Jeremy’s thoughts on Sandy Hook Shooting- Conspiracy!

NL- No, it has nothing to do with porn, but it is an interesting theory.

91 thoughts on “Jeremy’s thoughts on Sandy Hook Shooting- Conspiracy!

  1. jeremysteele11 says:

    Thanks, Cindi. Here’s my write up underneath the youtube video:

    Published on Dec 27, 2012

    “SHH” stands for Sandy Hook Hoax, because our (mis)leaders don’t want you to know about this (shh). Btw, please, don’t ever jump to any conclusions before doing the research… no matter how ridiculous things may sound from the periphery. If you suffer from “instantaneous dismissal syndrome” you’re doing no one, including yourself, any favors. This government might not believe in due process, anymore, but you should.

    There’s a whole load of various proof that Sandy Hook = Sandy Hoax, once you do the homework that the corporate mainstream media is not doing!, This psy-op is obviously for the purposes of disarming Americans. This scam is being used to destroy both the 1st and 2nd Amendments, as facebook, through the CIA, is deleting accounts of people who question or challenge the official story. At the same time, threatening words were made by the Connecticut State police spokesman that alternative whisteblowing media will be prosecuted. They want you to”shh” about the SHH.

    This video simply gets into Exhibits A, B and C, thus proving why we still need our 1st and 2nd Amendments now more than ever! See for yourself. Think for yourself. Do the research, otherwise you’re betraying your fellow man and this country. The truth is out there, but not if you sit like a mindless couch potato and let the politically/finacially controlled media put it together for you! After all, they’re still telling us JFK was killed by a “magic bullet” which is physically impossible! We are many years past 1984, folks! And have you seen that jackass “medical examiner” Wayne Carver? This guy was laughing, cracking stupid jokes, talking about himself in the wake of this carnage, didn’t know how many girls and boys were shot, acting very weird and unprofessional, to say the least. Don’t trust what anyone says. Verify!!!!! There are a lot of bad actors and strange anomalies in this scam; there were supposedly only handguns found in the school, yet only automatic bullets were used. An automatic was found in the alleged killer’s car trunk (not at the scene of the crime), while the car is registered in another man’s name. Anyway, this video doesn’t get into any of that, but once you see this, you’ll have a better understanding of why so many, many things just don’t add up! I could go on and on and on and on about it, but do the homework, unless American I-Dull or some other t.v. show is more important and interesting to you!

    My apologies for the imperfect resolution of my video of the photographs taken off the net, but you can find these photos on the net and judge for yourself! In both photographs of Emilie (Exhibit A and Exhibit C) you can clearly see her hair parted to the left.

  2. The fact that you would even entertain his theory is fucking sickening. These are someone’s dead children, and you think its “an interesting theory”?! This a porn site, for fuck sakes. You are just as pathetic as he is for posting this.

  3. What is wrong with this man? Why would anyone fake the shooting of a large number of children?

    I swear some people need to be smacked upside the head.

  4. jeremysteele11 says:

    Kelli, you and kbow are pathetic. There’s way more to the story than this, and is for the purpose of you jumping down the rabbit hole of discovery. Wise men say, “Don’t bite my finger, look where I’m pointing.” Look at the fucking photos, ASSHOLES! Do a google search. You can get a much clearer resolution than the video of the photos on line.

    “Why would anyone fake the shooting of a large number of children?” That’s not the first question you should ask, but the answer is obvious once you do the research- Gun Control.

    Stay tuned, as I will return with more information YOU CAN VERIFY, if you stop reacting like a pathetic dumbass and DO SOME FUCKING RESEARCH!

    And, in case you missed it comment #1, above, which was under moderation, is from me, now posted, which includes the write up you can read under the youtube post, which will give you a few more clues and leads.

    I DON’T HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS… yet, at least… BUT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK QUESTIONS… DO YOU KNOW WHO THOSE KIDS POSING WITH OBAMA ARE SUPPSOSED TO, BY NAME, BE??? DO YOU, AT LEAST, LIKE ME, SEE AN UNCANNY RESEMBLENCE?????????? DO YOU? WELL, THEN, SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    And again fuck you for your lazy “instantaneous reaction without investigation syndrome”! You all help make America the shitty place it too often is!

  5. jeremysteele11 says:

    resemblance, whoops

  6. jeremysteele11 says:

    Meanwhile, here is my collective response (from several comments due to space limitations per comment) to comments on my youtube page:

    Again, this vid is only the tip of the iceberg. I tell people this is a scam and many instanteously dismiss, say “You’re crazy”, “You have too much time on your hands” and other stupid insults w/o EVER doing the research.

    Things to consider and research: 1.. 4 handguns found at crime scene. Only automatic found in car trunk, which is registered to some criminal name Rozio, dob 1969. “Witnesses” and “Chief Medical Examiner” say automatics were used. No autos @scene.

    2. Check out youtube video “Sandy Hook Hoax ‘Medical Examiner’ Wayne Carver”. He supposedly just witnessed the shot up corpses of little children but he laughs alot, cracks jokes, goes “uhhh” a lot, says he’ll look at the alleged killer’s body the next day to determine how he died, says he doesn’t know how many boys and girls died, he talks about himself a lot, admits he does things to “fool you guys” (the media) acts very bizarre and unprofessionally. Major red flag!

    3. A Robbie Parker his age doesn’t register in his area. He’s seen laughing and smiling right before his speech and a photo exists of him memorizing a speech. He changes right before he’s told the cameras are rolling. As someone mentioned who’s brother died it took him over a year to smile at anything. Many parents (like Grace McDonnel, who seems WAY too happy) look far less convincing than Susan Smith who killed her two kids and blamed the murder on a black man.

    4. Check out youtube videos titled “Adam Lanza Has Not Existed Since 2009 ~ No Records, No Friends, Nothing!”, “Gun inconsistences in Sandy Hook mass shooting”, “911 Call Dispatch Audio Reveals Police Response to Sandy Hook School Shooting” < at 1min:20secs into it he clearly says, "WE got them THEY'RE coming at me". There are many reports of second and third gunmen, which of course then makes it a conspiracy.

    5. So far, I don't know who was shot, if anyone to be honest. Parents were not allowed to see bodies, no videos or photos exist showing any sort of carnage. This is like the Bin Laden hoax, if you're familiar with that. I think most, if not all, of the main family members are well paid actors who believe they're serving a noble mission to ban guns due to past shootings. However, alternative research shows MKUltra "mind control research" to be behind many shootings, like Aurora and the Unibomber.

    6. I don't claim to have all the answers but someone tell me who the hell those kids posing with Obama are supposed to be? America has gotten away with a lot of serious scams, like 9/11 (3 detonated bldgs, stand down orders from Cheney, etc), OK City (not possible a truck bomb caused that damage. It would be like sticking a little firecracker in a cat's ass and blowing up the whole cat), Waco (SWATS shot their own by accident, as shown and started that fire that killed many kids, etc), etc.

    7. Also: have you seen that Gene Rosen guy? Horrible, annoying actor. See videos, "Sandy Hook lies and inconsistences", "Sandy Hook Shooting False Flag- Bad Actors Used to Take Away the Second Ammendment", Also, "The James Holmes Conspiracy (2012 Full Documentary)", "Remembering victims of CT shooting",. "Helicopter Footage – Possible Second Shooter school shooting Newton CT" Also it's been discovered that Mr/Mrs Nick Phelps are actually Jennifer Greenberg Sexton and Richard Sexton of Florida!

    Stay tuned…

  7. jeremysteele11 says:

    Here, couch potatos, I bring this well written, objective piece to you (without the accompanying video on page, sources and notes, which you can find on a title search). This is just one of many things out there worth your time if you actually want to have an informed opinion about this event.

    The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information

    “[My staff] and I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their head later.” –Connecticut Medical Examiner D. Wayne Carver II, MD, December 15, 2012

    By Prof. James F. TRACY, Global Research.ca

    Inconsistencies and anomalies abound when one turns an analytical eye to news of the Newtown school massacre. The public’s general acceptance of the event’s validity and faith in its resolution suggests a deepened credulousness borne from a world where almost all news and information is electronically mediated and controlled. The condition is reinforced through the corporate media’s unwillingness to push hard questions vis-à-vis Connecticut and federal authorities who together bottlenecked information while invoking prior restraint through threats of prosecutorial action against journalists and the broader citizenry seeking to interpret the event on social media.

    Along these lines on December 19 the Connecticut State Police assigned individual personnel to each of the 26 families who lost a loved one at Sandy Hook Elementary. “The families have requested no press interviews,” State Police assert on their behalf, “and we are asking that this request be honored.[1] The de facto gag order will be in effect until the investigation concludes—now forecast to be “several months away” even though lone gunman Adam Lanza has been confirmed as the sole culprit.[2]

    With the exception of an unusual and apparently contrived appearance by Emilie Parker’s alleged father, victims’ family members have been almost wholly absent from public scrutiny.[3] What can be gleaned from this and similar coverage raises many more questions and glaring inconsistencies than answers. While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place—at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described.

    The Accidental Medical Examiner

    An especially important yet greatly underreported feature of the Sandy Hook affair is the wholly bizarre performance of Connecticut’s top medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II at a December 15 press conference. Carver’s unusual remarks and behavior warrant close consideration because in light of his professional notoriety they appear remarkably amateurish and out of character.

    H. Wayne Carver II has an extremely self-assured, almost swaggering presence in Connecticut state administration. In early 2012 Carver threatened to vacate his position because of state budget cuts and streamlining measures that threatened his professional autonomy over the projects and personnel he oversaw.

    Along these lines the pathologist has gone to excessive lengths to demonstrate his findings and expert opinion in court proceedings. For example, in a famous criminal case Carver “put a euthanized pig through a wood chipper so jurors could match striations on the bone fragments with the few ounces of evidence that prosecutors said were on the remains of the victim.”[4] One would therefore expect Carver to be in his element while identifying and verifying the exact ways in which Sandy Hook’s children and teachers met their violent demise.

    Yet the H. Wayne Carver who showed up to the December 15 press conference is an almost entirely different man, appearing apprehensive and uncertain, as if he is at a significant remove from the postmortem operation he had overseen. The multiple gaffes, discrepancies, and hedges in response to reporters’ astute questions suggest that he is either under coercion or an imposter. While the latter sounds untenable it would go a long way in explaining his sub-pedestrian grasp of medical procedures and terminology.

    With this in mind extended excerpts from this exchange are worthy of recounting here in print. Carver is accompanied by Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance and additional Connecticut State Police personnel. The reporters are off-screen and thus unidentified so I have assigned them simple numerical identification based on what can be discerned of their voices.

    Reporter #1: So the rifle was the primary weapon?

    H. Wayne Carver: Yes.

    Reporter #1: [Inaudible]

    Carver: Uh (pause). Question was what caliber were these bullets. And I know—I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists but if I say it in court they yell at me and don’t make me answer [sic]—so [nervous laughter]. I’ll let the police do that for you.

    Reporter #2: Doctor can you tell us about the nature of the wounds. Were they at very close range? Were the children shot at from across the room?

    Carver: Uhm, I only did seven of the autopsies. The victims I had ranged from three to eleven wounds apiece and I only saw two of them with close range shooting. Uh, but that’s, uh y’know, a sample. Uh, I really don’t have detailed information on the rest of the injuries.

    [Given that Carver is Connecticut’s top coroner and in charge of the entire postmortem this is a startling admission.-JT]

    Reporter #3: But you said that the long rifle was used?

    Carver: Yes.

    Reporter #3: But the long rifle was discovered in the car.

    State Police Lieutenant Vance: That’s not correct, sir.

    Unidentified reporter #4: How many bullets or bullet fragments did you find in the autopsy. Can you tell us that?

    Carver: Oh. I’m lucky I can tell you how many I found. I don’t know. There were lots of them, OK? This type of weapon is not, uh … the bullets are designed in such a fashion that the energy—this is very clinical. I shouldn’t be saying this. But the energy is deposited in the tissue so the bullet stays in [the tissue].

    [In fact, the Bushmaster .223 Connecticut police finally claimed was used in the shooting is designed for long range field use and utilizes high velocity bullets averaging 3,000 feet-per-second, the energy of which even at considerable distance would penetrate several bodies before finally coming to rest in tissue.]

    Reporter #5: How close were the injuries?

    Carver: Uh, all the ones (pause). I believe say, yes [sic].

    Reporter #6: In what shape were the bodies when the families were brought to check [inaudible].

    Carver: Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh—

    Reporter #7: Do you know the difference of the time of death between the mother in the house and the bodies recovered [in the school].

    Carver: Uh, no, I don’t. Sorry [shakes head excitedly] I don’t! [embarrassed laugh]

    Reporter #8: Did the gunman kill himself with the rifle?

    Carver: No. I—I don’t know yet. I’ll-I’ll examine him tomorrow morning. But, but I don’t think so.

    [Why has Carver left arguably the most important specimen for last? And why doesn’t he think Lanza didn’t commit suicide with the rifle?]

    Reporter #9: In terms of the children, were they all found in one classroom or—

    Carver: Uhm … [inaudible] [Turns to Lieutenant Vance] Paul and company will deal with that.

    Reporter #9: What?

    Carver: Paul and company will deal with that. Lieutenant Vance is going to handle that one.

    Reporter #10: Was there any evidence of a struggle? Any bruises?

    Carver: No.

    Reporter #11: The nature of the shooting; is there any sense that there was a lot of care taken with precision [inaudible] or randomly?

    Carver: [Exhales while glancing upward, as if frustrated] Both. It’s a very difficult question to answer … You’d think after thousands of people I’ve seen shot but I … It’s … If I attempted to answer it in court there’d be an objection and then they’d win—[nervous laughter].

    [Who would win? Why does an expert whose routine job as a public employee is to provide impartial medical opinion concerned with winning and losing in court? Further, Carver is not in court but rather at a press conference.]

    Reporter #12: Doctor, can you discuss the fatal injuries to the adults?

    Carver: Ah, they were similar to those of the children.

    Reporter #13: Doctor, the children you had autopsied, where in the bodies were they hit?

    Carver: Uhm [pause]. All over. All over.

    Reporter #14: Were [the students] sitting at their desks or were they running away when this happened?

    Carver: I’ll let the guys who—the scene guys talk—address that issue. I, uh, obviously I was at the scene. Obviously I’m very experienced in that. But there are people who are, uh, the number one professionals in that. I’ll let them—let that [voice trails off].

    Reporter [#15]: How many boys and how many girls [were killed]?

    Carver: [Slowly shaking his head] I don’t know.

    More Unanswered Questions and Inconsistencies

    In addition to Carver’s remarks several additional chronological and evidentiary contradictions in the official version of the Sandy Hook shooting are cause for serious consideration and leave doubt in terms of how the event transpired vis-à-vis the way authorities and major media outlets have presented it. It is now well known that early on journalists reported that Adam Lanza’s brother Ryan Lanza was reported to be the gunman, and that pistols were used in the shooting rather than a rifle. Yet these are merely the tip of the iceberg.

    When Did the Gunman Arrive?

    After Adam Lanza fatally shot and killed his mother at his residence, he drove himself to the elementary school campus, arriving one half hour after classes had commenced. Dressed in black, Lanza proceeds completely unnoticed through an oddly vacant parking lot with a military style rifle and shoots his way through double glass doors and a brand new yet apparently poorly engineered security system.

    Further, initial press accounts suggest how no school personnel or students heard gunshots and no 911 calls are made until after Lanza begins firing inside the facility. “It was a lovely day,” Sandy Hook fourth grade teacher Theodore Varga said. And then, suddenly and unfathomably, gunshots rang out. “I can’t even remember how many,” Varga said.[5]

    The recollection contrasts sharply with an updated version of Lanza’s arrival where at 9:30AM he

    walked up to the front entrance and fired at least a half dozen rounds into the glass doors. The thunderous sound of Lanza blowing an opening big enough to walk through the locked school door caused Principal Dawn Hochsprung and school psychologist Mary Scherlach to bolt from a nearby meeting room to investigate. He shot and killed them both as they ran toward him.

    Breaching the school’s security system in such a way would have likely triggered some automatic alert of school personnel. Further, why would the school’s administrators run toward an armed man who has just noisily blasted his way into the building?

    Two other staff members attending the meeting with Hocksprung and Scherlach sustained injuries “in the hail of bullets” but returned to the aforementioned meeting room and managed a call to 911.[6] This contrasted with earlier reports where the first 911 call claimed students “were trapped in a classroom with the adult shooter who had two guns.”[7] Recordings of the first police dispatch following the 911 call at 9:35:50 indicate that someone “thinks there’s someone shooting in the building.”[8] There is a clear distinction between potentially hearing shots somewhere in the building and being almost mortally caught in a “hail of bullets.”

    How did the gunman fire so many shots in such little time?

    According to Dr. Carver and State Police, Lanza shot each victim between 3 and 11 times during a 5 to 7 minute span. If one is to average this out to 7 bullets per individual—excluding misses—Lanza shot 182 times, or once every two seconds. Yet according to the official story Lanza was the sole assassin and armed with only one weapon. Thus if misses and changing the gun’s 30-shot magazine at least 6 times are added to the equation Lanza must have been averaging about one shot per second—extremely skilled use of a single firearm for a young man with absolutely no military training and who was on the verge of being institutionalized. Still, an accurate rendering of the event is even more difficult to arrive at because the chief medical examiner admittedly has no idea exactly how the children were shot or whether a struggle ensued.

    Where is the Photo and Video Evidence?

    Photographic and video evidence is at once profuse yet lacking in terms of its capacity to demonstrate that a mass shooting took place on the scale described by authorities. For example, in an era of ubiquitous video surveillance of public buildings especially no visual evidence of Lanza’s violent entry has emerged. And while studio snapshots of the Sandy Hook victims abound there is little if any eyewitness testimony of anyone who’s observed the corpses except for Carver and his staff, and they appear almost as confused about the conditions of the deceased as any layperson watching televised coverage of the event. Nor are there any routine eyewitness, photo or video evidence of the crime scene’s aftermath—broken glass, blasted security locks and doors, bullet casings and holes, bloodied walls and floors—all of which are common in such investigations and reportage.

    Why Were Medical Personnel Turned Away From the Crime Scene?

    Oddly enough medical personnel are forced to set up their operation not at the school where the dead and injured lay, but rather at the fire station several hundred feet away. This flies in the face of standard medical operating procedure where personnel are situated as close to the scene as possible. There is no doubt that the school had ample room to accommodate such personnel. Yet medical responders who rushed to Sandy Hook Elementary upon receiving word of the tragedy were denied entry to the school and forced to set up primary and secondary triages off school grounds and wait for the injured to be brought to them.

    Shortly after the shooting “as other ambulances from neighboring communities rolled up, sirens blaring, the first responders slowly realized that their training would be tragically underutilized on this horrible day. ‘You may not be able to save everybody, but you damn well try,’” 44 year old emergency medical technician James Wolff told NBC News. “’And when (we) didn’t have the opportunity to put our skills into action, it’s difficult.’”[9]

    In light of this, who were the qualified medical practitioners pronounced the 20 children and 7 adults dead? Who decided that none could be revived? Carver and his staff are apparently the only medical personnel to have attended to the victims—yet this was in the postmortem conducted several hours later. Such slipshod handling of the crime scene leaves the State of Connecticut open to a potential array of hefty civil claims by families of the slain.

    Did a mass evacuation of the school take place?

    Sandy Hook Elementary is attended by 600 students. Yet there is no photographic or video evidence of an evacuation on this scale. Instead, limited video and photographic imagery suggest that a limited evacuation of perhaps at most several dozen students occurred.

    A highly circulated photo depicts students walking in a single file formation with their hands on each others’ shoulders and eyes shut. Yet this was the image of a drill that took place prior to the event itself.[10] Most other photos are portraits of individual children. Despite aerial video footage of the event documenting law enforcement scouring the scene and apprehending one or more suspects in the wooded area nearby the school,[11] there is no such evidence that a mass exodus of children from the school transpired once law enforcement pronounced Sandy Hook secure. Nor are there videos or photos of several hundred students and their parents at the oft-referenced fire station nearby where students were routed for parent pick up.

    Sound Bite Prism and the Will to Believe

    Outside of a handful of citizen journalists and alternative media commentators Sandy Hook’s dramatically shifting factual and circumstantial terrain has escaped serious critique because it is presented through major media’s carefully constructed prism of select sound bites alongside a widespread and longstanding cultural impulse to accept the pronouncements of experts, be they bemused physicians, high ranking law enforcement officers, or political leaders demonstrating emotionally-grounded concern.

    Political scientist W. Lance Bennett calls this the news media’s “authority-disorder bias.” “Whether the world is returned to a safe, normal place,” Bennett writes, “or whether the very idea of a normal world is called into question, the news is preoccupied with order, along with related questions of whether authorities are capable of establishing or restoring it.”[12]

    Despite Carver’s bizarre performance and law enforcement authorities’ inability to settle on and relay simple facts, media management’s impulse to assure audiences and readerships of the Newtown community’s inevitable adjustment to its trauma and loss with the aid of the government’s protective oversight—however incompetent that may be—far surpasses a willingness to undermine this now almost universal news media narrative with messy questions and suggestions of intrigue. This well-worn script is one the public has been conditioned to accept. If few people relied on such media to develop their world view this would hardly be a concern. Yet this is regrettably not the case.

    The Sandy Hook tragedy was on a far larger scale than the past year’s numerous slaughters, including the Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting and the Batman theater shooting in Colorado. It also included glaringly illogical exercises and pronouncements by authorities alongside remarkably unusual evidentiary fissures indistinguishable by an American political imagination cultivated to believe that the corporate, government and military’s sophisticated system of organized crime is largely confined to Hollywood-style storylines while really existing malfeasance and crises are without exception returned to normalcy.

    If recent history is a prelude the likelihood of citizens collectively assessing and questioning Sandy Hook is limited even given the event’s overtly superficial trappings. While the incident is ostensibly being handled by Connecticut law enforcement, early reports indicate how federal authorities were on the scene as the 911 call was received. Regardless of where one stands on the Second Amendment and gun control, it is not unreasonable to suggest the Obama administration complicity or direct oversight of an incident that has in very short order sparked a national debate on the very topic—and not coincidentally remains a key piece of Obama’s political platform.

    The move to railroad this program through with the aid of major media and an irrefutable barrage of children’s portraits, “heartfelt” platitudes and ostensible tears neutralizes a quest for genuine evidence, reasoned observation and in the case of Newtown honest and responsible law enforcement. Moreover, to suggest that Obama is not capable of deploying such techniques to achieve political ends is to similarly place ones faith in image and interpretation above substance and established fact, the exact inclination that in sum has brought America to such an impasse.

  8. jeremysteele11 says:

    You’re a fucking idiot, Kelli. Obviously you know nothing about those scams, either. 911docs dot net would enlighten you, but, hey you FUCKING HAD TO SAY I SHOULD GET SMACKED… VIOLENCE… MAYBE SOME GUY WILL TRY TO IMPRESS YOU, CUNT, AND DO THAT… AND IT MIGHT ESCULATE ALL BECAUSE YOU CAN’T RESPECT PEOPLE AND SIMPLY LOOK AT THE PHOTOS AND DO SOME RESEARCH BEFORE SPEWING YOUR IGNORANT OPINIONS.

    WHY DON’T YOU SIMPLY LOOK AT THE PHOTOS ON LINE AND TELL ME IF THAT LOOKS LIKE EMILIE PARKER AND JESSIE LEWIS IN THE COMPARATIVE PHOTOS? DO THEY NOT LOOK LIKE EMILIE PARKER AND JESSIE LEWIS?

    Again, thanks for advocating ASSAULT, you piece of shit. The thanks I get for trying to save shits like you who don’t merit it. Ok fine, goodbye 1st and 2nd amendments. You can all thank the likes of Kelli.

  9. jeremysteele11 says:

    It’s now painfully and abundantly clear that Kelli and numbnuts like her base their “knowledge” on impressions…. impressions… not research… not due process… not facts.. but impressions… feelings… FUCK YOU!

    Just look at the photos, idiot. Stop asking questions of why first… first you gotta find out WHAT!!

  10. Jeremy Steele you sick piece of shit. From what I have read from your posts you have no more than a high school education, you are bitter and probably a drug addict. Put the bong and the thesaurus down, get a job and an education and a social life.
    I was texted about this post and had to comment. Before you threaten me, I am twice your size and have smacked guys in the mouth at porn parties before.

    Take this BS off of YouTube and go to school or do something productive. You have no job and everybody in the industry makes fun of you. It’s especially funny to see your only connection to this industry is trying to sound intelligent on LIB when we all know you are uneducated and have a mediocre mind.

    I happen to have a relative that is a friend of one of the Sandy Hook families and your post sickens me. Yes the victims are indeed dead Jeremy, great way to honor their memory.

  11. jeremysteele11 says:

    I’m not the one making threats, KO. That’s Kelli. I’m sorry you’re not able to construe that during your emotional suffering.

    From what I’ve read parents have been denied seeing their allegedly dead kids. I didn’t say I have all the answers but I have the right to point out all the many, many, many things that show this to be a hoax.

    BUT BACK TO THE PHOTOGRAPH. PEOPLE SHOULD DEMAND TO KNOW WHO EXACTLY IS POSING WITH OBAMA.

    You happen to have a relative that is a friend of one of the families. They too should ask WHO THE HELL ARE THOSE KIDS POSING WITH OBOMBA that look EXACTLY like, not kind of like, “victims” Emilie and Jesse? And I misspelled Obama on purpose because he sheds fake crocodile tears while drone bombing many scores more children to death around the world. But, hey, why the fuck should you care about them?

  12. jeremysteele11 says:

    And btw, so far my video has over 500 hits in less than two days and a 5 to 1 likes to dislikes ratio. So far 5 out of 6 people APPRECIATE what I shared and it’s going around pretty fast. STRAIN YOUR BRAIN TO EXPLAIN THAT ONE! Now go and be a dick for spite and click “dislike” if you like.

    My gf’s mom was right, after seeing my video. Emotionally charged people would make threats of violence or act violently for talking about this violence. Makes sense. God Bless America. She believes it was a hoax, too, as do MANY at this point. Do a youtube search of “Sandy Hook Hoax” and see how many videos there are.

    A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP DURING AND WE WILL NOT BACK DOWN!

  13. I learned everything I need to know about you with this statement

    “America has gotten away with a lot of serious scams, like 9/11 (3 detonated bldgs, stand down orders from Cheney, etc), OK City (not possible a truck bomb caused that damage. It would be like sticking a little firecracker in a cat’s ass and blowing up the whole cat)”

    Now after I finish rolling eyes and pressing submit, I will walk away being thankful to not have to waste my time ever reading anything you ever say again.

  14. jeremysteele11 says:

    I can understand people being upset if my conclusions were reached as lightning fast as the predictable reactions… but this is not about my conclusions, this is about SHIT THAT MAKES NO SENSE.. LIKE DEAD CHILDREN STILL BEING ALIVE…. LOOK AT THE PHOTOS ALREADY! DON’T BITE MY FINGER, MAKE THREATS OF VIOLENCE, TELL ME HOW BIG AND STRONG YOU ARE AND STUPID INSULTS AND LOOK AT WHAT I’M POINTING AT! JESUS H. CHRIST!

    And the only guns found at the school were hand guns, which weren’t used. Don’t be an enemy of America and attack me trying to figure this shit out!

  15. jeremysteele11 says:

    Well, now it’s over 600 hits and counting. When I first made the video there already was a similar one out called “Sandy Hook Emilie Parker WTF?”, but I was the first I know of to recognize and point out that the kid to the right of Obomber is Jesse Lewis.

    Currently, my video is now on page 4 of a “Sandy Hoax” youtube search. It is video 59, as I counted, of videos with the names “Sandy Hook Hoax” in them. To my knowledge none of these other people have been accused of not finishing high school, being on drugs, a piece of shit, bitter, in need of a social life, etc. And then I click page after page after fucking page after page after page and there’s still MORE videos with the names “Sandy Hook Hoax” in them…

    STOP RUNNING AND JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, PEOPLE, AND FIRST …. DO…. THE…. RESEARCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  16. Larry Horse says:

    You got all this, and you give me crap about OJ not being the real killer. One other thing, we got this lunatic fringe that believe the government is coming for them and take their guns away and put them in camps, especially ramping up since Obama has become President, even though under Bush the younger we had a civil rights destroying Attorney General in Alberto Gonzales. Here it seems like the kids are dead, the teachers are dead, and everyone is in on it? Huh? This logic is close to the logic holocaust deniers use, where if one thing in 100 is wrong, than the other 99 are wrong too. Of course I have my theories about why Fabian was arrested.

  17. Tell me this is a goddamn joke. Some kind of Jeremy supreme troll job. Like we’re supposed to believe that you, a failed porn mope, and the most consistent (read: no life) poster on LIB day by day, has some kind of “secret” information that we don’t? I used to prod and poke you Steele, because it was fun. But now, right here and fucking now, I’m ashamed that you breathe. You’ve spouted some completely zany bullshit before, but this, Jeremy, this is an all-time low even for you. I rue the day you have children. I fucking cried for these children, and if I saw you at this very second, I’d spit in your goddamn face.

  18. Cody Lane's Dad says:

    Jeremy,
    You are clearly the dumbest sucker ever. Put on your tin foil hat and go walk the boulevard and see if you can get some attention that way. You are about two months away from standing on the street corner with a bullhorn, you ignorant woodless bottom feeder.

  19. jeremysteele11 says:

    And how fucking dumb do people have to be that the fact that I see the same kids in both photos (and whether I’m right or wrong) somehow = I have no empathy for those that have or might have been killed and those that may have lost them = that I’m laughing about it, like Satan. WTF?

    LOOK. AT. THE. PHOTOS. Anything odd about it? Can you admit that, at least? Don’t bite my finger, look where I’m pointing.

    The ill-lumina-t-party has you dumber than you can possibly conceive. Their plan was to emotionally get you going and they succeeded. Their hope was to make you give up your guns like you’re responsible for this as well as you’re trying to make me out to be insensitive.

    Insults and threats are what denialists do. Look at the photos on line.

    You don’t see me hating on Larry because he believes O.J.’s son killed Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson.

    No, I’m more sensitive to this than you fools are. I actually care to look deeper into this than you have.

    Your responses are sadly predictable and have been predicted by others. Still, I WILL NOT BACK DOWN, SO FUCK YOU!

    Let’s see, over 900 views in 2 days and at the moment a 3:1 likes to dislikes, ratio…

  20. jeremysteele11 says:

    Back to the photo, and all photos of Emilie Parker available on the net. Do the search yourselves, people. EVERY single photo of her has her hair parted to camera left, including the two photos where she’s wearing the same dress with the Parkers and with Obomber. The two other “surviving” sisters have their hair parted down the middle.

    It’s the NWO. They used 9/11 to push the Patriot Act and take away our rights. And they’re using these shootings to remove our 1st and 2nd amendments. The purpose of the 2nd Amendent is for citizens to be protected from their government, which gets rotten and, as our founding fathers acknowledged.

  21. RobfromMarketing says:

    Everyone but you is nuts, Jeremy.

  22. jeremysteele11 says:

    This world is nuts, and thus so are we, due to an evil secret society ruling/ruining the world by design in order to hold it’s mastery (sounds like some cool lyrics).

    There are Satanic orders like Bohemian Grove and Skull and Bones, and I found out recently that Newtown, Ct. has a reputation as a Satanist hub- 45% of local respondents to a telephone survey had heard of Satanic cult activity in Newtown.

    I also found out the movie the Dark Knight Rises, in addition to having references of Aurora and Sandy Hook in it, connections to DARPA which has done mind control research, which James Holmes participated in as a paid guinea pig, with projects named “Batman” and “Robin”, also Batman Rise’s production designer was none other than Nathan Crowley, who is related to the infamous British black-magic legend, Aleister Crowley. Michael Tierney, my old former astrology friend, claims to have been Crowley in a past life, and I was the one who introduced him to the porn industry (sorry, my bad).

    Also, according to Episode 33 of the original Batman series, Bruce Wayne himself founded skull and bones (do a youtube search of “Batman Skull and Bones”)! … and 33 is the highest degree of freemasonry, which leaves it’s obelisks and owls and satanic symbols all over the place, especially around D.C.

    And according to researchers the illuminati, which is very ritualistic, leave specific clues of the plans, hidden in things before hand, to be diciphered after the fact.

    In the Dark Knight Rises, there’s a line from
    Blake/Robin: “Sir, that could all just be a coincidence.”

    And Commissioner Gordon, responds: “You’re a detective now, son. You’re not allowed to believe in coincidence anymore.”

    I am a detective on this case. And there are too many “coincidences”. If you call me a conspiracy theorist, I say it’s far less insulting than being called a “coincidence theorist”.

    And then there are the cosmic connections on a personal level for me, which I’ve already gotten into. When I worked as an extra on The Dark Knight Rises, as I’ve mentioned here, I said there was something evil about that set. And now that I know a Crowley was the Production Manager, go figure.

    I’ve already mentioned I worked the Stock Exchange terrorism scene where people get shot and killed. We already know about the Batman Aurora shootings, and we now know about references to Aurora (and Sandy Hook) in The Dark Knight Rises. And I’ve mentioned how the Aurora shooting caused Warner Brothers to pull their other movie I worked on Gangster Squad and delete the scene I was featured in (I had a close up) where tommy gun weilding gangsters start shooting the audience watching a John Wayne flick in the Chinese Theater. The Aurora audience was watching previews which included the Gangster Squad movie and it’s audience carnage scene, which was a glimpse of what the audience would (supposedly, at least) experience, personally.

    As I was doing research on the MKUltra mind controlled patsy theory connection on Aurora I stumbed upon a site about it that had me in an audience photo, front, far right, ducking down as Josh Brolin is walking down the center aisle towards the gangsters shooting as us. The site also showed a Lil’ Wayne video where they’re sitting amongst skeletons in an audience. I later found the very preview shown to the Aurora audience, and I was seen in that as well.

    Warner Brothers shot a replacement scene, shot in Chinatown to replace the Chinese Theater scene. I worked on that scene as well, one of a few, I noticed, who worked on both.

    I submit to you folks, Aurora, Sandy Hook and other events are Satanic false flag operations being used for the purpose of disarming Americans, for as little respect this war loving government has for other countries, it also has for it’s own citizens. Homeland Security is beefed up major big with artillery which can only be used against us, the people, and they want us disarmed, just like any other totalitarian nation does. Dubya Bush said he wish he could be the Dictator. Obama and associates are no different.

    Stay tuned for more on Sandy Hook. There’s lots of shit to share. You won’t believe it, nor should you, but nevertheless you should verify it as being true or not true.

  23. jeremysteele11 says:

    I also forgot to mention the Sunset/Vine shooter who killed a Capital Records producer on the last day of the Gangster Squad Chinese Theater audience carnage scene. It turns out the shooter was killed by a cop who was working as security nearby on Gangster Squad. And the following morning at sunrise, when we wrapped after working all night, was a solar eclipse.

  24. jeremysteele11 says:

    Correction: It was Bruce Wayne’s Great Grandfather who founded Skull and Bones, according to Episode 33 of the original Batman t.v. series.

  25. Larry Horse says:

    One thing to add to conspiracies and such, the pay the debt argument now is a con. Paying off the debt is a scam to justify a few things, cutting spending on social programs, lowering taxes in a vain effort to spur growth, take the entitlement money away from the people who paid into it. The Federal Government cannot run itself like a business, it is a safety net, if it did run itself like a business, there would be no money for the victims of Sandy, it would cut health benefits for everybody…etc so on, and tax rates would jump higher and higher to cover costs. My other two thoughts about the Federal Government are simple, cutting spending means cutting public and PRIVATE jobs, which means you have to find those people jobs in addition to any to the jobs the cuts will create, second government spending is not the problem, its the government inefficiencies.

  26. The govt. is really really good at monitoring the poor, elderly and disabled. They barely get enough to live on. They are very good at making sure these folks don’t have an extra $1 in their pockets but can’t catch the guys that ruined the banking and investment industry until the shit really explodes in their faces.

    Why aren’t they monitoring the Bernie Madoff’s and Fanny Mae people like that?

