Home

Back to Essays



Sunday, March 12, 2000

Email Luke

Kianna Did It

Metro contract girl Kianna Bradley ( Kiannabradley1@aol.com) writes: HEY LUKE!!!!!! WELL METRO BOUGHT THE MOVIE AND EVERYONE WILL GET PAID NEXT MONDAY NOT THIS MONDAY BUT NEXT. ANYWAYS, TELL EMMETT, THANKS AGAIN.. BUT I REALLY DO NOT NEED EARL IN MY LIFE, HE IS A VERY MEAN MAN!!!! HE DIES IN FRONT OF ME , THEN COMES BACK A WEEK LATER AND MAKES THE NOISES WHEN HE WAS DYING AGAIN BUT STARTS LAUGHING ABOUT IT! HE WAS HIGH ON HERION AGAIN!! I DONT NEED THAT IN MY LIFE.. I NEED A MAN NOT A CHILD THAT HOLDS LIFE IN A VERY LOOSE MANNER, HE GOT ANOTHER CHANCE AT LIFE AND IT STILL DOES NOT MATTER TO HIM, BUT TO ME, WELL IT MADE ME LOOK AT THINGS MUCH DIFFERENTLY,HE NEVER STOOD BEHIND ME WITH ANYTHING, ALWAYS TURNED HIS BACK ON ME, INEED SOMEONE THAT WHEN I f--- UP WILL ALWAYS BE THERE AND SAY YOULL GET THROUGH THIS OK, HE WOULDNT EVEN TAKE MY PHONE CALLS.

I VALUE RESPECT AND HONESTY , IF I CARE ABOUT YOU I STAND BY YOU NO MATTER WHAT WRONG OR RIGHT, THATS LOVE UNFORTUNATELY HE DOES NOT KNOW THE MEANING, AND FRANKLY I DONT WANT A PERSON LIKE THAT IN MY LIFE, OR NEED ONE LIKE THAT BY ANY MEANS, I HAD MY FRIENDS STANDING BY ME AND THATS ALL THAT MATTERS!!!!! METRO (GREG ALVES , WENDI KNIGHT, MICHAEL ADAM, GREG MURPHEY, PHYLLISHA ANNE, ALL THE TALENT AND PEOPLE THAT WORKED FOR ME, ANABOLIC , KHAN TUSION, DION FROM ELAGANT ANGEL, MY PRODUCTION MNG. PICASSO , AND EVEN EXTREME ASSOICIATES TRIED TO HELP, AND YES LUKE WAS BACKING ME ALSO!!!!!! THANK YOU TO A;LL THESE PEOPLE YOU GUYS ARE THE BOMB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EVERYONE NEVER GAVE UP ON ME AND I APPRECIATE IT WITH ALL MY HEART!!!!!!!! BUT EARL WELL, HE TURNED HIS BACK ON ME AND SAID I'M f---ED!!!!! HE LAUGHED I GUESS HE DIDNT THINK I WOUL PULL THROUGH BUT I DID!!!! AND YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M REALLY A NICE PERSON BUT f--- YOU EARL SLATE!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO EMMETT THANKS AGAIN SWEETIE FOR THE SWEET JESTER YOU ARE A DOLL !!!! AND KENDRA BABY LOOKS LIKE WE GOT EACHOTHERS BACK AGAIN!!!!! f--- BO TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOW ARE THE TIMES YOU SEE THE REAL PEOPLE IN THIS INDUSTRY AND YOU SEE WHO HELPS YOU AND WHO WONT WELL......BO FOLLOWINGS (PEOPLE WHO BACK HIM ARE NOT VERY REPUTABLE ANY WAYS) SO THAT SAYS ALOT, BO YOU LIED TO ALOT OF PEOPLE MAYBE YOU SHOULD JUST TRY TO MAKE IT RIGHT. I KNOW KENDRA DOES NOT DO DRUGS ,CAUSE IF SHE DID ,SHE WOULD BE PARTYING WITH ME!!!!!!!!:)I LOVE YA GIRL!!!!!! LOVE KIANNA

LA Weekly On Porn And Ebay.com

Here's an excerpt from Deborah Picker's article on Ebay.com:

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/00/16/cyber-picker.shtml

Luke F-rd, whose porn-gossip Web site has earned him the title "the Matt Drudge of pornography," reassured me over the phone that many of the underwear sellers are, in fact, professional entertainers. "Tons of porn stars are making their living that way," he says. "They make thousands of dollars a month selling personal belongings and funneling people to their own sites." Dave Michaels agrees, adding, "Not many are 'students/amateurs' like they say. That's part of the fantasy."

Indeed, it's all about the fantasy. Jenna Jameson, the current "it girl" in porn, uses eBay to sell -- among other things -- audiotapes she records to order for winning bidders. "I'll act as if I'm having sex with them and say their name . . . or talk about my feet -- whatever they want," she says of the tapes, which go for $1,000 to $2,000 a piece. "But it pays my rent -- and I have a very big house."

Jewish Guilt For Secular Humanists

Porner Dianna Roth, fresh from a contaminating session of fornication, seeks expiation by writing the pornisher rebbe Luke F-rd:

I'm sure you would prefer me to be bitten by a venomous snake or get rabies. I owe no apology to any supernatural being, but to you I do. I'm so very sorry to disappoint you and hurt you and jeopardize my blood. Please don't be judgmental. It could be black lung. I made a mistake.

It doesn't mean I don't love you. It just confirms what I've already told you -- I'm the world's most sexual being and my endurance is only human, Luke, not like your insane defiance of the corporeal... I will concede to you in any way you wish.

Although having sex with XXX was incredibly therapeutic for me. If I had waited long enough to read your site I would have hesitated regarding him. At least once during the sex I felt like hesitating. I've made no verbal, secular, religious commitments to anyone but myself regarding having sexual intercourse. (Pointedly disregarding having made any to you.)

The man came to me because I was not sober enough to drive to him. He has been a complete gentleman all along. I know how much I resemble YYY, and I don't know who in that relationship was the psychopath, maybe both. Can our relationship be sacred WITHOUT a physical component? Yes? No? Both? Yes, of course.

As to whether XXX got carried away with my unbelievable desirability or sadistically infected me with the Black Plague doesn't mean our relationship isn't sacred. It just means that I am a bear of very little sense sometimes and owe an apology for my careless, self-disrespecting behavior to you.

I love you and worship you and respect you and want you, and I think I'm going to go take a cleansing bath and bemoan your sexual pathology.

"If only I could have watched Luke F-rd masturbate and caught the droplets of his pure Jewish cum on my face, I might never have fallen..."

Chaim Amalek writes: Dear Pornishe Rebbe. 1. OK, I am completely unable to decode that letter from "Diana Roth". Please "Pornischer Rebbe", decode for me, if not you web site. 2. Lay off the canine chick beat! Nothing good can come from it. Stick to the horses. Besides, if you anathematize women who have sex with dogs, are you not descending down that slippery slope that led to prop 22?

Luke: Chaim, I hope the following helps.

Roth writes XXX: I can't take medicine or wash until after tests, so don't need anything. I will take break from editing double shift Monday to see AIM for full spectrum of all sexual disease tests. I haven't tested positive for anything for many years but if I were a slut I could have given you things, too? And if you knew I wasn't sexually active and you weren't healthy, what happened? If you lost your porn star control over me it would be understandable. If I lost control period it would be understandable. You are terribly precious, although I am sitting scared in my nightgown instead of happily working out in the sunshine as I was when you called. You hurt me and I hurt Luke so please declare your intentions so that I can stop wasting time speculating on them.

XXX replies to Roth: Hello, Consider it a lesson to trust noone.. Things go around in the biz more than they're admitted.. much more... But the truth is... I don't have anything... But, like Dave Hardman, I did and do want you to stop bothering me... I did in fact have sex with you once, in the dark, but honestly had no desire to continue further, and did not consider it as an obligation I had to do anything else.. I wanted you to stop bothering me, firstly, and secondly, consider that this is a dangerous business.. so, you should never be so careless.. Who ever knows if I have something or if I don't.. or if anyone does, for that matter..the point is... You should be tested whether if it was with me, or whoever else.. I do get tests above and beyond the rediculous requirement in the biz... and I have a feeling you're fine, at least physically. If you want to go around and spread that I have some kind of disease.. go ahead.. It's not the first time I've had rumours go around.. I don't really care anyore.. I will state the fact that I have tests to prove that I am clean for all things which I can be tested for.. as well as the fact that the source of the rumour is someone who has already been convicted of stalking another male performer. I've considered your constant letters, pages and phone calls as harrassment.. I don't want to meet you again.. I'm glad I could be of service to you once.. But that is all... It is done with. Goodbye.

Sex & Erotica In Japan

Peter Hayes writes from London: Thought I'd write about my time over in Japan today:

"Is your passport in order?" A male voice said on the other end of a phone. For today we'll refer to as the editor of the Church Times. "Yeah sure, why?" I asked. "We want someone to go to cover the day in the life of Tokyo sex journalist.... Three full days.... Right down your street... All expenses paid." The voice continues curtesy of Alexander Graham Bell. "Are you interested?"

So it came to pass that I spent three days in the concrete jungle that is modern Japan. I leaned a lot, but as I shall relate, that is all I got. The pack-of-three was still a pack-of-three on my return. Even the sex magazine I brought back I'd be happy to show to my mother.

Now I know a little about the world sex scene given - I was a foreign correspondent for a news agency for a while - but in the presence of an editor with an expense account I'm suddenly an expert. However, behind my can-do attitude, I'm not that fond of reporting on downtown Japan. In fact it is hell for the visiting journalist without contacts and knowledge of the language. For a start it is difficult to tell where you are (the streets don't have names!) and price of everything looks like a work of fiction on the old expense sheet.

However I learn that arrangements have been made and I'll only have to look, listen and report back.

My native guide works as a reporter on one of the three (yes three) sex newspapers that operate out of Tokyo. His name is Joshi. One possible translation of the newspaper title might be "Leisure and Nightlife" another might be "Where To Go To Get Laid." The paper that he works on reports upon sex and the erotic with little to no cultural distraction; although it contains nothing erotic itself, bar a few girls in small, tight, bikinis.

Prostitution is actually illegal here and firmly in the hands of the local Mafia (the Yakuza ) - but the scene remains unhindered just as long as it is carried out discreetly and the right "respect" is paid.

Things start badly, Joshi is writing in the morning and will be going out and about on his rounds - with me in tow - later. A shy floppy fringed guy of about 21, with slow but perfect English, he makes an unlikely vice reporter; but then again, Tokyo is an unlikely place.

Having arranged to meet after lunch I'm reduced to speaking to a foreign correspondent who knows the city well. One of his friends is a Canadian stripper and is available for a chat right away as she works evenings.

Caroline is a tall, strong lady with tightly pulled back natural blonde hair. Her inside knowledge is perfect as she has worked here on and off for years. Apparently you can only work for three months at a time then you have to leave for three months. In her free three months she designs clothes - approaching thirty she will soon turning to clothes design full time.

