<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike South At Xbiz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/</link>
	<description>Adult Industry News, Gossip and Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Whiteacre</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78985</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Whiteacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With respect, I didn&#039;t come to this thread to entertain you. I came to rebut the nonsense propagated by a bitter hypocrite who is an enemy of the adult industry.  Perhaps when we get the whole ugly story out, your interest will pick up. If not, G-d bless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect, I didn&#8217;t come to this thread to entertain you. I came to rebut the nonsense propagated by a bitter hypocrite who is an enemy of the adult industry.  Perhaps when we get the whole ugly story out, your interest will pick up. If not, G-d bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigger_lover</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78967</link>
		<dc:creator>tigger_lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the big deal then? I&#039;m sorry but I just don&#039;t get this whole feud you two Mikes have going on. Interest fading.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the big deal then? I&#8217;m sorry but I just don&#8217;t get this whole feud you two Mikes have going on. Interest fading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Whiteacre</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78949</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Whiteacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t allege that he was in bed with Donny, or anything like that; Mike is only in bed with himself. 

Just like in real life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t allege that he was in bed with Donny, or anything like that; Mike is only in bed with himself. </p>
<p>Just like in real life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigger_lover</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78946</link>
		<dc:creator>tigger_lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course Mike S. had more traffic during the PWL fiasco. It was one of the few places to get info, however correct or incorrect. It would have probably benefited him to prolong the site&#039;s existence, but personally I wouldn&#039;t know if he did or not. I don&#039;t always follow who&#039;s still friends with whom; I haven&#039;t had anything to do with the industry in years and would like to keep it that way, other than the occasional gossip. If the other anti-PWLers really no longer associate with him, that would indeed be interesting. Honestly though, I doubt Mike S. was in bed with Donny or anything. That would have been really obvious; like if he didn&#039;t post so much info on him, or if the girls who contacted him for help suddenly had more of their personal business on PWL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Mike S. had more traffic during the PWL fiasco. It was one of the few places to get info, however correct or incorrect. It would have probably benefited him to prolong the site&#8217;s existence, but personally I wouldn&#8217;t know if he did or not. I don&#8217;t always follow who&#8217;s still friends with whom; I haven&#8217;t had anything to do with the industry in years and would like to keep it that way, other than the occasional gossip. If the other anti-PWLers really no longer associate with him, that would indeed be interesting. Honestly though, I doubt Mike S. was in bed with Donny or anything. That would have been really obvious; like if he didn&#8217;t post so much info on him, or if the girls who contacted him for help suddenly had more of their personal business on PWL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Whiteacre</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Whiteacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@areyoukiddingme -- First of all, eat shit. Second, I don&#039;t play porno spokesman. I don&#039;t claim to represent anybody, I only advocate for my principles. One can agree or disagree, and I am always willing to defend my views -- views to which I am entitled.

Third, unlike South, he huffs and puffs, but I act. A year ago a group of dedicated performers and I engineered the largest-ever performer turnout at a Cal/OSHA meeting (with help from Cindi -- one of the unsung heroes of that cause). Where was Mike South?  Oh, that&#039;s right, after predicting I&#039;d fail, his response to my group&#039;s success was to make the empty boast that he could have gotten &quot;500&quot; perfumers to show up IF HE&#039;D WANTED TO. 

Considering the importance of the AHF assault on the adult industry, and South&#039;s refusal to post anti-AHF stories, the question of why he DIDN&#039;T WANT TO is easy to answer... (There are other questions too, like why didn&#039;t people like the Red Queen turn up either? -- but I digress...)

I have long-standing POSITIVE relationships with many, many key industry players going back almost 19 years. In any case, I guarantee I know more people than you, a-hole, yet you still have a voice here. Someday if you make a salient point or a cogent argument, you too might be considered a quotable source. Until then you&#039;re just a little bitch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@areyoukiddingme &#8212; First of all, eat shit. Second, I don&#8217;t play porno spokesman. I don&#8217;t claim to represent anybody, I only advocate for my principles. One can agree or disagree, and I am always willing to defend my views &#8212; views to which I am entitled.</p>
<p>Third, unlike South, he huffs and puffs, but I act. A year ago a group of dedicated performers and I engineered the largest-ever performer turnout at a Cal/OSHA meeting (with help from Cindi &#8212; one of the unsung heroes of that cause). Where was Mike South?  Oh, that&#8217;s right, after predicting I&#8217;d fail, his response to my group&#8217;s success was to make the empty boast that he could have gotten &#8220;500&#8243; perfumers to show up IF HE&#8217;D WANTED TO. </p>
<p>Considering the importance of the AHF assault on the adult industry, and South&#8217;s refusal to post anti-AHF stories, the question of why he DIDN&#8217;T WANT TO is easy to answer&#8230; (There are other questions too, like why didn&#8217;t people like the Red Queen turn up either? &#8212; but I digress&#8230;)</p>
<p>I have long-standing POSITIVE relationships with many, many key industry players going back almost 19 years. In any case, I guarantee I know more people than you, a-hole, yet you still have a voice here. Someday if you make a salient point or a cogent argument, you too might be considered a quotable source. Until then you&#8217;re just a little bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Whiteacre</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78936</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Whiteacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My point is both he and DL are egotists with no actual relevance to the current industry who nonetheless feel the obsessive need to create websites to tell the world their every thought on every industry matter, diagnose every problem, and prescribe solutions based on their own uninformed biases. Sites where, daily, a band of flunkies comes to suck their asses and tell them how brilliant and right they are.

