Court orders man to pay $40,500 for stealing porn

This single line is why I absolutely am for those lawyers who go after the jackasses who steal porn or as most people call them “copyright trolls”. Funny how when we are trying to stop you from stealing our shit we are “trolls” but when you get your shit stolen, you are a “victim”.

Next time you’re downloading porn online, try to avoid picking up anything from X-Art. Otherwise, you could end up like L. Sagala, a Michigan man who’s just been ordered by a judge to pony up $40,500 to the adult production company that owns X-Art after downloading the company’s clips off BitTorrent.

That single line just proves the point that suing these fuckers who steal from us does pay off. No I don’t mean with money, I mean with fear. Just look at how they end the story “But either way, unless you’ve got 40 grand burning a hole in your pocket, it’s probably best to stay away from illegally downloading X-Art for the time being.” LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’m sorry but it’s not okay to steal cars or porn. It’s not okay to break into someone’s house and steal their radio or tv nor is it okay to steal someone’s hard work – the movie someone made about blow jobs and anal sex. Theft is theft. It doesn’t matter what you steal, it’s just as wrong.

Here is the full article …. [source]

Next time you’re downloading porn online, try to avoid picking up anything from X-Art. Otherwise, you could end up like L. Sagala, a Michigan man who’s just been ordered by a judge to pony up $40,500 to the adult production company that owns X-Art after downloading the company’s clips off BitTorrent.

Malibu Media, the production company that owns X-Art, recently filed suit against Sagala for willful copyright infringement, according to TorrentFreak. Last week, a U.S. federal judge ruled in Malibu Media’s favor, ordering that Sagala pay $45,000 in statutory damages, as well as more than $1,500 in legal fees.

The Los Angeles-based company behind X-Art, a website that produces upscale adult erotica, is notorious in the file-sharing world as an aggressive “copyright troll.” This year, they’ve filed 288 cases against defendants who’ve downloaded their copyrighted work, and a total of 1,894 lawsuits since 2012. The company identifies people who download their work by scouring BitTorrent and collecting their IP addresses, then filing suit against them in courts across the country.

Although these suits are usually settled out of court for a few thousand dollars each, this was not the case with the unfortunate L. Sagala: He apparently failed to respond to the suit, which earned Malibu Media a default judgment in the company’s favor.

While such default judgments are apparently fairly common, this particular case is noteworthy for the relatively high amount of damages Sagala must pay, though Malibu Media says in its filing that the “plaintiff’s actual damages far exceed this sum.” Whether that’s actually the case depends largely on how you feel about copyright infringement. But either way, unless you’ve got 40 grand burning a hole in your pocket, it’s probably best to stay away from illegally downloading X-Art for the time being.

3 thoughts on “Court orders man to pay $40,500 for stealing porn

  1. Larry Horse says:

    why dont they sue tube sites, maybe because they run one or two. Congress should do something about this, except its porn, they should do something about the copyright trolls who try to extort money from podcasters, like Adam Carolla, who is going to court against these guys. These type of tort cases are bullshit.

  2. Suing a tube site is great in theory but not always practical. There is the issue of what country they are in. There is the issue of them hiding behind fake user submitted uploads.

    Then there is the financial considerations. How much does a small tube site owner really have?

    It’s far more profitable to sue individual users who are stealing from you in a open net kind of method. You’ll get more for your effort. Do the math — you sue 270 guys you might make $150 per 50 of them. That means you just made $7,500 with almost no real effort. Or you spend the same amount of money suing one guy, the small tube site site owner, and what do you get? Nothing. Because he’s a broke ass tube owner thinking he’s going to be the next YouPorn or PornHub.

    Those are the fuckers we really need to get. But they are protected behind a wall of fat cat lawyers, multiple international locations and fake users.

  3. What about suing the tube site streamers(viewers)? Has that ever been considered?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic