Home

Back to Essays



Tuesday, May 9th, 2000

Email Luke

Sacramento Update

An uneventfull day today with the porners at the state legislature.

Undercover Angel writes: Looks like the s--- has really hit the fan at Ultimate. Nick Pinkowski is being sued by a former contract girl who he has gotten pregnant. This not only has his wife furious and threatening divorce but also has Mary Gates from Adam and Eve (Ultimate's Parent Company) extremely upset, as well!

IEG's Seth Waishausky has received death threats. Unfortunately for him and the police those with motives are too numerous for them to even know where to begin looking!

It seems as though the "Queen of the Industry" crown is being passed (involuntarily) from Jenna to Alisha Klass. Alisha's feature dance performances are getting unbelievable reviews and are said to blow Jenna away, plus she is said to be professional and personable. On top of that I hear she has been contacted by E! to assume Jenna's role at the network.

Jill Kelly and Julian appear to be on the rocks. Jill has been spending time with Mark Davis while Julian has resumed doing scenes again!

Taylor Hayes has been banned from at least 3 different dance clubs (she's catching up with Jenna!) for being drunk and disorderly! Finally Jewel DeNyle is considering a $25,000 offer to do a 15 man anal gangbang.

Kid Vegas writes: I just wanted to say Good-bye to Scotty Swartz, & tell him everyone will miss your tiny little assy, & that we wish you luck with the EBAY Beanie Baby collectable sales. We all wish you would come back & be in the next Kid Vegas Movie, "Caught in Drublic," it is very unfortunate you must go. We will miss your little mans complex, your attitude before knowing anyone, you overflowing gob you call your mouth, your little fingers that twitch when your nervous, your charm of a pack mule, & most of all your desire to be someone. No, really Good Luck, if you need some support, mentally, physically, I can send some whore over for you. You got the Kid's Vote, I mean number...Smoke some dope, take a vacation, do some girls, actually do all the above & you'll feel better. See you in a few months!!!! Stop stressing son !

Brian writes: New Star Magazine today has an article on how CHER is freaking out because her son Elijah Blue is dating 80's porn star Amber Lynn.

Chupatinha writes on RAME: This morning on CNBC Financial News they were doing a story about alleged insider info affecting a stock and for pictures they had a computor monitor displaying the screen names and messages from some internet stock chat room. The guy supposedly on the "inside" used the nom de daytrader Hung_Like_John_Holmes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In a later response to one of his posts some clueless bastard says "When the SEC gets wind of this you WILL be strung up and hanged just like John Holmes". The newscasters seemed to have no idea of any context for the guy's name. A great morning coffee chuckler.

Tommy, the official magician of porn, writes: Xany wrote that he "can't stand to see a homely fellow (even though he may be hung-Ron Jeremy) in a sex scene with a gorgeous woman who would NEVER sleep with him in her private life." Hell, beautiful women banging ugly men is about the ONLY realistic part of porn. In porn, the money women are paid causes them to have sex with men who may be ugly. In real life, money has guaranteed ugly men pussy since antiquity. Anyone who's ever lived in Hollywood or D.C. knows ugly men don't have a tough time sleeping with beautiful women, providing their wallets are thick - and, unlike porn, their dicks don't have to be. P.S. Luke, I don't know if I'm rich enough or ugly enough to have a chance with Kendra Jade, but if you decide not to pursue her, have her drop me a line. tommymagic_tnt@yahoo.com

Greg Zeboray writes to Mike South: First, my letter was meant to begin by "...respectfully (not respectively) disagree with Brandy and South..." Anyway, Mike the FSC has done numerous good things for your industry. I firmly believe that had the FSC never existed, you would be operating in a much different (and unpleasant) environment then you are today. I am not saying the FSC is without fault - is there any organization today that is loved by everyone? I can't think of one. My point Mike is that I feel you should join the FSC, and then as a member lobby them to pursue agendas which are important to you. You and I have very similar "real world" political views, and I am quite confident you vote every election - use the same process within porn.

