Sunday, June 25th, 2000
I Love A Parade
Chaim Amalek writes: I am back from my first outing at a Gay Pride event. That's right, I decided to follow your lead, come out of the closet, and see for myself how accepting homos could be of a morbidly obese fat old man. They were not. Now I feel very foolish, and have returned to the closet to live life as a straight man.
Some observations:
LOTS more POC (people of color) than I expected. Who would have thought that there were so many queer blacks and hispanics? I watch the WB all the time and never see them. The orientals I expected, but not the blacks. And their floats were usually the ones with the most irritating sound systems, blasting the worst music.
Gay people think everyone wants to see them almost naked, dancing like women.
There were a few young Dykes from the Dalton school (an ultra exclusive prep school rich Manhattanites send their kids to) I had the hots for (assuming them to be of age, of course). It is a shame that they are being led astray. How happy will they be in life as members of the Daughters of Bilitus?
AIDS was the dominant theme. No mention was made of starving gay babies in Africa, or wildings.
[I have a nasty comment to make here, but as I lack reliable information, I cannot make it. Luke, see how easy this is?]
Gay people love to strut about, and do not seem modest. Why is that?
Lesbians look like s--- mostly. Don't believe the view you are fed on the Howard Stern show or in porn - Dykedom is mostly for women who cannot get men.
I left midway through the parade, as the heat started to get to me (God did not favor these of his creatures with temperate weather), so perhaps things changed, but here are some more troubling observations. White folk marched with white folk, black with black, yellow with yellow. If gays cannot cross the color line, then what hope is there for the rest of us? And there seemed to be an ALARMING absence of identifiable jews about. Of course, it is possible that all the whites were Juden, but I doubt it. I saw floats from supportive Christian groups but none from jewish organizations. Has Gay Pride been co-opted by the extreme white racist right? I wonder . . . .
He's No Gene Ross
Curious reviews my book on Amazon.com: The book is ambitious in its scope, but gets bogged down in the minutia of the business side of the pornography industry. Ultimately it lacks what porn fans truly crave...graphic photos of women in humiliating sex acts. Overall a decent first effort.
Authentic Voice of the Porn Fan
Luke: I surfed over to MrMarcus.com to read the authentic voice of the porn fan.
What's Up With Byron Long And A Bitches?
T writes on MrMarcus.com: lexus taylot hayes juli ashton temtress stephanie swift missy etc have all sucked a black dick want to know have any of these bitches given my man byron a f---ing I want to know the hot bitches he f---ed and i hope they sucked his balls and he licked those white bitches asses i know he f---ed dyanna lauren but she aint all that
Monique Does Double Vag!
Lil Birdie writes on MrMarcus.com: I could not believe my eyes!! I was on a set today helping shoot Monique in her first gangbang. And that little gal did a double vaginal penetration. I'm still in shock! I knew she was good - but I didn't know she was that good. The movie will be coming out in the next couple of weeks from Four Devils. Got to see it!!
Dream Scene
MikeT writes on MrMarcus.com: Lex and Marcus playing pimps who break in new girls like Serentiy, jill kelly and stacy valentine, dp and facial for all...
Sad State of the Black Performer
Latrell writes on MrMarcus.com: the current crop of black actor is weak
sean [michaels] - way to old, please retire, limp, weak series with repeats, fake player, only his $ gets him gals.
tony everready - thug, fake gangster, ugly as s---
byron long - does guys up the ass, enough said.
Racism In Porn
Monkey writes on MrMarcus.com: I am really getting sick of hearing you niggers say "white boy this, white boy that, dont playa hate, yack yack yack" SHUT UP! We do not want our world to degenerate into a nigger culture where you spell player, 'playa'. No White women I know likes niggers, they always say they are very unattractive, that they look like gorillas.
As far as the Julia Ann, Sean scene goes, please....those were only pictures, cant you see?? And Not ONE, not ONE penetration picture, ironically wierd, isnt it? She never had sex with sean, on camera or off. And Kaylan Nicole, she doesnt find niggers attractive, and would probably never do one. GOOD!
All my white brothers out there, we must protest this interracial porn...Write, e-mail, whatever all the white porn acctresses and encourage them NOT to do interracial scenes. Explain there fame, and worth will drop, and that we will not support them further. Also, those that did do interracial scenes must never be supported. Ignore them, let them beg for jobs, let them dry up, and start walking the streets, just for money. Let them show up at a club, and dance to an empty audience.
Black men should support there black sistERS. Not keep going for white women. You Nigger men, make it hard for the black women to get into porn, cause no one wants to f--- them, not even there own "brothas". Whites ...Lets protest interracial porn on an international scale. And see to it that the careers of those that cross the racial lines suffer finacially, and morally. Thanks for your time, have a nice day :->
KKK writes on MrMarcus.com: For the life of me I can't figure out why you f---heads want to see beautiful white women with f---ing biscuit lipped jungle bunnies. Do you f---ing Africans think white pussy tastes better than watermelon? All you bastards should still be in my Pappy's cotton patch. Nobody wants to see Kathy Lee Gifford f--- Kunta Kintay!!!! Your name is Toby!!! Most 0f you Niggers are jailbird,s---tin' dick turd fags anyway!!!
Porn star Azlea Antistia writes on MrMarcus.com: What a sad thing.
It's the year 2000 right. Are we stuck in the past still? Black, white,
it doesn't stop there you are from somewhere you originated from some
other country. The word white is such an ignorate word. To whom ever
didn't have the balls to write there real name and say such crap on
this message board please if your beliefs are as you say don't be a
coward and hide behind some bulls--- letter like KKK. You yourself may
have white skin, but guarenteed your background is Europen and Europen
countries are the same as africa, spain, italy, etc.... People aren't
different only there backgrounds are. You are a discrace to your own
race
Danadane writes on MrMarcus.com: I challenge anyone to find a purely "white" person or a purely "black" person. If the ignorant, fearful rejects of society ever actually realize that probably more than half their family tree is made up of different ethnicities, they'd probably kill themselves. And as always, if you don't like what goes on here, move on. They don't call this the World Wide Web for nothing. I'm sure you could find somewhere else to be and leave us to take good care of Marcus.
Michael writes Luke: There is no RACISM in porn, Just one nigger to many. Those niggers in porn are living proof of the niggers are evolutionary throwbacks. Take a picture of Sean Michael, Tony Eveready, Mr Marcus, or Byron Long or all four pictures, they all look alike, Uggly as all s---. Put that picture next to a picture of a damn gorilla, in a zoo or wild, they look alike. Try with a orangutan, they look alike, try a chimpnazee, the chimpanzee looks better. Those nigger bitches don't look much better, maybe a littler cuter than the chipanzee, but f---able in the dark by white men. But I wouldn't stick my dick in of those nigger bitches anyways, HIV thing you know. If you want to see niggers in porn why don't you just go to blockbuster and rent" King Kong" or "Mighty Joe Young" or the Clint Eastwood Movie with monkey that smarter than the average nigger . Hell go see Shaft, that a bunch of niggers. Those were niggers with no make-up. It is amazing how you make low budget movie with a nigger, or no budget movie with all niggers. I know porn with movies with niggers in them are just, chump or chimp change features. Any white bitch that f--- niggers is on her last nickel anyway.
Mike Miller writes: Luke, Do you have nothing better to print? All the racist crap is really tacky, I know you have burnt ALOT of bridges in the porn biz but at least Rob Spallone likes you? So why dont you make a written record of his day-to-day life? How about this . .write up a detailed summary of how you attempt to make a living? Your website has no banner ads so scratch that off, you book isnt selling so scratch that off .
Joshua writes: Man I started reading it about two weeks ago after reading about Kendra at Metal-Sludge.com, anyways the s--- is funny. I read it everyday, and the racial stuff is great. People have to get a sense of humor, cause that s--- was funny.
Mark Webb of Allure Entertainment writes: Absolutely the most disturbing things I have ever seen written on your site. How could you let a small group of ignorant people...and I use the term "people" loosely....use your forum and this industry to spread such hatred and ignorance. I know that this will bring some kind of sensationalism to your site and it might be the topic for a few days but this should have never been posted....on Marcus' site...on your site....anywhere !
Please don't think that because you aren't the one writing it that it still doesn't hurt people, you still helped spread their word / cause. We are all aware of racism in today's society, and these postings have nothing to do with this industry, but sometimes the best way to fight it is to ignore it, not give it the time of day, certainly not give it the attention you did today....you gave it way to much attention and let it rear it's ugly head. Apologies to everyone whose names were used with this trash are in order, this was wrong Luke.....and should be removed immediately.
Azlea: This message board I would assum is for fans of Mr.Marcus, people who love his work and the chicks he has or will lay it down to!! lol Racisim is a sad thing and I think that everyone will agree besides the rare few, that this board should be fun, nasty, hardcore and maybe a little drama every once in a while, but s--- leave the bulls--- at home and concentrate on that sweet hardcore mutha f---er Marcus and for the rare few that we won't mention you had to of liked something about Mr. Marcus to take the time to cum to his site.. It's alright hate all you want but you know you like it!!!
MysMan writes: Keep your stupid ass opinions to yourself, you self-hating white bitch. f--- you for coming on here and telling us what to do on Marcus' website. Marcus can speak for himself. So mind your goddamn business and stay the f--- out of here. Whats the matter, the white boys through with your sorry ass, so you better start buddying up to the brothers. You still aren't f---ing black dick. Your pocket book mean more to you than your so called "ideals" you spit out here. f--- You, f--- you, f--- you bitch.
Jjones writes: Azlea sounds like she wants to be next in line to be one of Marcus's white trash whores, she seems to be drooling. Well then get on the Casting Couch there is plenty of room, you know you want to you little whore, you are one of those loosing her shine, a has-been who needs a boost to her career like Brittany and Shayla, so go for it, I'm sure it has been your dream since you were a little girl to be a whore for a big brotha, I'm sure your family and friends are proud of how there little Azlea has turned out!
Chaim Amalek writes Luke: Regarding the general racial tone of your column, you claim to be horrified by what Pierce says. I know that because you say as much right after publishing material lifted from one "Mr. Marcus" in which people of color are presented as living their lives as one big minstrel show. Or maybe they are called coon shows - I forget my racial terminology here. (Any Klansmen out there know the correct terminology?) Then you publish some letters by more literate white folk demanding an end to miscegenistic acts by porn stars and a boycott of those who cross the color line. (Curiously, this was a central topic on the Jew-run Bob Berkowitz show the other night.)
You publish all this stuff and the work of Pierce for two reasons:
1. It is free, filling up space that would otherwise be full of dull crap from porners bitching about chargebacks.
2. It reflects your white racist world view! Admit it, white man, you are a cowardly racist who hides behind the writings of other men to give vent to his racial feelings.
Finally, you accuse me of race-baiting: "Though I frequently find Chaim Amalek funny, I find his race baiting repellant."
I do not write you to entertain, but to educate and inform, to mold the character of the forgotten wankers of society. And to the extent that I practice race baiting, you do NOT find it repellant. But the deeper truth is that I do not practice race baiting. Only white folks read your web site; there is no one here to bait. And every criticism of the dark race that could be inferred from the facts that I convey could be matched by a criticism of the white race, were that the topic of the day. For example, the white race is wholly to blame for the presence of descendants of negro slaves on our soil. (Yep, we brought 'em here, and failed to ship them back to Africa after our civil war like Honest Abe wanted to do. All because of John Wilkes Booth.) The weakness of the white race brought about the creation of mullatos, quadroons, octoroons, macaroons, and various other mischelings that so vex our people and divide black man against his brother man, and leave the black sistahs alone to fend for themselves. In addition to ecological pollution throughout the world, the white race has given us two racially ruinous world wars, MTV, weekends in the Hamptons, Disney, rent control, the WB, network television in general, and a Roman Catholic church that has become the chief vocational destination of the spiritually inclined gay pedophile. I could go on and on about this dying race.
But instead, I will work some more on my costume for my Gay Pride float. I plan on going as a popsickle topped with Jello brand chocolate pudding.
By the way, why is it that these parades are always on the Christian day of rest? Is it so that Satmar jews can march in the Puerto Rican or Gay Pride parades along with everyone else?
Luke: Chaim, you are wrong. I regard every human being as made in the image of God, and therefore possesses infinite value. I agree with the psychiatrist Victor Frankl who wrote: "There are only two races. The decent and the indecent." I believe that it is the content of a person's character that matters, not the color of their skin.
At the same time, I do believe there may be genetic differences between the races. Even though there are few if any "pure race" people. I am open to the teachings of Pastor Reggie White, the black retired Green Bay Packer defensive end who said that different races have different gifts. Whites are good at making money, blacks at dancing and Indians at sneaking up on people.
Laura writes: Judging by the blatant racism of those commenting on interracial sex scenes, the average white male porn viewer is an insecure, angry, hateful, degenerate, low-life white trash that hates women as well as blacks. Thier masculinity is threatened by the physical superiority, sexual prowess and larger dicks of black men. Oh and on an unrelated subject, in response to Chaim's assertion that lesbians are merely women that can't get men, I must remind him that a woman is a lesbian because SHE IS ATTRACTED TO WOMEN, PERIOD. It has nothing whatsoever to do with their ability to get men, they don't want men. There are alot of insecure men out there it seems that just can't accept that fact.
Why So Much Sodomy?
General Schvantzkoph writes on RAME: Why is there so much sodomy in porn today? In all of the DVDs that I've bought lately there seems to be more anal intercourse than vaginal, why? These girls have perfectly serviceable pussies, why not use them. And even when they do have normal sex the guys seem to limit themselves to these little half strokes, they never plunge their johnson in to the hilt. Personnally I'd like to see a lot fewer blowjobs, way less buggery, more reverse cowgirls, deep penetration and internal cum shots. I'd also like to see more long shots where you see the entire girl, and fewer of the dangling balls close ups which in MHO look like surgery videos.
Why Is Luke So Gratuitously Mean?
Lynne writes: Are you ok?
Luke: I am fine.
Lynne: Are you sure? Because you "put your family on the site" and decided it was "funny" after being TOLD a million times that it isn't. This is the first time I've seen you gratuitously mean toward your family since Australia.
I was hoping you did that so I could learn more about religion. It would surely have been a better excuse for the therapist than wanting to hurt your dad. I have questions about belief and divinity and the spiritual that reading may answer, since you cannot (that's new -- spiritual pressure).
I am sorry to have to challenge your religious beliefs. Jews may question. Jews may question even Luke F-rd. What gives, Luke?
This is from your Hart interview: "Loving someone is one of the closest ways to get to God.” The more soul-destroying pornography you surround yourself with, the more loving you need to do to balance it out, and I would be delighted if we could start with Yours truly, Lynne
Andrea True
Chris writes: Do you know whatever happened to this 1970s star? She was a struggling mainstream actress in New York in the early '70s who gravitated to porn. She parlayed a modelling job in Jamaica into a one-off recording session for a song somebody wrote... and the song became a smash hit in the early days of disco ("More More More," by the Andrea True Connection). After that, her music career sputtered and no one seems to know whatever became of her. Do you know?
Marc Putative: the andrea true connection's "more, more, more" served as the bedtrack for a top ten hit from last summer, "steal my sunshine" by len (also from toronto), a faceitous white hip-hop one-hit wonder. in all the attention the song received around the world, i can't recall a single invocation of where miss true might be hiding out nowadays. guess she's missed out on the gay pride party circuit with cyndi lauper, etc., etc.
Penetration Clearly Visible
MisterWelles writes on RAME: One of the taboos between Hard R rating and XXX rating was graphically depicting penetration. Sometime in the last two years magazines began showing penetration. Is this just a business decision to compete with all the porn on the internet, or was a legal decision that make it acceptable for Penthouse and others to show penetration?
JimGunn.com writes: It's just a very competitive marketplace for consumers' dollars nowadays between magazines, the internet and porn movies that are coming out faster and faster. Lots of people in all branches of the industry are pushing the so-called envelope in order to call attention to themselves.
Brandy Alexandre: It's just a business decision for the sake of competition. Any magazine can show penetration if they choose. It all depends on the image they are trying to project. Magazines are not rated.
Mike Paul: I keep waiting for obscenity trials to start over some Penthouse layout. Penthouse used to be a favorite target of Cincinnati, and I never heard it wasn't sold there anymore.
You have to believe that if magazines like that are for sale in a community long enough, it'd be hard to say they are outside the Community Standards. And if photographs are OK, why not videos?
It may be like that one softcore movie on Cinemax that showed a guy's dick: currently under the radar, but for how long?
Luke Gets Mail
Mad Jack writes about Paul at Notorious Productions: First of all, we were told it was a 10 minute scene, not 40, and I didn't leave happy. I was extremely pissed but tried to act as professional as possible considering the circumstances. I'm not as upset about my end as I am about Jagg doing as much work, if not more, than the other girl and only receiving 150.00. She was told she could "jump in" at the end of the scene, not work the ENTIRE THING!!! Had I been there, this wouldn't have happened. She was new and didn't know any better. I gave Rod the benifit of the doubt and he took advantage of the talent and me. f--- his ten percent. The checks on it's way back. Just make good to Jagg and send her the other hundred she deserves. We both know that you took more stills and video of her than you did the other girl.
Dan writes: Hi Luke, I'm witing this message to assist you with one of your major dilemmas. I've been reading your site for the last couple of days and noticed that you are meeting with Inari Vachs for some promotional event. You also mention that your sponsor has come up with enough money to throw a second girl into the equation and now you are accepting suggestions. First of all Luke, I have to say you're one lucky bastard. Inari Vachs is my favourite porn star, and for the most part, the main inspiration behind this message. Of course, at this point I'm going to make a feeble attempt at convincing you to forward my email address to Inari Vachs. Realizing that this will lead nowhere, I will jump to the business at hand. In addition to complimenting Inari, the candidate must also conform to some requirements of your own. I see little need to repeat these requirements. Suffice it to say you'd like to see a Jewish girl fill the spot. This reminds me of a little debate me and my room-mate had a few months ago. The subject of the debate, whether Tiffany Mynx was Jewish or not. While neither one of us knew for certain, I held the opinion that Miss Mynx was Jewish. My room-mate, on the other hand, chastised me for jumping to quick conclusions and explained that just because Tiffany Mynx somewhat resembles Barbara Streisand doesn't necessarily mean she observes the passover. To this day I am still completely ignorant of Miss Mynx's background and ancestry. However, I am still going to suggest her as a candidate. Whether she is Jewish or not, I feel that Tiffany Mynx would compliment Inari Vachs nicely. Tiffany Mynx is outgoing, has a good sense of humour and a great personality. She is very positive and upbeat and I feel that teaming her up with Inari would produce the right kind of chemistry. I think you'd have a fun time working with these two ladies.
Luke: I don't believe that either Tiffany or Inari are Jewish. But my sponsor is truly looking for another contract girl. Email skoskins@xxxgen.com (Steven Koskins).
Johnny: Inari's Serbian, so whatever religion that is.
John writes: People have been commenting on Paxil. I'm on it. My sexual desire is somewhat decreased, it's harder to cum, but I always reach orgasm. For me, the benefits of Paxil far outweigh the drawbacks.
Final Thoughts On Porn
Dudley Moore writes: Luke, I'd like to share my own final thoughts on porn with you and your audience:
1. Even though we are taught that sex is the unifying basis of relationships, family, and society itself, the reality is that sex is also fundamentally and explosively divisive. Sex is actually the expulsive force that creates new species, driving out members of the old species to discover and inhabit new evolutionary niches. Sex is even fundamentally divisive to the family structure itself: since members must not have sex with each other, they are forced to abandon family and explore the world, finding new habitats, creating new societies, and ultimately even new races. Just watch any talk show to see how fundamentally divisive sex really and truly can be to individuals, families, and society. Therefore, it makes sense that pornography itself is simply symptomatic of this same fundamentally divisive tension. Sex is at once destructive of existing relationships, family and society, and yet it is also extremely motivating and successful in forcing individuals out of the old family and society and into the new unknown world and sexual environment. Thus, the intense, permanent tension created by sex within the individual in the pursuit of pornography and its anonymous sex at any cost. The next time you find yourself cruising for anonymous sex, just remember that this is identically the same force that divided humanity across the globe and created new races and species!
2. Porn is part of a nomadic lifestyle. Just as nomads seek out their food sources one meal at a time, so porn is about taking sex one hit at a time. Yet there is something inherently shameful about being constantly in need, and having to seek out one's basic needs for survival on a one-at-a-time basis. Whereas family and organized society and civilization itself are based on concepts of a common future and planning, the nomad, like Neanderthal, lives purely from one day's survival to the next. Forget about stable relationships, porn is exclusively and very plainly about finding the next masturbation object. One's entire life is thus nomadic and obsessively-compulsively consumed with the ongoing search for next sex.
3. Porn is a measure of male frustration in society. Porn is about males seeking out sex objects who, in reality, are sexually unavailable. Thus, porn is always in the end about unsuccessful sex. For example, virtually all of the women in the sex industry are unavailable, sexually inaccessible bi/lesbians who actually prefer other women, so what does that tell you about their real-world availability to males? That it is just an illusion, a con, since heterosexual women, as a rule, only enact their sexual fantasies in the privacy and safety of a stable relationship. Some experts even insist we no longer live in a sexually repressed world. However, they fail to take into account the extraordinary degree of sexual frustration each of us males experiences daily. We are surrounded all day, every day, by women whose major preoccupation is to make themselves as beautiful and sexually desirable as possible, and yet who are at the same time absolutely inaccessible to us males sexually. These women are really dressing up in the latest revealing fashions to make themselves interesting and thus socially acceptable to their fellow female peers, not to us males.
Unfortunately the message these young women are getting from their peers is that sex is the only thing that makes them interesting in adult society. Unfortunately for us males, they simply are not available, it's just a fashion show. How frustrating, and what a daily ongoing hell and torment for us males in society to see all these sexy and sexier females on display, and not be able to have any, except in fantasy. And, oh yes, we can always look at the fake girls in the sex industry, which just adds to our sense of futility and frustation! Society simply does not take into account our male misery and extreme frustration, because it's an altogether invisible torment they can't see, and don't want to acknowledge.
4. Heterosexual women are the antithesis of porn. They seek safety and stability in longterm relationships only. You won't find them in porn. Our society, unfortunately, does not glorify the wonder and beauty of female heterosexuality, even though hetero women are in the overwhelming majority. Instead, society portrays bi/lesbian females, like Ally McBeal, in pursuit of their next fantasy masturbation choice.
Here are a few really fascinating experiments that demonstrate the underlying biological reality and beauty of female heterosexuality.
Experiment #1: Note the sourly monogamous frowns you get when you stare at hetero women inappropriately. (Homework assignment: Stare, and try NOT to get at least 15 sourly, disapproving monogamous frowns from heterosexual women this week.) These sour frowns speak to the underlying biological monogamy of these women. It's real, not just a social convention.
Experiment #2: Note that most hetero women almost always choose taller men. When passing by these women, notice that you automatically look up at and acknowledge the taller male as well. This fact also speaks to the underlying biological need that hetero women feel for the safety that taller males provide.
Experiment #3: Note that hetero women have a keen sense of sexual boundaries. For example, notice how these hetero women will immediately straighten up and correct their posture if you ever happen upon them in a too-relaxed or compromising posture. Again, female heterosexuality is real, beautiful, and biological, but also totally and forever alien to the artificial world of porn, with it's bi/lesbian, fantasy con-girls.
5. There is no such thing as macho. Macho is the basis for the male role in all pornography, yet any woman can tell you that all men are really emotionally insecure in private. Part of maturing into adult life as a man is realizing that macho was just an illusion after all. In fact, macho is actually about believing that all other males must have that mysterious thing called macho except you! Most males grew up without significant relationships with fathers or other male role models, and so take on one-dimensional role models from TV, etc., who they perceive to be perfectly strong, secure males, judging by their "manly" exteriors (really a bluff) that they present to the world. See the book, The Sexual Century, by Ethel Spector for an in-depth discussion of the role of the myth of male macho and its tormenting role in male psychosexual development.
