, and whatever else he may be feeling, is very proud of you, and If he could tell you himself, he would thank you for giving him a measure of peace as well.
Women With Cats
Rumdar writes: Luke.. Is the shrink telling us anything we guys don't already know? Women with any kind of pet (excluding goldfish) can forget relationships much less marriage. One women I briefly knew wanted me to get in bed with her and the Doberman. Another had a Pug. The little bugger would burrow in whenever we were making out looking to initiate a canine threesome. When I stuck him in the bathroom he howled like a banshee until we let him out. Then he jumped back on the bed looking for action. One buddy had his suit pissed on by a jealous cat. Another was boinking a gal on her livingroom couch when her canine took a s--- a foot away from the battleground. He dressed and exited quick/fast. I have choked down dinners inches from a superfund site litter box. While I was gagging the lady was smiling and asking if I wanted more wine. Wine? Where is the gas mask? Don't you smell anything? Prager's psychiatrist was right on. But he is not telling intrepid foot soldiers anything we have not already experienced on the front lines.
Genuine Female Orgasms
MsMulatto writes on RAME: Unless one believes a significant percentage of female orgasms depicted on celluloid are genuine, I don't see how one could conclude that watching thousands of porn tapes gives one any insight into what a genuine female orgasm looks or sounds like.
Pat Riley: My dick perks up and tells me. It's a question of being able to tell the real from the fake by the normal methods we use all the time in our social intercourse with other humans. How do you tell that the used car dealer's, "Would I sell you a lemon?" "This car is a great bargain." "You're really my friend, not just a customer." are as fake as his clip-on tie? By the experience of meeting and talking to lots of people, by understanding the motivation of the used car dealer, by the reputation of the group to which he belongs, etc. There's no absolute standard such that you can say "When he uses the word "lemon", he's lying but if he avoids it, he's telling the truth," but rather a combination of factors, some unconscious, that incline one to true or false.
Even the most naive virgin male knows something about the female and her view of sex which he picks up from the world around him. Unfortunately the world doesn't concentrate on the female's orgasm truth; only in the porno movies and similar can he obtain a feel of that area and his truth/false decision, given the lack of visible or audible reliability, usually will come from the individual performer's reputation for veracity that he sees on the screen. Paradoxically, the more he sees of an individual girl and the more he knows about her the less likely she is to be believed, thus the importance of new girls.
MsMulatto: Real-life experience is a better barometer (assuming one has ever been with a woman having a genuine orgasm, of course), but the fact is, men can't ever be certain based on the isolated example of an individual woman's "performance." (Combine that with the fact that women's response to orgasm varies considerably.)
Pat Riley: I don't think so because I don't think that in real life any male can really tell if the female is having an orgasm or is just faking it. Most of the time sex occurs in darkness or semi-darkness with the male in a position where he's unable to see the parts of the body that involuntarily change to indicate arousal (we're not even to orgasm, just arousal), he can't see her face, and her voluntary movements are easily faked. About the only thing he has going for him is the post- or pre-coital desire expressed verbally and that only works when he knows the girl very, very well.
Unfortunately I must also agree with the feminist/sexual liberation crowd who posit that many women have never had an orgasm and (my interpretation) wouldn't know one if they fell over it. (I don't agree that this is the male's fault though; it's the way females are built.) The latter runs counter to the male's view of copulation where, while the lead-in is pleasant, it pales into insignificance in comparison to the big kahuna, the final ejaculation (presuming it's not the tenth of the night as I discussed in my earlier post). IOW the real-life female may well be content with the nice warm feeling of arousal (so you'll see, if you looked, the involuntary signs of arousal) but because she knows that the male is looking for the big O she's willing to, and frequently does fake it. Asking the girl afterwards however, is a big mistake since it puts her on the spot and is likely to result in a lie. Witrock and even Ed both of whom should know better, are guilty of this. I do agree however, that the individual response varies widely both between females and on different occasions for the same female.
> So as Pat says elsewhere in his snipped post, if it looks real >to you, that's what counts. I also agree with him that you're probably more >likely to see authentic female orgasms in some amateur stuff.
Riley: Aw, gee, I got something right
The sound in the interview portion is poor and although Ed asks her to speak up, she really doesn't. At this point I wasn't very interested anyway, especially as the others in the tape and in most of Ed's tapes lately seem to be minority unmarried mothers fresh from the maternity wards. Julie's body doesn't indicate a child at home but of course, the absence of the telltale clues doesn't guarantee absence of the fact searched for. A child at home is to my mind an important factor, as are hovering husbands and SO's, because they indicate an unlikelihood that the girl is just having a fun time (even though she's being paid) so in both cases she's less likely to have an orgasm as a result of casual sex.
Even without a detailed understanding of what she was saying the general impression was that Julie was a nice and therefore probably truthful girl. She talks about her masturbation fantasies and then masturbates for Ed and us. It looks like she does actually masturbate in real life (unlike many of them) but I wouldn't see her performance as erotic or that she had an orgasm or that she was even particularly aroused.
She comes back in #137 (according to the dates this was actually shot before #136) and starts off with some more masturbation. Ho, hum, especially as she does some of this on her front and you can see her labia are closed up as tight as a drum (a good sign of lack of arousal). Then Ed dry humps her in doggie (disgusting) fortunately without taking off his clothes. At this stage the FF button is getting a workout and it only slows down momentarily when he takes off his clothes and starts screwing her for real. The camera is on the tripod (no cameraman) and the sex is rather disjointed so I'm thinking "waste of time" but then when he starts doing missionary I slow down and my dick starts to take notice. Hmmm. This might be worth watching--finger off the FF--and indeed it is. Her movements become in time with Ed, her nipples seem to be erect, her eyes are shut, her breathing is heavy without being exaggerated, (Ed by this time is down on top of her in contrast to his normal "L" position), her hands grab Ed's hips and her legs clutch his body. Finally Ed straightens up to his "L" position and he pulls out to let loose a load over her body. She continues with her heavy breathing and (this is one of the things I like about Ed) he seizes the opportunity to start sucking on her pussy (don't forget the camera is on the tripod), she pulls back, and then he pulls her body forward to him. Eventually (a few seconds) her breathing returns to normal and Ed stops.
Ed asks, "How was that?" or similar and she replies that she's still distracted by the cameras and the lights, and then Ed makes the mistake of asking, " How many orgasms did you have?" Aww, Ed, NO! She looks a little embarrassed and says, "Two," and then mutters something further about the environment. Personally I don't believe the "Two". I believe that she was on the way to an orgasm--highly aroused--but her first statement was correct. The cameras and the lights prevented fulfillment which I think Ed realized because he extinguished some of the lights and said that that's how it would be with only ambient lighting. Looked a lot better to me without the reddish hue characteristic of a quality porn production (as voyager would say).
So it's a hard call as to whether Julie had an orgasm but even without, it's a good scene especially near the end.
Rumdar: Luke.. After years and years of boinking Jewish women I believe I have discovered when they are having an orgasm. The snoring ceases and the right toe vibrates just a little. It happens quickly so you have to be looking for it. When they start snoring again the orgasm is over.
Raincoat: hey luke in regards to real female orgasms i personally believe they are rare as hen's teeth in porno. that being said you need to check out the blake palmer scene in "breaking it 2; a story of virgins" i believe it depicts a real female orgasm and possibly proof of the elusive female ejaculation. sorry i don't know the girls name, movie is several years old.
Pat Riley: Raincoaters are a narrow interest group who are likely to be high renters (as I think Brandy was trying to point out). Their wishes will be reflected in the rentals but when video producers flood the market with raincoater porn, the rest of the population will be excluded. I.e., there's little for the rest to rent especially when the rest is a non-focused majority who are not fanatical about renting porn anyway.
Roger Pipe's Top Twenty
Roger Pipe writes on RAME: >This is a list of women who I consider to be at the very top of their >profession.
Pat Riley: Profession? If you said "The girls I'd most like to f---," it would be more useful; the "top of profession" sounds like it might be heavily influenced by promotion.
> To be on this list, a woman must have been in at least one >movie released since July of last year.
PR: Katie Gold was in Gutter Mouths #13 which was released in August or September 1999. The DOP is June and July 1999 and Legend include actual dates of videoing.
Dina Jewel was in "www.roccofunclub.com" which was released in September 1999.