White Slave Videos Out of Eastern Europe

Sturgeon writes on RAME: Euro Dogs (Elegant Angel) – Great movie…I have a friend who works at the Justice Department. He keeps track on ongoing Interpol investigations in the United States. Because such investigations often involve activity originating in Europe, he also has access to certain investigations being conducted in Europe. He relayed the following to me: Interpol Alert: Second to last scene involving two blondes takes place in a brothel on the outskirts of Budapest. She is clearly not enjoying the sex.

Interpol has notified Hungarian authorities that they believe this brothel is controlled by members of the Russian Mafia. Interpol has confirmed that the blonde with the long hair was sold to a brothel owner after being lured to Hungary in April 1999 along with 3 other women from Ukraine. They were promised jobs at a hotel in Budapest. Efforts are being made to contact the makers/actors of this film to confirm the location of this brothel. It is also believed that the thin brunette being double teamed from the front and rear in the final scene was also a prostitute at this small town brothel. There is no evidence to suggest she was sold into sexual servitude like the blonde in the previous scene. However, her age and willingness to submit to multiple anal penetrations at the actor's request suggests a pimp or "boss" was on the scene to ensure her compliance. In his latest report he received a list of adult movies currently available in the United States which showed young russian women who had been sold into sexual slavery in Hungary, the Czech Republic and eastern Germany performing various sex acts.

Luke: I would love to know any additional information people might know about this story. How common is it for performers in pornographic videos to have been sold into slavery?

I will have to ask the Free Speech Coalition about this Tuesday morning at their capitol steps newsconference. Does the FSC have a policy of not using women who have been coerced into performing sex on camera?

What about a general policy on slave labor? Most vibrators and sex toys are made in China, which routinely uses slave labor.

How do the Free Speechers feel about the movies of Max Hardcore, which often show him urinating into the mouths of female porn stars? Is this a legitimate expression of free speech? What speech do you think Max is trying to make?

The porn industry now releases movies where people are being urinated on. Is this the type of speech you're here to represent? Bill Whitrock recently made a video where people defecate on each other. Is this what you represent?

Director Rob Black makes movies with titles such as "Slap Her In The Crapper." He frequently shoots rape scene, including one famous scene that won an AVN award which featured a woman in a wheelchair getting chased and eventually raped by three men. Do you support this type of free speech?

Anabolic's Rough Sex series features women getting beaten, whipped and punched. Do you defend this material as free speech?

Regan Starr told about Rough Sex: "This was absolutely real. I could not finish this scene. It was absolutely terrible. It was an atrocity. This is the worst line ever put out there. It's right up there with snuff videos.

"Mickey was not being false about it. He was hurting the girls. He was given the green light to hurt the women for the effect of the video. I was told before the video that, and they said this very proudly, mind you, Mark and Christopher made it aware to me that in this line most of the girls start crying because they're hurting so bad.

"When they started the video, I was absolutely amazed that they were literally trying to hurt me and make me cry. I started crying. I couldn't breathe. I was being hit and choked. I was really upset, and they didn't stop. They kept filming. You can hear me say turn the f---ing camera off and they kept going." (From )

Rough Sex director Kahn Tusion responds: "I've been reading the criticism. I've read Rebecca Bardoux's criticism that this is terrible and people go to jail for this. This is a lifestyle, Luke. There are people that participate in this. They get pleasure from it. I have simply documented it..."

For Julia Ashton in particular: An increasing number of porn stars have worked as prostitutes at the Bunny Ranch in Nevada. This confirms in many minds the view that porn stars are simply hookers.

How many porners need to get AIDS, there have been about a dozen in the last few years, before you shut down the industry?

The sex industry has long been a haven for organized crime. For instance, Metro Home Video was convicted in January of 1997 of working with the Gambino crime family. What is the FSC doing to deter O.C.?

An increasing number of porn girls, such as Kerri Downs, Kelly Giraffe aka Kalina Lynx and Chessie Moore, are having sex on camera with dogs. Is bestiality the type of free speech you guys represent?

Email Luke questions I should ask at Tuesday morning's Free Speech Coalition press conference on the steps of the capitol.