6. Everything Sigmund Freud said and taught was based on the idea of sex as the ultimate basis for every neurotic conflict and maladjustment to life. "The symptom becomes the entire life activity of the individual." So this fundamental conflict with one's own sex drive will always be a distressing part of the lives of every one of us who shares a fascination with porn.
Chaim Amalek Marches For LF.com In Gay Pride Parade
Chaim writes: Tomorrow is the annual Gay Pride Parade, in which everyone from Dykes on Bikes to Twinks on Links (gay golfers) demonstrates their pride at being queer. (Although I never quite understood that - do hets have a parade to express their pride at getting wood when they are with women?) I do not expect any wildings in central park over this one.
Anyway, I am thinking of marching as part of a one-man float representing l-keford.com. Any tips on what I ought to wear as I waddle down 5th Avenue?
Black Is Good, White Is Bad
Luke: I frequently publish the evil opinions of people I can't stand just as I frequently publish graphic depictions of evil behavior without passing explicit moral judgement. For instance, most of l-keford.com is devoted to coverage of the porn industry, which I regard in total as destructive.
I have utter contempt for some of the people I write about regularly, I simply do not feel the need to express it explicitly. Though I frequently find Chaim Amalek funny, I find his race baiting repellant.
That I publish some of the views of Dr. William Pierce, an evil man with Nazi views, does not mean that I regard him and his thinking as anything less than loathsome. And I welcome your responses to his evil thoughts. Email Luke
Dr Pierce writes: Today let's talk a little about the mass sexual assaults on White women by Blacks and Puerto Ricans which occurred in New York City a little less than two weeks ago. The assaults were on the Sunday before last: June 11, which in New York is officially Puerto Rican Day. And I should tell you that that fact alone dampens my sympathy for the victims right from the start. It's hard to feel sorry for anyone who would choose to live in a place that has an official Puerto Rican Day.
I don't know what your image of Puerto Ricans is. I believe that for most Americans it's a smiling, brown face serving them some sort of iced beverage with rum while they are relaxing under a beach umbrella. That's the average soccer-mom's image, which she acquired from watching those television commercials for Caribbean cruises. Whites who live in New York and have to deal with Puerto Ricans on a continuing basis have a different image: they call them "cockroaches," "cucarachas." They are the ghastly result of crossbreeding Caribbean Indians, Blacks, and an especially low grade of White trash and teaching their mongrel offspring to speak Spanish -- of a sort. They are probably the most unsavory ethnic group in the very unsavory stew of ethnic groups which is New York City.
About the only good thing that can be said for the Puerto Ricans is that they have set off a lot of bombs in various U.S. government offices over the years, and on one occasion they launched an assault on the U.S. Congress and shot half a dozen congressmen. They also made a reasonably creditable -- but unfortunately unsuccessful -- assassination attempt against President Harry Truman in 1950. But these valiant acts were carried out by an almost-White Puerto Rican elite and hardly compensate for the worthlessness of the average Puerto Rican.
After Puerto Ricans in New York's Central Park sexually assaulted approximately 50 White women -- plus a couple of non-White women -- following the Puerto Rican Day parade on June 11, everyone was looking for someone to blame. The first thing the media and the politicians had to say about that is, "Don't blame the Puerto Ricans! It wasn't a racial thing! The victims were of all races." Well, while it is technically correct that not every single victim was White, anyone watching films of the attacks can easily see that nearly all of them were -- while all of the attackers were non-Whites. The rampaging mob really wasn't interested in Black and Puerto Rican women, and so non-White women who were in the area managed to scurry out of harm's way, while the mob of Puerto Ricans and Blacks deliberately singled out White women -- and White girls as young as 14 -- ripping off their clothes, squeezing their breasts, and thrusting their fingers deep into their genitalia. White men who accompanied some of the women were held and forced to watch while the non-Whites brutalized and humiliated their women. Despite the fact that nearly all the victims were White, the news story on the assaults in this week's issue of Gerald Levin's Time magazine pictured both of the two Black victims, including one with peroxided orange hair. The aim clearly was to create the impression that at least half the victims were Black. The story in this week's issue of Katherine Meyer Graham's Newsweek magazine had a photograph of one of the two Black victims.
Some of the women blamed the police, who ignored the victims when they pleaded for help. There were rumors that the politicians had ordered the police not to arrest or harass the Puerto Ricans, lest they riot. I'm inclined to say, well, that's life in the Great Satan these days. What do you expect?
But many people are acting surprised by the sexual assaults and the reports that the police refused to intervene. The media and the politicians have been telling them that the crime rate in New York is going down: they have been boasting that the great experiment in multicultural living is succeeding. And now this! What a nasty surprise! That's like a family living in a cockroach-infested apartment. The family is too lazy or too preoccupied with other things to clean up the apartment and get rid of the cockroaches. They have heard rumors that cockroaches spread disease, but everyone still seems healthy, so they just discount the rumors, ignore the cockroaches, and continue watching their ball games on TV. Then they start getting sick. I'm not surprised. Are you surprised?
I'll tell you what does surprise me, and that's the fact that the Puerto Rican Day assaults have gotten any media coverage at all. This is the sort of thing that the controlled media nearly always take great pains to ignore. They don't want to confuse the lemmings, who have been taught that multiculturalism is the most wonderful development since the wheel. It makes me suspect that one of the women who had her genitalia probed by the subhumans in Central Park knows somebody who was willing and able to raise a fuss.
Certainly, these mass assaults on White women by our colored bothers generally are ignored successfully. Two moths ago, for example, Black college students had their so-called "Black Springbreak 2000" celebration in Biloxi, Mississippi. Approximately 20,000 young Blacks congregated in the Biloxi and Gulfport area, generally behaving as we expect 20,000 young Blacks to behave when they have the local law enforcement agencies overwhelmed. They ate in restaurants and walked out without paying. They smashed up convenience stores when the storekeepers ran out of beer. One unhappy White storekeeper complained, "My bathrooms are ruined. I didn't believe people could be so mean and ugly." Well, I hope you believe it now. Other Whites were shocked to see Blacks pulling down their pants and relieving themselves on the sidewalks.
The real Black behavior, however, manifested itself when White women and girls who didn't have the sense to stay indoors -- or in some cases were caught going to or from their places of employment -- were spotted by the Blacks. The cry would go up: "There's a White girl. Get her!" Then exactly the same thing would happen that happened in Central Park. The unfortunate White girl would be mobbed by Blacks, her clothes would be ripped from her body, and she would be fondled and probed while other Blacks gleefully watched and videotaped her humiliation. There were even photographs in the local newspapers of stripped White girls running from the mob and trying to cover their nakedness with their hands while the Blacks leered at them and made obscene gestures. But these Mississippi newspapers, just like those in New York, carefully avoided describing what happened in racial terms.
Well, that's certainly not the Mississippi I remember from the days when I was an undergraduate. In those days if a mob of Blacks had assaulted White women the way they did two months ago, not one would have left Biloxi alive. Roadblocks would have been set up to keep them from fleeing, and they would have been hunted down and killed to the last Black. The police would be manning the roadblocks and helping to provide the firepower. But you know, Mississippi is part of the so-called "New South" these days, where Blacks not only can get away with that sort of behavior, but the politicians and the media make excuses for them and cover for them.
Well anyway, my point was that you didn't hear about what happened in Biloxi two months ago unless you happen to live there. I got my information from the Gulfport, Mississippi, Sun Herald, but it certainly wasn't in the Washington Post or the New York Times. Most such incidents are successfully covered up by the national media. The incidents this month in Central Park are the rare exceptions to the rule.
So who is to blame for this situation? Well, the soccer moms undoubtedly will find some small flaw in the system to blame, some minor breakdown in the system which is supposed to permit them to live in the multicultural jungle that America has become without being assaulted by the animals who also live in the jungle. They want to put a Band-Aid on the system -- perhaps fire some lower-level police official -- and then have things continue as before but without the assaults. They want to be able to stroll through Central Park on Sunday afternoons, with subhuman animals all around them and still be perfectly safe. They are out of touch with reality.
Reality is that if you insist on living in a jungle, then you should expect to be eaten. Reality is that Whites and non-Whites are different. To Blacks and Puerto Ricans, grabbing a woman in public and ripping her clothes off is no big deal. Rape is no big deal either. Blacks really don't understand why Whites take rape so seriously. In the Third World rape is a macho thing. Young men do it and get away with it. And of course, as we bring more and more non-Whites into the United States, we must expect to see more and more of the sort of behavior we saw in Biloxi and in Central Park.
Brann writes: Sorry, but Dr Pierce does not know a whole lot about the the Black Spring Break happenings in Biloxi and Gulfport. I live in Pascagoula, MS, about 22 miles from Biloxi. The Sun Herald was very soft in its reportage on the matter. The MS state head of the NAACP basically invited this rather rowdy group (as all people my age or thereabouts are nowadays...I'm 21) to attempt to create some racial strife. There has been none in Mississippi for quite some time. Look at the Uniform Crime Statistics from the FBI. Take a look at the Hate Crimes section of that report. Mississippi has consistently ranked below almost any other state in the US. Rhode Island had more hate crimes than Mississippi. The problem with Black Spring Break was the lawlessness. ANY and I do mean ANY group would've run roughshod over the cops in the exact same manner. It simply wouldn't have been as well-covered by the media if it'd been whites.
Pierce is correct in one respect; the police were overwhelmed. This area is not often a popular getaway during the Spring Break period from mid March to late April, and as a result were not as well-prepared as a police force in Pensacola Beach or Fort Walton Beach would've been. Face it, Luke and Dr. Pierce, if the cops had cracked down hard, it would've been all that the NAACP needed to claim that Mississippi hadn't changed. They simply would've cried racism and people would've believed it.
Since there hasn't really been any racial conflict for some time, the NAACP is trying to create hostility and mistrust so they can justify their jobs and salaries. Did you hear from anybody other then the NAACP crying about the Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia in South Carolina before the NAACP did? That's because it's basically a non-issue. Honestly, I don't care one way or the other about the flag...not the proper one anyway.
What disgusts me is the image people have of life down here. People in New England didn't think we knew what the Internet was. They still think that all we have are dirt roads and swamps. In the homecoming episode of ER that featured Eriq LaSalle going back to Biloxi, they showed him traveling on dirt roads only and being shuttled from one part of Biloxi to the other by skiff. This is one of the most industrialized areas in the entire Gulf South, yet they treated it like backwoods swamp. I'm constantly amazed by people's stupidity and ignorance.
What I find interesting is that I've faced less discrimination (I'm a mixture of Filipino, Spanish, French, Irish, Seminole) living here for six years and for ten in Austin, Texas than I did on a two-day trip to NYC. Does Dr. Pierce know of the current outrage being expressed over the Harley riders gathering here? Same or worse behavior than the Black Spring Breakers.
Oh, and tell Dr. Pierce that it's somewhat rough to form a lynch mob to go after Blacks considering that the population here is 35% Black. Maybe if this had happened in Gary, Indiana (KKK HQ) or somewhere up north where 85% of the national membership of the KKK currently resides, he would've seen the lynchings he seems to want so badly.
Rashi Amalek Opines on Pierce's Parshat Shavouot
Chaim Amalek writes: Well, not really Rashi. As you know, Rashi did not feel free to contradict what his jewish antecedants had to say, whereas I am free to criticise Pierce or anyone else.
There are a few factual errors in this article (today's portion, which you well know where to find) that I am aware of through personal knowledge that I wish to point out. First, more than two of the women assaulted in Central Park were of color; perhaps a majority of the victims were PR or black. But the more important point, that the victimizers were not white, is absolutely correct and worth thinking about.
Second, some of the aborigninal inhabitants of the Americas did indeed practice agriculture, and had advanced well beyond the hunter-gatherer stage of human development. But they tended to live in meso- America. In any event, they were not bleeding heart ecologists. See "The Ecological Indian" for a full exposition of just how these people treated their environment.
As I do not live in the South, I am not in any position to judge the effect of tens of thousands of negro males descending on a town for spring break. Is Pierce correct in his description? He might be, the lack of national press on this notwithstanding, for I am aware of similare episodes that were ignored by the national press. Still, I am not sure. If any of you folks in l-keford.com land live in the south and can opine on this (gentile pornographer Mike South I am talking to you), please do so. Unless you work for a media organization and correspond with Luke under your real name, in which case you cannot possibly speak frankly on these issues without fear of loss of employment. I do not want to see a white brother-man lose his job. (JDC that would be you. Marc W, since you are a MOT and therefore have a bit more freedom to speak out, I am not sure of your status on this.)
Pierce's great weakness, for which white america should either be grateful or curse his name, is that he does not have any jewish brains backing the movement up. Indeed, if any jewish brains were to present themselves, he would have them bashed in by one of his psychotic Myrmidons. If some media savy jews like you Luke (OK, I am being patronizing here), or Marc W. were vetting his propaganda and handling his relations with the mainstream press, there is no telling how far he could take his movement.
Luke, when you go to Israel, be sure to look beyond the official blather doled out to visiting American Jews to see how Israel deals with its minority populations. Perhaps we can learn something from them.
Marc Putative: remember gents, i live in toronto, canada, where all the warm-hearted multicultural sloganeering gets tiresome after a while, but it means i have little basis upon which to contemplate pierce's pontifications ... my shul, for example, is in the thick of chinatown (a formerly jewish neighborhood--until they all earned mad shmatta money and moved to the 'burbs) surrounded by italian and portugese neighborhoods and everybody seems to get along just fine. cops are capable of giving black people a hard time, but there have been no major "racial" blowups since 1992, when some watered-down mimickry of the l.a. riots stormed the streets. the polarization i've felt during my four trips to nyc, or listening to stern in the mornings, has no parallel within my everyday surroundings. the only civil unrest around these parts comes from bleeding hearts of all colors, railing against "poverty". (as if anyone could be FOR it.)
Fred writes: Luke: Do you sense that there is a certain amount of impotent rage in Pierce's writing--a sense of powerlessness that fuels his rant? I'll bet there's some wierd trauma in his background that's fueling this. Or perhaps he rages against some perceived indignity, like poverty when he was growing up. I have a feeling Dr. Pierce should see a shrink. There's an undercurrent in his writing. Not just a repetitive theme, but some underlying pain that's pushing him to crank out this s---. I wonder what it is. Any guesses?