Heaven Leigh was in Blowjob Adven. Fellatio #19 released in September or October 1999. Also Bobbi's BJ & Anal Sluts released in April 2000, also Fear & Loathing with Kid Vegas, also...hey too many to list.
Tiffany Minx = Damage is Done (August 1999), Nymphomercials (9/99), Perfect Smiles (9/99), Trash Talkin' Co-Eds (9/99) The only one you got right was Samantha Style.
> There are some big names at >the bottom who were rule ineligible this year because they either >didn't do a movie, or did only one that really can't be counted. For >those of you who are not familiar with the history of this list, >Samantha Stylle is the two time defending champ. I have also listed in >paranthasis last years raking for each woman.
>Top 20 for 2000
>1. Cherry Mirage (2)
PR: Hardly close to Jenna or the Vivid girls in "top of profession" category (most of your list aren't so I'll leave it alone from now on). If you want a pillow to go to sleep on, her body would be a likely candidate.
>2. Leanni Lei (3)
PR: Trashy Oriental whore who just goes through the motions.
>3. Linda Thoren (6)
PR: I really can't remember Linda. Has she actually done any movies in the last few years?
>4. Serenity (4)
PR: The chipmunk.
>5. Jessica Darlin (7)
PR: Her taste in husbands makes her a non-starter. The fact that she's married also kills her.
>6. Layla Jade (HM)
PR: Same deal on the marriage question. The body is OK but the eyes betray something or other (they're dead).
>7. Julie Meadows (9)
PR: Did she do some recent movie? OK body but hardly stirring to the gonads.
>8. Alana Evans (5)
PR: Slutty, willing to do anyone, even a raincoater
>9. Kristi Myst (N/A)
PR: You can't be serious. With her tits and her lack of life? She was OK back with Randy and Alex Sanders about 100 years ago.
>10. Alisha Klass (10)
PR: Pretty but worn out her welcome with too much pretend sluttiness.
>11. Monique DeMoan (N/A)
PR: About 50 years ago she was attractive.
>12. Tera Patrick (N/A)
PR: Too big.
>13. Tasha Hunter (N/A)
PR: No waist, cantaloupes, marginal face (I had to look her up she's so memorable).
>14. Ginger Lynn (N/A)
PR: Maybe in 1985.
>15. Trinity (N/A)
PR: Who the hell is Trinity? Movie?
>16. Nikki Andersson (13)
PR: Personality of a rock as with most Europeans. Too fat, now.
>17. Jeannie Rivers (N/A)
PR: Ah, now there's one we agree on. Pity she's SO'ed with that loser Tony Martino.
>18. Monique (8)
PR: Didn't you hear the message that Monique is ugly. So say us all. Personally I think she has a nice little body though. Too used and too whorish.
>19. Dee (17)
PR: Maybe in 1997. Dee has worn out her welcome but she's still OK as a supporting girl.
>20. McKayla Matthews (N/A)
PR: Is this the same as McKayla (small girl with thin body and small tits, pretty face)? If so OK; if not I don't know her.
>Honorable Mention- Charlene Aspen (N/A),
PR: Improved in the last year but then there's that husband and the knowledge that she has an infant at home.
> Asia Carrera (HM),
PR: Yikes! Old, worn out, flabby, poor attitude, pushy personality.
> Kim >Chambers (HM),
PR: Fat.
> Chloe(N/A),
PR: If you mean Chloe Nichole, a ball buster, poor actress, and ugly.
> Alex Dane(N/A),
PR: She hasn't done a movie in the time frame and anyway I hear she's hooking now. Maybe back in 1996.
> Tricia Deveraux(N/A) ,
PR: You really want to poke someone who has a sexually transmittable fatal disease? Besides too fleshy and a marginal face.
>Haven (N/A),
Don't know her.
> India (HM),
Nice little body and pretty. I'd f--- her but hasn't she retired?
> Jenteal (HM),
Cantaloupes, thick body. Maybe back in 1995.
> Sabrina Johnson (16), Like her compatriot, Layla Jade, husband-equipped and to much "in it for the bucks".
> Lola >(N/A),
A young Sharon Mitchell.
> Taylor Hayes(N/A),
Baby, that is she has one. Too fleshy.
> Envy(N/A),
OK, doesn't do anything for me but I can see some attraction.
> Silvia Saint (12), A European with no personality. Body wise, too fleshy.
>Temptress >(N/A)
Too big and too pushy. Isn't she an avowed lesbian, living with Malitia?
>Jade Marcala (N/A)
PR: Another Oriental going-thru-the-motions whore.
White Slave Trade
It must be divine intervention in my life. Shortly before flying to Israel Saturday night, I received my weekly rant from Nazi Dr. William Pierce, author of "The Turner Diaries" which inspired the Oklahoma City bombings by Timothy McVeigh. I made copies of the following to hand out to all the passengers on my El Al flight to stimulate discussion.
Dr Pierce writes: Today I have some new information I want to share with you. It is information on a subject I've discussed with you more than once in the past: namely, the Jewish trade in White female slaves. The reason this new information is noteworthy is that it comes directly from the horse's mouth, so to speak. It is from the June 16 issue of the Jerusalem Post -- actually, the Saturday supplement to the Jerusalem Post. In Israel, of course, they have Saturday supplements instead of Sunday supplements. The Jerusalem Post's documentary article on Israel's trade in White slaves, published just two weeks ago, is astoundingly frank and straightforward, and in today's broadcast I will read to you directly from the article.
You know, one of the biggest problems facing me or anyone else trying to inform the public in a way which contradicts the party line propagated by the television networks is credibility. I tell the average citizen something like, "In Israel it is legal to buy and sell slaves, as long as they aren't Jews. The slave trade is big business in Israel, and it's legal." The average citizen's response to this statement is: "I don't believe it. That can't be true. Everyone knows that Jews are liberals and are big supporters of human rights. They would never tolerate such a thing as the buying and selling of human beings in their own country. Don't you ever watch television? If you did, you'd know that Jews just aren't like that." That reminds me of the refrain from a hymn I used to sing in Sunday school when I was a child. It went something like: "This I know, for the Bible tells me so." Today, of course, television has replaced the Bible as the source of all truth for the great mass of people -- certainly for everyone who is incapable of looking at the world around him and reaching his own conclusions based on the evidence.
Actually, I believe that no amount of evidence will change the mind of a true believer in the TV religion, any more than it will change the mind of a Bible-believer. Get yourself a copy of the Jerusalem Post -- and it's available in the New York Public Library and in a number of other larger libraries around the country -- and show it to a true believer, and he'll still tell you that he doesn't believe it. He'll tell you it's a forgery. It can't be true, because it doesn't agree with what he's seen and heard from television. Anyway, here goes. I quote from the June 16 issue of the Jerusalem Post:
"Every year hundreds of women, and an unknown number of girls under the age of 18, are bought, sold, drugged, imprisoned, and forced to work as prostitutes in Israel's thriving sex industry. In countries such as Russia, Ukraine, Latvia, and Hungary, traffickers prey on desperate women. Facing poverty, the women are lured to Israel with the promise that they will make fabulous salaries working as teachers or caregivers.
"But when they come to Israel their passports and travel papers are taken away, in order to prevent them from leaving. They are raped and beaten. Trafficked women are treated as objects, as commodities to be bought and sold by pimps for thousands of dollars or held in debt bondage, forced to work to pay off large sums of money. Their "owners" imprison them in locked houses or apartments with barred windows. They can rarely leave the apartment and are prevented from going out unaccompanied. They are frequently abused, especially if they refuse to have sex with a customer or try to escape. . . . In brothels, massage parlors, and sex clubs throughout the country, these women "slaves" are subjected to violence, degradation, and terror. According to a report released last month by Amnesty International entitled 'The Trafficking of Women to Israel,' the country is rapidly becoming a major destination for sex trafficking and slavery."
Now, I should tell you that I am skipping around in this long article and reading you just bits and pieces. It is full of heart-rending stories about individual female slaves, and there's not time to read all of them to you. One of the stories is about Anna, a 31-year-old unemployed physics teacher from St. Petersburg. She was lured to Israel by a Jew who promised her good working conditions and $1000 a month, which was 20 times what her salary had been in Russia. Now I'll read to you exactly what the Jerusalem Post says about Anna:
"Anna arrived here in October 1998 on a tourist visa. She was met at the airport and taken to an apartment and locked up with six other women . . . [from eastern Europe]. She was auctioned twice and finally bought for $10,000. Taken to Haifa, she was held in captivity with two other women. The apartment in which she lived had bars on the windows."