Curious writes: There seems to be a definite trend of taking young porn actresses ( 18 or 19 ) and dressing them up as much younger schools girls ( pig tails, school uniforms, roller skates) thereby making "pseudo-child porn". Is this valid free speech or vulgar and possibly dangerous exploitation?

Hank writes: As far as questions, Luke, go to: http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/industry/truth/index.htm

If you read this, especially chapters 3 through 8, you should have plenty of questions at FSC press conference. This is their "White Paper" (or "wipe paper" as I call it) that they came up with years ago (I don't remember whether it was '95 or '96). Bring up as many of these as you can and ask why all of these things are still in existence if not actually worsened since the original presentation of the "White Paper".

3. Child Pornography Why did the industry fight so hard to overturn the ruling on this?. In order to resume these portrayals (like Max Hardcore)?.

4. Content and consenting adults Many things to bring up here. The condition of some of the performers (drinking, drugs, mental state). Also ask about the coercion and pressure for cosmetic surgery, especially breast implants.

5. Health concerns, especially HIV (HA!) What about all the HIV cases (let alone VD) since?. What about the sloppy practices at AIM?.

6. Rape and sexual abuse Bring up the videos "Rough Sex" and "Rough Sex 2" and Regan Starr and Linda Thoren's comments about the shoots. What about Rob Black and Max Hardcore's videos since the "White Paper"?. Ask if there is "absolutely no rape or portrayal of rape in these videos"...then how about those?

7. Working conditions See #6

8. Drug Use HA!...bring up the total lack of screening despite claims of the "Paper" otherwise. How many performers continue to get hired and appear on sets under the influence of drugs (Luke, you are bound to be able to cite some specifics here). What about Chloe mentioning her continuing to get work *while* she was on drugs?. What about Kianna and others admitting they have shot while using drugs?. She isn't the only (and the guys too). Tie that in with the HIV and AIM debacle.

Chaim Amalek writes Luke: The list of questions you posed on your web site is excellent. Keep a tight focus on the extreme misogyny, with maybe a question or two about the mafia (but only after you have hit 'em with the former questions), and watch them and their liberal allies squirm. And feel free to share your concerns with your bretheren in the mainstream press just prior to the news conference, to help influence the tone of their questions as well.

The idea that FSC has genuine concern for the interests of the much abused women who make porn is ludicrous. Tell me, would a genuine union of electricians permit the bosses to use cattle prods on its members?

Concerned writes: Can you confirm that the "Free Speech Coalition's" real purpose in lobbying the state senate is to persuade them to change our state's nickname from "The Golden State" to "The Golden Shower State"?

Tricia Devereaux DVD Chat

http://www.adultdvdtalk.com/redesign/chat/tricia_transcript.html

ADT_Steph: Tricia - How about Luke F-rd? If we talk about him he puts it on his site ;)

Tricia: Luke F-rd is an asshole and I don't care if he does read this. He has no business making judgements of people or twisting people's words around. After I got HIV, he accused me of doing heroin, prostituting, etc. I threatened to sue, and he laid off.

LiLRed: There is nothing like a person that speaks their mind, Right on Tricia

Pat-Chloe-Fan: Who's Luke F-rd?

Sonic: Luke F-rd..let me write that down on my beat and search and kick their ass list! :mad:

bad2dabone: Steph...my guess is that Luke F-rd won't be putting that quote up on his site

Luke responds: I never remember any legal threat from Tricia Devereaux and I never adjusted my coverage of her. Questions about a person's sex life and drug use should be expected when one has contracted HIV.

Sacramento Update

Mike Ross's house, 6PM: I just went swimming with Mike. I spent the day talking to my former teachers at Placer High School and Sierra College, including my high school journalism teacher Robert Burge. He must be so proud.

Ross is gearing up to defend Sacramento's strip clubs. California's capitol city may be the first city in the country to ban clubs after the US Supreme Court's important PAPS decision. The number of strip clubs in the country has declined by about ten percent in the past 18 months as cities increasingly and effectively using zoning decisions to make life difficult if not impossible for strip clubs.

Porners meet for their newsconference on the capitol steps at 9:15 AM Tuesday. They've been coming up here every year for the past five years. Initially they came to lobby against the proposed sin tax. Each year there's seem to be less for the porners to specifically lobby on. But the FSC is in a rut, and it feels they must perpetuate this lobbying cycle.

If my site today is more disorganized than normal, it's because of Mike's cat Chelsea. She's always jumping onto my lap while I try to type these vital words upon which hang Western Civilization.

I asked Chelsea to contribute something to the site. So she walked across the keyboard and wrote: u8ijjjjjjjjjmkkhhlk,m^%Trrrrr1 qqqqqqqq

Lynne writes Luke: I asked you if you would sit down with me and have lunch and discuss it. You said yes. Instead you lied to me over and over, humiliated me, stood me up three times in twenty-four hours and generally did all the things you are known for doing. I flew down there to have lunch with you. To see if you could handle it. Obviously you could not. Nor could you even be honest about why not.

I do not think your journalism teacher would be proud to know that you let your friend, someone who has worked with you and would work with you, wait by herself in a bar while you hung out in the lobby knowing she'd been waiting since 9:30 that morning to make an appointment with you because that is what you told her would work for you. And then you lied twice more. Amazing.

What happened to telling me the truth? Overnight you changed your mind? If the truth is what you put on the site, that you were tired, that you arrived, that you hung out in the lobby instead of checking in with me at any point...Haven't I always been understanding and happy to grant you what you need? Surely you knew you were encouraging a bad situation....and didn't you get exactly what you didn't want? Anger, trouble and enough problems to avoid the whole situation with no regrets?

Vivid Ripoff

John King writes: What is the deal with Vivid compliation tapes. Do they keep repeating the same scenes over and over ad nauseum or something. i recently acquired three "new" ones, one of which was EXACTLY the same as another i've had for TWO years. Jesus you'd think they could come up with some different scenes. if i never see another comp tape from Vivid it will be too soon. how many girls do they have under contract? three? four? you'de think so if you watched some of their comp tapes. freaking rip-off. i finally found someone who blows worse than Pepper Productions, who if you didn't know better, you'd think that Ona Zee was the only damm girl they shot. i guess i'll go back to Anabolic and Extreme. at least they kick the old ones to the curb when they're done with them.

Luke Gets Mail

> Porner: White blondes with good boobs get > about $1200 for a boy-girl scene. A beautiful > Caucasian brunette, about $1000. A black girl > or mixed race, about $600. A white blonde is > the ultimate status symbol, across all > cultures.

Guffy writes: Hey, Luke...ask Chuck, I mean "Porner", if "good boobs" = fake boobs. What is the going rate for a blonde with real boobs?. What about a brunette with fake boobs?. Also, I wonder how long before Chuckie Cheese "convinces" Jeannie that she needs D cup boobs?

CC writes: I'm trying to find the title of a movie that featured John Holmes. John Holmes was being interviewed by Desiree Cousteau and basically he talks about the various sex acts he had done. Cousteau is wearing a white dress and I beleive there is a scene with her and Joey Silvera where she goes to interview for a job and they get it on. Not positive it's Silvera, but pretty sure. She is telling Holmes the story and it cuts to the scene. Basically like when Holmes tells his stories. In the end Holmes and Cousteau get it on.

Mesh writes on RAME: inari vachs is one of the best things to ever happen to porn.....pretty face, an apparently insatiable appetite for sex, good bj's, and an ass that doesn't quit (i seriously get a headrush just from getting a view of it....so beautiful. nice & developed, muscular, and it sticks out so uniquely well). it's kind of surprising that i like her so much, as i usually prefer the bigger chested women. inari is probably one of the handful of female performers that i'd abhor the thought of getting implants for.

Xany writes: Mr. Ford, I enjoy a pornographic video once or twice a week. I have a couple of questions to ask you (an apparent knowledgeable source). Why do the producers/ directors choose male performers who are nice looking AND well endowed? Peter North, Tom Byron, Rocco Stiffredi, and Nacho Vidal are examples of the type of men Im referring to. They are handsome and have large penises. I cannot stand to see a homely fellow (even though he may be hung-Ron Jeremy) in a sex scene with a gorgeous woman who would NEVER sleep with him in her private life. My second question concerns an actress (all time favorite). She performed in a John Stagliano video under the name "Cassidy" in 1993. Does she work anymore? Appear in magazines perhaps? My second all time favorite gal, Tanya Fox, has disappeard too.

Russell from www.ausadultvideo.com.au writes: Four Corners (ABC Australia) did a story last night (Monday 8/5) on Censorship and the Sex Industry in Aust. If you can get a copy its worth looking at. I read on your site earlier this year that you have rellies in FNQ maybe they taped it etc or know someone who did. Just thought you'd like to know especially with your column (9/5) about the FSC and the different kind of vids now coming out of the US. I for one won't carry Brown vids or animal on my site, not worth the drama or the hassles, I'm sure you know what I mean

Goddess writes (while singing "Torn Between Two Lovers"): Because I heart both Gene and Mike, I cannot, nay, I MUST NOT comment on Mike's earlier statements. But, what the hell, I will anyway. The exit console IS extremely annoying. I feel that if I want to further explore my porn site options, I'll do that on my own, I don't need AVN shoving their choices in my face. However, if all it takes to be reviewed on Gene's site is to direct a video "where we have all the same parolees f---ing all the same worn out pornchicks on all the same sets, we shot it on a budget that was less than the daily monetary expeditures of your average Ethiopian famine wracked family," as Mike so eloquently states, perhaps we'll be seeing HIS newest video reviewed on geneross.com. Except for the pesky boyfriends he can't seem to shake, Mike is usually the only guy in his vids. His wardrobe consists of a fresh Fruit of the Loom and Levi's, and for all we know, he could be wearing the SAME Fruit of the Loom and jeans in EVERY vid. Last but not least, Mike's idea of a "set" is a single occupancy at a Motel 6. He usually rents rooms that don't even have beds, just small couches. And when you think he's pulling the chick closer to him so he can f--- her harder, don't kid yourself! Mike's pulling her ass back up onto the couch, cause there ain't enough room for both of them.

Luke: AVN charges $1000 a month for those tiny rectangular ads that run down the side of AVN.com and GeneRoss.com. Considering there are about 15 of them, AVN publisher Paul Fishbein must really be lining his pockets. He charges $2000 for a full page ad in each issue of the Adult Video News magazine.

Mike South writes: Zeboray was harping about all the good that FSC does...maybe HE can enlighten us as to what exactly they have done...other than piss away money. and as for goddess anyone who watches my vids knows I have several pair of blue jean shorts as well as my Levis, and I never shoot in anything less than a days inn jeez for the human model for a Troll Doll yer a fiesty thing.

Georgia writes: I've seen a couple Mike South videos and I think Goddess is right. He is wearing the same clothes in every video. Is it true that Mike and Brandy Alexandre have formed an alliance against the Free Screech Coalition and are now going to do an adult video together??

Mike: Jeez Luke can't you tell from 2 sentences that Georgia IS Goddess. Keep watching though baby...by the are you the green haired one or the orange haired one?

I know that this has little to do with porn Luke, but it is high time someone spoke up. We need some enterpising young attorney out there to file a class action suit against Microsoft for defective product design. The reason these virus things continue to exist is because microsoft operating systems lack the most basic functionality of all operating systems and that functionality is to protect itself from users and protect users from each other. This is an open and shut case.

Faux Whipcord Thighs - Is Gene on the Juice?

Amused writes: I laughed when I read about Goddess's fawning over Gene Ross's "bulging biceps and whip cord thighs." Why? Because that Adonis-like body of Gene's is clearly the result of years of steroids abuse! Super human forms of his nature cannot possibly be produced by hours gymn labor alone. Wake up woman! He is on the "juice"!

ps A common side effect of steroid abuse is the shrinking of the testicles which would explain his less than probing reporting style.

Goddess writes: Geez, I'm surprised "Amused" didn't say Gene was gay. Isn't that usually what an insecure guy does when he sees a well built male?? How many hours do you spend in the gym, Amused??

Turn Ons in Porn

Learned Hand writes on RAME: Over time I have thought about what turns me on in porn. By this I don't mean the actual physical acts, or the body types I like best, but the emotional essence I want to see in a scene. Patrick Riley has obviously done the same thing and come to different conclusions that he explores in a different thread.

What really turns me on in a porn tape is a woman doing something transgressive. In other words, I want to see women doing things that are not accepted by society. I want to see her acting as a "bad girl," and I want to see her acting in ways that women generally don't act except in men's fantasies. I want to see her enjoying what she is doing, at least partly because to me that is even more transgressive and because it accords with the fantasy. So, what does this mean?

#1 I never, ever, want to watch a woman paired with her real life boyfriend or husband. Why? Well, I already know that women will sleep with their mates. Big f---ing Deal. When I see someone on the street, I don't fantasize "Boy, I bet she f---s her husband something fierce!" I think about f---ing her myself or imagine her as a slut who f---s around, by implication meaning I would have a chance.

#2 I do want to see the women performing with men that I know are *not* their boyfriends. This is one reason why I like series like Up'n'Cummers and Dirty Debs. I also like these series because they present the fantasy of a man with an unending series of willing women.

#3 Once I see the women paired with men who are not their mates, I want to see them treating those men as if they were that man's girlfriend. In other words I want to see intimacy that I know is not founded on the normal precursors to intimacy. I want to see the woman kissing the man and fully giving herself to him in a way that she would normally reserve. I want to see the fantasy that this woman drops the normal barriers to intimacy. So, I want to see all the signs of intimacy in this union. I want passionate kissing. I want embraces. I want to see face to face intercourse where she can see the man who is f---ing her. I love it when she lets him cum inside her. I really like it when she swallows his cum.

#4 I do not want to see condoms. Condoms undercut two of the themes I explored above. Condoms are an obvious barrier to intimacy or seen another way, the physical marker showing that intimacy does not exist. In addition I want to see the women acting in a way that is out of character for normal women. I would expect that a woman having sex with a man she hardly knows would wear a condom. It is slutty in an exiting way that she does not.

#5 I like to see girl girl sex. I think this is related to my internal voice which tells me that "good girls don't do that." Of course, that is just what I want to see, girls acting in a way that "good girls" don't.

#6 I like to see first timers and I like to see women doing things for the first time. By definition, these women are doing things they don't do in their normal lives, so if they are doint something slutty, that makes it extra slutty to me.

#7 #5 + #6 means that first time girl girl = woohoo!

So, how does this mean that I am different from what Patrick Riley wants? Patrick wants to be a voyeur on a woman's real sex life. As a result, he wants to see the women with their mates. He wants to believe that he is seeing real orgasms and real intimacy. Over time, Patrick has learned that interviews with with porn starlets always reveal that we are not privy to their real, private, sex life. As a result he wants no part of them. On the other hand, I want to see women acting outside of their normal lives. I love the intereviews because they show the contrast between the girls' real lives and what they are doing in the tape. So, there you have it. I know what I like, and I know it is different from what some other people like.

And The Winner Is....

Chaim Amalek writes: Luke, check out www.onlinejournalismawards.org. Columbia University is going to lend some class to the field of web journalism by creating a series of awards analogous to the Pulitzers, but for the web. This could be that big break you have always been pining for! Nominate yourself, and at the very least, you will be able to tell those status-savy jewesses whose frozen hearts you covet that you were nominated for something like the Pulitzer, and that you are a real journalist. And while you are at it, perhaps you could nominate me for some of my commentary, especially regarding the role of the Jew in American life. (Remember, just because something sounds like a joke does not mean you should not take it seriously.)

And on a more personal note, do you know what your most impressive achievement to date is? Creating a community of folks who regularly write you with advice on how I, Luke F-rd, should live MY life. Don't these people have anything better to do, or is l-keford.com much more compelling than even I ever thought? (I just deleted a critically important sentence that might change your/our life for the better. I need to discuss this with you in private first.)

Finally, why not give Ms. Jade a chance - assuming she quits the business and passes the physical, of course. I will wager that if she met these two conditions and you married her, you would find it very difficult to dump her. Now, I know that you want Jewish kids, and that she is not in a position to provide them, but that is no problem - Judaism permits polygamy for men (no polyandry for hetero women; and FYI lesbos don't formally exist). So you see, you can have your slice of pie and eat two. In fact, you can have as many slices of pie as you desire! So long as you figure out how to pay the baker. Please do this for your fans and let us know how things work out.

Chaim Amalek, Old Liberal Jew from the Upper West Side

PS Another white farmer was killed in Zimbabwe. When will they ever learn? Oh tell me when will they, ever learn. (Sorry - that old leftie tune "Where have all the flowers gone" is morphing in my head into "Where have all the white Zimbabwean farmers gone - gone to graveyards, every one". Ah, Fair Play for Cuba days gone by . . . .

PPS Them porner lobbyists in Sacramento - do real politicians actually meet with these folks? How high up the food chain do they penetrate? Do any of them trade sexual favors for votes on bills of importance to them? Provided that this were done with sexually desirable women, this could be a VERY effective lobbying technique. Feel free to pass this on!

3PS Another important prediction deleted here.

Luke: Most men would like to meet porn stars. Thus most politicians and their assistants like to meet porn stars. But they have no interest in the political views and concerns of porn stars. I'm sure a fair number of porn stars have had sex with politicians but I don't know if sex has been exchanged for specific votes.

Thanks buddy, you are especially needed when i am on the road...to fill in some gaps in my column! :)Luke

Thanks buddy, you are especially needed when i am on the road...to fill in some gaps in my column! :)Luke

Thanks buddy, you are especially needed when i am on the road...to fill in some gaps in my column! :)Luke

Chaim: As your Doppelganger, [DEE-LETED] I am so ethical that once again, I have deleted some text rather than hurt the feelings of the vulnerable. Really, if I were without morals, I would be living in a palace by now, every bit the equal of any porner's, and not as a gardener, either.

By the way, last week the Jews of Time Warner went to war with the Jews of Disney. The issue was money (these are jews, after all). The weapons of choice were lawyers and publicists. No blood was spilled. For whom did you root?

[LF: Time Warner. Its CEO Gerald Levin almost became a rabbi while Eisner is a liberal secular assimilated pro-homo Jew.]

More filler: interesting article on Abe Lincoln in the new Time magazine. Was old Abe ahead of his time - or not?

Proud Member of the FSC

Greg Zeboray writes: I must respectively disagree with South and Brandy on the FSC [Free Speech Coalition, porn's trade group] matter - I believe they are a very good thing for the industry. By contributing to the efforts to keep the rights to produce porn legal, they are helping everyone, from the talent to producers to distributors to book stores.

If there is one thing I disagree with the FSC on, it's their representation of themselves as a "trade association" in the broad sense. Having read their charter, my take is that they were created for the purpose of first amendment issues related to porn, and I feel they will be most effective if they concentrate on that. Now, they have an excellent sister organization - Protecting Adult Welfare - who's job it is to look after the talent, and we should all contribute to PAW so they can better achieve their objectives.

In regards to Bill Lyon, I think the FSC may have a real gem there. I have had a lengthy conversation with him regarding where he wants to take the association, and provided the board works with him, it will be great for all of you in the adult industry. I was not given the authority to disclose his plans, but hopefully he himself will soon! He did indicate his full agreement with me that everything discussed (on the record) in board meetings should be immediately disclosed to all members - it is our money they operate with.

Let me close by telling everyone that I remain a proud member of the FSC, and think everyone involved with the industry should be as well. I left the FSC for commercial reasons. It was not because I didn't support them. NO organization can please everyone 100%, but as Gloria Leonard says "at least they are doing something". That's more then I can say, and I suspect more then most all of you can say as well.

Sheens Reflect on Film Rated-X

RADNOR, Pa. (AP) - Martin Sheen says he encouraged his son Emilio Estevez not to direct his other son, newly sober Charlie Sheen, in a movie about the drug-addled porn industry. But Sheen told TV Guide that he was impressed by ``Rated X'' and the performances of both his offspring. Estevez and his brother star as the Mitchell brothers, two San Francisco porn kings. Charlie Sheen's character snorts cocaine, chugs vodka and smokes pot.