We meet outside her overpriced rabbit hutch ($6,500 a month rent between three girls - all strippers) and we go to a nearby open-air Buddhist temple to talk. I ask her if it is true that the streets of Japan is safe for women.

"Yes they are basically voyeurs, I'm too tall (she looks at least 5' 11) for most of them. I think I scare them a bit. I get presents left at the club but they (Japanese men) are frightened of western women." She said in good humour.

She has adopted Buddhism and pays homage at the temple in the local bell ringing, candle lighting, fashion.

(The next night I get to see why she is such a star. Twirling around a metal pole like an Olympic gymnast. While most of the girls of the evening - that were mostly European - could only use the pole as a phallic object or for a quick hang-turn, Caroline could do that extended leg hanging, spin and turn stuff that justifies the $2,000 - plus - a week she gets.)

Does she NEVER get chatted up? "No not really, you can go to hostess bars (places where the price of the drinks covers female company) if they want to chat up a girl. I 2am a professional and the club is quite professional. Western guys are different they are more forward. They ask you what you do and I tell them -- I'm a designer!"

We chat over some more over some overcooked rice and undercooked fish, but I learn little more worth reporting. The biggest risk for a foreign stripper in this city - it seems - is to die of boredom.

Dropping in at a local sex shop, on the way back to the newspaper offices, I browse the goods on offer. The offer includes magazines such a "European Cuties" (no translation rendered) whose cover features a blonde European of around 13/14 and several cartoon books in which teenage girls are shown being raped by creates from outer space. Their tentacles being used to give an original twist on douple penetration.

Some of these cartoons feature what you would take for being very young girls - perhaps as young as 5 or 6 - it they didn't have ears and/or a tail. These add-ons presumably deflecting their pedophilic intentions. The books show the "girls" being in states of distress such as crying or wetting themselves. Bondage seems popular but pubic hair is not allowed in over the counter stuff.

While this was an adult sex shop I have seen the same kind of products being sold on market stalls on previous visits. The local age of consent is only 13.

I'm told that rape and sex crime is extremely rare. I buy a drab soft sex photo magazine (as a browsing payment) and return to the newspaper offices to speak to Joshi who is still working on his reportage from yesterday and not ready for me. Instead I speak to his editor Mr Horishami (my guess at the spelling) who seems to think I am the accountant and gives me reams of figures and percentage breakdowns - for Nightlife - in his learned-from-the-americans English.

He seem familiar with London and stated three London landmarks that he had been past. However he became evasive about the criminal involvement in the industry - despite it being well known - and seemed to deny to that he was promoting or facilitating the sale of sex: "Look someone says I have a kariooki club at X street - we write that. If we review a place and find it is a massage parlour we say that... We simply pass on information, if we told lies we wouldn't sell any newspapers."

He then remembers another three London landmarks he has been past and I congratulate him for being such a widely travelled man. He gives me his business card (I didn't have one) and promise to phone him if I need any more vagary about Tokyo's erotic life - he didn't seem to get the joke, but then again Japan isn't big on irony.

In part two - tomorrow - I will tell you about my time out on the town with Joshi and about fraternising in a very new and original way.

Pentagrams In Porn

Irritated in Modesto writes: Who gives a rip about pentagrams on porn losers! I am much more offended by porn stars wearing crucifixes during porn shoots. No respect! How would you feel Luke if old Ron Jeremy wore a Star of David while he blew himself on screen?

Steve Neece writes about Satan worship: Don't know if it is or not but wouldn't surprise me. In the U.S. satan worship is most often the province of working class white teens from the midwest who are probably into it as an act of rebellion.How much of porn talent comes from this background? I doubt even 1% honestly believes that an actual satan exists tho many probably hope so . I know one person, an employee of GVA, who has claimed to be a satan woshipper during the 10 years I have known him. He is also a secular Jew who got off on Nazi theme porn when I first met him and may still.

In Europe satan worship started among peasants who felt god had forsaken them. They were serious and felt he was their only hope. Centurries later it became the pasttime of jaded members of the nobility who may or may not have believed.Members of the clergy seemed particularly prone to this obsession,perhaps because they were constantly fixated on him. I can easily see GenX types like Black, Zane, Kid Vegas etc. dabbling in this.I wonder if anyone would have the balls to make a serious vid glorifying this?After all, the family that preys together stays together.

XXX: luke, i heard that tiffany mynx has taken out an insurance policy not unlike the one jennifer lopez has on her body on ms. mynx's behind. it was confirmed to me that she took it out with loyds of london and the policy is for 500k in the event that something was to happen to her and she was to lose work because of damages to her derrier.

Zhr: luke, my roommate insists that debi diamond is dead. i don't think she is, but have not heard from her in years...can you settle the debate?

The Skank Look

Alan Watts writes: I agree, Luke, much ado is made of the "skank look" in porn, and I'd like to offer my own well-honed ideas on why skank is all the rage. It has to do, I believe, with the human evolutionary progression towards hairlessness over eons of endless time. That's right.

Human males, being creatures with large visual brains, have preferred mating with increasingly hairless females over the course of human evolution, and this mating preference accounts for the largely hairless(as compared to other primates)modern Homo Sapiens men and women of today.

This process--hairy ape to hairless modern man-- occurred rather quickly, probably over as much as a few million years to as little as a few hundred thousand, so it's likely that it was facilitated dramatically by conscious visual preference and selection of hairless mates by males and females alike.

Hairless women and men were more visually distinct from the hairy masses, and thus more desirable and heavily competed for. Hairless faces are also better for reading facial expressions, essential for highly evolved social communications--faces with interesting expressions are more attention-getting and convey a great deal more information.

Today's women continue this trend to hairlessness by shaving their legs, and removing unwanted facial and other body hair by various store-bought techniques up to and including electrolysis.

Porn extends this hairless trend to shaved pussies, to display the recessed female genitalia to highest visual advantage. The eyecatching skank look of porn actresses is thus based to a large degree upon total facial and body hair removal to the highest extremes, with additional use of makeup to cover over any remaining visible facial hair follicles, still further enhancing this hairless look with the prized smooth skin of youthful women, and then combining the finished product with the universal addition of high heels(with their opposing T&A angularity, for better visual display). I hope this answers your question.

Hasidic Porno

Lucas writes: We're shooting Sam Brown in a hasidic porno. The door opens, we se him and the bored hasid housewife... next shot is her bent over with a sheet behind her getting pumped... next shot is Sam pumping away on a sheet. f---ing hysterical.

Teri Weigel

Amused in Modesto writes: Check out Teri Weigel's site biography. It is lifted almost verbatim from your site's biography of her. For some reason they left off your most recent entry on her bio that said her blonde dye job looks like s---. Now you know how Gene Ross feels when you rip off his site. Amused

PS You have to laugh. She even misspells the word "biography" on her site. Stupid! Stupid! Stupid!

Luke: The difference is that I usually give credit when I borrow from others.

http://www.totallyteri.com/html/biography.html

David Austin On Deviance

Philosphy professor David Austin writes on RAME: While VCRs and Internet distribution have made a great deal of special interest and fetish material more widely available, almost all, if not all, bodily fluids appeared in pornographic movies more than fifteen years ago.

Since golden showers play is far from an obscure practice, urine is relatively clean - sterile as it leaves the bladder (of a healthy person) - and over half of the population sees nothing wrong with having sex during menstruation, I'm not sure why they draw such disgust and derision (-just plain stupid; weird; bad and dirty; crap). There's a good book just out about unusual sexual interests:

Katherine Gates, _Deviant Desires: Incredibly Strange Sex_ (Juno Books, 2000) ISBN 1-890451-03-7 8.5"x11", 248 pp, 400+ pics. with an interesting associated web site: http://www.deviantdesires.com/

A much earlier book that takes a similar attitude towards unusual sexual interests is:

Lars Ullerstam, _The Erotic Minorities_. Introd. by Yves de Saint-Agnès. Translated of _De erotiska minoriteterna_ by Anselm Hollo. (New York, Grove Press, 1966) xix, 172 p. 21 cm. LCCN 66014095 //r832

Money Shot On History Channel

From http://www.canoe.com/Television/mar11_porn.html

Documentary filmmaker Ric Bienstock takes an unblinking look at today's $5-billion-a-year porn industry. Porn stars such as Ron Jeremy and Juli Ashton give frank interviews about the, er, ins and outs of the business, including the fortunes being made in phone sex and on the Internet.

Roly-poly Jeremy, a 20-year porn veteran who was a guest on Mike Bullard earlier this year, figures he has made 1,500 adult movies in his career. However, he doesn't recommend it as a career move. "Male porn stars are lucky to make $30,000 to $40,000 a year," he says.

It's a fascinating account that traces porn back to the dawn of film. But be warned: The content is fairly graphic. You don't want to just stumble onto this, especially when Bienstock trains her cameras on a silicone sex toy factory. The sight of white-coated women painting veins on dozens of rubber dildos is probably a first for History Television [plays Monday at 10PM].

Dead Porn Stars

Bigbaddog writes: Luke, I have noticed a lot of posting in the past 6 mo. regarding deaths in and around the Porn industry. Can you please list the "deaths" and related incidents surrounding them. I find it very interesting that so many casualties have occured in such a short period of time in the small, but growing world of porno. This is a general issue that should really be covered in a full and consolidated story. Since you are THE man in porn news. We look to you for answeres. So, if you will, please send out the Luke F-rd story hounds, and fill in the blanks on this matter.

Inari Vachs - XXXGen Contract Girl

Fred Rising on RAME (newsgroup rec.arts.movies.erotica): Yeah, Inari is great in the interratial scenes, i.e. Gangland 3 where no less than four black dudes plaster her pretty face. Also, in Action Sex Sports, she blows four dudes at once, and each guy shoots his load into her hair. After they finish unloading, she brushes the fresh sperm into her hair.

Writing Fool writes: She is totally awesome in that scene, I agree. On top of her intense sexual performance, she also actually acts in that scene. She starts out being noticeably surprised at having to have sex with her fiancée's friends, but over the course of the scene her body language and facial expressions change and in the end she's really loving it. OK, so it¹s not Masterpiece Theater, but by porn standards it¹s good acting and adds to the heat of the scene.

Writing writes Luke Sunday night: Thanks for posting our discussion about Inari Vachs on your web site. I know that myself and other Inari fans have been trying to figure out what this Gen-XXX deal with Ms. Vachs really means. Our big fear is that the movies produced by her new contract holders won't allow her to perform with the heat, passion, and sexual virtuosity she currently displays. Nor have I been able to find a copy of their magazine and their web site is equally unhelpful. Can you shed light on this news?

Luke: I don't know much. There should be more soon on XXXGen.com. I think James DiGiorgio will be shooting XXXGen's movies.

Luke's Philosophy Of Porn

Alan Watts ghostwrites: Freud said every Jewish male wishes to kill his father and have sex with his mother. On this foundation is based the whole of modern psychodynamics and psychotherapy.

With this as my starting point, I'd like to endeavor one last time to clarify the underlying psychodynamics of the entire sex industry, in terms of the porn actresses and strip dancers without whom the sex industry could not exist, as well as the male customers who support this de-humanizing trade.

I firmly believe it would be no exaggeration at all to say that the male customers of the sex trade are, at the most primal level, unconsciously seeking out that ideal woman who will initiate and perform all desired sexual functions without the male (in the role of an infant) ever having to say a word or even make a single request. I truly believe that is the male fantasy in its most basic form, made incarnate in the women of the sex industry, who fulfill all baby's fantasies.

So in reality, these men have regressed to the original Freudian problem of trying to have sex with their mothers, in the form of their ideal fantasy woman.

Next, in the same psychoanalytic analogy, what is it that the female sex performers desire? Keep in mind they are performing FOR THE CAMERA. The camera is daddy/mommy, giving perfect attention and unconditional acceptance of all little girl does. Most porn actresses readily admit the camera is their raison d'etre. Since baby girl did not have a penis, she is desperately attempting to seduce daddy/mommy and also to prove that she does indeed have the ability to GET(produce) a penis, in their eyes. "Their eyes" of course being, once again, the all-seeing, all-knowing camera.

Go to any strip bar, and you'll see little girls desperately trying to gain the acceptance of daddy and prove they have some sexual worth. The problem is they are unconsciously convinced that they don't have any worth...any more than they have a penis, since they failed to solve the original Freudian problem, by identifying with their strong, heterosexual mothers! And all the bumping and grinding in the world won't grow her a penis. Just watch strippers performing doggy tricks for dollar bills, and you'll see a little girl trying to please daddy to prove her worth.

The attempt to grow a penis is futile, so they regress to the original Freudian problem of trying to seduce daddy. It's an endless cycle with no possiblity of a solution. For more detail, read Elaine Siegel's book: Female Homosexuality: Choice Without Volition: A Pschoanalytic Study.

Portion Of The Week

Chaim Amalek writes: Luke, what better way to end the sabbath than with a nice kiddush and this week's letter from the National Alliance? Seriously, does it not speak to the corruption of our times that Pierce is one of the few sources of commentary and news of this sort? Oh, and you had better not put this up on your web site, because that will only make Dovid Geffen and his jewish lawyer Bert Fields even more angry at you.

PS As a thought experiment, what is the minimum number of words that you would have to alter in this article to obtain an essay with which you would be in agreement?

LF: Email Luke on what is more evil - the following views or porno? And why.

American Dissident Voices Broadcast of March 11, 2000

The Killing of Kayla by Dr. William Pierce [LF: This guy has Nazi views - he hates blacks and Jews and other minorities]

A number of listeners have told me that I really must comment on the series of horrible murders of White people by Blacks during the past two weeks. My initial response to these suggestions was negative. It is not the purpose of these American Dissident Voices broadcasts to tell listeners what they already know. If the Jewish media report something well enough for people to get the essential facts of what happened, then I'm inclined to leave it alone.
In the case of these recent race murders, however, it is not entirely clear that the facts were presented adequately. Many people asked me whether or not the carjacker who dragged the six-year-old White boy to his death in Independence, Missouri, on February 22 is Black. They assumed that he is Black, because the murder occurred during a carjacking, which is an almost exclusively Black crime, and also because the murderer wasn't shown on television.
Americans have learned from experience that when the media refuse to show them the face of a criminal, it usually is because he is not White. There were many pictures of the victim, little Jake Robel, on television, but none of his murderer.Well, of course, the assumption was correct. Although most of the national media managed to avoid revealing the race of the murderer, several local newspapers in Missouri carried pictures of him. He was 34-year-old Kim Davis, of Kansas City, a Black criminal who looked as if he'd just been pulled down from a tree in Africa. He was hanging around a sandwich shop parking lot in Independence waiting for an opportunity to steal a car. When little Jake's mother drove up and got out of her car, leaving her six-year-old son in the back seat, the Black seized the chance.
He shoved Jake out onto the pavement but left the White child entangled in his seatbelt. As the Black drove off, Jake's mother was trying frantically to fee her son from his seatbelt and was screaming at the Black to stop, but he ignored her and roared out of the parking lot behind the wheel of her car, with the child bouncing and scraping along the pavement. He dragged the child for more than four miles, at speeds up to 80 miles an hour, before White drivers were able to block the stolen car, pull the Black out, tie him up, and sit on him until the police arrived. Of course, it was far too late to do anything for the child, except cover his torn body with a blanket. Police, of course, marked and photographed spots along the route of the dragging where there were pools of little Jake's blood and pieces of his flesh, so that the photographs could be used later as evidence in the Black's trial.
Do you remember when three young White men dragged a convicted Black criminal to his death in Jasper, Texas, two years ago? I'm sure that you do, because the media bosses made it a point not to let you forget. Over and over and over again we saw on our television screens those little circles the police had marked along the road where they had found some of the victim's blood.
Now, I will promise you that you never will see the spots the police in Missouri marked where little Jake Robel's blood was found. Those bloody spots won't be shown, nor will the Black murderer's face be shown, because the media bosses want you to forget about the murder of little Jake Robel as quickly aspossible. At least, little Jake's dragging received some news coverage for a day or two. That's more than two White women who were dragged to their deaths in carjackings got.
Just a week earlier, on February 14, 41-year-old Sandra Roberts was dragged to death in Kansas City. I'll bet you haven't heard a word about that, and you won't hear about it, for the usual reason. Then there was the murder of Patricia Stansfield in August 1998. The 46-year-old White woman was dragged two miles to her death along a road in Streator, Illinois, by a Black who was stealing her car. After the Black killer, Christopher Coleman, had dragged Patricia for two miles while she screamed for mercy, he eventually stopped, cut her dead body loose, and left her in a roadside ditch before continuing on with her car. And if you didn't hear about this killing from me, you didn't hear about it.
The media bosses imposed a total news embargo on the Black-on-White Stansfield dragging, which occurred just after the White-on-Black dragging in Jasper, Texas. They didn't want news about Patricia Stansfield's murder to detract from their massive publicity about the Jasper dragging. The murder of little Kayla Rolland in Michigan last week received more news coverage than the dragging of Jake Robel, but there was the usual media reluctance to let us know that the killer who shot the six-year-old White girl to death in her first-grade classroom was Black.
Most television viewers had to infer that he was Black by learning from news reports that he had been living in a crack house and that he had used a pistol which had been stolen from a local business by one of his adult relatives. If we were lucky we caught a brief glimpse of one of his very Black relatives being led into a courtroom in chains, although we never got to see the killer himself.
If we were diligent readers of news reports on the Internet we might have learned that he already had been suspended from school three times-in the first grade-once for stabbing a classmate. We might also learn that he had attacked little Kayla on the school playground the day before, and that when he pulled out a pistol and shot her in the neck he told her, "I hate you." None of the news reports that I was able to find, however, came right out and said that he was Black and habitually acted in a way so many other young Blacks do in racially integrated schools, where they cause problems far out of proportion to their numbers.
None of the news commentators asked why something hadn't been done to protect little Kayla from this juvenile monster with a record of assaults after his display of hostility and aggression against her the day before. They seemed much more concerned with explaining away the killer's behavior and treating him as a victim of society. About the only recent Black-on-White killings which have received news coverage which even mentioned the racial element were the murders of three White men in Pittsburgh last week by a Black killer who became enraged when a White repair crew failed to repair the door on his subsidized apartment fast enough to suit him and who told everyone who would listen that he hated Whites and wanted to kill all White people. It was pretty hard for the media to keep the racial angle out of that story.
I have a prediction to make, however: the media will let this story die a lot quicker than they let die a couple of other stories about racial killings which come to mind: the story of Buford Furrow, for example, who wounded several Jews and killed one Filipino in Los Angeles last year, or the story of Benjamin Smith, who killed one Korean and one Black in Illinois. In fact, the Furrow and Smith stories really haven't been allowed to die yet. They remain grist for Hollywood's White-guilt mill.
And I'm sure that you're familiar with the technique used by the media bosses for keeping such stories alive. They use the old Watergate technique, the Chinese water-drop technique, in which every day they breathlessly dribble out some new tidbit connected with the story, or if they don't have any new tidbit, they just rehash all of the old tidbits. One way or another they keep the story in the public consciousness long enough for it to sink in. After the story leaves the front pages, they remind the public about it with television documentaries every month or so.
In the past year there already have been several television specials featuring Buford Furrow and Benjamin Smith. I'm quite sure that during the next couple of years we'll see dozens more television specials based on the escapades of Furrow and Smith.. I'll also predict that we won't see any television specials about last week's murder of three White men in Pittsburgh by a hate-crazed Black killer-not even one--because they want us to forget about that as quickly as possible. We also will not see Mr. Clinton coming on television and giving us all a little sermon about hate in connection with last week's Pittsburgh murders, the way he did in connection with both the Furrow and Smith incidents.
What we did get to see on television after the murder of little Kayla Rolland, however, was Mr. Clinton pushing hard for more gun control laws-especially a law requiring trigger locks on guns in order to keep kids from using them. Are we supposed to believe that such a law would have kept six-year-old Kayla from being murdered by her Black classmate? Are we supposed to believe that Black crack dealers will run out and buy trigger locks for all their guns if Mr. Clinton and his anti-gun backers succeed in having such a law passed? What we need is minority control, not gun control.
And that brings us to the subject I really want to talk about today. You know, I could go on and on about Black-on-White crime and the reluctance of the controlled news media to report it, because it doesn't fit their agenda of making White Americans feel guilty, of keeping White Americans morally disarmed and off balance. I mentioned three terrible crimes against White people which occurred within the past two and a half weeks, but these Black-on-White crimes are not the point.
In a sense they aren't even important. In a sense I welcome such crimes. I welcome them because they remind us of a much bigger problem we have, and that is the destruction of our society, the destruction of our civilization, the destruction of our race by those who have deliberately brought about the conditions in America where six-year-old White girls are murdered in their first-grade classrooms by subhuman animals; conditions where White women and children are dragged to their deaths by subhuman animals bent on stealing a car with total disregard for the lives of anyone who gets in their way; conditions where a subhuman animal flies into a rage because White workers aren't fast enough in repairing the door to his rent-subsidized apartment which he himself kicked in when he lost his key and then begins murdering White people, whom he blames for all his own inadequacies.
What's important is that these conditions have been imposed on us deliberately, and we're all obliged to live under them, and they're getting worse, and eventually they will destroy our people. That's what's important. And if it takes the shooting of little Kayla Rolland in her classroom in Michigan to make us think about that, then little Kayla died for a good cause. If it takes the dragging to death of little Jake Robel along a highway in Missouri to distract us from our ball games for a few minutes and give just a few of us a chance to see the big picture, then it is worth it.
I know that sounds terrible and heartless to people who are constitutionally incapable of seeing the big picture, to people who are incapable of thinking about anything except in individual and personal terms. All they can think about is poor little Kayla, poor little Jake, the poor fellows who were murdered by a hate-crazed Black in Pittsburgh. What we must think about instead of what happened to little Kayla is that other little White girls like Kayla all over America, in most of the schools in America, are exposed every day to Blacks like the one who murdered Kayla; that evil people in Washington and Hollywood and New York have deliberately imposed on our country policies which make it impossible for little White girls like Kayla to escape being exposed to Blacks.
Of course, most little White girls like Kayla don't get shot to death by six-year-old primates who have been declared equals and given seats in their classrooms by evil men in Washington who know better. Many more are raped than are shot. Even more are lured into the hip-hop life-style, into the jungle culture of rap and filth and drugs promoted by the Hollywood and New York Jews who control the entertainment media to which millions of little White girls like Kayla become addicted, because it is fashionable to be addicted. And 30 or 40 years from now all little White girls like Kayla-every little White girl in America--will be obliged to live in a society in which there is no protection at all because Whites will be a minority: a society in which interracial marriage will be the norm, encouraged by Hollywood even more than it is today. That's what the Jews of Hollywood and New York and the treacherous politicians of Washington who serve them are planning for America. That's why they always overemphasize the rare White-on-Black crime stories and minimize the Black-on-White crime stories. And that's why any incident, no matter how horrible or painful, which makes us think about the future, which alerts us to what is in store for us, should be welcome.
When I see the Hollywood Jews presenting an interracial couple on television in an attempt to persuade young White girls that dating Blacks is fashionable and is something they ought to try themselves, I'm angrier than when I read about the murder of a little White girl by a Black classmate. In the long run it's the interracial sex which is more destructive. And it is the evil men who have deliberately imposed on America the policies which brought about little Kayla's murder who are more reprehensible, more deserving of hanging, than the juvenile primate who shot her.
As early as the 1920s the Jews of America were openly and aggressively promoting their program for multiculturalizing us, for breaking up our homogeneous White society and making us instead into a cosmopolitan hash of various racial minorities which they could more easily penetrate and control. I said "as early as the 1920s"; actually, this behavior on the part of the Jews of working to destroy the solidarity and homogeneity of a society they intend to penetrate and control is thousands of years old. It's in their genes. But in America by the 1920s it was open and very obvious.
America was at that time a mixture of Celtic, Germanic, Slavic, and Mediterranean peoples, part Protestant and part Catholic, but all Europeans, all Whites. The freed Black slaves and their descendants had their own separate society. The Indians lived on reservations. It was a White country, and nearly everyone but the Jews assumed it would stay that way. We wanted it to stay that way. Most of our people never dreamed that anyone would want to force White Americans to accept their former African slaves as "equals" and encourage our daughters to bed down with these "equals." We never dreamed that anyone was scheming to change our immigration laws so that they could block the flow of our people from Europe and instead bring in millions of Chinese and Vietnamese and Pakistanis and Haitians and Mexican mestizos and Soviet Jews and use them to destroy our cities and our neighborhoods and our schools and organize them into voting blocks for the purpose of disempowering and dispossessing us. We didn't dream that such a thing could happen or that anyone would want it to happen.
We knew that Jews usually were up to no good, and we had signs at the doors of many of our better hotels and restaurants and business establishments: "No Jews Admitted." But most of us never dreamed that this clever but despicable minority would succeed in turning our society upside down, in capturing control of our government, in destroying our institutions, in suppressing our traditions and our values and our standards of behavior, and in making a multicultural pigsty of our country. We never dreamed that the day would come when White parents would be forced by law to send their six-year-old daughters to school with little Black monsters descended from their African slaves. And of course, in the 1920s we never dreamed of television and of the destructive power of a Jew-controlled Hollywood.
To be sure, some of our people did try to warn us. In the 1920s the Iron Curtain of Political Correctness had not yet descended on our universities, and many historians, biologists, anthropologists, and other scholars were not afraid to write frankly about racial matters and Jewish matters. Unfortunately, it was all done very politely, in a very gentlemanly manner, and the average White voter never looked up from his funny papers.
The Jews, on the other hand, were organizing and propagandizing at all levels, with 3000 years of practice behind them. They were recruiting the more venal and unscrupulous elements among the Christian clergy; the most resentful, neurotic, and ambitious elements among the academics; the most empty-headed and trendy of the would-be "intellectuals." They infiltrated our universities and took over whole departments. They bought our politicians by the hundreds. And of course, they were buying up the mass media as fast as they could elbow their Gentile competitors out of the way. The "culture war" of the 1920s and 1930s was short and decisive. We never even took our gloves off, and they whipped us good. Then they were able to lie us into the Second World War, and after that our goose was cooked.
They used the dislocations associated with the war to introduce far-reaching changes into our society, and within 15 years after the war they had our whole society in turmoil. And today White children and White women are dragged to death behind cars being stolen by Blacks, and the media keep it hushed up while saturating us with images of a few Whites committing crimes against non-Whites. And six-year-old White girls are murdered in their classrooms by little Black monsters who are treated as victims of a White-racist society. And all the while they hammer into us day and night with their media the defeatist notion that the multiculturalism they have imposed on us is here to stay, that there's nothing we can do about it, and so we'd better get used to it.
They believe that they've got us beaten down to the point now where nothing will make us rebel. Well, listen Jewboys! You're dead wrong. Just let a few more of our women and children get butchered by your multicultural pets, and you'll see what we can do about it. The war isn't over, and this time we'll fight with our gloves off. Payback day is coming. We'll start with the traitors among our own people, with the politicians and the journalists. But we will get around to you. Believe me, we will!

Luke responds:

One. Dennis Prager said about (former Klansman) David Duke's success - that when good people fail to make needed points, bad people will make them.

Dr. Pierce raises some good points. Our media does obsess far more over whites killing blacks than blacks killing whites. To me, such murders are equally evil.

Two. Heterogenous societies are more violent and crime ridden than homogenous ones. Australia, when it only allowed white people to immigrate, had very little crime. Since it's opened up its immigration policies, crime has soared. America's great diversity is a two edged sword. Differences energize us. At the same time, blacks, whites, asians, Jews, etc frequently feel less connection to those who are different. This breaks down community and leads to crime.

Three. I agree with Dr. Pierce that Hollywood is overall a force for evil in our society though I do not regard promotion of interracial mating as bad.

Four. I see some frightening parallels between America today and the Weimar Republic of the 1920s, when the country polarized into left and right. The Left so insulted traditional German values, like the American Left is doing today, that it paved the way for a huge Nazi reaction.

Five. The best solution to violent crime is that people feel a strong part of their community, particularly a religious community. If people don't bond over values, such as religion, many will primarily bond over ethnicity, which is dangerous.

PS. I just saw the movie "The Closer You Get" which features an inspiring theme of people mating with their own kind.

Avi writes Luke: Stick to porn and other similar topics and leave out the racist crap. You really diminish your site and yourself by putting that trash up.

Music critic J.D. Considine writes: "Luke -- I have to second Avi's opinion. Stick to porn. Contrary to what that crackpot Pierce insists, Kim Davis' race was reported in many papers (mine included). And the reason Jake Robel's death was more widely reported than other carjackings has nothing to do with black-on-white crimes. It was big news because the victim was a child -- a child whose mother tried desperately to save him.

"As for your comment, " I see some frightening parallels between America today and the Weimar Republic of the 1920s, when the country polarized into left and right." -- what parallel universe do you inhabit? I'd love to know where this alleged American left is, because there's no evidence of them being active in politics. In 1968, when Hubert Humphrey ran against Nixon, he was considered a centrist Democat. This year's Democrats, Bradley and Gore, are considerably to the right of Humphrey. They could be considered "leftist" only if your notion of the conservative mainstream is Pat Buchannan. Get a gip, Luke. This stuff is much more disturbingly delusional than those gun photos and the "Luke is gay" riff."

Jeff: violence, be it racially motivated or not, will always be worse than porn if you ask me. porn just shows people having sex which is natural, and i dont think hollywood promotes interracial dating if theyre still nervous about showing blacks and whites having sex, at least in porn they show interracial scenes. i think instead of focusing on the blacks shooting people what does he have to say about the white men killing people in the name of white power?

Laura writes: Luke even though I know your politics are right wing I was still surprised you could find even some agreement with that nazi lowlife bastard Pierce's rantings. Of course it goes without saying that violent crime committed by blacks on whites is just as evil as whites on blacks, I doubt anyone would dispute that. But conservatives like you would have everyone believe liberals feel otherwise. Also your assertion that a multicultural society breeds more crime than a homogenous one is contradicted by the fact that violent crime is down considerably, at its lowest level in years at a time when our country is becoming more culturally, ethnically and racially diverse. Furthermore your contention that we need more religion to bring us together and reduce violence also makes no sense by virtue of the fact that we are the most religious country in the western world and yet are the most violent among them. It's good however that you publish these nazi ravings and bring to our attention the views and agenda of these sick extremists. And finally what's with the remark "an inspiring story of people having sex with their own kind" in commenting on a particular movie? You sound almost as bad as Pierce.

Chaim Amalek writes: Pierce is a bit too hydrophobic for my taste. Likely, this sort of drooling fanaticism is why he is one of the establishment's preferred faces of white racism. Far more interesting commentary is to be found elsewhere on the web. The most intellectually rigorous (which is NOT to say that I am in agreement with it - I am NOT) racist/antisemitic commentary - and therefore the most dangerous to the Geffens of the world - is to be found at: http://www.ddc.net/ygg/ This is a collection of essays that have appeared on the internet, first in Usenet, then on the web, over the last five years, under the pen-name of "Yggdrasil". Not even the ADL has been able to figure out who this person really is. Indeed, so prolific a writer is he that some feel that it is the pen name used to cover an entire organization's output. Interesting to think that 80 years ago, 95% of what Yggdrasil writes would have been considered mainstream.

I want you all to know that I post this sort of information on my web site as a public service announcement, to warn the masses of the dangers that lurk out there. It is also pro-porn, in that the sooner the authorities realize that the choice is between a population that spends its time watching porn and TV, and a population that becomes radicalized through its access to racist web sites, the sooner the System will come down in favor of internet porn. And isn't that what all of us really want? In an age in which the only acceptable religion is no religion at all, porn is the opiate of the masses. Inhale deeply!

David Geffen

An anonymous bisexual producer of gay porn says: David Geffen is universally expected to take a more active role in making changes in the media's portrayal of gay sex, especially gay broadcast porn.

As the world's most respected, uncloseted gay media mogul, he has a responsibility to the gay community at large to put together a program wherein gay-themed television programming is available to those who want it. The homophobia in straight porn is akin to the Nazi attitude toward the Jews during the Holocaust. Because all media is, at some level, capitalistic enterprise, its values reflect that which the public is perceived to wish to purchase but won't turn them off against religious values etc.

I saw Barry Diller speak at CES one year, and have no doubt that he could design great, tasterful, esthetic programing for a 24 hr satellite network which would have a gay ambiance. If lifetime can be girlie, why can't THE RAINBOW NETWORK simply represent the honesty of gay life. there are enough consumers for it and David Geffen, despite his other investments, can afford his own satellite.