Et cetera. The article goes on to say that the Jew who had bought Anna repeatedly reminded her that he knew where her family lived in St. Petersburg, and that he would harm them if she escaped or failed to obey his orders. Anna was not able to escape, but she finally was deported back to Russia by Israeli immigration authorities because her tourist visa had expired. Her former "owner" remains at liberty, and Anna remains in terror that he will one day show up again at her residence in St. Petersburg.
Then there is the story of a young woman from Belarus -- from White Russia. Again I read the exact words of the Jerusalem Post:
"Tatiana (not her real name) had been promised a job working as a cleaner in a hotel in Eilat. She was told the job would pay enough to support her mother and six-year-old son. In Eilat a man pretending to be from the hotel where she thought she was going to be employed took her to a brothel, where she was forced to work as a prostitute. She was told that she would have to repay her 'sale price' and travel costs. She tried unsuccessfully to escape and was finally freed after a police raid. She was held in Neveh Tirza. Three days after her arrest Tatiana found an anonymous note on her prison bunk threatening to kill her and punish her family if she spoke out about what had happened to her. She petitioned the chief of police but was told that the Israel Police cannot guarantee anyone's safety abroad. She testified in June 1999 and was deported later that month. . . . Her fate is not known. A police spokesman refused to comment on the case." End of Tatiana's story.
Now, listen very carefully, because we are getting to the real meat of this article. I will read you exactly what the Jerusalem Post says about the role of the Israeli government and Israeli law in this horrifying business. I quote: "In Israel prostitution is not illegal. Nor is there legislation against trafficking or slavery, though there is a law forbidding taking people out of the country by force. Police officials complain that in the absence of legislation their options are limited. . . ."
Now I'm skipping to another paragraph, and again I quote: "According to the statistics provided by the Israel Police, in 1997 between 500 and 600 police files were opened under Article 10 of the penal code, which covers prostitution and obscenity offenses. An unknown additional number of cases against traffickers and pimps were also opened under other sections of the penal code, for crimes such as assault, kidnapping, and unlawful possession of passports. And though the police have opened more than 1,100 files during the past three years, only 126 cases against men involved in trafficking have actually been brought to court. During the same period more than 1,200 women were deported from Israel. According to sociologist Esther Herzog, director of Shin -- "The Movement for Equal Representation for Women" -- in 1999 the police arrested more than 400 women but only 28 pimps. And even these minuscule numbers, she says, are probably inflated. Since there is no law here against trafficking in human beings or slave trading, it is impossible to know how many of the above cases were related to trafficking, and how many were connected to prostitution-related offenses, such as pimping or operating a brothel." End of quote.
I hope that you absorbed what I just read: There is no law in Israel against trafficking in human beings or slave trading -- and consequently there is a flourishing trade in White slaves in Israel today. I didn't write that, and it's not from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It was written by two female Israeli journalists and published two weeks ago in a prominent Jewish newspaper in Jerusalem.
You might wonder why such devastating information was published by a Jewish newspaper. There are a couple of reasons. First, the same feminism which the Jews push so enthusiastically in America has cropped up in Israel too. Jewish women always have resented the greater sexual attractiveness which Gentile women have for Jewish men. After all, there's not much a Jewess can do about her face or her personality. Too many Jewesses look like Ana Pauker or Madeleine Albright and swear like Madeleine Albright. These Russian and Ukrainian girls being forced into prostitution in Israel not only are better looking, but they are much softer and more feminine than Israeli women. I believe that there is no question but that Israeli Jewesses would like to see them out of Israel. They don't like the sexual competition, and as organized feminists they have enough muscle to be able to express their views in Israel's mass media.
That's one reason this article appeared in the Jerusalem Post. The other reason is that the Jews who publish the Jerusalem Post understand that there's no real danger that the Jews will be called to account for their slave trafficking. They understand that with their control of the mass media everywhere in the Gentile world, they can say whatever they want among themselves with little risk that the soccer moms or couch potatoes of America will ever hear about it; and if they do happen to hear about it, they won't believe it; and even if they do believe it they're too demoralized and spineless to do anything about it.
Want to try an experiment? Get yourself a xerox copy of the June 16 Jerusalem Post article from a library. If that issue has mysteriously disappeared by the time you get to the library, send me $25 for my time and trouble and I'll xerox my copy of the article and mail it to you. Take your copy of the article to the editor of your local newspaper. Send a copy to your congressman. Have your kid take it to his high school social studies teacher for class discussion. If you're a university student enrolled in a class in international relations or ethics or law or any subject relevant to this article, take it to your professor and ask him what he thinks about it. I'll guarantee you: not one of these people will appreciate having this matter brought to his attention. The newspaper editor and the congressman will already know about it, but they won't want to talk about it. The high school social studies teacher would prefer that your kid bring a case of live hand grenades to class for discussion. And the university professor will have visions of his chances for tenure evaporating if he can't get you to shut up and go away quickly. And as I said at the beginning of this program, the average lemming will find the whole issue unreal because he didn't see it on TV.
You won't even be able to embarrass a Jew with it. He'll just brazenly deny it and accuse you of "anti-Semitism." That, unfortunately, is the state of public and private morale in America today. That's why our civilization is going down the tubes. That's why Timothy McVeigh blew up the Federal building in Oklahoma City. It was the only way he knew to get people to look up from their ball games for a minute and pay attention to what's happening to their world.
So, why do I bother? I bother because between the ball-game fans at one end and the corrupt politicians and corrupt Christian preachers and corrupt newspaper editors at the other end there is an intelligent and responsible two percent or so of the population -- a moral two percent -- capable of understanding and caring about what the Jews are doing to our world and to our people. And these Russian and Latvian and Hungarian girls lured to Israel and forced into a life of slavery and degradation are our people. Among the moral two per cent of the U.S. population there are people who care as much as I do about the fact that their government sends billions of dollars a year to prop up a regime which permits beautiful, young White girls to be stripped, raped, beaten, put up on an auction block, and sold to whichever leering, swarthy, hook-nosed kike makes the highest bid. We fight wars to protect that regime from its Arab neighbors. We permit the kinsmen of those who make up that regime to control our mass media of news and entertainment. We condemn the Germans for trying to free themselves from such control. There are Americans who care about these things as much as I do. And by God, we intend to do something about these things, even if we have to do it Timothy McVeigh's way. I hope it doesn't come to that, but we will break the grip of these Jews and their collaborators on our society.
Luke Gets Mail
Tony writes: That nut William Pierce is something else. Its spooky that he walks around free like any average citizen. He makes this big stink about prostitution in Israel. There does seem to be a problem with the Russian mob these days but to call it slavery is really headache inducing. Thanks again, Luke, for exposing the bunghole for what he is.
Is This What Menopause Is Like?
Curious writes: Simmer down Lynne. During Wednesday's radio show I asked if you felt "exploited" when a twenty-something Rabbi ( older and an authority figure ) got you to blow him in a synagogue when you were only sixteen since I perceive that as an abuse. I hold an adult to a higher moral standard than that. You do not.
Curious, I should smack you for suggesting that somehow I should not have the gumption to support my own opinions because yours differ. "Simmer down" is a smarmy way of telling a woman to "drop it." "Drop it" out in the parking lot, buddy -- and maybe you'll have to be the one who backs down. But I forget -- you are afraid of pain and violence...
No one ever "got" me to blow them. I always begged to be allowed to blow them. How dare you insinuate that a person who is sixteen, who has been interacting as an adult for years on most levels, who asked over and over again to be legally emancipated by the court system so as to get away from crazy parents who were interfering in my ability to go to school and have a normal, teenage life, who, with the assistance of the administration at her high school, placed herself in an institution to get away from her family, cannot choose to blow a rabbi rather than some pud-pulling fellow sixteen-year-old who can't hang on to his orgasm long enough for me to get his dick in my mouth?
Curious, I hold adults including myself to far higher moral standards than you do, because I expect them to make decisions based on specific realities and not according to kneejerk prohibitions which may or may not be appropriate given the individual situation. I also seem to have had a lot more experience with sexuality, both adolescent and adult, than most people, incuding yourself, and so my sexual mores are far more complex than yours, forcing me to be more consciously ethical rather than less.