  27. Jerkuliscious says:

    Batman don’t enter into anything you burnt out twit. Everyone with 3 firing brain cells knows the fucking Jews control everything and that the most powerful Jew Super Hero out here is Kal-El, son of Jor-El. So who gives a shit if Brice Wayne’s great grandpappy started some Ivy League buttfucking club, they can only accomplish what the Jews, allow them to. If they step out of line, the “Voice of God” will keep them in check by using his heat vision to set them on fire like a woman with an opinion is 1343.

    Fucking Batman….you outted yerself, faggit. You all up on the nuts of the eccentric bachelor that keeps a young boy in underoos around the house. You should stop by Jersey’s Sandy Hook and go way down to the end of the nude beach where the pole smokers chill out. You’ll make more money than you used to on Rodeo swallowing obelisks.

  28. jeremysteele11 says:

    Oh Jerkulicious, you’re sooooo mean!

  29. jeremysteele11 says:

    Anyway, Lt. Vance (who spoke of prosecuting social media) and Dubya Bush (who said “Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories”) have something in common… attacking those who have qood questions in regards to their bad answers (Sandy Hook & 9/11) and all the things that don’t add up or make sense… call us “conspiracy theorists” instead of good Americans who demand answers for their fucking bullshit!

    Alternative media not allowed to ask questions and draw conclusions based on what they see? When is big media gonna address the felon’s car Adam Lanza was allegedly driving and why the gun that allegedly killed all their kids was found in the trunk if he was shot or killed himself on site? Many questions. Still no answers. And who’s the bad guys? Us or Them (gate keepers against public inquiry)?

  30. Jeremy. I have always respected you and enjoyed a lot of your posts and insights, but in all sincerity you are embarrassing yourself here.

    I think that you need to take a step back and look at the things you are writing here and the thought process. This isn’t far from those screaming people wondering around with a vacant look in their eyes saying the government is watching them and rambling about conspiracies and secrets and plots against them. Wait, don’t tell me you also believe the schitzophrenics are really telling the truth???

    Seriously, seek help.

  31. jeremysteele11 says:

    I understand where you’re coming from Mariah. I’m not dumb. I know how nutty it seems, but that’s because it is nutty. But that doesn’t make it untrue. Do you know how much sex slavery and child sex slavery is going on and how it connects to big corporations like Halliburton and Dyncorp? If we really cared about all these children we’d know this. Do you know many how many children go missing per year? Where is the media on this? Do you know that the “elite” go to Bohemian Grove and witness Satanic mock human sacrifice rituals and have an emblem of a child in a bonfire? And this is a prerequisite to be a member of “The Club”, many which are recruited from Skull and Bones. I know I seem like Nick East but there is a lot to going on that we never hear about. There’s ample evidence beyond any shadow of a doubt that Oklahoma City’s bombing of the Murrah building was an inside job. Tim McVeigh was a patsy. There’s no way he could’ve possible blown the building up the way it was with a truck filled with fertilizer. They deliberately killed a whole bunch of school children in a nursery in order to advance their anti-terror legistlation. The mass shootings that keep happening are what they hope are the final touches towards completing the agenda to disarm Americans and/or create civil war. Sounds nutty, I know, just like my 9/11 stuff but all this requires a bit of homework and thinking.

    Ted Gunderson, former FBI chief, Los Angeles division has exposed The Franklin Cover-Up-participation of persons of high position in satanic rituals and child prostitution in the Omaha, Nebraska. You can read about it in the 1992 book, The Franklin Cover-Up, by former state senator and attorney, John DeCamp. which describes the role played by the CIA’s “Finders” in the drugging, mind control, and forced coercion of kidnapped children into silent compliance to serve the pedophilic and sadistic appetites of some of the most prominent and well known people in Omaha, Nebraska and Washington, DC. Gunderson also claimed that the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was carried out by the United States government and that the events of 9/11 were perpetrated by the United States Government as well. Mr. Gunderson estimates that 1.5% of the American population today are satanists. He estimated that there were a total of 3 MILLION people in America practicing satanism. Mr Gunderson also estimated that between 50,000 and 60,000 people are taken each year for use in satanic rituals with some becoming human sacrifices. 100,000 children disappear in the U.S. every year.

    And as for as the anomalies of the Sandy Hook case, that’s a whole other story, though the two may well be connected.

  32. Cody Lane's Dad says:

    Jeremy,
    You are clearly the dumbest sucker ever. Put on your tin foil hat and go walk the boulevard and see if you can get some attention that way. You are about two months away from standing on the street corner with a bullhorn, you ignorant woodless bottom feeder.

  33. I think that there is a section of society that thrives on believing that there is an element working against them at all times. It is comforting to them and allows them to accept their places in the world including lack of success or personal struggles, and others are just paranoid and borderline mentally ill.

    I am not in denial that pwerful people and organizations have too much to lose and will protect themselves at any cost, but to believe that things like this are cooked up and put out for the world is insulting. If my son was killed in something like this and I read people writing the shit you are spewing you would have a very serious problem. Those aren’t fucking actors. Those are real people who lost their children, and to do what you are doing with such sincerity is insulting and cruel and beneath you. As you say you aren’t dumb, but you’re certainly being fucking stupid with this. If I were one of those parents you would pray you never ran into me some place.

    Didn’t you recently become a parent? If so get this crazy shit out of your system before your child sees you act this way, otherwise you will damage them or damage their opinion of you. either way that would be a shame.

  34. jeremysteele11 says:

    They are actors. Most of them clearly are, in mine any many a person’s opinion. No tears. The Soto family on P. Morgan was smiling, almost laughing. That Gene Rosen was aweful and his story made no sense. Same with Jesse Lewis’s dad. Robbie Parker was laughing and smiling before taking an actor’s moment after hearing him say “read the cue?” take a deep breathe like he’s hyperventilating, and reading his speech. I didn’t see one single family member shedding actual water from their eyes. Very bizarre and unreal. There were terror excercises the same day, same place and an organization called “crisis actors”. There are many anomalies.

    Do a youtube search on “Sandy Hook Hoax” and you’ll see a shitload of videos, some better than others. But there’s a lot of stuff to look into, which you should before arriving at an opinion. Juries are instructed to arrive at verdict after hearing more than one side. Do not allow yourself to suffer from “instantaneous dismissal without any investigation whatsoever” syndrome.

    There’s a large consensus on this basic opinion I have, Mariah. Read the comments on these videos, too. This isn’t just me. My video is over 2,000 views in 4 days and up to page three on the “Sandy Hook Hoax” youtube search list.

    I’ve already mentioned a few things you seemed to have missed. One of them is that the alleged weapon used was in the trunk (thus not used) in another guy’s name, Rodia. Another is ample evidence of multiple shooters, so maybe people were killed but not the so-called Parkers. A Robbie Parker his age doesn’t even register in his area. Notice the way Emilie’s hair, in both photos, flows and curls down exactly the same, the way her chin rounds just the same in the smile, the same part in the hair to the left, as well as the same dress, by Jove, we have a match.

    Another thing you missed is that I’ve already mentioned to you, my girl isn’t pregnant. She’s menstruating again. Maybe it was growing and decided to bail out from entering this world, I don’t know. She wasn’t menstruating for a month or so then had spotty periods, then started bleeding again. I’ll make sure never to concede to using that spermicide shit ever again. Either way, I’m relieved, as soon the first and second amendments, along with due process and other former freedoms and rights, will be a thing of the past. Hitler is salivating in his grave.

    But I still see people waking up in this age of the photon belt. The light is shining on all the dirt. Many are waking up which is why Lt. Vance and Dubya Bush try to censor freedom of speech. They’re concerned.

  35. jeremysteele11 says:

    Meanwhile, I’m usually left of left, but I find it ridiculous and stupid how the liberal left, including many Hollywood actors, want to confiscate guns and blame this shit on the NRA, while Hollywood glorifies violence in t.v. and movies, and makes it all fun and games, and almost cartoon like. The left glorifies gore while trying to get the conservative right to give up their guns. Such fucking genius!

    As Thomas Jefferson said, “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”… which is EXACTLY the problem we have… and I mean not only we as a nation, but we as a planet!

  36. funny I saw plenty of tears. I saw plenty of anguish. I saw sincere grief and heartbreak.

    I can search for anything ridiculous and find plenty of loony people with opinions on a variety of stupid fucking subjects. I don’t give a shit how many views a video on youtube has lol there are plenty of people who hope every day they can uncover some giant plot so they can feel vindicated for the voices in their heads.

    You’re way off here Jeremy, and again, you’re embarrassing yourself.

  37. jeremysteele11 says:

    Plenty of tears from those that are not partipant in something that stinks to high hell, of course. I’m talking all the family members I saw, some made crying kind of faces with no tears. Look at the Soto and other families. But again you gotta look at everything not just Wayne Carver like Paperchaser did or families or photos as you might. This merits intensive investigation. And again, check it out for yourself. Youtube search “Sandy Hook Hoax” and check out several videos, see if you learn anything. If I’m embarrassing myself, so are a lot of people.

  38. jeremysteele11 says:

    (interesting cindi, this comment won’t go on moderation if mr paper chaser’s name is posted as two and not one name…. wtf!)