Also, if you argue in opposition to their views, instead of a reasoned point-by-point reply you get called names. On PWL it was &quot;you&#039;re part of the gay mafia&quot; or whatever; with South it&#039;s &quot;you&#039;re a moron&quot; or &quot;an idiot.&quot;  No substance, just hate. An absolute refusal to acknowledge the possibility that their words are not absolute pearls of wisdom, and a refusal to defend their claims. IT IS because they say IT IS. Bullies and douchebags, in other words.

On PWL if you spoke out, you got a wiki that called you names -- with South, he retires to his piece of shit site and drags your name through the mud in a stupid blog post calling you names.

There&#039;s other stuff, too, and it will be revealed soon. Like what REALLY went on during the PWL fight, and how South&#039;s tactics placed the goal of increased traffic to his site above both the cause at hand AND the wishes of his anti-PWL collaborators.

It was simply: get something posted first, wonder if it&#039;s good for the (purported) cause later. THAT is Mike South.  His only true cause is Mike South.  WE HAD TO CUT OFF THE FLOW OF INTEL TO HIM BECAUSE OF IT.  We weren&#039;t volunteering our efforts and placing our families, friends, and personal privacy at risk to build his site&#039;s traffic. It was after we cut him off that the site came down. What he was doing was prolonging the saga -- prolonging it while profiting from it.

Haven&#039;t you noticed that since PWL, South&#039;s been somewhat alienated from virtually all of the anti-PWL team?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is both he and DL are egotists with no actual relevance to the current industry who nonetheless feel the obsessive need to create websites to tell the world their every thought on every industry matter, diagnose every problem, and prescribe solutions based on their own uninformed biases. Sites where, daily, a band of flunkies comes to suck their asses and tell them how brilliant and right they are.</p>
<p>Also, if you argue in opposition to their views, instead of a reasoned point-by-point reply you get called names. On PWL it was &#8220;you&#8217;re part of the gay mafia&#8221; or whatever; with South it&#8217;s &#8220;you&#8217;re a moron&#8221; or &#8220;an idiot.&#8221;  No substance, just hate. An absolute refusal to acknowledge the possibility that their words are not absolute pearls of wisdom, and a refusal to defend their claims. IT IS because they say IT IS. Bullies and douchebags, in other words.</p>
<p>On PWL if you spoke out, you got a wiki that called you names &#8212; with South, he retires to his piece of shit site and drags your name through the mud in a stupid blog post calling you names.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s other stuff, too, and it will be revealed soon. Like what REALLY went on during the PWL fight, and how South&#8217;s tactics placed the goal of increased traffic to his site above both the cause at hand AND the wishes of his anti-PWL collaborators.</p>
<p>It was simply: get something posted first, wonder if it&#8217;s good for the (purported) cause later. THAT is Mike South.  His only true cause is Mike South.  WE HAD TO CUT OFF THE FLOW OF INTEL TO HIM BECAUSE OF IT.  We weren&#8217;t volunteering our efforts and placing our families, friends, and personal privacy at risk to build his site&#8217;s traffic. It was after we cut him off that the site came down. What he was doing was prolonging the saga &#8212; prolonging it while profiting from it.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t you noticed that since PWL, South&#8217;s been somewhat alienated from virtually all of the anti-PWL team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigger_lover</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78931</link>
		<dc:creator>tigger_lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael, are you saying that Mike S. is secretly doing something similar to what Donny did? &#039;Cause other than that I don&#039;t see what you could reveal that would be a bombshell. Or do you just have a personal beef with him?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, are you saying that Mike S. is secretly doing something similar to what Donny did? &#8216;Cause other than that I don&#8217;t see what you could reveal that would be a bombshell. Or do you just have a personal beef with him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: areyoukiddingme</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78903</link>
		<dc:creator>areyoukiddingme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@MichaelWhiteacre : What a hypocrite you are Ari. You said yourself that you have never made a XXX film &amp; don&#039;t work in adult industry. Now you go around playing adult business spokesperson. What a joke! Mr. South at least has worked in porn. I would take his word over yours any day. He doesn&#039;t correspond with Michael Fattorosi or Vanessa Blue (alleged Donny Long accomplice). How about you Ari? Have any contact with either of them lately?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MichaelWhiteacre : What a hypocrite you are Ari. You said yourself that you have never made a XXX film &amp; don&#8217;t work in adult industry. Now you go around playing adult business spokesperson. What a joke! Mr. South at least has worked in porn. I would take his word over yours any day. He doesn&#8217;t correspond with Michael Fattorosi or Vanessa Blue (alleged Donny Long accomplice). How about you Ari? Have any contact with either of them lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Whiteacre</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78898</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Whiteacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 02:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick - Just another Mike South lie, using the real name of an ex-girlfriend of mine who was/is a performer.  Shades of PWL ... he and the Donkey have a lot in common -- except the Donkey was more relevant to the adult industry in his day than South will ever be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick &#8211; Just another Mike South lie, using the real name of an ex-girlfriend of mine who was/is a performer.  Shades of PWL &#8230; he and the Donkey have a lot in common &#8212; except the Donkey was more relevant to the adult industry in his day than South will ever be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickMadrid</title>
		<link>http://www.lukeisback.com/2012/05/mike-south-at-xbiz/comment-page-1/#comment-78861</link>
		<dc:creator>RickMadrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lukeisback.com/?p=20586#comment-78861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jennifer who? and what??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer who? and what??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