Speaking of ethics, it would never occur to me to deliberately print a bad photo of someone and make up an insulting smart ass remark about how the photo is an accurate representation of their looks and their life. Nor would it occur to me to make up an insulting, smart ass headline about how someone must be suffering from a condition of hormonal aging in order for them to hold specific opinions.
Curious: To your credit you clearly stated on the radio show that you do not intend to pursue a sexual ( yes, oral sex is sex ) relationship with your sixteen year old math whiz and for that I applaud you.
Lynne: I never stated that I ever intended to pursue any sort of sexual relationship with that minor or any minor. All I said was that I intended on initiating a potential sexual relationship with a person, but that when I found out that person was a minor, I was shocked and that I felt like an idiot. Mistakes are made. If I mistakenly ask a gay man, or a married man, out to dinner, and he is not interested or available to me, I have not committed a crime. If a seventeen year old looks nineteen, and I ask her out to a movie, I have not committed a crime. I have made a mistake.
At least my position, which is that adolescents do have very powerful sexualities, is more honest position than pretending that ALL ADOLESCENTS ARE ASEXUAL and that somehow, by deluding ourselves in this way, we can avoid the issue of what happens when the lines blur.
Curious: It just raises my ire whenever an adult of either sex makes any sort of sexual insinuation toward a child or adolescent. I really feel that in our society we adults do a hell of a job f---ing up young people's minds already without interfering with their sexuality too.
Lynne: If interaction between an adult and a young person constitutes interference, how do you justify positioning yourself as an authority figure and presuming to teach them anything? It's okay to give young people an inaccurate, self-serving picture of government, but for a seventeen year old girl to continue having sex with her boyfriend if he turns eighteen first should be a prosecutable offense? A mature sixteen-year-old boy dating an immature nineteen-year-old girl is illegal, but a mature fifty-year-old man dating a immature nineteen year old girl is legal. But which is more exploitative? Why is it okay to teach young people how to drive, but not to use a condom?
Consent laws are social constructs, peculiar to the place and time. I think that for the most part they work fairly well, but they are only guidelines, and the more restrictive they become, the more they are broken. Besides, to impose American upper-middle class mores on the rest of the world is rude! How can a woman be old enough to contract a marriage in Germany or Kentucky, but not old enough to do so in California? Because the age of sex-readiness is a value judgement, not an absolute.
You also want me to stop "praising Hardman's cock." See, Curious, the fact that the guy is a jerk doesn't mean he's a bad performer or a lousy lay. I have no need to "get back" at someone as incompetent at personal relationships as David. He has a career and I have no axe to grind. Best of luck to him -- may he survive a little longer in the cesspool. And meanwhile we can all see how nicely I treat my ex-friends...because a gal who slams her former lovers will do the same to her present lovers when the time comes...
I have come and gone from porn more than once, and may do so again. I left porn because I was bored, not because I was disgusted or found Jesus. Teachers, cops, nurses...anyone who does anything beyond the point where it ceases to be fun burns out. I have the guts to do whatever I want, because I don't adhere to someone else's pop morality. And unlike most, I have the BRAINS to reinvent myself whenever I want.
The entire l-keford.com community is basically welcome to everything in your personal life, if only because the exposure makes me think a little more about the consequences of what I do. Helps keep me straight to live in a fishbowl. I tell Luke everything. I love his masturbation diary. I am a pornographer. Sex is my favorite subject, my favorite recreation, my favorite pursuit. My vocation, my avocation, my obsession. There are no bikers, students, teachers or even Labradors in my hot tub. But also no algebra...anything but that...
Dear Chaim: Just what I need...to spend my energy pursuing a social life with people who are poorly socialized! You note that I "will have to be aggressive in finding your place amongst them, but will be rewarded for your aggression," but you forget that I have been told over and over again NOT to be aggressive, but to be feminine and modest and wait to be chosen....
Which is it? I thought "strong, aggressive and forceful" scared people! I thought I was supposed to be practicing "meek, mild and humble!"
I am sure that you are right, and that once I become a part of the group, the women will hate me as usual and the men will run like frightened rabbits as usual, but as you point out, there will be no Luke F-rd to distract me. (By the way, NICE girls do not go to conventions alone....conventions, movies, concerts... and even though I am not a NICE girl, I can't stand crowds. Having thirty thousand strangers all around me when I'm alone scares me to death, even when they're dressed as Klingons...)