    Plenty of tears from those that are not partipant in something that stinks to high hell, of course. I’m talking all the family members I saw, some made crying kind of faces with no tears. Look at the Soto and other families. But again you gotta look at everything not just Wayne Carver like Paper chaser did or families or photos as you might. This merits intensive investigation. And again, check it out for yourself. Youtube search “Sandy Hook Hoax” and check out several videos, see if you learn anything. If I’m embarrassing myself, so are a lot of people.

    It’s on the radio several gunmen. Lanza MIA 3 years. Mr. Rodia felon’s car. Hand guns only on crime scene… etc etc etc etc

  39. jeremysteele11 says:

    And if I’m embarrassing myself so much, then please explain why I’ve currently got a 10:3 thumbs up to thumbs down ratio and over 2,400 views since I posted it on December 27th. Is that something to feel embarrassed about?? And I currently have like practically zero subscribers and this was my first time creating a video like this.

  40. jeremysteele11 says:

    For you to know what’s ridiculous about what a person believes you need to be able to look and acknowledge their strongest looking points and deconstruct them. If you don’t even know all the various points being brought up by various sources then how do you know it is all bullshit? Assumption is the mother of all fuck-ups. Big Media has it’s uses of course, but as a whole, is the Big Gatekeeper against truth… there is too much power politics to allow truth to be drumbeaten into our heads. That is how scam after scam keeps happening, mam.

  41. RobfromMarketing says:

    You really don’t know when to shut up.

  42. Paperchase says:

    Hi Mariah:

    Thank you for trying to bring Geremy back to the land of sanity, but empathy and reasoning are not going to work her. Unfortunately he’s uncritically absorbed every conspiracy theory that’s ever bitten him on the ankle.

  43. Paperchase says:

    “And if I’m embarrassing myself so much, then please explain why I’ve currently got a 10:3 thumbs up to thumbs down ratio and over 2,400 views since I posted it on December 27th.”

    Jeremy, just because you are able to recruit several thousand people to watch the train wreck that is your life and beliefs does not give you, or them, any increased validity. Similarly that you are able to receive approval from the similarly mentally challenged on the internet does not prove anything other then there are a lot of idiots out there.

    My sympathies to Lucky, I have no idea how she managed to put up listening to you for so long.

  44. Paperchase says:

    Isn’t it a strange world where perverts have to defend the government from the conspiracy theorists?

    Someone really poured some koolaide into the water supply.

  45. Cody Lane's Dad says:

    All this clown cares about is his hits and views numbers. I don’t think he really cares or believes half his own bullshit. Once a whore…

  46. jeremysteele11 says:

    The 3,000 views and 14:4 ratio I have at the moment, Mr Lane, indicate interest and support for what I’ve presented. I made this video because I’m fed up with these continual scams being played out. I’m now convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is a scam, the more I research it. I plan on another youtube presentation better than this one, elaborating on more things, so watch out!

  47. Jeremy, I can post a video right now with the words Sandy Hook in it and get a lot of viewers.

    the thumbs up ratio simply means there are many lunatics who are in need of serious medication and an entire team of scientists working on them.

    So do you honestly think that Joe Public is an informed person? 8 out of 10 times they know less than nothing. You can say what you want and claim to have seen or not seen things that you should have, but the reality is that you are sadly in need of some help here.

    I think that it’s you who should watch out Jeremy. You say enough and insult these families enough and you might get a confrontation by one of them that won’t go so well for you.

  48. jeremysteele11 says:

    I’m sure you can, but I started my vid with no subscribers, whatsoever, so I think the numbers are pretty impressive considering. The thumbs up/down ratio are from those who’ve actually watched the presentation. And from the way you’ve reacted it seems you are not one of them. At worst I might be in need of eyeglasses because I see the same exact two people in the respective photos, but not medication. The people with Obomber who resemble those who supposedly died have never been identified by name. And I imagine if, God forbid, you just lost your child a day ago and were on the cameras you’d be crying like crazy. Did you see the Soto family? They were smiling, laughing. No tears! Very bizarre and fake. Please show me what family members you saw with actual water out of their eyes. I’m not talking about neighbors or people who believe the kids that have died have died. I’ve been looking and have yet to find any! My next youtube video will about how at least three people have risen from the dead since allegedly dying on December 14th. If you still think Osama caused 9/11 then like Kelli spoke to me, maybe there’s no point of this conversation, because it’s like talking algebra to someone learning 3×9. And if you think JFK was killed by a magic bullet then you really must trust your t.v., which is more controlled by power politics and owned by a smaller number of rich fucks than ever. I highly doubt any of the families I’ve seen will be insulted and confront me because none of them that I’ve seen are real… NONE,and in more ways than are they not real… not Jesse Lewis’s dad, nor even Robbie Parker who had to come from smiling and laughing before he was cued to start, took a deep breathe to get into character and then deliver a decent scripted performance, but who never shed tears, either!.. There may be actual victims in this, I’m not disputing that, but the people I’ve seen on t.v. are full of shit, like Gene Rosen, who’s an actor (literally, as it’s been disclosed), the so-called Phelps, which have been revealed to be the Sextons out of Florida… and a big bombshell I’m about to reveal in my next video which will show yet another victim resurrected faster than Jesus did, and right before Christmas season. Don’t pass judgement until you examine the evidence. That wasn’t Adam Lanza’s car they found the gun that wasn’t used in. Re-read what I just fucking wrote, Mariah. That wasn’t Adam Lanza’s car, but Chris Rodia. Police radio has vans on the run like a movie with men in masks and a guy in a nun outfit like a movie. There may be real victims in this, but there are definitely a lot of lies and this was definitely an inside job. It doesn’t matter what Mr P Chase thinks. Drills in the area the same time an actual attack of this magnitude being a coin-ka-dink? Please! “Drills” are how they pull off these psy-ops and get people calm and not reacting to these guys as they set this shit up and seal it off afterwards. They’re after guns so they can live their Hitlerian dream. They got FEMA concentration camps if and when the economy and society crashes and this drumbeat of shooting shit has been one patsy, mind-controlled through MKUltra psych-research, with motherfuckers they “studied” for months who come out of nowhere and can’t blink if you paid them too. NO, they’re not mind controlled, they’re just crazy, right? It’s just a coincidence that all these nuts are coming out of the woodwork, one after another in these mass shootings as Obama has been seeking to disarm Americans so they can’t defend themselves against Tyranny. I know how crazy all this shit sounds, if you’re not involved in studying the nefarious activities of those who work out of The Pentagon (which is the base of a pentagram). As Edgar J. Hoover said, the likes of yourself are handicapped from coming to terms with a conspiracy so monstrous, that you refuse to believe it actually exists, but you see there’s meetings at Bohemian Grove where people like Ted Turner and Bill Gates say we gotta do something about overpopulation… reducing it by a severe amount, as much as 95% of what it is… now how are they gonna do that if we can still protect ourselves from Homeland Security?

    I’m sure you’re no less convinced I’m nuts. That’s fine. That doesn’t matter to me. Facts do. Do the research. Don’t let the final conclusions that I or others have dissuade you from examining the evidence which come before the conclusions do.

  49. jeremysteele11 says:

    comment from January 2nd, 2013 at 6:35 p (which should read a for am, not p) under moderation

  50. jeremysteele11 says:

    Meanwhile, Mariah I suggest you read what I wrote under the rebuttal thread. News you do not know about, some intially reported, then repressed, then not brought up again… which is the same mode of operation of the controlled media regarding other scams that have been pulled. This has psy-op written all over it (but not if you’re illiterate to such things) and an acting team called “Crisis Actors”, which, in spite of their theatrical training and terror drills, were still unable to shead any actual tears! Suspend your disbelief Mariah because life is a big movie, and there are evil twists and turns and suprises, and things are not always as they seem or are presented.

  51. jeremysteele11 says:

    This is worth watching, called “The Sandy Hook Rampage Movie FULL MOVIE”, which illustrates, very well, some of my points. You can jump past the first 18 minutes which is actually a fictional movie unrelated to, but something like, Sandy Hook, put in there for some reason. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IsgZk19Sars

  52. Jeremy, may I ask what your experience and expertise on traffic and search engine aggregation is? Mine is 9 years of owning and operating my own network of websites, successfully I might add. In 2012 my network averaged 1.8 million unique visitors monthly. I never buy traffic, and only 15% of my traffic is from affiliates. That means 85% of my traffic is from search engines. I know far more about traffic and the value of traffic and what it takes to get it. I posted a video of me at a lesbian club and titled it “Sexy lesbian lap dance in gay bar” I had 485,000 views and 1747 likes in 30 days before youtube removed it for content violation. so please, don’t think your few thousand views means shit because it doesnt. Subscribers has zero to do with it. You don’t know what you’re talking about here Jeremy.

    your youtube numbers are NOT impressive by any means. You said 2 thousand views but how many thumbs up? 10??? pretty miniscule number. You could have put a sponge Bob video up and titled it Sandy Hook and gotten the same numbers. Big deal. You are being ducking delusional here, and the saddest part is that you don’t even see it.

    You do know that just because someone posted it online doesn’t mean it’s true right?

