TJ Cummings HIV+ Testing

 

  • October 11 – October 25 – TJ Cummings tested negative on October 11th and October 25th from CET.
  • December 3 – He did not test again until December 3rd *within the PASS system* – This time from TTS.
  • December 5 – He retested on December 5th at CET.
  • December 6 – FSC calls for 14 day mandatory moratorium

8 thoughts on “TJ Cummings HIV+ Testing

  1. is anyone else concerned that the FSC hasn’t said anything about the 1st generation list? Normally the day after (okay we will give them to monday because of the weekend) they usually come out with – All first generation have tested negative? and its tuesday and nothing?

  2. The FSC blog claims “Currently, all people who have had at-risk contact with the positive performer have been retested with the RNA Aptima test.”

    Yet we now know that isn’t true.

    Even more shocking is that the FSC claims he hasn’t had any contact with the performer pool since November 21st … “The December 5 date is two weeks after the performer’s last at-risk contact with a member of the performer pool, on November 21.”

    Yet we also know that isn’t true. More than a handful of people have come forward to say they have done live shows, privates, content trades, etc. since that time.

  3. As a Free Speech Board member, I can assure you that FSC is not, and never has been, “financially in bed” with CET. They were simply the first clinic to meet the guidelines set up under the APHSS (now PASS) testing system for adult talent—something TTS did not do for quite some time until it finally hired a doctor—AT FSC’s INSISTENCE—to deal with STD/HIV-positives revealed during testing.

    Beyond that, the adult industry has ALWAYS required a confirmatory test before declaring a performer HIV-positive, because there are a fair number of false positives generated by the testing process, and a false positive, if widely reported (by sites like yours), can be the end of a performer’s career, so care is taken.

    However, that doesn’t mean that the PASS medical board (all doctors) doesn’t ask the potentially positive person for a list of the people with whom he or she has had sexual contact during the previous month. It would have been that list, PROVIDED BY THE PERFORMER, which would have caused FSC to say that it had “notified everyone.” If the performer fails to reveal a contact, how can that possibly be FSC’s fault? But needless to say, if a person comes forward who has not been previously contacted and says they had sexual contact with the person, of course that person is tested as well.

  4. I’m sure that whoever is putting together the generations list has spoken to the agents, but the main source still has to be the performer him/herself.

    As for what you’ve “seen this last year,” there’s plenty of bogus information floating around about pretty much anything to do with the adult industry, and from your “vantage point” (which I assume is somewhere in Florida, since Cindy is based there, but feel free to correct me), I’m unsure you’re in a position to pass judgment on what’s believable regarding HIV-positives in LA and the actions of FSC.

  5. After all I’ve seen this last year, somehow your assurance just doesn’t comfort me.

    And as for your exposure list coming only from the performer, why would you not read out to the agents? Aren’t they organized under some sort of union to work together to solve problems in cases just like this? It doesn’t make sense you wouldn’t speak to a single one of the agents about this now that the person who has tested positive has come out and named himself as the person in question.

  6. larryhorse1 says:

    Mr Kernes, does it really matter where Kelli is writing from, especially these days with email, Skype, texting et al. She could be on Mars and be more accurate and less biased than yourself and AVN.

  7. @count

    Did you finally wake to the reality of this business? Of course its’ about making money! Most performers work as contractors (i.e., they don’t make money, if they don’t work). You think it’s cheap living in LA?

    Let me blow your mind again….most male performers in straight porn are either bi or gay. They work in gay porn to make more money.

  8. Kernes is lying to you ask the agents…I did

    8 agents in LATATA not one was contacted by anyone about the exposures, the moratorium, or anything else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic