.jpg?resize=175%2C175&ssl=1)
Sophia writes-
My friend says that the reason that this chick(suspect) poured Patron on her (mia) and set her(mia) on fire, was because Nathanial introduced her(suspect) to Mia as his girlfriend and Mia said eww, like she(suspect) was gross and then she(suspect) didn’t get hired. A friend of hers (?) says, that the girl (suspect) is responsible 100% and that when it happened Nathanial ran down the street. But love is blind and they(suspects) were caught together. God help him, if that’s true. Anyway I thought you’d like to know, that it was because of a stupid reason.
??
wtf did i just read?
a chick is a suspect
who’s nathanial?
wtf is this ??
sometimes love is blind, deaf and dumb and not really love either
Ok, I’m a little puzzled as well…
Is Sophia(or her eyewitness) trying to say that the guy was a victim? “Poor Nathaniel ran down the street scared, because he had nothing to do with it”…
Didn’t Sophia’s 1st “eyewitness” account say Nathaniel called Mia outside? So he called Mia outside with him and the girl who Mia had said “eww” to, but he didn’t know anything? What the fuck did he think was going to happen between him and 2 girls that clearly didn’t get along? A fucking threesome?
Something doesn’t add up. Either 1 or both of the eyewitnesses aren’t being truthful. I suspect it’s the 2nd eyewitness girl. Women often tend to blame the woman in a situation rather than the guy. I think it goes along with the whole wanting to protect the badboy thing.
-Daymond