  53. jeremysteele11 says:

    I have no experience and expertise on traffic and search engine aggregation. And it’s not 2,000 hits anymore, it’s over 4,400 at the moment. And if I’m delusional you can’t expect me to see it, can you. Nevertheless, I’m content with my traffic, as it’s going, and there’s a shit load of proof the official story is bogus. I’ve made a few of those points, all which have been ignored, except for two points about Carver and terror drills, which I’ve counterpointed without response. There is no dialogue, only conclusions made in spite of contradictory information… I can go on and on about it, but I just uploaded my latest video titled, “Sandy Hook Hoax Part 2 – Victoria Soto Bombshell: She’s still alive & playing her own sister!” which I literally uploaded right now. And yes, I totally agree, just because someone says something’s true don’t make it so. That goes for everything, you’ve heard from mainstream news and pundits, Mariah. You gotta hear the evidence in total, otherwise you’re not really qualified to have an opinion worth listening to. For example, if I say have a video of Bob shooting Rob and you never look at it because you’re a friend of Bob and thus refuse to ever believe he could shoot Rob, you have no right to pass judgements, get it?

  54. jeremysteele11 says:

    Over 5,000, now… and I’m also proud of the 37 views I’ve had in the mere hour or so my new vid has been up… Each one means something, as far as I’m concerned, and I’m feeling the love on this latest one. People are starting to get it. Others who don’t care to take the time to at least know why others see things the way they do, agree with it, or not, are not really the focus of my attention or concern, although I have no problem, and in fact, enjoy, debating specific points, if and when they actually have any. But saying I or someone is a crackpot is saying absolutely nothing about the information presented. The latest is quite a revelation, but if you judge it by the title and never look at it, it’s simply your loss. You lose the argument simply by the fact that you’re actually not engaging in one, while pretending to.

  55. exactly Jeremy. If you did have experience and expertise you would realize that views has ZERO to do with the content. It has to do with words used in the title.

    You are claiming proof when you clearly don’t have access to ANYTHING other than what is being offered to you. Its no different than when Sarah Palin claimed that the Dutch were offering to help stop the BP oil spill but they weren’t getting calls returned from the white house…how in the fuck would she know about who is calling whom in the white house? she has zero access to that information and is doing NOTHING but speculating to further her own beliefs and causes be it true or not.

    When I first starting posting and reading LIB there were a lot of people who posted here and many different points of view. But now, it’s a handful of people, and I blame this type of craziness. The constant bickering and the paranoid rantings of the mentally ill…it has become a blog for people with mental illness. No matter the topic of Cindi’s post, it gets steered into a pissing match between people arguing over who is out to get them or who is conspiring or keeping secrets.

    I am done here. Cindi I love ya but your blog has become a joke and not worth the time to type it into my browser. Its one loon after another having a place, although dying, to spew their rhetoric and say hateful or hurtful things.

    Good luck Jeremy. I can promise you that your conspiracy craziness is illness based NOT fact based.

  56. jeremysteele11 says:

    Again, Mariah, you still haven’t actually critically examined anything regarding the many details of Sandy Hook, yet you say you know. You’ve proven this with these blanket statements that address nothing in regards to it. I know you would’ve never reacted the way the Soto family did on t.v.. At least you’ve proven, unlike them, that you have feelings, which of course are being manipulated so that you can’t actually apply any critical eye whatsoever in regards to the details of this event.

  57. Lou Lange says:

    As a former resident of Connecticut (over 30 years), one who still has relatives there, and many friends in the Newtown area, I am appalled by what you are suggesting. Was the massive police response faked? Were the funerals faked?
    CSP has firmly said no photographic evidence would be released. Why does that kick off conspiracy theories? Do you really think we need to see photographs of the children killed and/or Mr. Lanza?
    I think you had best watch what you published before you become a target of slander and libel suits from the victims…

  58. jeremysteele11 says:

    there were drills and there was an incident, police dispatch speak of things which contradict the official story, and the key families interviewd are actors… i suspect that few died… but its easier to figure out what the lies are before what the truth is… the bottom line is this is a psy-op, and more info is coming, stay tuned

  59. jeremysteele11 says:

    few if any were killed, i meant… more on this later

  60. Paperchase says:

    Mariah, please don’t leave me alone here with Geremy! 🙁 I beg you, I’m not sure that I can put up with his wild flights of fantasy without a support group.

    So Jeremy if few, if any people were killed you are essentially claiming that the OCME in Connecticut lied about doing 28 autopies, and they were just hanging out in the basement killing time that weekend to fool the media. Death certificates are also public information in Connecticut. Are you claiming that this paperwork which will be on file at the town clerk’s office was also falsified by people unknown.

  61. jeremysteele11 says:

    all i can tell u is watch the soto family interview… if theyre real to u youre braindamaged…

  62. jeremysteele11 says:

    n death tolls r still a mystery to me, but ok city killed many kids and like the wtc, murrah was rigged, a truck w a fertilizer bomb couldnt possibly have caused the damage it did

  63. Paperchase says:

    You have just grossly insulted the Soto family for no apparent reason. Their daughter gave her life to save the children she instructed. I’d ask if you had any shame, but given your previous claims, the answer is clearly “No”.

  64. jeremysteele11 says:

    dont worry about it since the teacher we know as vicky soto isnt dead… check out my video in it.. victoria soto actually is the name of the alleged sister crying on the phone… and now reason my ass, did u see that family interview?

  65. jeremysteele11 says:

    no reason i typed, not now reason….fkn phone

  66. RobfromMarketing says:

    Not agreeing with or even reading half the garbage Steele posts but the interview from the father of one of the deceased children was very bizarre. Smiling / Laughing before going on camera to talk about your dead daughter?

  67. jeremysteele11 says:

    thats right, then he takes a deep breathe as if hyperventilating, gets himself into character, and reads his script … hes a crisis actor involved in a psy-op

  68. jeremysteele11 says:

    im being accused of insulting the parents, but their laughs n smiles and lack of tears is an insult to the kids memory… and to believe this shit is real insults ones intelligence…. didja see that mcdonnal mom interview? that woman was way too fkn happy, and tearless as ALL the parents were!

  69. jeremysteele11 says:

    Apparently I’m not the only “lone nut” disputing Sandy Hook was caused by a lone nut.

    From today’s Sun Sentinel dot com out of Florida:

    FAU prof stirs controversy by disputing Newtown massacre

    (Sun Sentinel )

    January 7, 2013|By Mike Clary, Sun Sentinel

    A communication professor known for conspiracy theories has stirred controversary at Florida Atlantic University with claims that last month’s Newtown, Conn., school shootings did not happen as reported — or may not have happened at all.

    Moreover, James Tracy asserts in radio interviews and on his memoryholeblog.com. that trained “crisis actors” may have been employed by the Obama administration in an effort to shape public opinion in favor of the event’s true purpose: gun control

    “As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers, there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends,” writes Tracy, a tenured associate professor of media history at FAU and a former union leader.

    In another post, he says, “While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place — at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described.”

    FAU is distancing itself from Tracy’s views.

    “James Tracy does not speak for the university. The website on which his post appeared is not affiliated with FAU in any way,” said media director Lisa Metcalf.

    Tracy said he knows he has sparked controversy on campus. In one of his courses, called “Culture of Conspiracy,” Tracy said some students have expressed skepticism about his views.

    “But I encourage that,” said Tracy, 47, a faculty member for 10 years. “I want to get students to look at events in a more critical way.”

    In the Internet age, “We see more and more professors getting into trouble for what they’re posting on Facebook, or Tweeting,” said Gregory Scholtz, director of the department of academic freedom at the Association of University Professors. “And administrations are sensitive to bad publicity; they don’t like things that public might find obnoxious or reprehensible. But most reputable administrations stay above the fray and give latitude.”

    Robert Shibley, an official with the Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, said Tracy is well within his rights of free speech, especially when teaching a course on conspiracy theory.

    “The only way that a university would have a right to tone it down, or insist he stop talking about it, is if students come to him and say they find it disturbing,” said Shibley. “People are allowed to talk about things that are upsetting — for example, abortion.”

    On Monday, the website Global Research posted a timeline written by Tracy which purports to show how federal and local police agencies, abetted by “major media,” conspired early in the Sandy Hook investigation to constuct a scenario pointing to Lanza as ” the sole agent of the massacre” when others may have been involved.

    In one of his blog posts, “The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information,” Tracy cites several sources for his skepticism, including lack of surveillance video or still images from the scene, the halting performance of the medical examiner at a news conference, timeline confusion, and how the accused shooter was able to fire so many shots in just minutes.

    In an interview Monday, Tracy said “while it appears that people lost their lives” at Sandy Hook Elementary on Dec. 14, he is not ready to buy that a lone gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, entered the school and methodically shot 20 children and six adults before killing himself.

    Lanza is also suspected of killing his mother at their Newtown home before arriving at the school.

    Asked if he has been accused of promoting fringe theories, Tracy said, “I do get that sense, from emails and otherwise.”

    Tracy said he believes the deaths at Sandy Hook may have resulted from a training exercise. “Was this to a certain degree constructed?” he said. “Was this a drill?

    “Something most likely took place,” he said. “One is left with the impression that a real tragedy took place.”

    But, he added, he has not seen bodies, or photos of bodies. “Overall, I’m saying the public needs more information to assess what took place. We don’t have that. And when the media and the public don’t have that, various sorts of ideas can arise.”

    Tracy said also has doubts about the official version of the Kennedy assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing, the 9-11 terror attacks and the Aurora, Colo., theater murders.

    “I describe myself as a scholar and public intellectual,” he said, “interested in going more deeply into controversial public events. Although some may see [my theories] as beyond the pale, I am doing what we should be doing as academics.”

    mwclary@tribune.com, 954-356-4465

    James Tracy

    Title: Florida Atlantic University associate professor, media history and analysis, political economy of communication.

    Age: 47

    Born: Hornell, N.Y.

    Education: Undergraduate: San Jose State, communication, 1995

    Master’s degree: University of Arizona, media studies, 1998

    PhD.: University of Iowa, 2002.

    Activities: editor, Democratic Communiqué, journal of the Union for Democratic Communications.

  70. Sandy Bunz says:

    Ask the detective Mark Furman if he thinks the press is true and objective. Most eduucated people believe there are a lot of things happening in the world that are planned by the very few to sway public opinion of the masses. Is it any coincidence the CNN broadcast imports a British spokesman to push an agenda of multi-national mogul corporations duing the most watched time slot in the USA. If a so called reporter, who escaped prosecution in the UK for the death of a child linked to wiretapping he directed while working for Rupert Murdoch isn’t a scoundrel, who is? If a right wing reporter from the US went to Britain and critisized their government policies that reporter would have limbs broken outside a pub. The Brits like to drink and fight.

  71. jeremysteele11 says:

    When grieving parents don’t cry they lie. Take that one to the fucking bank, thanks.

    The Mark Furhman issue was so unfuckingbelievable. Johnny Cockring’s audacity should’ve had him laughed out of society. But the pundits and the prosecution were too dumb to pick up on it, as well as the fact that Furhman was partipating in the writing of a script by playing a racist cop. But the stupid proseuction refused to even talk to him, they declared him a bad apple, they shot themselves in both feet, they assumed he was the scum of the Earth when if they had done just a little bit of research they could’ve established the fact that he exonerated black defendants through his efforts of presenting exhibits of discovery, he had black co-workers who had no complaints, etc. Has he ever used the “n” word? Has anyone black or white ever not, whether it be 1st person, 3rd person, with jest, hostility or regretably? What if he talked about white trash, did that address the whole white race? The level of stupidity in America demonstrated at times is truly abysmal and horrifying!

  72. Sandy Bunz says:

    A SCANDLE PRESUMED TO BE O K
    Does anyone ever question why the CNN anchorman was trained by the CIA as can be seen on his Wiki page.
    A quote from the page: Career history

    During college, Anderson Cooper spent two summers as an intern at the Central Intelligence Agency.

    Do we really trust this guys intentions, bias’ and motives. It brings up a question— How many other so called journalists are reporting the news as the CIA calls it, have been trained by them and for how many decades has the CIA had operatives delivering the daily news?

  73. jeremysteele11 says:

    as former fbi chief colby said before he was killed the fbi controls the media… and now more than ever… and cooper is but one example that proves that

  74. jeremysteele11 says:

    Only criminals have something to hide. Same shit with 9/11

    Bush “Never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories” and “Let’s not investigate 9/11 either, it gets in the way of our war on(of) terror”

    Lt. Vance “Social Media will be prosecuted for putting out false information” while putting out false and contradictory information, withholding information, etc.

  75. jeremysteele11 says:

    My first video currently has over 26,000 views and my latest Part 4 just out is 7 minutes long and addresses the “Mass Media Mind Control and evidence of a drill, not a blood spill”. Currently I have a 2:1 ratio of thumbs up to thumbs down with my first video, which I admit I should not have started with. I just found the photo issue interesting, although it’s not the end-all regarding this staged drill played off as real, and people can insist it’s two kids who look alike.

    Thumbs up/thumbs down ratio
    Part 1: 75:37
    Addendem to Part 1: 14:3 (additional photos and analysis)
    Part 2: 80:6 (On the real Victoria Soto)
    Part 3: 12:1 (On the Tearless Families)
    Part 4: 3:0 (Mass Media Mind Control, Evidence of a drill, not a blood spill)

  76. RobfromMarketing says:

    Steele, I wish you had seen Johnathan Kay’s segment on Anderson Cooper’s show 1/11/2013. Although he was plugging his book he shed some insight into why Conspiracy Theorists believe the bullshit they do and how they feel as if they’re a part of some greater puzzle they’re helping to solve, and how up until the internet CT’s existed but never had the medium to convey their garbage messages to a large number of people. Really was a great debate.

  77. jeremysteele11 says:

    I’ll look it up, Rob. Interestingly, I mention and show a photo of Anderson Cooper holding up the owl photo. Cooper was literally trained as a journalist by the CIA, which goes with FBI director Colby’s quote that the CIA controls the media. Check out my Part 4. Cooper is doing all he can to discredit “conspircy theorists”. They’re doing everything but simply examining the evidence and doing true investigative journalism, as the media is the courier/servant of the gov’t.

  78. jeremysteele11 says:

    owl drawing, i meant

  79. RobfromMarketing says:

    Thanks Holdek, if you pause the above link at 2:16, you can actually see the illuminati/nwo/Free mason micro mind control agents entering Kay’s mouth, where he was rendered unconscious shortly after he went off air, and is now being held in a secret human testing laboratory deep underground below Fort Knox awaiting experimental brainwashing techniques.

    A friend of a friend who knows a guy, told me.

  80. jeremysteele11 says:

    My Part 2 has now passed my Part 1 (which CIA man Anderson Cooper addressed), with over 32,000 views. My thumbs up vs down ratio on Part 2 is 100:9. So are 100 out of 109 viewers nuts? Or is this simply a matter that there are so many inconsistencies and anomalies in the official story that people are seeing through this? Brzezinski warned his fellow members that we are in an age when the people are starting to wake up.

  81. jeremysteele11 says:

    The Man is trying to Ban. Smells like Stalin’s great purge.

    And the proposed Obama ban proves the maxim true: “Just because I’m paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not after me.”

  82. jeremysteele11 says:

    Holy shit, my Part 2 is on fire! nearly 46,000 views versus 34,000 on my Part 1! Yeah, I admit my part 1 was a bit lame, in comparison. Was just getting into this thing.

  83. jeremysteele11 says:

    Now it’s past 59,000…. and Holy shit before time ran out to update this it just went up past 74,000!
    This shit is contageous!

  84. jeremysteele11 says:

    Over 91,000 … the way its burning up from all the publicity i might have a mil by next week…

  85. That just means there are a million conspiracy nuts and gullible people.

  86. jeremysteele11 says:

    i think the nuts are less gullible than the sheeple people

  87. congratulations Jeremy. you are now officially right down in the mental illness gutter with the other nutcases here you have bickered with for years. because there are other idiots and paranoid people viewing your stupid videos means nothing.
    so again congrats on being a part of that group of people that is pittied and considered a sad loss by the rest of us.

    You think the US is such a horrible place and conspiring against it’s people…but you do realize that in nearly all other countries in the world that the people saying the things you have been saying literally disappear in the night?

    I feel very sorry for you. I predict we will read about you in the near future. I hope you get help before something worse becomes of your life.

  88. jeremysteele11 says:

    Re: my viral video Part 2, funny, because virtually no one has challenged the fact that the famous photo of the woman crying on the phone is, as I’ve revealed, of a woman named Victoria Soto (and matching the woman singing). So, if that’s Victoria Soto, why has mainstream media referred to her as Carlee and/or Jillian Soto?
    And does the alleged deceased have the same name?

    Observation of matches in photos/videos does not equal nuttiness. At worst, it reveals defective vision, unless you’re the guy from that ‘wellaware1’ disinfo site claiming Alex Jones is really Beau Bridges with latex make-up.

    Obeservation of the fact that they’ve been doing “coincidental” drills in the area and have revealed no facts proving the official story (no closed circuit videos at least of the guy shooting his way in, as it’s been established you can’t get in without being buzzed in), or the fact that aerial footage showed none of the mass of 450 plus students, or any mass of parents, teachers or faculty, and emergency vehicles blocked in against standard procedure…. none of this proves mental illness, but acuity.

    According to my gf’s phone it reads 149,000 views, although my computer still only reads 114,000 views.

    I’m sure you believe Osama caused 9/11, too, right? Now, that’s ill.

  89. jeremysteele11 says:

    There’s a solution this matter. I recommend everyone go to

    petitions . whitehouse . gov/petition/release-video-surveillance-footage-sandy-hook-elementary-school-during-shooting-massacre/Nq9zmSTc

    AND SIGN THIS PETITION:

    We petition the obama administration to:

    Release video surveillance footage from the Sandy Hook Elementary School, during the Shooting Massacre.

    There’s one way to resolve questions about whether Adam Lanza was the lone gunman (or even a gunman at all) who murdered 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Ct.

    Did you know that the school had a security surveillance system?

    Indeed, the WTNH Channel 8 reports, Dec. 14, 2012, that the school had sent a letter to parents on the installation of a new security and surveillance system at the beginning of the 2012-2013 school year.

Comments are closed.

TrafficHolder.com - Buy & Sell Adult Traffic